“The Franchise Feeds the Beast” is a movie review written by Manohla Dargis published in the New York Times. In the film review, Dargis shared her thoughts regarding the Jurassic World movie. She did not only express her opinion about the movie itself, but also the director and the helpers behind the movie. She attempts to tell people by saying that the movie was successful thanks to Steven Spielberg, even though he was not the director of the franchise. She begins the review by stating that Jurassic World was going to be a success from the start. For example, “Jurassic World comes with more muscle.” She adds, “One that’s been built on best-selling novels, three earlier flicks, theme-park attractions and the usual marketing tie-ins.” Then she goes on saying that the great film is amazing thanks to Steven Spielberg, but in reality he was not the director of Jurassic World. He was the director of the early Jurassic Park theme movies. The reader may perceive that she is a fan of …show more content…
He was one of the executive producers of the movie, which gives an explanation to the writer that her assumptions about Spielberg messing around with the directing may be true. Dargis goes on saying that the true director was taught well by Spielberg. The reader may think the same and her claims sort of make sense, but she does not give full credit to Steven Spielberg. The movie may have had a lot of helpers behind the scenes, but the true director is Colin Trevorrow. The writer talks about the director, “Mr. Trevorrow was principally tasked with delivering “Jurassic World” in salable shape, which he has done.” This does not go along with her Spielberg thoughts, which leads her to writing that he still shadows the movie directing. the writer is saying that Steven Spielberg set the bars to the movie since the beginning. Due to that a lot of the scenes were good because he has given examples to the new