...THE INDIAN REMOVAL ACT OF 1830 Migdalia Tuero HIST101: American History to 1877 Professor Kathleen Davis February 13, 2014 There are several historical events and issues that have impacted the contemporary political development among American history. In the history of America one of these groups are the Native Americans. The white man throughout the South called for a removal of the Indian peoples. They wanted the Native Indians to be resettled to the west because their presence created a problem for the white man who needed additional land for settlement. “The status of Native American peoples posed an equally complex political problem” (Henretta, Edwards, Self 2012, 302). Therefore, Andrew Jackson posed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This Act was passed on May 28, 1830 in order to authorize the president to give unsettled land in the west to the eastern state Indians as part of the removal from their land. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 removed the Native Americans from their rightful lands and it also is responsible for the deaths of 4000 Native American Indians. In 1830, the population in the states of Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi and, Florida amongst other southern states, were growing rapidly, therefore it appeared that the “removal to the West seemed the only way to protect Indian peoples from alcoholic devastation and financial exploitation and to preserve the Indians’ culture” (Henretta et al. 2012, 302). However, this was not the case and...
Words: 1123 - Pages: 5
...How would you feel if that one person you despise the most forced you to move out of your house all the way into a new state. This is what happened to the cherokee indians during 1830 when the indian removal act was signed. The cherokee had been living in Georgia for a hundred years before the first Georgians arrived and were forced to move west into Louisiana. There were many reasons for this act to happen however it was as if the Cherokee had no say against it. The government was very biased for its people and did little to support the cherokee. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not justified because the cherokees were getting kicked out of their own homelands, they were treated poorly, and only a small majority of the cherokee agreed with...
Words: 916 - Pages: 4
...the Indian Removal Act of 1830, it depicts the circumstances regarding towards the persecuted Indian tribes by the authorities of the United States when they were confronted with the enactment under compulsion. The prejudice endorsed by the U.S. towards the native Indian tribes inaugurated with the tenet of manifest destiny in the beginning of the 19th-century. The ideology primarily shapes the justification for the U.S to gradually expand their territory westward. However, the united states would have to be dealt with some...
Words: 988 - Pages: 4
...in American history have always been a fascinating subject. There have been reading assignments on Native American’s removal and resistance, Black Hawk and his rebellion, and Emerson’s letter to President Van Buren. These pieces gave us a brief overview of America’s goals at the time, the action they took to achieve these goals, the Native Americans’ reaction, and the opinions held by the American people. These readings only scratched the surface of Native Americans and the role they have played in American History. The main cause of the interaction between Americans and the Native Americans was an increase in demand for land by Americans. As they pushed west and south, the frequency of interactions with Native Americans increased and so did hostility. I am aware that land demand issues were normally approached at first with peaceful negations. The American government would meet with the tribes and develop a treaty that resulted in less land for the Native Americans and more land for Americans. This would satisfy the Americans for a period of time but demand for land would just continue to increase. At this point Indians would either get restless and rebellions would ensue or Americans would violate the treaties and make moves on the Native’s land. In either situation the superior force of the American troops would result in them defeating the Indians. The Indians would then be forced to comply with American demands, meaning less land. Although this is a broad and brief overview...
Words: 2235 - Pages: 9
...miles of land, would you agree to move away from home? For most of the Cherokee during the earlier 1800’s, the answer to this question was a firm no. During that time period, the United States government had been attempting to move Native American tribes west into their newly purchased Louisiana Territory. Previously, the Cherokee had sided against them in many wars, and had expressed violent attacks against them. The government wanted to move them off of their Georgia land. This caused the Indian Removal Act to be created. The president, Andrew Jackson at the time, suddenly had the power to negotiate treaties with Native Americans that would move them into Indian Territory. While many...
Words: 1448 - Pages: 6
...Entry: The Indian Removal Act We all have heard the historical accounts of Jackson’s President era; from academics and from non-academic sources such as T.V. programming and they have given some attention to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Act affected Native Americans living in the United States east of the Mississippi, by forcing them to move west of the Mississippi. (Cave, 2003) Few people are aware that Jackson’s administration had violated the guarantees that were granted by the Indian Removal Act legislation that had in turn granted the authorized removal (Schultz, 2014). Most accounts have given majority of focus on the removal process with little to no attention to what the law allowed and physical actions that had been taken by Jackson’s administration (Cave, 2003). Congress officially passed The Indian Removal Act in 1830 (Schultz, 2014). The Removal Act never granted authorization for land treaties to Native American tribes or the forced relocation of Native American Indians east of the Mississippi. Some consider the actions to have been an abuse of presidential power by President Jackson (Cave, 2003). President Jackson gave false impressions to Congress to achieve his desired result of removing Native Americans from their land so that white man could settle land that was perfect for farming (Schultz, 2914). In conclusion, this grabbed the author’s attention because of the nature of how the actions had unfolded. The Indian Removal Act seemed to have...
Words: 359 - Pages: 2
...Critical Thinking Essay (Indian Removal Act) As the 19th century began, Americans who had their eyes set on new unclaimed land poured into the south and began heading towards present day Alabama. Since the Indian tribes living there seemed to be the main thing prohibiting the expansion, white settlers petitioned the federal government to remove them from the land. In his 1829 State of the Union address, President Jackson called for the removal of Native Americans from their tribal lands. Andrew Jackson wanted to renew a policy of political and military action for the removal of the Indians from these lands and worked towards creating a law for Indian removal. The Indian Removal Act was put in place to give to the southern states access to the land that Indians had formerly settled on (U.S. Department of State). The Indian Removal Act brought many issues to the table. Such as whether it was constitutional, who had the authority to pass what, and could it be done peacefully. In 1823, a case, Johnson v. M’Intosh, which was fighting for Indian’s rights, was brought before the...
Words: 775 - Pages: 4
...During the 1830s and 1840s in America, there were several political events that divided the nation. Three of these were the abolishment of the Second Bank of the United States, the signing of the Indian Removal Act, and the abolitionists' antislavery offensive in 1835. One point of national controversy was regarding the existence of a national bank. The First Bank of the United States was a centralized, national bank chartered in 1791 for a term of 20 years. Its purpose was to hold federal funds and help stabilize the country's finances. When the bank's charter expired in 1811, Congress created a Second Bank of the United States whose charter was to expire in 1836. President Jackson was distrustful of banks and was very much opposed to having a federal bank. When Senator Henry Clay proposed an early rechartering of the bank in 1832, the bill was passed in Congress but vetoed by President Jackson. According to Jackson, the federal bank was unauthorized by the Constitution and destructive to states' and individual rights. This was the beginning of what came to be known as the Bank War. Those who were in favor of the bank tended to be bankers, developers, and those in the business community. Since the wealthy were the ones who had the most to gain by having a national bank, the bank gained a reputation for being pro-aristocracy and against the common man. Those in the Senate who supported the bank were angered by this move and censured Jackson, but the censure was eventually removed...
Words: 747 - Pages: 3
...Indian Removal Act of 1830 Essay By: Hayden Yackeren Although many people thought the Native Americans were the Americans allies, they weren’t always. They took the side of our enemies during wars that changed history. One war in particular, 620,000 lives were brutally taken from their friends and family, and the Cherokee were a big part of that. Later, we took over their land and told them to stay and abide by our laws, or move to a reservation. Most Indians went to the reservation, which was bigger than where they previously resided, but the Cherokee were a stubborn tribe who didn’t want to do either. The movement to get the Indians out was called the Indian Removal act of 1830. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians got to keep a majority of their...
Words: 850 - Pages: 4
...The Indian Removal act was not only a symbol in American History but really devastating. The Native Americans that lived in the 1800s especially the 1830s have endured the worst things possible and we didn’t have too because of our own selfish needs. But that’s not all how and why did the Indian Removal act have caused the war and there is more to talk about. Claim The Indian Removal act was important, it was significant to American History, and led to the Civil War. Reason The Indian Removal act was significant to American History because it allows Native a Americans to own that land and keep it from harm, and it led to the Civil War because of fugitive slaves. The Indian removal act was important because it led to the eviction of over...
Words: 693 - Pages: 3
...Even though the Five Civilized Tribes began adopting the ways of the white settlers, their land was valuable to the white settlers. This land was fertile and good for growing cotton. Gold was found on the land and was wanted by the white settlers. Other white settlers wanted the land to sell to make a profit. The white settlers wanted the Native Americans off their tribal land and fully supported their removal. Also, President Andrew Jackson believed white settlement on these lands would improve the...
Words: 932 - Pages: 4
...his stubborn support of Indian removal provoked controversy not only in the Indian tribes, but also among the American community. Jackson's refusal to respect the independence of the Cherokee tribe, allowed the state of Georgia to assert its jurisdiction over the Cherokees. With Andrew Jackson's assistance, Indian Removal Act of 1830 was passed which authorized the relocation of eastern Indian tribes to lands west of the Mississippi River. President Andrew Jackson was the main supporter of the removal of Indian tribes in order to give their lands to whites. Cherokee Nation was forced from its land, mainly as a result of the discovery of gold within their territory. Both the white Americans and the Cherokees had various opinions on Indian removal - some opposed and many supported it with a range of different arguments. Insatiable craving for foreign soil remained the primary cause, even though many people believed that the removal of Indians was the only way to save them from the extinction. While the Indians lived in close proximity to whites, they died as a result of...
Words: 1330 - Pages: 6
...respect to American Indians, in which tensions between the federal government and natives created a complex trust relationship. The election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 ushered in an era marked by a growing demand to expand westward for political and economic opportunities for the common, white man. By the early 1830s, the U.S. government’s relationship with Indian tribes had changed and President Jackson had come to view the tribes as obstacles to American expansion. Consequently, President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law in 1830, authorizing him to negotiate with the Indians for their removal to federal territories west of the Mississippi in exchange for their homeland. While most historians are in...
Words: 573 - Pages: 3
...being scalped alive by the Indian Cherokee tribe, sounds painful right? The Cherokees were an Indian tribe living in Georgia, already U.S. territory at that time. There was an Indian removal act signed and put into action by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. No, the Cherokee’s weren’t forced out of Georgia without anything to take with them, they were offered a different part of land in America along with $5 million. The 1830 Indian Removal Act was greatly justified because America got the land they purchased back, there were no more torturous and violent acts placed on Americans, and there was one less thing for Americans to worry about knowing the Indians were moved off their land. First of all, America was finally free of the violence placed on them by the Indians. The Americans had adults and children being tortured by the Cherokees, one way...
Words: 527 - Pages: 3
...the nation came into frequent contact with the various Native American tribes through the South-Eastern parts of the country. The main tribes; Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole had to be relocated west, opening twenty-five million acres of land to white settlers. The discover of the “New World” by European explorers caused endless problems for Native American Indians. First contact between the Europeans and Native Americans, resulted from the expedition of Hernando de Solo in 1540. De Solo took captives for slave labor, and left new diseases that the Native Americans encountered that began to dramatically decrease their populations. Even after the American...
Words: 1224 - Pages: 5
