...College Athletes Should be Paid Professional Athletes There are those that dispute that college athletes are just amateurs. Robert and Amy McCormick Cooper, law professors at Michigan State University, think it is definitely a job for football and basketball players on athletic scholarships at Division I schools (Cooper, 2011). The pair argue that under federal labor laws these athletes are “entitled to form unions and negotiate wages, hours and working conditions” (Cooper, 2011). The McCormick’s compare Division 1 football and basketball players to certain Brown University students, specifically graduate assistants who were found to be employees under common law and the NLRB's 2004 decision. Common law was applied using three tests, (1) the right of others to control a person's activities, (2) whether that person...
Words: 660 - Pages: 3
...College should take so many money from student who play athletes and other sports like football, basketball. College should not have to pay for playing athletes because sports is a talent that some students have . And I think only some students have that kind of sports talent that they want to fulfilled in their life. So, college should not have to pay for playing athletes. The students have to pay $5,000 per year. College athletics coach earn $4.2 million every year. Student's parents should pay for their child and spend their saving money. College athletes make billions of dollar every year. They make money by doing T.V advertising, radio, newspaper, marketing, ticket sale and many more. By doing this they attract students attention towards...
Words: 353 - Pages: 2
...College sports has grown extremely popular amongst among Americans in the course of recent decades. This has given expanded incomes for the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the taking an interest schools which has fuelled the discussion of whether school competitors ought to be compensated past their athletic grants. Competitors shape the essential part of intercollegiate games. Regardless of the achievement of NCAA competitions, competitors don't get any money. The fundamental reasons fronted by the NCAA for absence of payment are that it needs to keep up its beginner status and that paying would trade off the honesty of intercollegiate games. It has expanded its benefits through the offer of stock, TV rights and licenses for...
Words: 1963 - Pages: 8
...arguing whether college athletes should be paid to play sports. These athletes received many scholarships for sports and other academic reasons. Scholarships are money towards one's college fund to go to school and play sports or for academics reasons (Amorose). Athletes that play sports at these Universities are a big insurance liability for the school and Athletic program (Harper). These facilities at the Universities have to put so much money towards the player's food and housing for them. College athletes should not get paid to play. Only two percent of college students receive a scholarship to play sports. This might seem like a pretty small ratio. But giving that 81 percent of high schoolers attend...
Words: 1601 - Pages: 7
...most likely sell his jersey for a decent profit, yet Edwards couldn’t even buy himself dinner. Division 1 athletes have a full plate in college with school and sports and the only help they get is a scholarship, yet that still does not give athletes any spending money because they can’t work during the year. All of their time is consumed, so they can’t do anything about it, and that...
Words: 1293 - Pages: 6
...players filed a petition fighting for their right to be paid as “employees” of their university. They filed this petition because they believed that due to the amount of time and work that they put in towards their football program they should be compensated for it. However, getting the opportunity to play a sport in college should be a privilege rather than a job, seeing as the sport is almost always one which you love to compete in and enjoy. After all, the only reason that these people are on a team is because their school and coaches offered them the chance to play, so why should they have the opportunity to get paid for it? Because of this, I believe that college athletes should...
Words: 715 - Pages: 3
...most debated issues in the world of sports is whether college football players should get paid for their performances. My honest opinion is that football players should receive a certain proportion of money because of the service that college athletes provide to the institution they attend. Nevertheless, college athletes should receive a certain amount of money each month or even every two weeks because scholarships are not enough. Scholarships only covers a certain portion of things such as classes and books. In addition, they should be rewarded in a reasonable manner after putting their bodies out on the line, bringing in a tremendous amount of money for their school, and the (NCAA)...
Words: 1358 - Pages: 6
...Doughty was a college football player with dreams of going to the league. On the day of the draft, Stanley and his parents patiently watched. Stanley’s name wasn’t called. It was a hard moment for him and his family. 10 minutes later he got a phone call from the Kansas City Chiefs asked him to be apart of their team. Within 2 weeks he was in Kansas City. He signed a 2 year contract for $400,000. Within 2 weeks he began training with the team. Doctors asked if he had been seriously injured, he answered no, thinking he hadn’t had any serious injuries. The Chiefs head trainer called him off the field. He let Stanley know he was playing with a cervical spinal injury, so he couldn’t play. The next day Stanley was headed home on a plane with questions...
Words: 1089 - Pages: 5
...or not to pay college athletes is an incredibly controversial topic. Everyone has a different opinion, which of course is no surprise. One must only look briefly into the subject to see there is an abundance of support for and against compensation. There are many flaws in the system concerning the concept of athlete compensation. When considering whether or not to pay college athletes, one must look at where the money would come from, how the NCAA is treating athletes, and if college athletes are primarily students. Understandably, the money’s source is a sizable concern when contemplating the possible payment of college athletes. Allen Sack does not spend much time focused on this in his article, but it is definitely an important facet of the discussion. Sack does, however suggest that maybe there is money being put towards advertising that could be better spent elsewhere. If this money was used more...
Words: 653 - Pages: 3
...psychological mechanisms of movement. I aspire to be part of a sports team’s medical staff in the future. This is the only thing I see myself doing in the future. I love sports and I am also interested in human anatomy. There is nothing else I am passionate about besides sports. I would prefer to work with an NCAA team. I also plan on minoring in Sports Management. I often think about the worldwide debate, should college athletes be paid? People argue that they are paid through free education, food and a place to stay. Others argue that they should be paid because they...
Words: 1628 - Pages: 7
...Did you know college athletes that go to Division one make their school millions of dollars? College athletes should get paid for playing on their athletic team. Some people say the athletes shouldn't get paid because they get scholarships. Athletes should get paid because they don't have time to get a part time job, they don't have time to form relationships, and they make money for the college. College players don't have enough time to get a part time job. Did you know that college players spend 43.3 hours a week dedicated to their sport (Jacobs). That's almost the amount of time someone works a week for their job. Those 43.3 hours are distributed over training sessions, games, travel and other required sessions, and they don't get paid...
Words: 397 - Pages: 2
...Why Should College Athletes Get Paid? Athletes are very important and strong and they always show it to their best ability. They are really hardworking and they show great help to the NBA/NFL. College athletes are hot topics of the universities nowadays. Athletes work for the challenge and competition. College athletes should be paid because their life is on line, great athletic skills, and, if they have really good potential and smart, lastly, they have to give support for the families. Even when College athletes are on the court or either on the field the game is in the players hand. When players play their lives are always on the line. In thought when they are playing the sport anything could happen. Some athletes have knee injuries and anything. Anything can happen when playing sports. Universities are big in names and it's really important to have the mind set and concentration of the game. To conclude hardworking athletes are the best athletes and when choosing your life over somethings that means it's very important. When athletes are playing the sports, they...
Words: 593 - Pages: 3
...Should College Athletes Be Paid a Salary? Being a college athlete is not only stressful but it is also a tiring job to maintain. Being an athlete comes with a huge amount of responsibilities, and with having responsibilities they tend to get in the way of having time to do anything else. On top of that it is harder for college athletes to maintain a job outside of school . Since most college athletes are busy maintaining their studies such as what they are majoring in and their sports, it makes it harder for them to fulfill their goals when they are student athletes. The only student athletes that have that support are students who come from a wealthy family which provide them with money to spend, however most athletes are not that fortunate, which is why colleges should pay their student athletes. College athletes should be paid not only because they are filled with dedication and determination towards school...
Words: 1681 - Pages: 7
...Matt Miller COM 210-003 Persuasive Speech 4/4/12 Topic: Should college athletes be paid to play sports? Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience why collegiate athletes should not be paid to play. Introduction Opening Comment: Image that you just scored the game-winning basket in the NCAA basketball tournament championship. Your shot just helped the school get tens of millions of dollars. Now by a show of hands, how many of you think that you should earn a share of that money? Central Idea: One of the most controversial and prominent topics in sports today is whether or not schools should pay their student-athletes to play their sports. I am going to argue as to why they should not be paid to play. Preview of Main Points: I will talk about five key reasons as to why collegiate athletes do not deserve to be paid to play. These are because of already established scholarships, would lead to decreased competition, the fact that there isn’t enough money for schools to give out already, a removal of innocence would occur, and recruiting would suffer among schools. Transition: First, I will explain why collegiate athletes already receive enough money from scholarships and free tuition. Body I. Tuition and the “Student” A. Already receiving thousands of dollars from athletic scholarships 1. According to a Parade Magazine article, Division I student athletes can receive between $20,000 and $50,000 per year. 2. A study done by...
Words: 1044 - Pages: 5
...Table of Contents 1 The Ethical Issue – Whether to Pay NCAA Football Student-Athletes 3 1.1 The Case For Maintaining the Current System - Not Paying NCAA Football Student-Athletes 4 1.2 The Case For Paying NCAA Football Student-Athletes 6 1.3 Conclusion 11 1.4 References 13 The Ethical Issue – Whether to Pay NCAA Football Student-Athletes Top college football programs make hundreds of millions of dollars in revenues each year, all without having to pay the people who actually play the game. Is it ethical for colleges to not pay their football stars for playing their hearts out on the field, building popular branding images for themselves and their school, and for the collective big-money earnings and prestige that often comes to their schools? Or is indirect payment to these players in the form of a free undergraduate education and college degree through an athletic scholarship sufficient enough? In the 2012 NFL season, 1,947 players played in at least one game. Of those, 62% attended college at one of the five “power conferences” in the U.S., and only one of those players did not attend college at all.[i] Donald Remy, the NCAA chief legal officer has said, “The NCAA’s rules do not force athletes who wish to be professionals to enroll in school,”[ii] yet premier NCAA schools clearly offer the best path to fulfilling these hopeful football players’ dreams. Nevertheless, despite the more opportunistic path of attending a Division...
Words: 4619 - Pages: 19
