Free Essay

The Necklace

In:

Submitted By nataliademoss
Words 2874
Pages 12
The Necklace

by Guy de Maupassant
(1850-1893)

Translators: Albert M.C. McMaster, A.E. Henderson, Mme. Quesada, & others.

The girl was one of those pretty and charming young creatures who sometimes are born, as if by a slip of fate, into a family of clerks. She had no dowry, no expectations, no way of being known, understood, loved, married by any rich and distinguished man; so she let herself be married to a little clerk of the Ministry of Public Instruction.

She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was unhappy as if she had really fallen from a higher station; since with women there is neither caste nor rank, for beauty, grace and charm take the place of family and birth. Natural ingenuity, instinct for what is elegant, a supple mind are their sole hierarchy, and often make of women of the people the equals of the very greatest ladies.

Mathilde suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born to enjoy all delicacies and all luxuries. She was distressed at the poverty of her dwelling, at the bareness of the walls, at the shabby chairs, the ugliness of the curtains. All those things, of which another woman of her rank would never even have been conscious, tortured her and made her angry. The sight of the little Breton peasant who did her humble housework aroused in her despairing regrets and bewildering dreams. She thought of silent antechambers hung with Oriental tapestry, illumined by tall bronze candelabra, and of two great footmen in knee breeches who sleep in the big armchairs, made drowsy by the oppressive heat of the stove. She thought of long reception halls hung with ancient silk, of the dainty cabinets containing priceless curiosities and of the little coquettish perfumed reception rooms made for chatting at five o'clock with intimate friends, with men famous and sought after, whom all women envy and whose attention they all desire.

When she sat down to dinner, before the round table covered with a tablecloth in use three days, opposite her husband, who uncovered the soup tureen and declared with a delighted air, "Ah, the good soup! I don't know anything better than that," she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry that peopled the walls with ancient personages and with strange birds flying in the midst of a fairy forest; and she thought of delicious dishes served on marvellous plates and of the whispered gallantries to which you listen with a sphinxlike smile while you are eating the pink meat of a trout or the wings of a quail.

She had no gowns, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that. She felt made for that. She would have liked so much to please, to be envied, to be charming, to be sought after.

She had a friend, a former schoolmate at the convent, who was rich, and whom she did not like to go to see any more because she felt so sad when she came home.

But one evening her husband reached home with a triumphant air and holding a large envelope in his hand.

"There," said he, "there is something for you."

She tore the paper quickly and drew out a printed card which bore these words:

The Minister of Public Instruction and Madame Georges Ramponneau request the honor of M. and Madame Loisel's company at the palace of the Ministry on Monday evening, January 18th.

Instead of being delighted, as her husband had hoped, she threw the invitation on the table crossly, muttering:

"What do you wish me to do with that?"

"Why, my dear, I thought you would be glad. You never go out, and this is such a fine opportunity. I had great trouble to get it. Every one wants to go; it is very select, and they are not giving many invitations to clerks. The whole official world will be there."

She looked at him with an irritated glance and said impatiently:

"And what do you wish me to put on my back?"

He had not thought of that. He stammered:

"Why, the gown you go to the theatre in. It looks very well to me."

He stopped, distracted, seeing that his wife was weeping. Two great tears ran slowly from the corners of her eyes toward the corners of her mouth.

"What's the matter? What's the matter?" he answered.

By a violent effort she conquered her grief and replied in a calm voice, while she wiped her wet cheeks:

"Nothing. Only I have no gown, and, therefore, I can't go to this ball. Give your card to some colleague whose wife is better equipped than I am."

He was in despair. He resumed:

"Come, let us see, Mathilde. How much would it cost, a suitable gown, which you could use on other occasions--something very simple?"

She reflected several seconds, making her calculations and wondering also what sum she could ask without drawing on herself an immediate refusal and a frightened exclamation from the economical clerk.

Finally she replied hesitating:

"I don't know exactly, but I think I could manage it with four hundred francs."

He grew a little pale, because he was laying aside just that amount to buy a gun and treat himself to a little shooting next summer on the plain of Nanterre, with several friends who went to shoot larks there of a Sunday.

But he said:

"Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown."

The day of the ball drew near and Madame Loisel seemed sad, uneasy, anxious. Her frock was ready, however. Her husband said to her one evening:

"What is the matter? Come, you have seemed very queer these last three days."

And she answered:

"It annoys me not to have a single piece of jewelry, not a single ornament, nothing to put on. I shall look poverty-stricken. I would almost rather not go at all."

"You might wear natural flowers," said her husband. "They're very stylish at this time of year. For ten francs you can get two or three magnificent roses."

She was not convinced.

"No; there's nothing more humiliating than to look poor among other women who are rich."

"How stupid you are!" her husband cried. "Go look up your friend, Madame Forestier, and ask her to lend you some jewels. You're intimate enough with her to do that."

She uttered a cry of joy:

"True! I never thought of it."

The next day she went to her friend and told her of her distress.

Madame Forestier went to a wardrobe with a mirror, took out a large jewel box, brought it back, opened it and said to Madame Loisel:

"Choose, my dear."

She saw first some bracelets, then a pearl necklace, then a Venetian gold cross set with precious stones, of admirable workmanship. She tried on the ornaments before the mirror, hesitated and could not make up her mind to part with them, to give them back. She kept asking:

"Haven't you any more?"

"Why, yes. Look further; I don't know what you like."

Suddenly she discovered, in a black satin box, a superb diamond necklace, and her heart throbbed with an immoderate desire. Her hands trembled as she took it. She fastened it round her throat, outside her high-necked waist, and was lost in ecstasy at her reflection in the mirror.

Then she asked, hesitating, filled with anxious doubt:

"Will you lend me this, only this?"

"Why, yes, certainly."

She threw her arms round her friend's neck, kissed her passionately, then fled with her treasure.

The night of the ball arrived. Madame Loisel was a great success. She was prettier than any other woman present, elegant, graceful, smiling and wild with joy. All the men looked at her, asked her name, sought to be introduced. All the attaches of the Cabinet wished to waltz with her. She was remarked by the minister himself.

She danced with rapture, with passion, intoxicated by pleasure, forgetting all in the triumph of her beauty, in the glory of her success, in a sort of cloud of happiness comprised of all this homage, admiration, these awakened desires and of that sense of triumph which is so sweet to woman's heart.

She left the ball about four o'clock in the morning. Her husband had been sleeping since midnight in a little deserted anteroom with three other gentlemen whose wives were enjoying the ball.

He threw over her shoulders the wraps he had brought, the modest wraps of common life, the poverty of which contrasted with the elegance of the ball dress. She felt this and wished to escape so as not to be remarked by the other women, who were enveloping themselves in costly furs.

Loisel held her back, saying: "Wait a bit. You will catch cold outside. I will call a cab."

But she did not listen to him and rapidly descended the stairs. When they reached the street they could not find a carriage and began to look for one, shouting after the cabmen passing at a distance.

They went toward the Seine in despair, shivering with cold. At last they found on the quay one of those ancient night cabs which, as though they were ashamed to show their shabbiness during the day, are never seen round Paris until after dark.

It took them to their dwelling in the Rue des Martyrs, and sadly they mounted the stairs to their flat. All was ended for her. As to him, he reflected that he must be at the ministry at ten o'clock that morning.

She removed her wraps before the glass so as to see herself once more in all her glory. But suddenly she uttered a cry. She no longer had the necklace around her neck!

"What is the matter with you?" demanded her husband, already half undressed.

She turned distractedly toward him.

"I have--I have--I've lost Madame Forestier's necklace," she cried.

He stood up, bewildered.

"What!--how? Impossible!"

They looked among the folds of her skirt, of her cloak, in her pockets, everywhere, but did not find it.

"You're sure you had it on when you left the ball?" he asked.

"Yes, I felt it in the vestibule of the minister's house."

"But if you had lost it in the street we should have heard it fall. It must be in the cab."

"Yes, probably. Did you take his number?"

"No. And you--didn't you notice it?"

"No."

They looked, thunderstruck, at each other. At last Loisel put on his clothes.

"I shall go back on foot," said he, "over the whole route, to see whether I can find it."

He went out. She sat waiting on a chair in her ball dress, without strength to go to bed, overwhelmed, without any fire, without a thought.

Her husband returned about seven o'clock. He had found nothing.

He went to police headquarters, to the newspaper offices to offer a reward; he went to the cab companies--everywhere, in fact, whither he was urged by the least spark of hope.

She waited all day, in the same condition of mad fear before this terrible calamity.

Loisel returned at night with a hollow, pale face. He had discovered nothing.

"You must write to your friend," said he, "that you have broken the clasp of her necklace and that you are having it mended. That will give us time to turn round."

She wrote at his dictation.

At the end of a week they had lost all hope. Loisel, who had aged five years, declared:

"We must consider how to replace that ornament."

The next day they took the box that had contained it and went to the jeweler whose name was found within. He consulted his books.

"It was not I, madame, who sold that necklace; I must simply have furnished the case."

Then they went from jeweler to jeweler, searching for a necklace like the other, trying to recall it, both sick with chagrin and grief.

They found, in a shop at the Palais Royal, a string of diamonds that seemed to them exactly like the one they had lost. It was worth forty thousand francs. They could have it for thirty-six.

So they begged the jeweler not to sell it for three days yet. And they made a bargain that he should buy it back for thirty-four thousand francs, in case they should find the lost necklace before the end of February.

Loisel possessed eighteen thousand francs which his father had left him. He would borrow the rest.

He did borrow, asking a thousand francs of one, five hundred of another, five louis here, three louis there. He gave notes, took up ruinous obligations, dealt with usurers and all the race of lenders. He compromised all the rest of his life, risked signing a note without even knowing whether he could meet it; and, frightened by the trouble yet to come, by the black misery that was about to fall upon him, by the prospect of all the physical privations and moral tortures that he was to suffer, he went to get the new necklace, laying upon the jeweler's counter thirty-six thousand francs.

When Madame Loisel took back the necklace Madame Forestier said to her with a chilly manner:

"You should have returned it sooner; I might have needed it."

She did not open the case, as her friend had so much feared. If she had detected the substitution, what would she have thought, what would she have said? Would she not have taken Madame Loisel for a thief?

Thereafter Madame Loisel knew the horrible existence of the needy. She bore her part, however, with sudden heroism. That dreadful debt must be paid. She would pay it. They dismissed their servant; they changed their lodgings; they rented a garret under the roof.

She came to know what heavy housework meant and the odious cares of the kitchen. She washed the dishes, using her dainty fingers and rosy nails on greasy pots and pans. She washed the soiled linen, the shirts and the dishcloths, which she dried upon a line; she carried the slops down to the street every morning and carried up the water, stopping for breath at every landing. And dressed like a woman of the people, she went to the fruiterer, the grocer, the butcher, a basket on her arm, bargaining, meeting with impertinence, defending her miserable money, sou by sou.

Every month they had to meet some notes, renew others, obtain more time.

Her husband worked evenings, making up a tradesman's accounts, and late at night he often copied manuscript for five sous a page.

This life lasted ten years.

At the end of ten years they had paid everything, everything, with the rates of usury and the accumulations of the compound interest.

Madame Loisel looked old now. She had become the woman of impoverished households--strong and hard and rough. With frowsy hair, skirts askew and red hands, she talked loud while washing the floor with great swishes of water. But sometimes, when her husband was at the office, she sat down near the window and she thought of that gay evening of long ago, of that ball where she had been so beautiful and so admired.

What would have happened if she had not lost that necklace? Who knows? who knows? How strange and changeful is life! How small a thing is needed to make or ruin us!

But one Sunday, having gone to take a walk in the Champs Elysees to refresh herself after the labors of the week, she suddenly perceived a woman who was leading a child. It was Madame Forestier, still young, still beautiful, still charming.

Madame Loisel felt moved. Should she speak to her? Yes, certainly. And now that she had paid, she would tell her all about it. Why not?

She went up.

"Good-day, Jeanne."

The other, astonished to be familiarly addressed by this plain good-wife, did not recognize her at all and stammered:

"But--madame!--I do not know---- You must have mistaken."

"No. I am Mathilde Loisel."

Her friend uttered a cry.

"Oh, my poor Mathilde! How you are changed!"

"Yes, I have had a pretty hard life, since I last saw you, and great poverty--and that because of you!"

"Of me! How so?"

"Do you remember that diamond necklace you lent me to wear at the ministerial ball?"

"Yes. Well?"

"Well, I lost it."

"What do you mean? You brought it back."

"I brought you back another exactly like it. And it has taken us ten years to pay for it. You can understand that it was not easy for us, for us who had nothing. At last it is ended, and I am very glad."

Madame Forestier had stopped.

"You say that you bought a necklace of diamonds to replace mine?"

"Yes. You never noticed it, then! They were very similar."

And she smiled with a joy that was at once proud and ingenuous.

Madame Forestier, deeply moved, took her hands.

"Oh, my poor Mathilde! Why, my necklace was paste! It was worth at most only five hundred francs!"

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...The Necklace Summary How It All Goes Down At the beginning of the story, we meet Mathilde Loisel, a middle-class girl who desperately wishes she were wealthy. She's got looks and charm, but had the bad luck to be born into a family of clerks, who marry her to another clerk (M. Loisel) in the Department of Education. Mathilde is so convinced she's meant to be rich that she detests her real life and spends all day dreaming and despairing about the fabulous life she's not having. She envisions footmen, feasts, fancy furniture, and strings of rich young men to seduce. One day M. Loisel comes home with an invitation to a fancy ball thrown by his boss, the Minister of Education. M. Loisel has gone to a lot of trouble to get the invitation, but Mathilde's first reaction is to throw a fit. She doesn't have anything nice to wear, and can't possibly go! How dare her husband be so insensitive? M. Loisel doesn't know what to do, and offers to buy his wife a dress, so long as it's not too expensive. Mathilde asks for 400 francs, and he agrees. It's not too long before Mathilde throws another fit, though, this time because she has no jewels. So M. Loisel suggests she go see her friend Mme. Forestier, a rich woman who can probably lend her something. Mathilde goes to see Mme. Forestier, and she is in luck. Mathilde is able to borrow a gorgeous diamond necklace. With the necklace, she's sure to be a stunner. The night of the ball arrives, and Mathilde has the time of her life. Everyone...

Words: 2467 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Necklace

...The Necklace: The Lost Chapter The term butterfly effect means that a small change in one setting can have a larger impact somewhere else. On one Sunday afternoon, Madame Loisel went for a walk in the Champs Elysees to clear her thoughts after a long week of work. She was simply thinking how long ten years of paying debts distracted her from the possibility of children. Once the thought of children came to mind, “she suddenly perceived a woman who was leading a child. It was Madame Forestier, still young, still beautiful, and still charming (Maupassant 10).” How astonishing that Mathilde was thinking how differently her life would have been if she had not lost the necklace and had the chance to raise a child and there her eyes were led to Madame Forestier and her child. Mathilde decided she had nothing else to lose, so she decided to walk up to Madame Forestier to simply say hello. “Good-day, Jeanne (Maupassant 10).” Jeanne did not recognize Mathilde because Mathilde had aged greatly and looked worn like an old leather wallet about to fall apart. Mathilde explained to her good friend that it was because of her she had great poverty. Jeanne confused and almost offended asked: “I’m sorry; I don’t seem to understand how I am the cause of your hardship? The last time we saw each other everything seemed fine!” Mathilde then relayed the memory of returning the diamond necklace but that it was a substitute necklace. She told Jeanne she lost the original necklace at the ball...

Words: 1232 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Theme and Narrative of “The Necklace” Renee’ Alsup ENG 125 Colin Garretson October 27, 2012 Theme and Narrative of “The Necklace” I have chosen Guy de Maupassant “The Necklace” to analyze in this week’s paper. This story is based on a couple who is in love, but not necessarily happy. Madame Loisel made do with what she had throughout life, but wanted better and wanted people to look up to her. “The Necklace” revolves around an outstanding piece of diamond jewelry. Madame Loisel is obsessed with this necklace and wants to be adorned by the other women at the party. Madame Loisel’s husband worked in the Department of Education. They were not well of people but made it through life. Madame Loisel always longed for more than what she had. As stated, she suffered intensely, feeling herself born for every delicacy and every luxury. She suffered from the poverty of her dwelling, from the worn walls, the abraded chairs, the ugliness of the stuffs.” (Clugston, 2010). Monsieur Loisel handed her, an invitation to a party for “The Minister of Education” requesting their attendance, she was not elated as he was in hopes she would be. The reason being is that she did not have a dress exquisite enough to wear. After offering to buy her a dress for the party, she still was not satisfied. “All right. I will give you four hundred francs. But take care to have a pretty dress.” (Clugston, 2010). She needed Jewelry. He offered flowers but she needed to be adorned by the other...

Words: 883 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Theme and Narrative of “The Necklace” I have chosen Guy de Maupassant “The Necklace” to analyze in this week’s paper. This story is based on a couple who is in love, but not necessarily happy. Madame Loisel made do with what she had throughout life, but wanted better and wanted people to look up to her. “The Necklace” revolves around an outstanding piece of diamond jewelry. Madame Loisel is obsessed with this necklace and wants to be adorned by the other women at the party. Madame Loisel’s husband worked in the Department of Education. They were not well of people but made it through life. Madame Loisel always longed for more than what she had. As stated, she suffered intensely, feeling herself born for every delicacy and every luxury. She suffered from the poverty of her dwelling, from the worn walls, the abraded chairs, the ugliness of the stuffs.” (Clugston, 2010). Monsieur Loisel handed her, an invitation to a party for “The Minister of Education” requesting their attendance, she was not elated as he was in hopes she would be. The reason being is that she did not have a dress exquisite enough to wear. After offering to buy her a dress for the party, she still was not satisfied. “All right. I will give you four hundred francs. But take care to have a pretty dress.” (Clugston, 2010). She needed Jewelry. He offered flowers but she needed to be adorned by the other women by wearing jewels and showing that she measured up to them. “You will wear some natural flowers.” (Clugston...

Words: 327 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...In the short story, “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant it describes an ungrateful woman who in the end got what she deserved. Mathilde Loisel is a woman who desired to live the fancy life, but is too poor. Later on, Mathilde’s husband receives an invitation to a fancy ball, but instead of being excited, Mathilde is upset that she doesn’t have a dress or any jewelry. She ends up getting a necklace from a friend. Then, she ends up going to the ball, but afterwards she loses the necklace she borrowed in a cab. She has her husband look for it, but he had no luck. After not being able to find it they decide to buy a replacement and end up spending a lot of time and money to replace it. In the end of the story Mathilde finds out that the original...

Words: 323 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Guy de Maupassant's short story "The Necklace", written in the late nineteenth century, tells the tale of a middle class woman named Madame Mathilde Loisel who only dreams of the finer things of life. Although she lives quite comfortably, she is dissatisfied with her life as being the wife of a clerk. Mr. Loisel is content with the life they live but still he puts forth all his effort to make her happy. One day, Loisel manages to secure the two of them invitations to a ball which was being thrown by his boss. This still doesn't please Mathilde due to her lack of fine clothing and jewelry. After having to buy a new dress and borrow a necklace from her old friend Mrs. Forrestier, the couple arrive at the ball, only for Mathilde to become the center of attention. The author goes on to explain that it was the tragic misfortune that happened the night of the ball that caused the devastating turn of events soon turning Mathilde's dream into a nightmare. Aside from the ironic twist caused by the necklace, Maupassant also expresses many points of symbolism throughout the story which piece together the events to the characters. In the beginning of the story, it's clear to realize that Mathilde constantly dreams of having nothing more than the finest luxuries. Instead of being grateful for the fine apparal she does have throughout her household, she describes them as "drab", "threadbare", and "ugly" (paragraph 3). It's apparent that the author is portraying the...

Words: 635 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...for a gift from the sea” (Anne Morrow Lindbergh). “The Necklace”by;Guy de Maupassant is a story about showing how in the beginning, you may be very greedy, but in the end you’ll see that you actually should be very thankful for what is given to you in the period of your life.Life is greatful and if you just look at it, you’ll see what is actually already in your hands that you should be very thankful. Life isn’t always about having everything you need,it’s about being grateful for what you already have and not complaining. In the opening of “The Necklace” Mathilde and her husband get invited to a big party....

Words: 708 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Necklace

...Carie Pimenta English-113-02IN Instructor Roger Wooten 8 February 2015 Analysis of Mme. Loisel Mme. Loisel is the main character in a story called “The Necklace” written by Guy De Maupassant. Mme. Loisel is a woman unhappy with who she is and what she has in life, wanting and dreaming of more which cost her more that she could have ever imagined. The character of Mme. Loisel is that of a woman who feels as though she was born into a life she did not belong. She let herself be married to a little clerk her provided her with the essentials to live. Yes, she lived in poverty and instead of appreciating the simple things in life, like the roof over her head, the clothes she did have and the food on her table she was angry and wanted more. She wanted attention, to be envied and to have all the luxuries she thought she deserved. She had a friend who ended up with the things she thinks she deserves but does not see her because she gets too envious and suffers more after a visit with her. Her husband seems quite content with the life they live. Works hard but also knows his wife wants more. He came home one evening with a surprise she thought she would be thrilled with but got the opposite. He had tickets to go to a very big event at the palace that not many clerks are invited too. Instead of happiness she got upset worrying about what she would wear. Her husband then asks her what it will cost for a dress for the ball and it just so happens it is what he has saved...

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Necklace Central Idea

...The Necklace Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she misplaces the closest thing she has to the life she dreams of and not telling her friend about the mishap, she could have set herself aside from ten years of work. This is a story that shows the true irony in life. “The Necklace” ends up to be a very ironic story as it explains why valuing the more important things in life can be very effective towards a person’s happiness. One example of the story’s irony is when she is at the party dressed as a beautiful and fancy woman. ‘She danced madly, wildly, drunk with pleasure, giving no thought to anything in the triumph of her beauty, the pride of her success…’ .(Maupassant) This is a form of irony because Guy explains earlier that Mme. Loisel is just a middle class woman who dreams of a wealthy life, but she is just alluding herself as a luxurious woman. Another example of irony in the story is when Madame...

Words: 1335 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Literary Analysis of the Necklace

...Haftom Wineh Eng. 112 08/04/15 Literary Analysis of “The Necklace” In the short story of “The Necklace,” Guy De Maupassant narrates about a woman who just cannot seem to be happy and dreams about being rich. Maupassant uses imagery and symbolism to convey his theme as well as the value of a false materialism in the story. The narrator uses the necklace as a symbol to show us the biggest deception of appearances. At the story’s heart is a masterful depiction of the protagonist, Loisel Mathilde. She is a young, beautiful, charming, materialistic, discontent and snobbish lady. Mathilde agrees to marry a clerk at the Ministry of Public Instruction, who always tries to make her happy. Mathilde cares very much about beautiful things and appearances that, in fact, do not match with her reality. She borrows a necklace and loses it, and then spends ten years of hard life paying back the cost of the lost necklace. Maupassant shows ironic situation by using a necklace as a symbol to illustrate Mathilde’s obsession with wealth and her dishonesty, which cause her downfall in the story. The protagonist, Mathilde, lives in middle-class society but longs to be a member of high-class society. She spends most of her time envying everybody with a sweeter life than her own. Maupassant narrates that Mathilde has a little peasant girl who works in her house and washes the...

Words: 1636 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Necklace: a Literary Analysis

...An Analysis of “The Necklace” Some people will lie and go to great lengths to try and appear to be something they really aren’t without considering that embracing who they truly are is far more important. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story “The Necklace” placed in France during 1800’s, things were not much different. During this time, France was a city ruled by classicism. At that time, wealth was seen to be essential, and social class was even more so. A person could be very wealthy and have luxurious things, but none of that mattered unless they were considered upper-class in society. In this story, De Maupassant develops a young and beautiful working class woman who desires a more luxurious lifestyle and sees it as something she absolutely needs to truly be happy. She constantly despised her husband’s plainness, and his satisfaction towards the basic life they lived. She felt as if she deserved more than the life she was wrongfully born into. One night she borrowed a friend’s beautiful diamond necklace for a party only to misplace it. She couldn’t bare the idea of telling her friend how she lost her necklace, so she used the money her husband’s father had left him and borrowed from wherever else her and her husband could to buy another diamond necklace. It took her husband and her ten years to pay off this unnecessary debt. When she finally had the courage to tell her friend the truth after the debt was finally paid, she found out the necklace was an imitation. Madame Loisel...

Words: 954 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Necklace Rhetorical Analysis

...The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant the social satire.  Mathilde Loisel was a pretty woman born to be marrying a man of wealth. Mathilde in time married a little clerk who worked in the Ministry Of Education, sometimes things don’t go as planned or expected. The author does a very good job in describing the good and bad physical, moral, and emotional conflicts brought by Mathilda when she barrow the necklace from Madame Forestier. The only thing that Mathilde didn't knew was that the gorgeous necklace was an imitation. Madame Loisel receive the necklace and she felt younger and beautiful as described in the story, she already had this characteristics but never realize that beauty is something that the eyes cant see , that the hands cant touch....

Words: 1538 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Necklace Response Essay

...“The Necklace” Response Paragraph Due to losing Mme. Forestier’s diamond necklace at the ball, Mathilde Loisel (and her husband) worked diligently for ten years to payoff the debt. When it comes to gaining the reader’s sympathy, I certainly did not feel pity for Mathilde since she caused the workload and punishment for herself; rather, I felt pity for Mr. Loisel. Her egoistic self and pride along with her status consciousness, knowing that her husband could not afford her extravagant demands, is what trapped her into the catch 22 situation. The mere fact that she felt the necessity of borrowing jewels after her husband bought her an expensive dress expresses how deeply she valued wealth and luxury: “She has no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And...

Words: 427 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Necklace Quote Analysis

...The quote was in paragraph 82 of the short story “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. Madame Loisel would sometimes question herself about the 1 day many years ago when she had the time of her life. But moments later, her life came crashing down when she lost the necklace. She asked herself the determining question, what if she did not lose the necklace? She could not imagine the scenario where she could have been in that moment. Madame Loisel felt shocked when she told herself how life is strange and unpredictable meaning that she could not see herself in the past going home that night and maybe giving the necklace back the day after or the next. She knew that the small pendant brought misery to Madame Loisel and her husband. Madame Loisel...

Words: 492 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Believability Of Madame Loisel In The Necklace

...of the character Madame Loisel in the story The Necklace. I will be evaluating the character based on whether, in my opinion, she would do the things that she does in the story in a real life situation. I picked Madame Loisel over Monsieur Loisel because, in my opinion, her character in the story is the most unbelievable. One of the biggest reasons that I think Madame Loisel is not believable as a character is because she worked for ten years to pay off a debt that could have been prevented in the first place. She could have prevented the debt by her just simply not losing the necklace, because, in reality, it would be very hard to lose a necklace because it is literally attached to her neck so, unless if she took it off, or it broke, it would be nearly impossible to lose it. Nevertheless, even if she did end up breaking it, she could have had it repaired and returned it to her friend with no questions asked....

Words: 597 - Pages: 3