. For example, in an article titled “Subsistence Hunting in Alaska” describes the importance of this type of hunting by proclaiming, “For most rural Alaska residents, subsistence hunting is critical to their nutrition, food security, and economic stability. In many rural areas, subsistence hunting, similar to subsistence fishing, is considered part of normal routine of work” (“Subsistence Hunting, Alaska” 1). Basically, what the author is saying here is that without subsistence hunting in their culture it would be hard for them to survive. It emphasizes that it is a “normal routine of work” (“Subsistence Hunting, Alaska” 1). The majority of the American population uses some sort of vehicle to arrive from point A to point B almost daily, it …show more content…
Which can be true, some people like to kill animals and let it lay, while other hunt for trophies. While both are exceedingly unethical, yet the world lets it happen. Although, it is legal is most countries still, trophy hunting is illegal in Botswana. PETA, which stands for, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, addresses on their website that “Botswana has set a wonderful example for how governments can take real action to help animals” (“Which African Country” 1). After this decision was made, it was hoping to be the start of a revolution. Killing animals for trophy is extremely unethical and is causing countless problems in our world; some believe that it is okay while others strongly disagree. Trophy hunting is what has gave hunting a bad reputation. What trophy really means is that people are hunting to show off the animal not to use it like subsistence hunters, or better the environment like therapeutic hunters. Trophy hunters kill for fun. Even though some countries are banning it, some refuse because it bring in big bucks (money wise) into the country. But not only are some countries doing it but also airlines are taking part as well. In an article on the Humane Society International website it declares, “Since the killing of Cecil the lion in early July, 42 airlines have announced or reaffirmed bans on wildlife trophy shipments on their carriers” (“More Than 42” 1). Not only will this please the customers of these airlines. But, it will also make transporting the trophies a lot harder once obtained. To put it another way, trophy hunters will have to find an alternative route to ad from their hunting site. For many of these hunters it is out of driving distance, and even for some it is across oceans. With the airlines banning this, it will potentially force the hunter to think twice about their route and the expenses it will take. While some