...World War I was known as the Great War and the War to End All Wars. It lasted from July 28, 1914 to November 11, 1918. The main trigger for the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferninand of Austria along with more things. For example, the Triple Entente also triggered the war. The countries in the Triple Entente were Great Britain, Russia, and France. This resulted in Russia going to war with Austria. Another one of the causes was nationalism. Nationalism basically showed the loyalty that someone had for its country and some people took it very seriously which eventually led to more wars. In addition militarism was a cause of war because countries tried to have a strong military but for example Germany tried doing that and England...
Words: 394 - Pages: 2
...World War I was the first big war in the 20th century. World War I started with an assassination, and more countries got involved. On June 28, 1914 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand was murdered in Sarajveo, at the Capital of Bosnia- Herzegovina, Bosnia was one of Austria- Hungary’s shires. The Austrian Government thought that Serbia was behind the murder of their Archduke and declared war. The most significant cause of WWI starting was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. The Assassination of Franz- Ferdinand set off a fast chain of events, that chain of events included Austria- Hungary, which blamed the Serbian government for the attack and anticipated to use the incident as justification. As Russia supported Serbia, an Austria-...
Words: 398 - Pages: 2
...During the pre-war period, there was controversy between many countries in Europe. Whether it was because of nationalism, militarism, alliances or imperialism, there were many problems between several nations. Although the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the main underlying causes of World War I which led to the uprising of many other events, there was much more to it, that led up to it. All the causes of World War I were all associated with each other, it they were all very different. For example, imperialism was pushed by nationalism due to the layalty of ones country, but they are both very different in how they cause World War I. The main three causes of World War I was imperialism, alliances and nationalism. Imperialism...
Words: 670 - Pages: 3
...Chester W. Nimitz). The Great War also known as World War I, is known for being one of the bloodiest wars in history. It first started on august first 1914 and ended november eleventh 1918. The two sides fighting the war were the Central powers and the Allies. There are arguably many different reasons for the cause of this war. These causes include militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism. Militarism is a policy of glorifying war and having an army ready to fight at all times. Alliances are agreements between countries to fight with each other during war. Imperialism is a policy of colonizing weaker countries for resources. Nationalism is the belief that people should be loyal mainly to their own country. The main underlying causes of World War I are militarism and alliances. Militarism is a policy of glorifying war. Countries that practiced militarism would spend great amounts of money on their militaries. In the year 1914, Great Britain spent 79 million pounds on their military with over fifty percent of that money going towards their navy (Document C). In the same year, Germany spent over 100 million pounds on their...
Words: 475 - Pages: 2
...The Underlying Causes of WW1 One after the other non-stop gunfire, bombs and artillery shaking the ground like a never ending earthquake. Militarism, Imperialism and Alliances the three underlying causes of World War I. World War I or The Great war was a war from 1914-1918 that engulfed all of Europe in the beginning of the nineteenth century, that included Russia, France and Great Britain (Triple Entente) and Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy (The Triple Alliance). It took place mainly in France, Italy ,Russia and Turkey. Germany mainly attacked on two fronts, the eastern front and western front where the main battles that shaped the war took place. Therefore militarism being the main cause of World War I. Militarism or the belief of a government or people that a country should maintain a strong military capability. This idea is what caused militarism to spread through Europe like an infectious disease, and was a major key factor in the start of World War I. According to “The London Times History of the World” the increase of armaments from 1890-1914 doubled in all of...
Words: 565 - Pages: 3
...The essay is divided into two main sections; it will first consider the long term causes of World War I. The long term causes of the war are complex and it is difficult to look at the long term causes without looking at the short term causes. Which leads on to the second section of my essay, which is short term causes of World War I. This is because you cannot look at one cause insolation from the other. It will then go on to describe the four main reasons for the long term causes for the war, these being militarism, imperialism, alliances, and nationalism. Followed by the short term causes which essentially kicked it all off. World War I was caused by a combination of several factors, both long and short term, and it was precipitated by an...
Words: 354 - Pages: 2
...How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the Cold war in 1945 and 1946 owed much to ideological differences and little to personalities and conflicting national interests? The three allied powers had been together fighting against hitler but once the Second World War ended problems between the big three started to appear. I believe that these problems which led later on in 1945 were a cause for the leaders personalities and each nation's national interests not due to ideological differences. The personalities of each of the leaders were definitive for the cold war as we can see how some did not want o could negotiate, also national interests was one of the main causes for the Cold war as for example Russia was looking for expansion for protection and USA was looking for Communist containment. However, I do not think that ideological differences was not one of the main reasons for the cold war as if it was one of the main reasons there would have been a war before with the Russians, however, it is true that their different ideologies caused tension to rise. Firstly, ideology was not at all the main role for the cause of the cold war. I believe that it was just a simple cause for the rise of tension between Russia and the West. If different ideologies owed a lot to The Cold war I think that there would have happened a war earlier or a “hot war” would have occurred. On the other hand, we could also say that their ideological differences clashed, suspicion and...
Words: 798 - Pages: 4
...World War I was not the result of one act but multiple acts that that led to problems. There were many problems that grew and got worse before the war started. The major cause was the death of Franz Ferdinand. Even though this was not the immediate cause of the war, it led to bigger problems that grew on each other. This was the biggest and well known cause, but there were many little causes that fired up a need for a war. The distinct classes, the idea of nationalism, the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, and the alliances between countries would eventually lead to a war that would change the world forever. First of all there were five main powers that led into World War I. There was Russia, Germany, France, Great Britain, and Austria-Hungary. These were all led...
Words: 634 - Pages: 3
...Remarque’s anti-war novel tapped into the global sorrow and sense of nationalism created by World War I. His inspiration stemmed from his own time spent as a German soldier. War novels before All Quiet on the Western Front tended to romanticize war, as well as emphasize patriotism, nationalism, and glory. Remarque refutes this tradition by exposing its meaningless violence of war. “While they continued to write and talk, we saw the wounded dying. While they taught that duty to one's country is the greatest thing, we already knew that death-throes are stronger” (64). Dying for one’s country is the greatest sense of nationalism, however this novel argues that there is never a just cause for war. Remarque characterizes Paul Baumer as an expression of his own political standpoint of opposition to nationalism, a major “ism” of the twentieth century. Nationalism played a valuable role in the twentieth century and is arguably one of the main causes of World War I. Although nationalism can serve for unifying a country, it can also cause intense pride and competition between countries. In the early 1900s, nationalism created a fierce competition and rivalry between Europe’s powers. These powers were the nations of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, and France. In order to advance and be the greatest nation, competition both militarily and economically broke out. Germany, especially, took advantage of this immense since of nationalism, by seducing young...
Words: 636 - Pages: 3
...was very significant in the cause of World War II, Mussolini, the Abyssinia crisis, Spanish civil war, and its influence on Nazism aided Fascism in causing World War II. Fascism did not start from nothing. Benito Mussolini...
Words: 1133 - Pages: 5
...There are a lot of causes and ways World War II got started. A lot of tension and turmoil from World War I and also from Hitler is what really led up to the world having its second world war. Some causes of the war is Hitler not going by the orders of other countries. Another is the Great Depression that was around the world and led to a bunch of turmoil and bad blood and led up the second World War. One big cause that led up to WWII was the turmoil left behind from WWI. According to the article “The causes of World War II” on sunysuffolk.edu there was an economic collapse and Germany started getting a strong military and disobeying the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was not happy and felt they were being treated harsh and unfair because of...
Words: 836 - Pages: 4
...World War 1 was caused by many events and this is what makes it difficult to figure out what the main cause was. The acronym MAIN stands for Militarism, Alliance System, Imperialism and Nationalism. Europe can be seen as a bottle of Diet Coke and you can look at the assignation of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand as a piece of Mentos. We all know what happens when you bring those two harmless substances together. Though all four of these causes play a key part in WW1 I believe that the most important cause was Alliance System because if not for all the alliances the bottle of diet coke would be just be an empty bottle. Militarism is defined as the building of a nation’s army, navy, soldiers and military forces. From the year 1870 up until the start of World War 1 both France and Germany had doubled their armed forces. Britain and Germany were in competition to build the biggest and best navy. It was said that “Whichever country ruled the waves could rule the world”. This meant that the nation with the largest navy had the fastest and easiest form of transportation at the time and could get colonies more easily. This also caused technology to increase rapidly. Another event that pushed militarism was the conscription laws. During this time most of the countries in Europe except Great Britain had conscription laws. This meant that by law men that were 18 or older were forced to join the army. As all the armed forces of Europe were growing the empty bottle was starting getting...
Words: 809 - Pages: 4
...Long Term Causes of the First World War The First World War was a major battle, a great war that the world had never seen before. It was a time in which lives were lost, economies devastated and politics turned upside down; but what were the causes? There wasn’t just one simple immediate cause of the war, but several long term causes. The roots of the war included mutual defence allies and imperialism, and it was these factors that led to a destructive and fierce war. Long before the war began; countries within the continent of Europe had decided to protect themselves and therefore, signed mutual defence agreements (Kelly). These agreements not only meant that they were protected, but also that they would have to protect their allies if they were attacked. Many of these alliance agreements had been made and signed between 1879 and 1914. For example in 1879, Germany and Austria-Hungary had signed a Dual Alliance to protect them from Russia and in 1881; Austria-Hungary became an ally of Serbia, so that they could protect Serbia from Russia trying to gain control (historyonthenet.com). Other alliances included France and Russia; Britain, France and Belgium, and finally Japan and Britain. In this case it was inevitable that there would be a world war and it all began with Austria-Hungary announcing a war on Serbia. Of course Russia jumped to protect them, which led to the Germans starting a war with Russia and then France and because Germany went into France through...
Words: 410 - Pages: 2
...The Great World History Debate: “Were German Militarism and Diplomacy Responsible for World War I?” Name Course Date The World War I, among other significant historical events, is the most deliberated event of the 20th century. Indeed, it is accredited to changing the course of the world's history giving it a new dimension to ponder on for the next centuries. Rise of communism, one of the world's most controversial ideologies, was linked to the catastrophic episode. Nonetheless, powerful empires like Austria, Turkey, Russia and Germany saw their rise and fall in communism. In addition, the war resulted to the most number of deaths and annihilation compared to other cataclysmic events in history. In the light of these horrendous outcomes, an undying curiosity arose among renowned historians and researchers in search for answers as to who was the protagonist of the war. The underlying question has been whether Germany was solely responsible for World War I given their military strength and diplomatic prowess. Notorious Professor V.R. Berghahn and Professor Samuel R. Williamson clash in a battle of wit in attempts to shed clear lights on Germany as the cause of World War I. Professor V.R. Berghahn believes that there is great depth of literature that evidences the role of Germany in the heinous unfolding. These evidences, both military and diplomatic certify the German empire as the main protagonist of the First World War (1914-1918). On the other hand, Professor Samuel R...
Words: 1467 - Pages: 6
...The Main Reasons of the War in August 2008 Literature Review Course: Academic Writing December 22, 2014 Introduction There are lots of unsolved conflicts in contemporary world, among which is the issue of so called South Ossetia Region. As new government of Georgia came in to the power in 2004, territorial integrity became one of the major concerns to be solved. At that time the majority of Georgian society thought that integrity issue would be solved in the peaceful manner. However, since then, events developed in such way that in August 2008 military conflict launched in South Ossetia. The nature of this conflict had significant implications for regional and international power politics. According to the American scientist Kenneth Waltz “peace is the one among a number of ends simultaneously entertained… To explain how peace can be more readily achieved requires an understanding of the causes of the war”. After the war between Russia and Georgia the whole world was concerned about what was the reason of the August war? This paper attempts to review some literature about this topic trying to answer this main question and create even a little understanding of the views that were expressed during or after the war. According the literature reviewed, views about causes of the war can be divided in two parts. First part is about interests’ contradiction between Russia and the USA and the second – about “Matter” of Saakashvili. Interests’ contradiction – Russia...
Words: 2450 - Pages: 10
