...peace is the answer and Malcolm X who believes that violence is the answer. I have always thought that Martin Luther King had the best philosophy. Three reason why I think this is every time you kill someone it creates a much bigger problem for you, Martin Luther King solved many things with peace, and he believed in integration. Although Malcolm had a great philosophy, I thought his was a little too violent and I think that you should only use violence for self defense. I think that Martin Luther King (MLK) had a better...
Words: 559 - Pages: 3
... 02 March 2016 MLK Jr vs Malcolm X Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X had many similarities and differences when it came to their roles in the civil rights movement. A huge similarity of the two is they fought hard for their people with getting treated bad. They both wanted to see black people in the best position possible. Risking their lives everyday for the rights they felt they deserve. They were both assassinated because of their leadership role positions they played during this time. Even though they had different beliefs/religions, both their religions played a significant role in their approaches. They both had the greatest impact on the civil rights movement during the 1960s. One of the main reasons why Malcolm X and MLK Jr is different is their approach to the civil rights movement. While MLK Jr wanted to keep the peace and have a non-violent protest, Malcolm X was very opposite. Malcolm X felt that if they wanted to be violent then so should his people. Also, MLK Jr thought more of people being equal and Malcolm X was more for his people being in high power and being controlled by themselves. Also, their religion was a extremely huge difference and had an impact on the way they went about things. MLK Jr grew up in a Christian home where his parents stressed necessary things such as education and religion. Malcolm X converted to Islam after being arrested for drugs and burglary. His outlook on things were far more violent than MLK Jr. MLK Jr believed that...
Words: 599 - Pages: 3
...would it lead us in the future. Two people who are famous enough to change the racism in the whole nation. Martin Luther King, and Malcolm X they both have different perspective, but they shared the same goal. There are two differences which are their history and believes, and they shared the same faith. First of all, MLK and Malcolm X they have grown up in a different environment. MLK was very educated because his family could afford to pay for his schooling. In the other hand, Malcolm X grown up in unfavorable environment with barely any education. Although, both of their fathers was murdered which has a strong impact on them. In addition, MLK he believed that violence shouldn’t face with violence, and he would not use the violence even if he was been forced. However, some of MLK believes was related to christian faith. Also, Malcolm X is a muslim who has his own principle, and he believed to defend himself if the police officers try to attack him. Also, there is a famous saying “ by any means necessary”. After discussing the two differences between MLK and Malcolm X, we must not forget to mention some similarities between them. one of the important common things was that both of them have educated wives. However, eventually both of them was assassinated at the same age while they are looking for civil rights. In conclusion, MLK and Malcolm X the fact that they came out from different history and believes, but they share the same goal is very fascinated. Personally,...
Words: 290 - Pages: 2
...In this essay we will see whose philosophy made more sense if it was MLK or Malcolm X. Both MLK and Malcolm X had their own beliefs and visions of the white and black being together. They both made their own philosophy containing their information, and some people found MLK philosophy better and others Malcolm’s philosophy better. We will find out which one had the biggest impact and why. The two main topics we will be focusing on are working together or separately and education. To begin with, we will focus on the different views MLK and Malcolm had in both races, working together or separately. MLK believed that all conflicts in the community should end with reconciliation and to cooperate together in friendship. MLK had also said that the tension is not between the whites and the blacks. MLK said we must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools. In document B it cites that with his faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to climb up to freedom together, knowing that one day we will be free. On the other hand, Malcolm thought it was a better idea for black people to work towards their liberation. Malcolm got tired of waiting for the black people to get their rights,...
Words: 545 - Pages: 3
...Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) and Malcolm X were two fortunate African American leaders who fought for the freedom of Black America. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of a kind just like his “I Have a Dream “speech which explained the injustice and violation of freedom towards African Americans even after slavery had ended it also explains how he wants both African Americans and whites to unite as one. As to Malcolm X, his most famous speech was “God’s Judgement” which also explained the injustice towards the African American race but leans more towards the violent path rather than the peaceful way. Both characters have similarities and differences between their speeches like the imagery they each portray, the tone/mood they present, and the type of character that they each show throughout the speech. The imagery that both speeches portrayed was in a way much different. For Example, MLK’ s “I Have a Dream” speech was intended to portray a world where both African Americans and whites were united and together without judgment and...
Words: 543 - Pages: 3
...out on the Vietnam War. The aims of MLK differed significantly from those of Black Power activists. The aims and methods of MLK did differ from those of Black Power activists. For example, King’s campaigns such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955 and Birmingham 1963 were very peaceful, despite facing violence. King’s peaceful message was due to him being a devout Christian and believing in love for all mankind. As a result, they were successful because they drew on the support from white people. In contrast, was Black Power Activists who some like Malcolm X, believed that blacks should defend themselves because it made them look weak and allowed whites to take advantage. Malcolm X wasn’t a Christian and so he didn’t believe in King’s Christian philosophy. This is a clear difference in both methods and ideology. King also wanted integration with whites, which can be contributed to his ‘love your fellow man’ philosophy. This was clear in King’s March on Washington 1963, where both whites and blacks marched on Washington to hear speeches from civil rights leaders. King didn’t just want integration with whites, as shown in his Poor Peoples Campaign 1968. In this, King called for a coalition of blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics and poor whites. This is a clear sign that King not only wanted to help blacks but others in American society. In contrast was Malcolm X again, who believed that integration would bring about a new form of slavery between whites and blacks, with whites being...
Words: 971 - Pages: 4
...To what extent did the aims and methods of Martin Luther King differ from those of black power activists? There is no question that the aims and methods of Martin Luther King differed from those of Black Power activists. King was peaceful and wanted integration with whites while Black Power activists confronted violence and believed in black supremacism and separatism. But they were also similar in some ways, such as speaking out on the Vietnam War. The aims of king differed significantly from those of Black Power activists. The aims and methods of MLK did differ from those of Black Power activists. For example, King’s campaigns such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955 and Birmingham 1963 were very peaceful, despite facing violence. King was brought up by a rich black family, with a good education, and a good chance at life. He was a black aristocrat, and a wealthy man. King’s peaceful message was due to him being a devout Christian and believing in love for all mankind. As a result, they were successful because they drew on the support from white people. King also wanted integration with whites, which can be contributed to his ‘love your fellow man’ philosophy. This was clear in King’s March on Washington 1963, where both whites and blacks marched on Washington to hear speeches from civil rights leaders. King didn’t just want integration with whites, as shown in his Poor Peoples Campaign 1968. In this, King called for a coalition of blacks, native Americans, Hispanics...
Words: 1079 - Pages: 5
...wrong; it is simple. It is the desire for justice and equality. Similarly, in her book The Feminine Mystique, Betty Friedan tells women to seek their freedom, despite feeling wrong for wanting to have the opportunities their husbands and their brothers were raised to expect. Just as Friedan tells women they can no longer “that voice within [them] saying “I want something more than my husband and my children and my house’” (Friedan 32), MLK tells the black people “we’re going to march again, and we’ve got to march again, in order to put the issue where it is supposed to be” (King). The leaders of both movements work to inspire their people and call them to action. This connection shows the ideological connection between the two movements. In each, there is the understanding that people need to be shown the injustice and that the injustice needs to be fought by the...
Words: 2124 - Pages: 9
...Black power in many ways was the opposite of everything non-violence was. Racial hatred, violence and self-reliance. The ideas that self-defense was a natural right, and in order to maintain it, African Americans must assert it, not become passive. As Malcolm X said, “The only way to defend yourself from a man with a rifle and club is to use a rifle and club yourself.” However, the two approaches did have similarities, with similar end results being blacks and whites live in harmony. Both demanded equality not just in theory but also in societal life. Where they differed most was in the methods used and the time each group was willing to wait. The non-violence method was rooted in religion and common sense. To succeed non-violent protest required not just the support of the black population, but that population's...
Words: 1032 - Pages: 5
...The Edexcel International GCSE in History Schemes of work We are happy to provide these new enhanced schemes of work for you to amend and adapt to suit your teaching purposes. We hope you find them useful. Practical support to help you deliver this specification Schemes of work These schemes of work have been produced to help you implement this Edexcel specification. They are offered as examples of possible models that you should feel free to adapt to meet your needs and are not intended to be in any way prescriptive. It is in editable word format to make adaptation as easy as possible. These schemes of work give guidance for: * Content to be covered * Approximate time to spend on different key themes * Ideas for incorporating and developing the assessment skills related to each unit. Suggested teaching time This is based on a two year teaching course of five and a half terms with one and a half hours of history teaching each week. This would be a seventy week course with total teaching time of approximately 100 hours. The schemes suggest the following timescale for the different sections: * Paper 1: 20 hours for each of the two topics: Total 40 hours. * Paper 2 Section A: 20 hours for the topic: Total 20 hours. * Paper 2 Section B: 25 hours for the topic since it covers a longer period in time. Total 25 hours. * Revision: 15 hours. Possible options for those with less teaching time * 20 hours for Section Paper 2 Section B ...
Words: 19278 - Pages: 78
...U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation 2012 The Strategic Information and Operations Center at FBI Headquarters is the 24/7 command post that monitors FBI operations and law enforcement activities around the globe. An FBI agent examines a potentially contaminated letter during a white powder training exercise. 2012 The FBI Story I A Message from FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III For the FBI and its partners, 2012 was a year that reminded us once again of the seriousness of the security threats facing our nation. During the year, extremists plotted to attack—unsuccessfully, thanks to the work of our Joint Terrorism Task Forces—the U.S. Capitol, the New York Federal Reserve Bank, and other landmarks on U.S. soil. Tragically, on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, a hateful attack in Benghazi took the lives of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans. In the cyber realm, a rising tide of hackers took electronic aim at global cyber infrastructure, causing untold damages. High-dollar white-collar crimes of all kinds also continued to siphon significant sums from the pocketbooks of consumers. And in Newtown, Connecticut, 20 young children and six adults lost their lives in one of the worst mass shootings in American history, ending a year of violence that saw similar tragedies around the country. Working with its colleagues around the globe, the FBI is committed to taking a leadership role in protecting the nation. As you can see from...
Words: 67387 - Pages: 270
