Premium Essay

“the Bolshevik State Under Lenin Between 1918 and 1924 Was a Ruthless Dictatorship, Caring Little the Russian People.” to What Extent Do You Agree with This Statement?

In:

Submitted By josy
Words 1047
Pages 5
“The Bolshevik state under Lenin between 1918 and 1924 was a ruthless dictatorship, caring little the Russian people.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?

After having overthrown the weak Provisional Government in the October Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks had seized power in Russia. Although they were a quite small party, that at first only had power in Petrograd, they managed to gain support and power throughout the whole country, turning it into a Bolshevik dictatorship. (Oxford 113) This was only possible because of their driven leader, Lenin, their equally motivated military leader Trotsky and the promises they made to the soviet people. Some of these are: the most famous phrase: “Peace, Bread, Land”, which captured the needs of the people in three simple words, the promise of “Soviet Power” above all and the abolition of private property and redistribution of said property. (Oxford 115) Even though this seemed very promising and beneficial for the Russian people, the methods of the Bolsheviks were less than ethical and, even though promising that it was all for the people, very controversial.
The first thing to be determined, is whether Russia under the Bolsheviks was a dictatorship, and if so, a dictatorship of a single person, in this case Lenin, or the dictatorship of the whole party, Lenin’s role not being as important as historians have played it out to be. (Oxford 136) The Bolsheviks have not concealed the idea of making the country a dictatorship, but had said it to be a “dictatorship of the proletariat” (Oxford 114), meaning peasants would run the country, represented by the Bolsheviks. To do this, the Sovnarkom (Soviet of People’s Commissars) which was an organization of Bolshevik ministers, was put together. These ministers were to be elected, but were appointed by above over time. The Bolsheviks further played out their plan of

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Latin

...Lincoln High School IB History Internal Assessment Student Handbook Table of Contents What is the History IA? ­ ­ ­ Planning Your Historical Investigation ­ Examples of Types of Investigations ­ Examples of Research Questions ­ ­ Choice of Topic ­ ­ ­ ­ 20th Century ­ ­ ­ ­ History of the Americas ­ ­ Alternative ­ ­ ­ ­ The Written Account & Assessment Criteria A. Plan of the Investigation ­ ­ B. Summary of Evidence ­ ­ C. Evaluation of Sources ­ ­ D. Analysis ­ ­ ­ ­ E. Conclusion ­ ­ ­ F. Sources and Word Limit ­ ­ Sample History IAs ­ ­ ­ ­ 1­Trotsky and the Russian Civil War 2­US in Chile 3­Women in the French Revolution 4­Pre­WWI Alliances ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 4 7 9 ­ 10 11 12 13 14 14 ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 1 2 2 3 4 ­ ­ 10 ­ ­ 16 Information in this guide is gathered from a variety of sources, including, but not limited to: The IB History Course Guide, Oxford’s IB Skills and Practice, IBOCC, and anecdotal experience. What is the History IA? The History IA is your chance to explore a period, theme, or event in history that you are interested in. For full IB Candidates, it also serves as 20% of your final History Grade. The final paper will be assessed by your teacher, with a sampling sent off to IB for score moderation. The History IA asks you to use the full range of skills you have been taught in class. In particular: ● knowledge and understanding ● application and interpretation ● synthesis and evaluation...

Words: 14314 - Pages: 58

Free Essay

Politics

...Consensus Decision Making 123 Open, Friendly, and Respectful 136 Civil Disobedience 142 Epilogue 151 Notes 154 ©2002 by Howard Ryan. All rights reserved. Readers have my permission to use and distribute for non-profit and educational purposes. Critique of Nonviolent Politics 2 Preface (2002) Critique of Nonviolent Politics may be the only comprehensive critique of nonviolent theory that has been written. I wrote it between 1980 and 1984, while living in Berkeley, California. Since 1977, I had been active in the movement against nuclear power and weapons which, in California, focused its protests at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant near San Luis Obispo, and at the University of California's Lawrence Livermore Labs where nuclear weapons are designed. Nonviolence was the prevailing political theory in the movement, especially in the "direct action" wing which organized mass blockades and occupations at nuclear facilities. Nonviolence informed our tactics and strategies, our group processes, and our general ethos and outlook. As I engaged in the movement, I was drawn to nonviolent theory and became an avid...

Words: 74845 - Pages: 300