George Curry presents a decent essay on the cruelty and gruesomeness of the symbol of the “noose” entitled, “Calling Nooses What They Are – Terrorism.” Curry’s background presents him as a qualified writer but he falls short in producing a strong argument because he lacks various components that set an argumentative form of writing aside from a more persuasive writing type.
Most of Curry’s essay consist of him siting proficient facts which are hugely conducive to his argument, but the fact is the majority of his essay is the statements of these facts and stories and common knowledge. Many things are questionable about Curry’s text which can make his audience “skeptical” of him and what he is presenting. Never in his writing does he qualify