...I'm going to analyze an extract from a play "The man of destiny" by George Bernard Shaw, an Irish playwright, who was mostly talented for drama. He wrote more than 60 plays. Nearly all his writings are devoted to the social problems, but have a vein of comedy which makes their stark themes more palatable. The fact of his being the only person to be nominated both a Nobel Prize in literarture and an Oscar proves him to be a very talented person. "The man of destiny" is a drama and drama is a kind of a genre which can be personified, leading to the climax through series of events. The play opens with the lieutenant hearing the Lady's voice which he thinks to be the voice of a man who has tricked him out of Napoleon's letters. In fact it was the Lady who has stolen them. Napoleon orders her to give back the letters but the Lady starts to flatter Napoleon in order to distract his attention. Suddenly Napoleon hears the lieutenant's voice and that makes him to remember about the letters again. The Lady agrees to give him the letters except one which is a love letter. The Lady hints that the love letter has been written by Napoleon's wife to his friend Barras. Napoleon doesn't believe her and thinks she has done that because of revenge. The play ends with Napoleon driving the Lady out. There's an external type of a conflict in the play. The two parties are Napoleon, that is protagonist, and the Lady, antagonist. The author doesn't describe Napoleon directly, but it isn't very difficult...
Words: 812 - Pages: 4
...Выполнила: студентка 4 курса гр. 02194 Бадмаева Л.Б Проверила: преподаватель Федотова Н.А Analysis “The man of Destiny” The text under analysis is entitled “The man of Destiny”, written by a prominent playwright George Bernard Shaw. George Bernard Shaw was born in 26th of July in 1856 in a middle class family in Dublin. He was the second (after Shakespeare) the most popular play writer in the English theatre. His first profitable writing was music and literary criticism, in which capacity he wrote many highly articulate pieces of journalism. Nearly all his writings address prevailing social problems, but have a vein of comedy which makes their stark themes more palatable. Besides, he is known of his outspokenness and “barbed humor”, brilliant dialogues, full of witty paradoxes and often bitterly satirical. Bernard Shaw’s main talent was for drama, and he wrote more than 60 plays. Among them are “Saint Joan”, Caesar and Cleopatra, Man and Superman, Pygmalion and “The man of Destiny”. The man of Destiny is an 1897 play. It was published as a part of Plays Pleasant, which also included Arms and the Man, Candida and You never Can Tell. The story takes plays in the 17 century. It consists play of dialogues that includes author’s remarks in brackets. Bernard Shaw called his play “The man of Destiny”, because it was a name given to Napoleon Bonaparte as reflecting his own belief, for he was a fatalist. The story is referred to Drama. Drama is a genre of literature represented...
Words: 1359 - Pages: 6
...role of fate, or “chi,” in the novel. How do you think Achebe feels about fate versus a person’s control over his or her own destiny? Through the novel “Things fall apart”, written by Chinua Achebe, the author demonstrate so many meaningful, African traditions and religion. Throughout the story, which took place in the Nigerian village of Umuofia, the concept of “Chi” personal god that determines fate/destiny was discussed and is important to our understanding of the main character, Okonkwo. Moreover, Okonkwo was a man who had plans for greatness but his chi said otherwise and one can explain Okonkwo’s dreadful fate as the result of a problematic chi. Further, by showing how fate overpowered Okonkwo’s destiny, Achebe portrays that fate is way more powerful than destiny and no matter how hard a person try to make their own destiny, fate takes control. As mentioned before, Achebe shows the significant of Chi through the main Character. Okonkwo worked so hard to changes his fate and become a leader in his clans but his fate changed his life. Although he was recognized for his many achievements and was respected by the village because at a young age he threw the legendary Amalinze the cat for the first time and was a wealthy farmer unlike his father, but his problematic chi changed his destiny. Okonkwo proved to be a good man and wanted a good destiny but his chi spoke louder. In chapter 12 he accidentally shot Ezeudu’s sixteen-year-old son, which led him into exile for seven...
Words: 453 - Pages: 2
...1220 Date: 18 December 2008 Name: Marc Krishke Instructor’s Name: Professor Karen Richie Course: English 1220 Date: 12/10/08 Title: Oedipus the King: A Story of Fate Thesis: “Oedipus the King” by is generally a story about fate as it deals with its unalterable nature and the consequences that come with the attempt to change it. I. Fate and its Characteristics A. Characteristics of Fate 1. Fate as controlled by external force 2. Insignificance of man in relation to fate B. Fate according to Sophocles 1. Determined nature of fate 2. Freedom of man as manifested through his attitude towards destiny II. Oedipus A. His destiny as determined before his birth 1. The attempt of King Laius and Queen Jocasta to alter his fate 2. The futility of such attempt B. Oedipus’ lack of knowledge as instrumental in determining his fate C. Oedipus’ negative attitude towards his destiny D. Man’s attitude as uncontrolled by fate but possesses the power to influence 1. The role of arrogance and self-confidence in the fulfillment of the prophecy 2. Arrogance as a result of experience 3. Self-confidence as contributed by the people of Thebes 4. Arrogance and self-confidence as his response against fate III. Fate according to Epictetus A. Fate must not be feared and wanted B. Fate must be accepted with grace and...
Words: 3315 - Pages: 14
...fate or God.This is a constant theme in Oedipus the King where we question if his path was pre-determined or chosen willingly. “Listen to me and learn some peace of mind:no skill in the world,nothing human can penetrate the future.”(780-782; Fagles). This is a quote derived from Jocasta who is Oedipus’ wife and mother, and she supports the idea where our paths and destiny were already chosen. Throughout this play we learn which one truly prevails. “Fate was the will of the gods, a reality that could not be opposed, ritually...
Words: 1206 - Pages: 5
...UNDERSTANDING DIVINE DESTINY Kenneth Omeje Scripture quotations marked KJV are from the Holy Bible, King James Version (Authorized Version). First published in 1611. Quoted from the KJV Classic Reference Bible, Copyright © 1983 by The Zondervan Corporation. Scripture quotations marked NKJV are taken from the New King James Version. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked NIV are taken from the Holy Bible, New International Version®. NIV®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved. [Biblica] Scripture quotations marked RSV are taken from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright...
Words: 11246 - Pages: 45
...simplistic religions. Throughout history, there has always been a clear divide between those who believe in fate and destiny, and those who believe in their own free will. The struggle to prove or disprove the existence of fate is one that has been present along with the idea of fate since its beginning. In Oedipus the King, Sophocles not only clearly shows his own opinion on the existence of fate, but also demonstrates the struggle humans encounter when trying to determine whether they have control over their destiny. Ancient societies, such as the Ancient Greeks, strongly believed in religious ideals to a greater extent than many modern societies; however, Oedipus’s story is one of few from Ancient Greece that openly questions the existence of fate, and dares to entertain the idea of free will. The time described in the play is one where the truthfulness of religion was being heavily questioned, and at its core, Oedipus the King is about the existence of fate. Throughout its pages, the play shows characters who both believe in destiny like Tiresias, and also characters like Oedipus, who transition from believing in fate to believing in free will, and back again. In Oedipus the King, the difference in opinions between Oedipus and Tiresias regarding the existence of fate, clearly show the nature of fate in the play, and Sophocles’s opinion on the existence of destiny and free will as well. Oedipus is a character held in high esteem by most others in the play, and throughout is...
Words: 2174 - Pages: 9
...Morality? And Destiny? ; As seen by the followers of Buddhism. Though Buddhism is based off of, and follows some principles of Hinduism, Buddhism does not believe in a god or entity as ultimately everything is created in one’s own mind. When researching Buddhism, there is no specific view on the origin of man, or the planet. It was mentioned several places that a person does not need to know the origin of man in order to achieve enlightenment, or in other words there is no need to know where you came from, only where you are going. Modern Buddhism, as a generalization, has adopted the theory of evolution as they do not believe there is anything to dispute it. So how do they view themselves? Identity is more about answering question about yourself with regards to the fetters (areas of suffering). There are ten fetters total, however the top three, and most important to identity are 1. Belief in self (sakkaya-ditthi), 2. Doubt (vickiccha), and 3. Attachment to rites and rituals (silbabatta-parsmaso). How one handles these suffering is how you can view their identity. The question of morality is very close to Christianity, I have read a lot about Buddhism and there are a lot of factual references stating that moral behavior flows from the mastering of one’s ego and desires, that the growth of love and compassion will guide your morality. When you look at the sila (moral code) the same basic morals are shared with other religions. The purpose of life and the view of destiny are closely...
Words: 752 - Pages: 4
...is what prophets and prophecies are worth! Have no dread of them.” (143) The chorus responds two different ways to Iokaste. The first way is that they think that the gods are all knowing. You can see this when they say, “And any mortal who dares hold no immortal power in awe will be caught up in a net of pain.”(148) Then the chorus flips the coin by saying if the gods end up being wrong then there is no fate and man determines his own destiny. You can see this when they say, “Words in the wind, and the Delphic vision blind! Their hearts no longer know Apollo, and reverence for the gods has died away.” In the end of the play it is shown that man cannot avoid his destiny. You can see this in the conclusion of the play when Oedipus finally realizes his fate. He was the killer of his father and the person who laid in the same bed as his mother. Oedipus utters, “My voice is hurled far on a dark wind. What has god done to me?”(161) All in all many philosophical questions were raised by Iokaste. This play ends up making the point that the gods know our fate and that man is...
Words: 389 - Pages: 2
...the South, predominantly black, however, the North was favored for its opportunity. Throughout Ralph Ellison's “King of The Bingo Game” we watch as the main protagonist of the story struggles to find his luck as a black man from the South, looking for an opportunity in the North. This was all in hopes of saving his terminally ill pregnant wife. Ellison expresses that humans can not change their destiny through the...
Words: 1179 - Pages: 5
...DEALING WITH POWER OF THE GRAVE "Power of the grave must die" The grave is a terrible place. It is a place where glorious lives and destinies are buried on a perpetual note. A place where virtues and riches are forgotten. Many glorious children, born to manifest glory in life were slaughtered and buried before the day of their glory could come. I decree into your life, ANY POWER ASSIGNED TO SLAUGHTER YOUR DESTINY SHALL REPLACE YOU IN THE GRAVE IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS. The grave is a pathetic place, you don't belong there neither does your destiny. When the power of the grave is in operation in your life, enemies no longer worry their head concerning you, they know that the real thing that should make you somebody has been buried. No matter how beautiful a lady may be, if her husband has been buried she can never get married, barrenness is inevitable if the womb of a woman has been buried, she can never conceive. Enemies don't care about the grade you got from the university, if your certificate is buried, a master degree holder can never get any good employment... If the fingernail of a man is buried in the grave, his hand can never prosper. If the hair is buried, his glory is gone. If they bury an image with your name written on it, then you're a walking dead, the real you is not here but beneath the ground level so you are restricted to attain greatness in life... God says in Ezekiel 37:12 " I will open up your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves...
Words: 731 - Pages: 3
...Book Review: Destiny of the Republic Hillary Harkins 9-26-14 If you stopped 10 random people off the street and asked them who James A. Garfield was, do you think they would know he was President of the United States? Garfield wasn’t like most of the presidents we have had in the past, he is in a category with very few, he didn’t really leave much of a rein behind him. It would have been hard to leave much of a history in the white house when he only served as President of the United States from March 4, 1881 - September 19, 1881. While reading "Destiny of the Republic” Candice Millard tells a story that not only shows the murder of Garfield but also shows the politics related to the murder and his medical history, that really was a shock and a secret to the public. A few things that really shocked me in this story was the fact that Garfield was born into Poverty in 1831. He grew up with out a father in a very rural part of Ohio. He only went to school till the age of 16 and left to go take part in a very dangerous line of work on the Canals. I think the reason this surprised me was because if you look back at most presidents we have had in the past most were educated and most came from decently well families. At the age of 26, he would take over the position of President of Williams Colleges, where in the past years he went and so impressed his teachers that by his second year at the school he would be moved up to assistant professor. He went from working in the...
Words: 1050 - Pages: 5
...‚The Happy Man’ The story I’m going to analyze is entitled ‘The happy man’ and it was written by Somerset Maugham, a well-known English writer. He was born on 25 of January in 1874, he was an English playwright, novelist and short story writer. He was one of the most popular authors of his era. Now, I’d like to give the summary of the story. At the beginning of the story the author tells us that the narrator didn’t like to give advices. The narrator thought about life and showed his attitude to the whole life. He said that he didn’t know anything of others. But then the narrator remembered that once he had advised well. Once a man, a total stranger, came to him and ask him for a piece of advice. He wanted to know if he would have any chance to have a job in Spain. The narrator said that if he wasn’t worried about money, he would be success. 15 years later the narrator happened to be in Servile. He had some in disposition and went to an English doctor. It turned out that this doctor was Stephens. He was happy in Spain. And thanked the narrator a lot. The method of character’s portrayed is indirect, which sometimes called dramatic. The author didn’t comment upon the person ages, the author made them act, speak and let the reader judge for himself. The main characters of the story are the narrator and Stephens. The narrator was an intelligent, clever and bright. We can judge by his way of narration, speech. He was a doctor but didn’t practice. And first of all he...
Words: 1434 - Pages: 6
...“ Do we control the direction of our lives, or do forces outside of our control determine our destiny.” In my opinion it could go both ways. It could go both ways because it depends what decisions you make in your own life. But in the book,” A Lesson Before Dying,” by Ernest J. Gaines, the way he portrays his conclusion in the book is by outside forces controlling people lifes and other people helping others to not fall under the pressure. For example, on page 4,” Brother and Bear drove up beside him and offered him a ride.” Jefferson never knew what Brother and Bear were going to do at the store. And now he was going to die because the cops blame everything on him. In the beginning of the book Jefferson does not control his own destiny. Until Grant talks to him and tries to make him a man. Even though Jefferson stills dies by getting electrocuted, he says on page 254,” Tell Nannan I walked.” And that's what Grant was trying to do all along to make him walk like a man and not a hog....
Words: 568 - Pages: 3
...ILIAD The gods and goddesses took a huge place in the lives of Greek people. The gods were a great power, and provided clear explanations for all events. The Greeks thought that the gods help people in trouble and influence on all mans actions and thoughts working through human nature. Although Homer in The Iliad attached significant meaning to the gods intervention in the lives of the human characters I think that “If the gods were removed from the Iliad, the events would be largely the same”. The events, that were happened in the lives of main characters of the Iliad, basically were depended on their own particular traits of characters and behavior. Patroklos’s death is the plot moment in the Iliad. From this moment the events are on the move very quickly and getting fatal for the main characters of the poem - Achilleus and Hector. After Patroklos’s death Achilleus forgets about his offences , pride and speculations about fair actions. Now the most important thing in his life is to avenge Patroklos’s death. Hector is becoming the worst enemy for Achilleus , although he never wanted to fight against Hector and the Trojan as well. “...I am unwilling to fight against brilliant Hector...”(9.356). Now Achilleus is ready to fight in spite of threats of Apollo, who always stands behind Hector. Nobody and nothing can change his decision to take revenge. The deep human sorrow displays in his behavior. Achilleus wants to deaden his pain by means of killing his...
Words: 1558 - Pages: 7