CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

INTRODUCTION
Leaderships is the capacity and will to rally men and women to a common purpose and the character which inspires confidence - Bernard Montgomery-
The widespread fascination with leadership may be because it is such mysterious process, as well as one that touches everyone’s life. The term leaderships mean different things to different people. It is a word taken from the common vocabulary and incorporated into the technical vocabulary of a scientific discipline without being précised redefined. As a consequence, it carries extraneous connotations the create ambiguity of meaning (Janda, 1960). Further confusion is cause by the use of other imprecise term such as power, authority, management administration, control and supervision to describe the same phenomena. Bennis (1959, p.259) surveyed the leadership literature and concluded:
Always, it seems, the concept of leaderships eludes us or turns up in another forms to taunt us again with its slipperiness and complexity. So we have invented and endless proliferation of terms to deal with it...and still the concept is not sufficient defined. Researchers usually define leaderships according to their individual perspective and the aspect of the phenomena of the most interest of them. After a comprehensive review of the leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p.259) concluded that “there are almost as many definition of leaderships as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept. “leaderships has been defined in terms of individual traits, behavior, influence over other people, interaction patterns, role of relationships, occupation of an administrative positions, and perceptions by others regarding legitimacy of influence. Some representative definitions over a quarter century are as follows: Leaderships is “interpersonal influence,