Free Essay

Sir Nicolas

In:

Submitted By nicolashabib
Words 12879
Pages 52
Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 726 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

A P P E N D I X B : TA B L E S

B.1 Binomial Probability Distribution

n51
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1

0.950
0.050

0.900
0.100

0.800
0.200

0.700
0.300

0.600
0.400

0.500
0.500

0.400
0.600

0.300
0.700

0.200
0.800

0.100
0.900

0.050
0.950

n52
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2

0.903
0.095
0.003

0.810
0.180
0.010

0.640
0.320
0.040

0.490
0.420
0.090

0.360
0.480
0.160

0.250
0.500
0.250

0.160
0.480
0.360

0.090
0.420
0.490

0.040
0.320
0.640

0.010
0.180
0.810

0.003
0.095
0.903

n53
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3

0.857
0.135
0.007
0.000

0.729
0.243
0.027
0.001

0.512
0.384
0.096
0.008

0.343
0.441
0.189
0.027

0.216
0.432
0.288
0.064

0.125
0.375
0.375
0.125

0.064
0.288
0.432
0.216

0.027
0.189
0.441
0.343

0.008
0.096
0.384
0.512

0.001
0.027
0.243
0.729

0.000
0.007
0.135
0.857

n54
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.815
0.171
0.014
0.000
0.000

0.656
0.292
0.049
0.004
0.000

0.410
0.410
0.154
0.026
0.002

0.240
0.412
0.265
0.076
0.008

0.130
0.346
0.346
0.154
0.026

0.063
0.250
0.375
0.250
0.063

0.026
0.154
0.346
0.346
0.130

0.008
0.076
0.265
0.412
0.240

0.002
0.026
0.154
0.410
0.410

0.000
0.004
0.049
0.292
0.656

0.000
0.000
0.014
0.171
0.815

n55
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4
5

0.774
0.204
0.021
0.001
0.000
0.000

0.590
0.328
0.073
0.008
0.000
0.000

0.328
0.410
0.205
0.051
0.006
0.000

0.168
0.360
0.309
0.132
0.028
0.002

0.078
0.259
0.346
0.230
0.077
0.010

0.031
0.156
0.313
0.313
0.156
0.031

0.010
0.077
0.230
0.346
0.259
0.078

0.002
0.028
0.132
0.309
0.360
0.168

0.000
0.006
0.051
0.205
0.410
0.328

0.000
0.000
0.008
0.073
0.328
0.590

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.021
0.204
0.774
(continued )

726

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 727 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.1 Binomial Probability Distribution (continued)

n56
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.735
0.232
0.031
0.002
0.000

0.531
0.354
0.098
0.015
0.001

0.262
0.393
0.246
0.082
0.015

0.118
0.303
0.324
0.185
0.060

0.047
0.187
0.311
0.276
0.138

0.016
0.094
0.234
0.313
0.234

0.004
0.037
0.138
0.276
0.311

0.001
0.010
0.060
0.185
0.324

0.000
0.002
0.015
0.082
0.246

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.015
0.098

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.031

5
6

0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000

0.002
0.000

0.010
0.001

0.037
0.004

0.094
0.016

0.187
0.047

0.303
0.118

0.393
0.262

0.354
0.531

0.232
0.735

n57
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.698
0.257
0.041
0.004
0.000

0.478
0.372
0.124
0.023
0.003

0.210
0.367
0.275
0.115
0.029

0.082
0.247
0.318
0.227
0.097

0.028
0.131
0.261
0.290
0.194

0.008
0.055
0.164
0.273
0.273

0.002
0.017
0.077
0.194
0.290

0.000
0.004
0.025
0.097
0.227

0.000
0.000
0.004
0.029
0.115

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.023

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.004

5
6
7

0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000

0.004
0.000
0.000

0.025
0.004
0.000

0.077
0.017
0.002

0.164
0.055
0.008

0.261
0.131
0.028

0.318
0.247
0.082

0.275
0.367
0.210

0.124
0.372
0.478

0.041
0.257
0.698

n58
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.663
0.279
0.051
0.005
0.000

0.430
0.383
0.149
0.033
0.005

0.168
0.336
0.294
0.147
0.046

0.058
0.198
0.296
0.254
0.136

0.017
0.090
0.209
0.279
0.232

0.004
0.031
0.109
0.219
0.273

0.001
0.008
0.041
0.124
0.232

0.000
0.001
0.010
0.047
0.136

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.009
0.046

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.009
0.001
0.000
0.000

0.047
0.010
0.001
0.000

0.124
0.041
0.008
0.001

0.219
0.109
0.031
0.004

0.279
0.209
0.090
0.017

0.254
0.296
0.198
0.058

0.147
0.294
0.336
0.168

0.033
0.149
0.383
0.430

0.005
0.051
0.279
0.663
(continued )

727

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 728 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.1 Binomial Probability Distribution (continued)

n59
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.630
0.299
0.063
0.008
0.001

0.387
0.387
0.172
0.045
0.007

0.134
0.302
0.302
0.176
0.066

0.040
0.156
0.267
0.267
0.172

0.010
0.060
0.161
0.251
0.251

0.002
0.018
0.070
0.164
0.246

0.000
0.004
0.021
0.074
0.167

0.000
0.000
0.004
0.021
0.074

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.017

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8
9

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.017
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.074
0.021
0.004
0.000
0.000

0.167
0.074
0.021
0.004
0.000

0.246
0.164
0.070
0.018
0.002

0.251
0.251
0.161
0.060
0.010

0.172
0.267
0.267
0.156
0.040

0.066
0.176
0.302
0.302
0.134

0.007
0.045
0.172
0.387
0.387

0.001
0.008
0.063
0.299
0.630

n 5 10
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.599
0.315
0.075
0.010
0.001

0.349
0.387
0.194
0.057
0.011

0.107
0.268
0.302
0.201
0.088

0.028
0.121
0.233
0.267
0.200

0.006
0.040
0.121
0.215
0.251

0.001
0.010
0.044
0.117
0.205

0.000
0.002
0.011
0.042
0.111

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.009
0.037

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.006

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8
9

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.026
0.006
0.001
0.000
0.000

0.103
0.037
0.009
0.001
0.000

0.201
0.111
0.042
0.011
0.002

0.246
0.205
0.117
0.044
0.010

0.201
0.251
0.215
0.121
0.040

0.103
0.200
0.267
0.233
0.121

0.026
0.088
0.201
0.302
0.268

0.001
0.011
0.057
0.194
0.387

0.000
0.001
0.010
0.075
0.315

10

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.001

0.006

0.028

0.107

0.349

0.599

n 5 11
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.569
0.329
0.087
0.014
0.001

0.314
0.384
0.213
0.071
0.016

0.086
0.236
0.295
0.221
0.111

0.020
0.093
0.200
0.257
0.220

0.004
0.027
0.089
0.177
0.236

0.000
0.005
0.027
0.081
0.161

0.000
0.001
0.005
0.023
0.070

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.004
0.017

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8
9

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.039
0.010
0.002
0.000
0.000

0.132
0.057
0.017
0.004
0.001

0.221
0.147
0.070
0.023
0.005

0.226
0.226
0.161
0.081
0.027

0.147
0.221
0.236
0.177
0.089

0.057
0.132
0.220
0.257
0.200

0.010
0.039
0.111
0.221
0.295

0.000
0.002
0.016
0.071
0.213

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.014
0.087

10
11

0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000

0.001
0.000

0.005
0.000

0.027
0.004

0.093
0.020

0.236
0.086

0.384
0.314

0.329
0.569
(continued )

728

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 729 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.1 Binomial Probability Distribution (continued)

n 5 12
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.540
0.341
0.099
0.017
0.002

0.282
0.377
0.230
0.085
0.021

0.069
0.206
0.283
0.236
0.133

0.014
0.071
0.168
0.240
0.231

0.002
0.017
0.064
0.142
0.213

0.000
0.003
0.016
0.054
0.121

0.000
0.000
0.002
0.012
0.042

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.008

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8
9

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.053
0.016
0.003
0.001
0.000

0.158
0.079
0.029
0.008
0.001

0.227
0.177
0.101
0.042
0.012

0.193
0.226
0.193
0.121
0.054

0.101
0.177
0.227
0.213
0.142

0.029
0.079
0.158
0.231
0.240

0.003
0.016
0.053
0.133
0.236

0.000
0.000
0.004
0.021
0.085

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.017

10
11
12

0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000

0.002
0.000
0.000

0.016
0.003
0.000

0.064
0.017
0.002

0.168
0.071
0.014

0.283
0.206
0.069

0.230
0.377
0.282

0.099
0.341
0.540

n 5 13
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.513
0.351
0.111
0.021
0.003

0.254
0.367
0.245
0.100
0.028

0.055
0.179
0.268
0.246
0.154

0.010
0.054
0.139
0.218
0.234

0.001
0.011
0.045
0.111
0.184

0.000
0.002
0.010
0.035
0.087

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.006
0.024

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.003

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8
9

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.006
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.069
0.023
0.006
0.001
0.000

0.180
0.103
0.044
0.014
0.003

0.221
0.197
0.131
0.066
0.024

0.157
0.209
0.209
0.157
0.087

0.066
0.131
0.197
0.221
0.184

0.014
0.044
0.103
0.180
0.234

0.001
0.006
0.023
0.069
0.154

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.006
0.028

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003

10
11
12
13

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.006
0.001
0.000
0.000

0.035
0.010
0.002
0.000

0.111
0.045
0.011
0.001

0.218
0.139
0.054
0.010

0.246
0.268
0.179
0.055

0.100
0.245
0.367
0.254

0.021
0.111
0.351
0.513
(continued )

729

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 730 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.1 Binomial Probability Distribution (concluded)

n 5 14
Probability
x

0.05

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0
1
2
3
4

0.488
0.359
0.123
0.026
0.004

0.229
0.356
0.257
0.114
0.035

0.044
0.154
0.250
0.250
0.172

0.007
0.041
0.113
0.194
0.229

0.001
0.007
0.032
0.085
0.155

0.000
0.001
0.006
0.022
0.061

0.000
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.014

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8
9

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.008
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.086
0.032
0.009
0.002
0.000

0.196
0.126
0.062
0.023
0.007

0.207
0.207
0.157
0.092
0.041

0.122
0.183
0.209
0.183
0.122

0.041
0.092
0.157
0.207
0.207

0.007
0.023
0.062
0.126
0.196

0.000
0.002
0.009
0.032
0.086

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.008

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

10
11
12
13
14

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.014
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.000

0.061
0.022
0.006
0.001
0.000

0.155
0.085
0.032
0.007
0.001

0.229
0.194
0.113
0.041
0.007

0.172
0.250
0.250
0.154
0.044

0.035
0.114
0.257
0.356
0.229

0.004
0.026
0.123
0.359
0.488

n 5 15
Probability
x

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

0.95

0.463
0.366
0.135
0.031
0.005

0.206
0.343
0.267
0.129
0.043

0.035
0.132
0.231
0.250
0.188

0.005
0.031
0.092
0.170
0.219

0.000
0.005
0.022
0.063
0.127

0.000
0.000
0.003
0.014
0.042

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.007

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

5
6
7
8
9

0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.010
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.103
0.043
0.014
0.003
0.001

0.206
0.147
0.081
0.035
0.012

0.186
0.207
0.177
0.118
0.061

0.092
0.153
0.196
0.196
0.153

0.024
0.061
0.118
0.177
0.207

0.003
0.012
0.035
0.081
0.147

0.000
0.001
0.003
0.014
0.043

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

10
11
12
13
14

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.003
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.024
0.007
0.002
0.000
0.000

0.092
0.042
0.014
0.003
0.000

0.186
0.127
0.063
0.022
0.005

0.206
0.219
0.170
0.092
0.031

0.103
0.188
0.250
0.231
0.132

0.010
0.043
0.129
0.267
0.343

0.001
0.005
0.031
0.135
0.366

15

730

0.05

0
1
2
3
4

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.005

0.035

0.206

0.463

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 731 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.2 Poisson Distribution

m x 0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0
1
2
3
4

0.9048
0.0905
0.0045
0.0002
0.0000

0.8187
0.1637
0.0164
0.0011
0.0001

0.7408
0.2222
0.0333
0.0033
0.0003

0.6703
0.2681
0.0536
0.0072
0.0007

0.6065
0.3033
0.0758
0.0126
0.0016

0.5488
0.3293
0.0988
0.0198
0.0030

0.4966
0.3476
0.1217
0.0284
0.0050

0.4493
0.3595
0.1438
0.0383
0.0077

0.4066
0.3659
0.1647
0.0494
0.0111

5
6
7

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0001
0.0000
0.0000

0.0002
0.0000
0.0000

0.0004
0.0000
0.0000

0.0007
0.0001
0.0000

0.0012
0.0002
0.0000

0.0020
0.0003
0.0000

x

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

0
1
2
3
4

0.3679
0.3679
0.1839
0.0613
0.0153

0.1353
0.2707
0.2707
0.1804
0.0902

0.0498
0.1494
0.2240
0.2240
0.1680

0.0183
0.0733
0.1465
0.1954
0.1954

0.0067
0.0337
0.0842
0.1404
0.1755

0.0025
0.0149
0.0446
0.0892
0.1339

0.0009
0.0064
0.0223
0.0521
0.0912

0.0003
0.0027
0.0107
0.0286
0.0573

0.0001
0.0011
0.0050
0.0150
0.0337

5
6
7
8
9

0.0031
0.0005
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000

0.0361
0.0120
0.0034
0.0009
0.0002

0.1008
0.0504
0.0216
0.0081
0.0027

0.1563
0.1042
0.0595
0.0298
0.0132

0.1755
0.1462
0.1044
0.0653
0.0363

0.1606
0.1606
0.1377
0.1033
0.0688

0.1277
0.1490
0.1490
0.1304
0.1014

0.0916
0.1221
0.1396
0.1396
0.1241

0.0607
0.0911
0.1171
0.1318
0.1318

10
11
12
13
14

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0008
0.0002
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000

0.0053
0.0019
0.0006
0.0002
0.0001

0.0181
0.0082
0.0034
0.0013
0.0005

0.0413
0.0225
0.0113
0.0052
0.0022

0.0710
0.0452
0.0263
0.0142
0.0071

0.0993
0.0722
0.0481
0.0296
0.0169

0.1186
0.0970
0.0728
0.0504
0.0324

15
16
17
18
19

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0009
0.0003
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000

0.0033
0.0014
0.0006
0.0002
0.0001

0.0090
0.0045
0.0021
0.0009
0.0004

0.0194
0.0109
0.0058
0.0029
0.0014

20
21
22

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0002
0.0001
0.0000

0.0006
0.0003
0.0001

m

731

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 732 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.3 Areas under the Normal Curve

Example:
If z = 1.96, then
P(0 to z) = 0.4750.

0.4750

z

0

1.96

z

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4

0.0000
0.0398
0.0793
0.1179
0.1554

0.0040
0.0438
0.0832
0.1217
0.1591

0.0080
0.0478
0.0871
0.1255
0.1628

0.0120
0.0517
0.0910
0.1293
0.1664

0.0160
0.0557
0.0948
0.1331
0.1700

0.0199
0.0596
0.0987
0.1368
0.1736

0.0239
0.0636
0.1026
0.1406
0.1772

0.0279
0.0675
0.1064
0.1443
0.1808

0.0319
0.0714
0.1103
0.1480
0.1844

0.0359
0.0753
0.1141
0.1517
0.1879

0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9

0.1915
0.2257
0.2580
0.2881
0.3159

0.1950
0.2291
0.2611
0.2910
0.3186

0.1985
0.2324
0.2642
0.2939
0.3212

0.2019
0.2357
0.2673
0.2967
0.3238

0.2054
0.2389
0.2704
0.2995
0.3264

0.2088
0.2422
0.2734
0.3023
0.3289

0.2123
0.2454
0.2764
0.3051
0.3315

0.2157
0.2486
0.2794
0.3078
0.3340

0.2190
0.2517
0.2823
0.3106
0.3365

0.2224
0.2549
0.2852
0.3133
0.3389

1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4

0.3413
0.3643
0.3849
0.4032
0.4192

0.3438
0.3665
0.3869
0.4049
0.4207

0.3461
0.3686
0.3888
0.4066
0.4222

0.3485
0.3708
0.3907
0.4082
0.4236

0.3508
0.3729
0.3925
0.4099
0.4251

0.3531
0.3749
0.3944
0.4115
0.4265

0.3554
0.3770
0.3962
0.4131
0.4279

0.3577
0.3790
0.3980
0.4147
0.4292

0.3599
0.3810
0.3997
0.4162
0.4306

0.3621
0.3830
0.4015
0.4177
0.4319

1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9

0.4332
0.4452
0.4554
0.4641
0.4713

0.4345
0.4463
0.4564
0.4649
0.4719

0.4357
0.4474
0.4573
0.4656
0.4726

0.4370
0.4484
0.4582
0.4664
0.4732

0.4382
0.4495
0.4591
0.4671
0.4738

0.4394
0.4505
0.4599
0.4678
0.4744

0.4406
0.4515
0.4608
0.4686
0.4750

0.4418
0.4525
0.4616
0.4693
0.4756

0.4429
0.4535
0.4625
0.4699
0.4761

0.4441
0.4545
0.4633
0.4706
0.4767

2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4

0.4772
0.4821
0.4861
0.4893
0.4918

0.4778
0.4826
0.4864
0.4896
0.4920

0.4783
0.4830
0.4868
0.4898
0.4922

0.4788
0.4834
0.4871
0.4901
0.4925

0.4793
0.4838
0.4875
0.4904
0.4927

0.4798
0.4842
0.4878
0.4906
0.4929

0.4803
0.4846
0.4881
0.4909
0.4931

0.4808
0.4850
0.4884
0.4911
0.4932

0.4812
0.4854
0.4887
0.4913
0.4934

0.4817
0.4857
0.4890
0.4916
0.4936

2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9

0.4938
0.4953
0.4965
0.4974
0.4981

0.4940
0.4955
0.4966
0.4975
0.4982

0.4941
0.4956
0.4967
0.4976
0.4982

0.4943
0.4957
0.4968
0.4977
0.4983

0.4945
0.4959
0.4969
0.4977
0.4984

0.4946
0.4960
0.4970
0.4978
0.4984

0.4948
0.4961
0.4971
0.4979
0.4985

0.4949
0.4962
0.4972
0.4979
0.4985

0.4951
0.4963
0.4973
0.4980
0.4986

0.4952
0.4964
0.4974
0.4981
0.4986

3.0

0.4987

0.4987

0.4987

0.4988

0.4988

0.4989

0.4989

0.4989

0.4990

0.4990

732

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 733 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

B.4

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

Table of Random Numbers

02711
94873
54921
77640
61545

08182
90935
78680
97636
00835

75997
31684
06635
37397
93251

79866
63952
98689
93379
87203

58095
09865
17306
56454
36759

83319
14491
25170
59818
49197

80295
99518
65928
45827
85967

79741
93394
87709
74164
01704

74599
34691
30533
71666
19634

84379
14985
89736
46977
21898

17147
13748
87455
08999
78804

19519
04742
14813
57409
81333

22497
92460
50373
91185
53809

16857
85801
28037
10200
32471

42426
53444
91182
61411
46034

84822
65626
32786
23392
36306

92598
58710
65261
47797
22498

49186
55406
11173
56377
19239

88247
17173
34376
71635
85428

39967
69776
36408
08601
55721

82173
97594
73881
46071
44492

26921
25168
67176
22912
19686

28472
89178
93504
90326
12495

98958
68190
42636
42453
93135

07960
05043
38233
88108
95185

66124
17407
16154
72064
77799

89731
48201
96451
58601
52441

95069
83917
57925
32357
88272

18625
11413
29667
90610
22024

92405
72920
30859
32921
80631

31864
51574
35350
46943
22665

72170
90692
76132
36502
87226

37722
43339
92925
01172
33304

55794
65689
92124
46045
57975

14636
76539
92634
46991
03985

05148
27909
35681
33804
21566

54505
05467
43690
80006
65796

50113
21727
89136
35542
72915

21119
51141
35599
61056
81466

25228
72949
84138
75666
89205

39437
77082
24544
27503
24590

97957
47784
25649
15558
24545

11838
40098
43370
37738
06435

10433
97962
28007
24849
52758

21564
89845
06779
70722
45685

51570
28392
72402
71859
90151

73558
78187
62632
83736
46516

27495
06112
53956
06016
49644

34533
08169
24709
94397
92686

57808
11261
06978
12529
84870

48155
20226
70178
10169
81084

86226
53752
73444
41465
03701

40359
90648
38790
51935
28598

28723
24362
53626
05711
70013

15364
83314
93780
09799
63794

69125
00014
18629
79077
53169

12609
19207
68766
88159
97054

57171
69413
24371
33437
60303

86857
97016
74639
68519
23259

31702
86290
30782
03040
96196

69202
80561
08199
98883
84568

20777
95787
26703
28220
69286

21727
89426
95128
39358
76054

81511
93325
48599
53720
21615

51887
86412
09333
80161
80883

16175
57479
12584
83371
36797

53746
54194
24374
15181
82845

46516
52153
31232
11131
39139

70339
19197
61782
12219
90900

62727
81877
44032
55920
18172

04269
10538
77843
12034
10524

35173
13124
24955
94636
72829

95745
36099
25900
49455
47641

53893
13140
63843
76362
93315

86022
37706
95029
83532
80875

77722
44562
93859
31062
28090

52498
57179
93634
69903
97728

84193
44693
20205
91186
52560

22448
67877
66294
65768
34937

22571
01549
41218
55949
79548

68935
89450
90696
49006
74591

76632
65665
20451
32047
87025

46984
29190
24211
93086
52368

61772
43709
97310
00112
59416

92786
11172
60446
20470
34417

22651
34481
73530
17136
70557

07086
95977
62865
28255
86746

89754
47535
96574
86328
55809

44143
25658
13829
07293
53628

97687
73898
72226
38809
12000

06315
62386
86848
65643
11084

17012
09184
82122
69480
46534

77103
62092
04028
46598
78957

00968
46617
36959
04501
77353

07235
99419
87827
40403
39578

10728
64230
12813
91408
77868

42189
95034
08627
32343
22970

33292
85481
80699
48130
84349

51487
07857
13345
49303
09184

64443
42510
51695
90689
70603

733

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 734 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

B.5

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

Student’s t Distribution



–t t Confidence interval



–t 0
Left-tailed test

t

90%

95%

98%

0.10

0.05

0.025

0.01

1
2



–t 0 t Two-tailed test
Confidence Intervals, c

99%

99.9%

80%

Level of Significance for One-Tailed Test, a df ␣

0 t
Right-tailed test

Confidence Intervals, c
80%

1
2

0.005

90%

95%

98%

99%

99.9%

Level of Significance for One-Tailed Test, a
0.0005

df

0.10

Level of Significance for Two-Tailed Test, a

0.05

0.025

0.01

0.005

0.0005

Level of Significance for Two-Tailed Test, a

0.20

0.10

0.05

0.02

0.01

0.001

0.20

0.10

0.05

0.02

0.01

0.001

1
2
3
4
5

3.078
1.886
1.638
1.533
1.476

6.314
2.920
2.353
2.132
2.015

12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571

31.821
6.965
4.541
3.747
3.365

63.657
9.925
5.841
4.604
4.032

636.619
31.599
12.924
8.610
6.869

36
37
38
39
40

1.306
1.305
1.304
1.304
1.303

1.688
1.687
1.686
1.685
1.684

2.028
2.026
2.024
2.023
2.021

2.434
2.431
2.429
2.426
2.423

2.719
2.715
2.712
2.708
2.704

3.582
3.574
3.566
3.558
3.551

6
7
8
9
10

1.440
1.415
1.397
1.383
1.372

1.943
1.895
1.860
1.833
1.812

2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228

3.143
2.998
2.896
2.821
2.764

3.707
3.499
3.355
3.250
3.169

5.959
5.408
5.041
4.781
4.587

41
42
43
44
45

1.303
1.302
1.302
1.301
1.301

1.683
1.682
1.681
1.680
1.679

2.020
2.018
2.017
2.015
2.014

2.421
2.418
2.416
2.414
2.412

2.701
2.698
2.695
2.692
2.690

3.544
3.538
3.532
3.526
3.520

11
12
13
14
15

1.363
1.356
1.350
1.345
1.341

1.796
1.782
1.771
1.761
1.753

2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131

2.718
2.681
2.650
2.624
2.602

3.106
3.055
3.012
2.977
2.947

4.437
4.318
4.221
4.140
4.073

46
47
48
49
50

1.300
1.300
1.299
1.299
1.299

1.679
1.678
1.677
1.677
1.676

2.013
2.012
2.011
2.010
2.009

2.410
2.408
2.407
2.405
2.403

2.687
2.685
2.682
2.680
2.678

3.515
3.510
3.505
3.500
3.496

16
17
18
19
20

1.337
1.333
1.330
1.328
1.325

1.746
1.740
1.734
1.729
1.725

2.120
2.110
2.101
2.093
2.086

2.583
2.567
2.552
2.539
2.528

2.921
2.898
2.878
2.861
2.845

4.015
3.965
3.922
3.883
3.850

51
52
53
54
55

1.298
1.298
1.298
1.297
1.297

1.675
1.675
1.674
1.674
1.673

2.008
2.007
2.006
2.005
2.004

2.402
2.400
2.399
2.397
2.396

2.676
2.674
2.672
2.670
2.668

3.492
3.488
3.484
3.480
3.476

21
22
23
24
25

1.323
1.321
1.319
1.318
1.316

1.721
1.717
1.714
1.711
1.708

2.080
2.074
2.069
2.064
2.060

2.518
2.508
2.500
2.492
2.485

2.831
2.819
2.807
2.797
2.787

3.819
3.792
3.768
3.745
3.725

56
57
58
59
60

1.297
1.297
1.296
1.296
1.296

1.673
1.672
1.672
1.671
1.671

2.003
2.002
2.002
2.001
2.000

2.395
2.394
2.392
2.391
2.390

2.667
2.665
2.663
2.662
2.660

3.473
3.470
3.466
3.463
3.460

26
27
28
29
30

1.315
1.314
1.313
1.311
1.310

1.706
1.703
1.701
1.699
1.697

2.056
2.052
2.048
2.045
2.042

2.479
2.473
2.467
2.462
2.457

2.779
2.771
2.763
2.756
2.750

3.707
3.690
3.674
3.659
3.646

61
62
63
64
65

1.296
1.295
1.295
1.295
1.295

1.670
1.670
1.669
1.669
1.669

2.000
1.999
1.998
1.998
1.997

2.389
2.388
2.387
2.386
2.385

2.659
2.657
2.656
2.655
2.654

3.457
3.454
3.452
3.449
3.447

31
32
33
34
35

1.309
1.309
1.308
1.307
1.306

1.696
1.694
1.692
1.691
1.690

2.040
2.037
2.035
2.032
2.030

2.453
2.449
2.445
2.441
2.438

2.744
2.738
2.733
2.728
2.724

3.633
3.622
3.611
3.601
3.591

66
67
68
69
70

1.295
1.294
1.294
1.294
1.294

1.668
1.668
1.668
1.667
1.667

1.997
1.996
1.995
1.995
1.994

2.384
2.383
2.382
2.382
2.381

2.652
2.651
2.650
2.649
2.648

3.444
3.442
3.439
3.437
3.435
(continued )

734

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 735 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

B.5

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

Student’s t Distribution (concluded)

Confidence Intervals, c
80%

90%

95%

98%

Confidence Intervals, c
99%

99.9%

80%

Level of Significance for One-Tailed Test, a df 0.10

0.05

0.025

0.01

0.005

90%

95%

98%

99%

99.9%

Level of Significance for One-Tailed Test, a
0.0005

df

0.10

Level of Significance for Two-Tailed Test, a

0.05

0.025

0.01

0.005

0.0005

Level of Significance for Two-Tailed Test, a

0.20

0.10

0.05

0.02

0.01

0.001

71
72
73
74
75

1.294
1.293
1.293
1.293
1.293

1.667
1.666
1.666
1.666
1.665

1.994
1.993
1.993
1.993
1.992

2.380
2.379
2.379
2.378
2.377

2.647
2.646
2.645
2.644
2.643

3.433
3.431
3.429
3.427
3.425

76
77
78
79
80

1.293
1.293
1.292
1.292
1.292

1.665
1.665
1.665
1.664
1.664

1.992
1.991
1.991
1.990
1.990

2.376
2.376
2.375
2.374
2.374

2.642
2.641
2.640
2.640
2.639

3.423
3.421
3.420
3.418
3.416

81
82
83
84
85

1.292
1.292
1.292
1.292
1.292

1.664
1.664
1.663
1.663
1.663

1.990
1.989
1.989
1.989
1.988

2.373
2.373
2.372
2.372
2.371

2.638
2.637
2.636
2.636
2.635

3.415
3.413
3.412
3.410
3.409

86
87
88

1.291
1.291
1.291

1.663
1.663
1.662

1.988
1.988
1.987

2.370
2.370
2.369

2.634
2.634
2.633

3.407
3.406
3.405

0.20

0.10

0.05

0.02

0.01

0.001

89
90

1.291
1.291

1.662
1.662

1.987
1.987

2.369
2.368

2.632
2.632

3.403
3.402

91
92
93
94
95

1.291
1.291
1.291
1.291
1.291

1.662
1.662
1.661
1.661
1.661

1.986
1.986
1.986
1.986
1.985

2.368
2.368
2.367
2.367
2.366

2.631
2.630
2.630
2.629
2.629

3.401
3.399
3.398
3.397
3.396

96
97
98
99
100

1.290
1.290
1.290
1.290
1.290

1.661
1.661
1.661
1.660
1.660

1.985
1.985
1.984
1.984
1.984

2.366
2.365
2.365
2.365
2.364

2.628
2.627
2.627
2.626
2.626

3.395
3.394
3.393
3.392
3.390

120
140
160
180
200
`

1.289
1.288
1.287
1.286
1.286
1.282

1.658
1.656
1.654
1.653
1.653
1.645

1.980
1.977
1.975
1.973
1.972
1.960

2.358
2.353
2.350
2.347
2.345
2.326

2.617
2.611
2.607
2.603
2.601
2.576

3.373
3.361
3.352
3.345
3.340
3.291

735

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 736 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

B.6A

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

Critical Values of the F Distribution (a 5 .05)

.05

0

F

Degrees of Freedom for the Numerator
3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

12

15

20

24

30

40

161
18.5
10.1
7.71
6.61

200
19.0
9.55
6.94
5.79

216
19.2
9.28
6.59
5.41

225
19.2
9.12
6.39
5.19

230
19.3
9.01
6.26
5.05

234
19.3
8.94
6.16
4.95

237
19.4
8.89
6.09
4.88

239
19.4
8.85
6.04
4.82

241
19.4
8.81
6.00
4.77

242
19.4
8.79
5.96
4.74

244
19.4
8.74
5.91
4.68

246
19.4
8.70
5.86
4.62

248
19.4
8.66
5.80
4.56

249
19.5
8.64
5.77
4.53

250
19.5
8.62
5.75
4.50

251
19.5
8.59
5.72
4.46

6
7
8
9
10

5.99
5.59
5.32
5.12
4.96

5.14
4.74
4.46
4.26
4.10

4.76
4.35
4.07
3.86
3.71

4.53
4.12
3.84
3.63
3.48

4.39
3.97
3.69
3.48
3.33

4.28
3.87
3.58
3.37
3.22

4.21
3.79
3.50
3.29
3.14

4.15
3.73
3.44
3.23
3.07

4.10
3.68
3.39
3.18
3.02

4.06
3.64
3.35
3.14
2.98

4.00
3.57
3.28
3.07
2.91

3.94
3.51
3.22
3.01
2.85

3.87
3.44
3.15
2.94
2.77

3.84
3.41
3.12
2.90
2.74

3.81
3.38
3.08
2.86
2.70

3.77
3.34
3.04
2.83
2.66

11
12
13
14
15

4.84
4.75
4.67
4.60
4.54

3.98
3.89
3.81
3.74
3.68

3.59
3.49
3.41
3.34
3.29

3.36
3.26
3.18
3.11
3.06

3.20
3.11
3.03
2.96
2.90

3.09
3.00
2.92
2.85
2.79

3.01
2.91
2.83
2.76
2.71

2.95
2.85
2.77
2.70
2.64

2.90
2.80
2.71
2.65
2.59

2.85
2.75
2.67
2.60
2.54

2.79
2.69
2.60
2.53
2.48

2.72
2.62
2.53
2.46
2.40

2.65
2.54
2.46
2.39
2.33

2.61
2.51
2.42
2.35
2.29

2.57
2.47
2.38
2.31
2.25

2.53
2.43
2.34
2.27
2.20

16
17
18
19
20

4.49
4.45
4.41
4.38
4.35

3.63
3.59
3.55
3.52
3.49

3.24
3.20
3.16
3.13
3.10

3.01
2.96
2.93
2.90
2.87

2.85
2.81
2.77
2.74
2.71

2.74
2.70
2.66
2.63
2.60

2.66
2.61
2.58
2.54
2.51

2.59
2.55
2.51
2.48
2.45

2.54
2.49
2.46
2.42
2.39

2.49
2.45
2.41
2.38
2.35

2.42
2.38
2.34
2.31
2.28

2.35
2.31
2.27
2.23
2.20

2.28
2.23
2.19
2.16
2.12

2.24
2.19
2.15
2.11
2.08

2.19
2.15
2.11
2.07
2.04

2.15
2.10
2.06
2.03
1.99

21
22
23
24
25

4.32
4.30
4.28
4.26
4.24

3.47
3.44
3.42
3.40
3.39

3.07
3.05
3.03
3.01
2.99

2.84
2.82
2.80
2.78
2.76

2.68
2.66
2.64
2.62
2.60

2.57
2.55
2.53
2.51
2.49

2.49
2.46
2.44
2.42
2.40

2.42
2.40
2.37
2.36
2.34

2.37
2.34
2.32
2.30
2.28

2.32
2.30
2.27
2.25
2.24

2.25
2.23
2.20
2.18
2.16

2.18
2.15
2.13
2.11
2.09

2.10
2.07
2.05
2.03
2.01

2.05
2.03
2.01
1.98
1.96

2.01
1.98
1.96
1.94
1.92

1.96
1.94
1.91
1.89
1.87

30
40
60
120
`

736

2

1
2
3
4
5

Degrees of Freedom for the Denominator

1

4.17
4.08
4.00
3.92
3.84

3.32
3.23
3.15
3.07
3.00

2.92
2.84
2.76
2.68
2.60

2.69
2.61
2.53
2.45
2.37

2.53
2.45
2.37
2.29
2.21

2.42
2.34
2.25
2.18
2.10

2.33
2.25
2.17
2.09
2.01

2.27
2.18
2.10
2.02
1.94

2.21
2.12
2.04
1.96
1.88

2.16
2.08
1.99
1.91
1.83

2.09
2.00
1.92
1.83
1.75

2.01
1.92
1.84
1.75
1.67

1.93
1.84
1.75
1.66
1.57

1.89
1.79
1.70
1.61
1.52

1.84
1.74
1.65
1.55
1.46

1.79
1.69
1.59
1.50
1.39

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 737 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

B.6B

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

Critical Values of the F Distribution (a 5 .01)

.01

0

F
Degrees of Freedom for the Numerator

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

12

15

20

24

30

40

1
2
3
4
5

Degrees of Freedom for the Denominator

1
4052
98.5
34.1
21.2
16.3

5000
99.0
30.8
18.0
13.3

5403
99.2
29.5
16.7
12.1

5625
99.2
28.7
16.0
11.4

5764
99.3
28.2
15.5
11.0

5859
99.3
27.9
15.2
10.7

5928
99.4
27.7
15.0
10.5

5981
99.4
27.5
14.8
10.3

6022
99.4
27.3
14.7
10.2

6056
99.4
27.2
14.5
10.1

6106
99.4
27.1
14.4
9.89

6157
99.4
26.9
14.2
9.72

6209
99.4
26.7
14.0
9.55

6235
99.5
26.6
13.9
9.47

6261
99.5
26.5
13.8
9.38

6287
99.5
26.4
13.7
9.29

6
7
8
9
10

13.7
12.2
11.3
10.6
10.0

10.9
9.55
8.65
8.02
7.56

9.78
8.45
7.59
6.99
6.55

9.15
7.85
7.01
6.42
5.99

8.75
7.46
6.63
6.06
5.64

8.47
7.19
6.37
5.80
5.39

8.26
6.99
6.18
5.61
5.20

8.10
6.84
6.03
5.47
5.06

7.98
6.72
5.91
5.35
4.94

7.87
6.62
5.81
5.26
4.85

7.72
6.47
5.67
5.11
4.71

7.56
6.31
5.52
4.96
4.56

7.40
6.16
5.36
4.81
4.41

7.31
6.07
5.28
4.73
4.33

7.23
5.99
5.20
4.65
4.25

7.14
5.91
5.12
4.57
4.17

11
12
13
14
15

9.65
9.33
9.07
8.86
8.68

7.21
6.93
6.70
6.51
6.36

6.22
5.95
5.74
5.56
5.42

5.67
5.41
5.21
5.04
4.89

5.32
5.06
4.86
4.69
4.56

5.07
4.82
4.62
4.46
4.32

4.89
4.64
4.44
4.28
4.14

4.74
4.50
4.30
4.14
4.00

4.63
4.39
4.19
4.03
3.89

4.54
4.30
4.10
3.94
3.80

4.40
4.16
3.96
3.80
3.67

4.25
4.01
3.82
3.66
3.52

4.10
3.86
3.66
3.51
3.37

4.02
3.78
3.59
3.43
3.29

3.94
3.70
3.51
3.35
3.21

3.86
3.62
3.43
3.27
3.13

16
17
18
19
20

8.53
8.40
8.29
8.18
8.10

6.23
6.11
6.01
5.93
5.85

5.29
5.18
5.09
5.01
4.94

4.77
4.67
4.58
4.50
4.43

4.44
4.34
4.25
4.17
4.10

4.20
4.10
4.01
3.94
3.87

4.03
3.93
3.84
3.77
3.70

3.89
3.79
3.71
3.63
3.56

3.78
3.68
3.60
3.52
3.46

3.69
3.59
3.51
3.43
3.37

3.55
3.46
3.37
3.30
3.23

3.41
3.31
3.23
3.15
3.09

3.26
3.16
3.08
3.00
2.94

3.18
3.08
3.00
2.92
2.86

3.10
3.00
2.92
2.84
2.78

3.02
2.92
2.84
2.76
2.69

21
22
23
24
25

8.02
7.95
7.88
7.82
7.77

5.78
5.72
5.66
5.61
5.57

4.87
4.82
4.76
4.72
4.68

4.37
4.31
4.26
4.22
4.18

4.04
3.99
3.94
3.90
3.85

3.81
3.76
3.71
3.67
3.63

3.64
3.59
3.54
3.50
3.46

3.51
3.45
3.41
3.36
3.32

3.40
3.35
3.30
3.26
3.22

3.31
3.26
3.21
3.17
3.13

3.17
3.12
3.07
3.03
2.99

3.03
2.98
2.93
2.89
2.85

2.88
2.83
2.78
2.74
2.70

2.80
2.75
2.70
2.66
2.62

2.72
2.67
2.62
2.58
2.54

2.64
2.58
2.54
2.49
2.45

30
40
60
120
`

7.56
7.31
7.08
6.85
6.63

5.39
5.18
4.98
4.79
4.61

4.51
4.31
4.13
3.95
3.78

4.02
3.83
3.65
3.48
3.32

3.70
3.51
3.34
3.17
3.02

3.47
3.29
3.12
2.96
2.80

3.30
3.12
2.95
2.79
2.64

3.17
2.99
2.82
2.66
2.51

3.07
2.89
2.72
2.56
2.41

2.98
2.80
2.63
2.47
2.32

2.84
2.66
2.50
2.34
2.18

2.70
2.52
2.35
2.19
2.04

2.55
2.37
2.20
2.03
1.88

2.47
2.29
2.12
1.95
1.79

2.39
2.20
2.03
1.86
1.70

2.30
2.11
1.94
1.76
1.59

737

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 738 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.7 Critical Values of Chi-Square

This table contains the values of x2 that correspond to a specific right-tail area and specific number of degrees of freedom.

Example: With 17 df and a .02 area in the upper tail, ␹2 ϭ 30.995
␹2

0
Degrees of
Freedom,
df

0.05

0.02

0.01

2.706
4.605
6.251
7.779
9.236

3.841
5.991
7.815
9.488
11.070

5.412
7.824
9.837
11.668
13.388

6.635
9.210
11.345
13.277
15.086

6
7
8
9
10

10.645
12.017
13.362
14.684
15.987

12.592
14.067
15.507
16.919
18.307

15.033
16.622
18.168
19.679
21.161

16.812
18.475
20.090
21.666
23.209

11
12
13
14
15

17.275
18.549
19.812
21.064
22.307

19.675
21.026
22.362
23.685
24.996

22.618
24.054
25.472
26.873
28.259

24.725
26.217
27.688
29.141
30.578

16
17
18
19
20

23.542
24.769
25.989
27.204
28.412

26.296
27.587
28.869
30.144
31.410

29.633
30.995
32.346
33.687
35.020

32.000
33.409
34.805
36.191
37.566

21
22
23
24
25

29.615
30.813
32.007
33.196
34.382

32.671
33.924
35.172
36.415
37.652

36.343
37.659
38.968
40.270
41.566

38.932
40.289
41.638
42.980
44.314

26
27
28
29
30

738

0.10

1
2
3
4
5

35.563
36.741
37.916
39.087
40.256

38.885
40.113
41.337
42.557
43.773

42.856
44.140
45.419
46.693
47.962

45.642
46.963
48.278
49.588
50.892

Right-Tail Area

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 739 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.8 Wilcoxon T Values

2a
.15

.10

.05

.04

.03

.02

.01

a n .075

.050

.025

.020

.015

.010

.005

4
5
6
7
8

0
1
2
4
7

0
2
3
5

0
2
3

0
1
3

0
2

0
1

0

9
10
11
12
13

9
12
16
19
24

8
10
13
17
21

5
8
10
13
17

5
7
9
12
16

4
6
8
11
14

3
5
7
9
12

1
3
5
7
9

14
15
16
17
18

28
33
39
45
51

25
30
35
41
47

21
25
29
34
40

19
23
28
33
38

18
21
26
30
35

15
19
23
27
32

12
15
19
23
27

19
20
21
22
23

58
65
73
81
89

53
60
67
75
83

46
52
58
65
73

43
50
56
63
70

41
47
53
59
66

37
43
49
55
62

32
37
42
48
54

24
25
26
27
28

98
108
118
128
138

91
100
110
119
130

81
89
98
107
116

78
86
94
103
112

74
82
90
99
108

69
76
84
92
101

61
68
75
83
91

29
30
31
32
33

150
161
173
186
199

140
151
163
175
187

126
137
147
159
170

122
132
143
154
165

117
127
137
148
159

110
120
130
140
151

100
109
118
128
138

34
35
40
50
60

212
226
302
487
718

200
213
286
466
690

182
195
264
434
648

177
189
257
425
636

171
182
249
413
620

162
173
238
397
600

148
159
220
373
567

70
80
90
100

995
1,318
1,688
2,105

960
1,276
1,638
2,045

907
1,211
1,560
1,955

891
1,192
1,537
1,928

872
1,168
1,509
1,894

846
1,136
1,471
1,850

805
1,086
1,410
1,779

739

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 740 19/11/13 8:52 AM f-500

B.9A

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

Critical Values for the Durbin–Watson d Statistic (a 5 .05)

k51

k52

k53

k54

k55

n

dL,.05

dU,.05

dL,.05

dU,.05

dL,.05

dU,.05

dL,.05

dU,.05

dL,.05

dU,.05

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100

1.08
1.10
1.13
1.16
1.18
1.20
1.22
1.24
1.26
1.27
1.29
1.30
1.32
1.33
1.34
1.35
1.36
1.37
1.38
1.39
1.40
1.41
1.42
1.43
1.43
1.44
1.48
1.50
1.53
1.55
1.57
1.58
1.60
1.61
1.62
1.63
1.64
1.65

1.36
1.37
1.38
1.39
1.40
1.41
1.42
1.43
1.44
1.45
1.45
1.46
1.47
1.48
1.48
1.49
1.50
1.50
1.51
1.51
1.52
1.52
1.53
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.57
1.59
1.60
1.62
1.63
1.64
1.65
1.66
1.67
1.68
1.69
1.69

0.95
0.98
1.02
1.05
1.08
1.10
1.13
1.15
1.17
1.19
1.21
1.22
1.24
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.30
1.31
1.32
1.33
1.34
1.35
1.36
1.37
1.38
1.39
1.43
1.46
1.49
1.51
1.54
1.55
1.57
1.59
1.60
1.61
1.62
1.63

1.54
1.54
1.54
1.53
1.53
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.56
1.56
1.56
1.57
1.57
1.57
1.58
1.58
1.58
1.59
1.59
1.59
1.60
1.60
1.62
1.63
1.64
1.65
1.66
1.67
1.68
1.69
1.70
1.70
1.71
1.72

0.82
0.86
0.90
0.93
0.97
1.00
1.03
1.05
1.08
1.10
1.12
1.14
1.16
1.18
1.20
1.21
1.23
1.24
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.29
1.31
1.32
1.33
1.34
1.38
1.42
1.45
1.48
1.50
1.52
1.54
1.56
1.57
1.59
1.60
1.61

1.75
1.73
1.71
1.69
1.68
1.68
1.67
1.66
1.66
1.66
1.66
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.66
1.66
1.66
1.66
1.67
1.67
1.68
1.69
1.70
1.70
1.71
1.72
1.72
1.73
1.73
1.74

0.69
0.74
0.78
0.82
0.86
0.90
0.93
0.96
0.99
1.01
1.04
1.06
1.08
1.10
1.12
1.14
1.16
1.18
1.19
1.21
1.22
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.27
1.29
1.34
1.38
1.41
1.44
1.47
1.49
1.51
1.53
1.55
1.57
1.58
1.59

1.97
1.93
1.90
1.87
1.85
1.83
1.81
1.80
1.79
1.78
1.77
1.76
1.76
1.75
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.73
1.73
1.73
1.73
1.73
1.72
1.72
1.72
1.72
1.72
1.72
1.72
1.73
1.73
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.76

0.56
0.62
0.67
0.71
0.75
0.79
0.83
0.86
0.90
0.93
0.95
0.98
1.01
1.03
1.05
1.07
1.09
1.11
1.13
1.15
1.16
1.18
1.19
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.29
1.34
1.38
1.41
1.44
1.46
1.49
1.51
1.52
1.54
1.56
1.57

2.21
2.15
2.10
2.06
2.02
1.99
1.96
1.94
1.92
1.90
1.89
1.88
1.86
1.85
1.84
1.83
1.83
1.82
1.81
1.81
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.79
1.79
1.79
1.78
1.77
1.77
1.77
1.77
1.77
1.77
1.77
1.77
1.78
1.78
1.78

SOURCE:

J. Durbin and G. S. Watson, “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression, II,” Biometrika 30 (1951), pp. 159–178. Reproduced by permission of the
Biometrika Trustees.

740

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 741 19/11/13 8:53 AM f-500

B.9B

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

Critical Values for the Durbin–Watson d Statistic (a 5 .025)

k51

k52

k53

k54

k55

n

dL,.025

dU,.025

dL,.025

dU,.025

dL,.025

dU,.025

dL,.025

dU,.025

dL,.025

dU,.025

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100

0.95
0.98
1.01
1.03
1.06
1.08
1.10
1.12
1.14
1.16
1.18
1.19
1.21
1.22
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.29
1.30
1.31
1.32
1.33
1.34
1.35
1.39
1.42
1.45
1.47
1.49
1.51
1.53
1.54
1.56
1.57
1.58
1.59

1.23
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.28
1.28
1.30
1.31
1.32
1.33
1.34
1.35
1.36
1.37
1.38
1.38
1.39
1.40
1.41
1.41
1.42
1.43
1.43
1.44
1.44
1.45
1.48
1.50
1.52
1.54
1.55
1.57
1.58
1.59
1.60
1.61
1.62
1.63

0.83
0.86
0.90
0.93
0.96
0.99
1.01
1.04
1.06
1.08
1.10
1.12
1.13
1.15
1.17
1.18
1.20
1.21
1.22
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.29
1.30
1.34
1.38
1.41
1.44
1.46
1.48
1.50
1.52
1.53
1.55
1.56
1.57

1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.42
1.42
1.43
1.43
1.44
1.44
1.45
1.45
1.46
1.47
1.47
1.48
1.48
1.48
1.49
1.49
1.50
1.50
1.51
1.53
1.54
1.56
1.57
1.59
1.60
1.61
1.62
1.63
1.64
1.65
1.65

0.71
0.75
0.79
0.82
0.86
0.89
0.92
0.95
0.97
1.00
1.02
1.04
1.06
1.08
1.10
1.12
1.13
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.19
1.20
1.21
1.23
1.24
1.25
1.30
1.34
1.37
1.40
1.43
1.45
1.47
1.49
1.51
1.53
1.54
1.55

1.61
1.59
1.58
1.56
1.55
1.55
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.54
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.55
1.56
1.56
1.56
1.56
1.57
1.58
1.59
1.60
1.61
1.62
1.63
1.64
1.65
1.65
1.66
1.67
1.67

0.59
0.64
0.68
0.72
0.76
0.79
0.83
0.86
0.89
0.91
0.94
0.96
0.99
1.01
1.03
1.05
1.07
1.08
1.10
1.12
1.13
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.19
1.20
1.25
1.30
1.33
1.37
1.40
1.42
1.45
1.47
1.49
1.50
1.52
1.53

1.84
1.80
1.77
1.74
1.72
1.70
1.69
1.68
1.67
1.66
1.65
1.65
1.64
1.64
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.62
1.62
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.64
1.64
1.65
1.66
1.66
1.67
1.67
1.68
1.69
1.69
1.70

0.48
0.53
0.57
0.62
0.66
0.70
0.73
0.77
0.80
0.83
0.86
0.88
0.91
0.93
0.96
0.98
1.00
1.02
1.04
1.06
1.07
1.09
1.10
1.12
1.13
1.15
1.21
1.26
1.30
1.33
1.36
1.39
1.42
1.44
1.46
1.48
1.50
1.51

2.09
2.03
1.98
1.93
1.90
1.87
1.84
1.82
1.80
1.79
1.77
1.76
1.75
1.74
1.73
1.73
1.72
1.71
1.71
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.69
1.69
1.69
1.69
1.69
1.69
1.69
1.70
1.70
1.70
1.71
1.71
1.71
1.72

SOURCE:

J. Durbin and G. S. Watson, “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression, II,” Biometrika 30 (1951), pp. 159–178. Reproduced by permission of the
Biometrika Trustees.

741

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 742 19/11/13 8:53 AM f-500

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.9C Critical Values for the Durbin–Watson d Statistic (a 5 .01)

k51

k52

k53

k54

k55

n

dL,.01

dU,.01

dL,.01

dU,.01

dL,.01

dU,.01

dL,.01

dU,.01

dL,.01

dU,.01

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100

0.81
0.84
0.87
0.90
0.93
0.95
0.97
1.00
1.02
1.04
1.05
1.07
1.09
1.10
1.12
1.13
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.24
1.25
1.29
1.32
1.36
1.38
1.41
1.43
1.45
1.47
1,48
1.50
1.51
1.52

1.07
1.09
1.10
1.12
1.13
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.19
1.20
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.29
1.30
1.31
1.32
1.32
1.33
1.34
1.34
1.38
1.40
1.43
1.45
1.47
1.49
1.50
1.52
1.53
1.54
1.55
1.56

0.70
0.74
0.77
0.80
0.83
0.86
0.89
0.91
0.94
0.96
0.98
1.00
1.02
1.04
1.05
1.07
1.08
1.10
1.11
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.18
1.19
1.20
1.24
1.28
1.32
1.35
1.38
1.40
1.42
1.44
1.46
1.47
1.49
1.50

1.25
1.25
1.25
1.26
1.26
1.27
1.27
1.28
1.29
1.30
1.30
1.31
1.32
1.32
1.33
1.34
1.34
1.35
1.36
1.36
1.37
1.38
1.38
1.39
1.39
1.40
1.42
1.45
1.47
1.48
1.50
1.52
1.53
1.54
1.55
1.56
1.57
1.58

0.59
0.63
0.67
0.71
0.74
0.77
0.80
0.83
0.86
0.88
0.90
0.93
0.95
0.97
0.99
1.01
1.02
1.04
1.05
1.07
1.08
1.10
1.11
1.12
1.14
1.15
1.20
1.24
1.28
1.32
1.35
1.37
1.39
1.42
1.43
1.45
1.47
1.48

1.46
1.44
1.43
1.42
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.40
1.40
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.42
1.42
1.42
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.44
1.44
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.46
1.48
1.49
1.51
1.52
1.53
1.55
1.56
1.57
1.58
1.59
1.60
1.60

0.49
0.53
0.57
0.61
0.65
0.68
0.72
0.75
0.77
0.80
0.83
0.85
0.88
0.90
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
1.00
1.01
1.03
1.04
1.06
1.07
1.09
1.10
1.16
1.20
1.25
1.28
1.31
1.34
1.37
1.39
1.41
1.43
1.45
1.46

1.70
1.66
1.63
1.60
1.58
1.57
1.55
1.54
1.53
1.53
1.52
1.52
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.52
1.52
1.52
1.53
1.54
1.55
1.56
1.57
1.58
1.59
1.60
1.60
1.61
1.62
1.63

0.39
0.44
0.48
0.52
0.56
0.60
0.63
0.66
0.70
0.72
0.75
0.78
0.81
0.83
0.85
0.88
0.90
0.92
0.94
0.95
0.97
0.99
1.00
1.02
1.03
1.05
1.11
1.16
1.21
1.25
1.28
1.31
1.34
1.36
1.39
1.41
1.42
1.44

1.96
1.90
1.85
1.80
1.77
1.74
1.71
1.69
1.67
1.66
1.65
1.64
1.63
1.62
1.61
1.61
1.60
1.60
1.59
1.59
1.59
1.59
1.59
1.58
1.58
1.58
1.58
1.59
1.59
1.60
1.61
1.61
1.62
1.62
1.63
1.64
1.64
1.65

SOURCE:

J. Durbin and G. S. Watson, “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression, II,” Biometrika 30 (1951), pp. 159–178. Reproduced by permission of the
Biometrika Trustees.

742

Lin20522_appb_726-743.indd Page 743 28/10/13 11:55 AM user-f-w-198

/201/MH02018/Lin20522_disk1of1/0078020522/Lin20522_pagefiles

B.10 Factors for Control Charts

Chart for
Averages

Chart for
Ranges

Number of
Items in
Sample,
n

Factors for
Control Limits
A2

d2

D3

D4

2
3
4
5

1.880
1.023
.729
.577

1.128
1.693
2.059
2.326

0
0
0
0

3.267
2.575
2.282
2.115

6
7
8
9
10

.483
.419
.373
.337
.308

2.534
2.704
2.847
2.970
3.078

0
.076
.136
.184
.223

2.004
1.924
1.864
1.816
1.777

11
12
13
14
15

.285
.266
.249
.235
.223

3.173
3.258
3.336
3.407
3.472

.256
.284
.308
.329
.348

1.744
1.716
1.692
1.671
1.652

Factors for
Central Line

Factors for
Control Limits

SOURCE:

Adapted from American Society for Testing and Materials, Manual on
Quality Control of Materials, 1951, Table B2, p. 115. For a more detailed table and explanation, see J. Duncan Acheson, Quality Control and Industrial Statistics,
3d ed. (Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1974), Table M, p. 927.

743

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Comput

...Time Table:- Bimal Sir:- 6:00pm to 8:00pm (Sunday). Sarangi Sir:- 4:00pm to 5:30pm (Sunday). 3:30pm to 5:30pm (Wednesday). Bisoi Sir:- 3:30pm to 5:00pm (Monday). 3:30pm to 5:00pm (Tuesday). Rita Madam:- 4:30pm to 5:45pm (Thrusday). 4:30pm to 5:45pm (Friday). Madhu Madam:- 6:00pm to 8:00pm (Tuesday). Monday Timetable:- 4:00am to 5:00am= Jogging 5:00am to 5:30am=Exercising 5:30am to 6:15am=School Study 6:15am to 7:00am=School Ready Time 7:00am to 2:00pm=School Time 2:00pm to 2:45pm=Rest to sleep 2:45pm to 3:30pm=Tuition Ready 3:30pm to 5:00pm=Physics Tuition 5:30pm to 6:45pm=Relax Time 6:45pm to 7:00pm=Tiffin 7:00pm to 10:30pm=Study Time 10:00pm to 4:00am=Sleep…………. Tuesday Timetable:- 4:00am to 5:00am= Jogging 5:00am to 5:30am=Exercising 5:30am to 6:15am=School Study 6:15am to 7:00am=School Ready Time 7:00am to 2:00pm=School Time 2:00pm to 2:45pm=Rest to sleep 2:45pm to 3:30pm=Tuition Ready 3:30pm to 5:00pm=Physics Tuition 5:00pm to 5:45pm=Tiffin 6:00pm to 8:00pm=Biology Tuition 8:30pm to 10:30pm=Study Time 10:00pm to 4:00am=Sleep…………. Wednesday Timetable:- 4:00am to 5:00am= Jogging 5:00am to 5:30am=Exercising 5:30am to 6:15am=School Study 6:15am to 7:00am=School Ready Time 7:00am to 2:00pm=School Time 2:00pm to 2:45pm=Rest to sleep 2:45pm to 3:30pm=Tuition Ready 3:30pm to 5:30pm=Mathematics Tuition 5:30pm to 6:45pm=Relax Time 6:45pm...

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

International Business

...Dear Sir / Madam, I am college student at TheUniversity in Germany, where I follow “International Business and Management Studies” . For one of my courses, I have an assignment to interview a company where ICT is used significantly. The first thing that came in my head when I wanted to start this assignment was “Facebook”. Facebook has become one of the leading social network in the world. But behind this great company lies a mass of people who have realized it, and today employees do their best to improve this network. My mission for my course is to have an interview with a company like yours. For my assignment I made a few questions, I will be pleased if you can answer them. 1. Which operating system is currently being used, are there plans to change or update in the future? If so which new operating system will be used and when? 2. Which Office Application system is currently being used? Indicate the presentation of workers who use each application, (for example e-mail (Outlook) -100%) Are there plans to upgrade or change, if so when? 3. Which other ICT applications are used within the company and why? (Think about databases, CRMs, portals) 4. Where does the company see the future going to (in regards to ICT) 5. Does the company encourage home-workers and what facilities do they offer. 6. When an employee starts working (graduation at HBO level) what ICT skills are important for that employee to have. And if you can give a short interview about yourself...

Words: 300 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

G 20 Major Economies of World

...G-20‬‬‬‬‬‬ Major economies‬ Project by: Sahib Deol Sec. A Sem. 3 DECLARATION I, Sahib Deol, student of BBA 3nd Semester of SCMS (UG) NOIDA, hereby declare that the Project on “ G-20 Major Economies” is for the partial fulfillment of course objectives for the BBA Degree. I assure that this project is the result of my own efforts and all the information and facts furnished in this Project are based on our intensive study. Date: 15/10/2012 Name:Sahib Deol Place: Noida Introduction The Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (also known as the G-20, G20, and Group of Twenty) is a group of finance ministers and central bank governors from 20 major economies: 19 countries plus the European Union, which is represented by the President of the European Council and by the European Central Bank. The G-20 heads of government or heads of state have also periodically conferred at summits since their initial meeting in 2008. Collectively, the G-20 economies account for more than 80 percent of the gross world product (GWP),00 80 percent of world trade (including EU intra-trade), and two-thirds of the world population. They furthermore account for 84.1 percent and 82.2 percent of the world's economic growth by nominal GDP and GDP (PPP) respectively from the years 2010 to 2016, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The G-20 was proposed by former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin[5] as a forum for...

Words: 2713 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Banning of the Burqa in France

...In 2010, 335 out of 557 members of the French National Assembly voted to approve a bill that would ban the wearing of a traditional Islamic full veil in public. One member voted against the bill, and the other 221 members abstained from voting, so when the bill went to the Senate for a final vote, they already had a seemingly good grasp on the support level they would get if the law were passed. On April 9, 2011, however, a group of 61 protestors against the law had to be taken away in police vans and detained. While the majority of the French population is not affected by this law, a small group of Muslim women (and a pool of potential tourist) are. In 2009, French President, Nicholas Sarkozy made a statement claiming that religious face veils were “not welcome” in France because they goes against the country’s secular values ("French Senate Bans Burqa: Bill awaits President Nicholas Sarkozy’s signature" September 14, 2010). This essentially sparked the discussion and consideration of a banning on religious face veils, namely traditional Muslim burqas and niqabs. The rationale behind the banning is that it not only goes against the countries secular values of equality and dignity, but it also “imprisons women” and causes a safety issue for the citizens of the country (Ristici April 11, 2011). While freedom of religion and religious expression is practiced in France, the law under which the ban exists was passed with the reasoning that it made the nation’s citizen to feel threatened...

Words: 1941 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Principios de La Propaganda

...desde todo ángulo, más que todo por estar dirigido a un target general sin edad en específico, inclusive dirigida a personas que no tengan las herramientas que todos deberíamos de tener , como leer y escribir. La persuasión y manipulación que llegan a tener un resultado positivo en la mayoria de la población venezolana.  Once principios diferentes se utilizan para realizar estas propagandas. Dirigiéndonos específicamente hacia las campañas políticas que han hecho el actual gobierno de Venezuela, en sus momentos de campaña los años anteriores; es el vivo ejemplo de la efectiva de estos principios durante sus campañas posteriormente que mencionaremos.  Análisis de los principios de la propaganda dentro de la campaña presidencial 2013 de Nicolás Maduro 1- Principio simplificación o enemigo único: Calificar al adversario utilizando una idea eje como forma de ataque. Diosdado Cabello asegura que MCM “es la escogida para liderar la punta del tridente del mal” En este decreto por parte de Cabello, queda insinuado que Machado es la escogida por el gobierno americano para liderar la punta del tridente, “ella está en la puntica pues”, en referencia a la “trilogía del mal” que ha denunciado en las últimas alocuciones y que estaría integrada por representantes de la oposición venezolana. Link: http://www.noticias24.com/venezuela/noticia/204537/asegura-que-mcm-es-la-escogida-por-ee-uu-para-liderar-la-punta-del-tridente-del-mal/ 2- Principio del método de...

Words: 1695 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Nicolas Poussin Research Paper

...Nicolas Poussin was born to Jean Poussin and Marie de Laisement on June 15, 1594 in Les Andesys, Normandy. His father was a nobleman who served in the Tavanes regiment under Kings Charles IX, Henry III, and Henry IV. Due to a lack of monarchial funds during this time, Jean had to cover the cost of his armor, horse, and other necessities which ultimately left him poor by the time he left the regiment. Although Nicolas’ family was considered impoverished nobility, Nicolas was educated in Latin, letters and the sciences. Nicolas was gifted in drawing and his gift was recognized by Quentin Varin while he visited Les Andesys in 1611 and 1612, ultimately Varin became his first teacher. In 1612 Nicolas left for Paris, while in Paris he studied anatomy,...

Words: 900 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Case Study

...the scene seems as if the movie is taking place in our world and next something terribly random happens, which would never happen in reality and it makes you question yourself what world this is in. Blurring the line between the two makes a movie harder to follow unless it’s consistent so it actually can make sense as long as your watching the movie. The Conan Brothers did an excellent job in doing so in Raising Arizona, the blurred line between reality and fantasy makes the movie more enjoyable. There are some scenes where they are so ridiculous you can’t help but laugh, without the use of this style it could have made the movie more serious and may have not been as comical. The Main character Herbert McDunnough (“Hi”) is played by Nicolas Cage who also narrates the entire film. Herbert is a criminal who sticks up grocery stores, he is married to a policewomen named Edwina McDunnough (“Ed”) played by Holly Hunter. The two quickly fall in love after she was taking mugshots of Herbert, the couple get married after Hi proposes to her after his most recent release from prison, the two move into a arizonan mobile home in the desert. They find out Ed is infertile and because of Hi’s criminal record they are unable to adopt. They resort to stealing a child from a locally famous furniture salesman who happens to have quints. Herbert believes anyone with five children wouldn't miss one. Nathan Arizona is the famous furniture salesman and father who puts up a hefty reward for the child's...

Words: 761 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Moon Struck

...Bad luck seems to linger amongst the Castorini family and Cammareri which seems to guide the movie into a romantic and uncanny comedy that takes place in New York City. Loretta Castorini believes that having gotten married at City Hall with her late husband, who has been hit by a bus and has passed away, cursed her. Now that Loretta’s current boyfriend has proposed, she has decided to marry him because he is nice and she would like to do it the correct way this time. Loretta seems to feel cursed again after the proposal because Johnny Cammareri got a phone call that his mother is now ill and has to leave. Before he left he gave Loretta a task, which was to invite him to the wedding and mend things between him and his younger brother Ronny Cammareri who works in a bakery. In this scene where Loretta confronts Ronny, there was so much emotion and finding out why him and his older brother do not get along was quite heart breaking. Ronny’s hand was maimed in the slicer because, Johnny asked him for some bread and wasn’t paying attention then Ronny’s girl at the time left him for another man because of the incident, Heartbroken, he decides to direct that rage on his brother because, it was Johnny’s fault. Ronny so, enraged for his brother taking “his life”, has an intense argument with Loretta. When things cool down, they both go up to his apartment to have a serious conversation. This is where things get so heated, I wasn’t sure I was gonna live through the scene. Something...

Words: 524 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Leadership

...of the financial crisis, helping to foster international policies related to financial supervision and regulation and to strengthen global economic governance. As Chairman of the G-20 when France took over its presidency for the year 2011, she launched a wide-ranging work agenda on the reform of the international monetary system. In 2014, Lagarde was ranked the 5th most powerful woman in the world by Forbes magazine. Lagarde has been involved in a couple of controversies through her career as a politician and as the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund. Christine Lagarde faced controversy after French judges said she appeared to be "personally" involved in a decision to approve a pay out to a friend of Nicolas Sarkozy when she was the finance minister. The head of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, has been charged with "simple negligence" over her handling of a controversial €400m pay out to French business tycoon Bernard Tapie. Lagarde announced that she had been placed under investigation by a magistrate on Tuesday – the French equivalent of being charged in the UK – after being questioned for 15 hours at the court of justice in Paris, which deals...

Words: 472 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

French Affair with London

...The French love affair with London Will the British and the French ever understand each other? “Rosbifs” are well known as the discoverer of binge drinking, they are awful cook and hypocritical. On the other side of the Channel, the “Froggies” are uppity, unclean and always on strike. Both keep clichés going and issues of dispute are not lacking as the debate between Sarkozy and Cameron at one of the last European convention demonstrated. Jean Guiffan has supported in Histoire de l’anglophonie en France (2004) that almost 15% of the French people declared not to trust their neighbours across the Channel. On the other hand, they demonstrate respect for each other when they walked hand-in-hand through les Champs-Elysées to celebrate the centenary of the Entente Cordiale in 2004. Part of our common history would make us think that French and English people do not get along but the French community in London is one of the most extensive and well established around Great Britain. At first sight, some cultural differences may simply be too wide to bridge. It is not easy to ignore the ancient rivalry when the station of the Eurostar in London is called Waterloo. William the Conqueror, Jean of Arc, the Hundred Years’ War, the Napoleonic Wars, and the race for colonies: from the cradle, French and English people feed their hard feelings. For example, “Son of British” was a common insult in Middle Ages in France (Zeldin, 2002). Anglophobia was an heirloom handed down from generation...

Words: 2505 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Explain How Marketers Can Influence Consumers at Each Stage of the Logical Flow Model

...EXPLAIN HOW MARKETERS CAN INFLUENCE CONSUMERS AT EACH STAGE OF THE LOGICAL FLOW MODEL The logical flow model is a series of sequential steps that a consumer goes through when buying a product. The different steps are Problem recognition, external search, evaluation of alternatives, product choice and post purchase evaluation. Purchase decision differs therefore the amount of effort we put for each steps will differ accordingly, that’s why some of the steps are more important than others. Sometimes the decision making process is done automatically, this is when usually little information is needed, some other time purchase decision can be real hard, this usually for an important purchase like for example a house. Purchase decision is nowadays more and more difficult in view of ‘consumer hyperchoice’ (Solomon, Bamossy, Askegaard, Hogg, 2010). The logical flow model should be well studied by marketers so as to understand how consumers get the information, which criteria consumers use to make product or service choice, so that they can find more ways to influence the consumers. ‘companies [will] then develop products or services that emphasize the appropriate attributes, and marketers can tailor promotional strategies to deliver the types of information consumers are most likely to desire, via best channels, and in the most effective formats. ‘ (Solomon et al. 2010). This is not as easy as consumers simply do not go through all the steps of the logical flow, therefore it’s important...

Words: 2297 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

They Cariiedd Something

...The saga of Italian reporter Giuliana Sgrena, held for a month by kidnappers in Iraq and then shot by U.S. soldiers as she made her escape, is just another bizarre chapter in the continuing story of how President Bush's invasion of Iraq has put America behind the international eight ball. The wounding of Ms. Sgrena and the killing of her rescuer, Italian intelligence agent Nicola Calipari, triggered massive mourning in Rome and intensified simmering anti-American sentiment in Italy, where public opposition to the invasion clashes with official government backing. Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, one of Mr. Bush's staunchest supporters on the war, has asked the U.S. Embassy for an explanation of the affair, in which the car carrying Ms. Sgrena and Mr. Calipari to the Baghdad airport was fired upon as it drove - or sped - through a highway checkpoint. The initial U.S. explanation was that the car was bearing down on the checkpoint at high speed and that the U.S. troops, fearful of another suicide car bombing and uninformed by the Italians of the car's mission, took customary defensive action when the driver of the car ignored commands to stop. That may be true, and perhaps a failure of communication was at fault. But in the court of public opinion in Italy and much of Europe, the incident only rekindles hostility toward the Americans for starting a war that they have not yet been able to finish. The string of unintended consequences, from the liberation that...

Words: 291 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Family Man

...“The Family Man”: Film Essay by Kara Douglas Eng 101, section 20650 Dr. S. Federico April 19, 2010 “The Family Man”: Film Essay Do you like movies that show you how someone’s life could have been had they done things a different way? Are romantic comedies what peak your interest? Then The Family Man (2000) is the next movie you should watch. With the help of a magnificent cast, an uncomplicated plot, and captivating dialogue this movie is bound to become a classic. Directed by Brett Ratner, this movie follows in the footsteps of It’s a Wonderful Life and A Christmas Carol. All of these films start with the main character living life one way, going back through time and seeing things in a different way which leaves them wanting to change the way they currently live their lives. Nicholas Cage and Téa Leoni’s characters complement each other fantastically. They really make you feel like the characters are truly in love. Cage, who plays Jack Campbell a president on Wall Street whose life completely changes in one night, really made the character feel like a real person. Viewers are able to believe his story. You actually see him coming into his own as this "new" person. His newfound responsibilities are quite humorous and easy to chuckle at. Jack deals with the problems a true family man would. Kate on the other hand, played by Leoni, is a pro-bono lawyer. She helps him get through the days, although she doesn’t know why he...

Words: 790 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Wto Agreement on Agriculture Incentives

...A report in the Financial Times by John Thornhill leads with a remarkable quote from French President Nicolas Sarkozy warning the EU that he would block a proposed World Trade Organization (WTO) agreement on agriculture that would reduce European production incentives: In a world where there are 800m poor people who cannot satisfy their hunger and where a kid dies every 30 seconds from hunger, I will never accept a reduction in agricultural production on the altar of global liberalism. President Sarkozy is happy to have French farmers feed poor, hungry people in developing countries, but not happy to have those people improve their livelihoods by competing with French farmers on a level playing field. According to the OECD, between a quarter and a third of European Union farm receipts in recent years are the result of government subsidies and price support programs. Until the recent price spikes, one effect of the generous farm subsidies provided by Europe, the United States, Japan and other rich countries was to push down world prices, thereby depressing the incomes of farmers in countries that could not afford such largesse and reducing incentives for farmers in those countries to produce more domestically. France has been one of the strongest advocates of retaining these trade-distorting policies. With elections in the United States this fall and in India next year, the barely alive Doha Round of international trade negotiations is facing a long hiatus or even failure...

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

France

...France If there was one thing at the forefront of the minds of French voters, with the upcoming presidential election, it would be the current economic crisis focusing mainly on the failing euro. (Hey, Big Spender) This paper will summarize three articles that relate to the failing euro and the French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s role in this issue, part of a possible solution of getting it back on track in “Going Dutch” by Martin Feldstien, in the “The Failure of the Euro” from Foreign Affairs, “Hey, Big Spender” from The Economist, and Eduardo Cue, in the “Prospects Are Good for New Plan from Merkel,Sarkozy” from U.S. News and World Report. European nations are required to become integrated and unified as a whole to participate and enhance Europe’s role in world affairs abroad. One of the main ideas to begin this integration was the trial of creating a unified currency system that is now increasingly being recognized as a experiment that has vehemently failed. This failure was not an accident or the result of bureaucratic mismanagement but rather the inevitable consequences of imposing a single currency on a very heterogeneous group of countries. The adverse consequences of the failing euro on the European economies include the current debt crises, fragile conditions of numerous banks, high levels of unemployment, and large trade deficits. (Feldstein) Lately, worries about the stability of the euro reached a high as Italy's bond yield, indicative of the rate it would pay...

Words: 651 - Pages: 3