...How NASA Builds TEAMS (A2)? Please use as example the Case Study: New England PATRIOTS: Making the Team. Use your creativity. Model the way is the first of the five practices of exemplary leadership. In this practice, a leader needs to ensure that their audience understands and believes in something strongly. Leaders are expected to speak on and stand for matters of conscience and value to the organization. In order to do this, a leader needs to Find Their Voice. In other words, the leader needs to discover what they are passionate about. This practice is analogues to the Express Authentic Appreciation behavior in NASA’s 4-D team building methodology. In order to be able to express authentic appreciation towards their audience, a leader needs to be in tune with what drives the members of his audience. Listening to the audience, asking clarifying questions, and expressing expectations can accomplish this. The second subcomponent of model the way is Affirm Shared Values. This subcomponent is vital to the success of any team, group, or organization because as individuals, we each have different motivators, but if we share core values then building quality relationships can be accomplished. Address Shared Values is the 4-D behavior that when practiced aids in building strong and genuine relationships, which is a fundamental element of successful and productive teams. Both the model the way practice and cultivate behavior address a very fundamental human need which is...
Words: 4437 - Pages: 18
...After being asked to make a decision on the important vote that we've been asked to take part in, I've carefully scoured the details of both sides and have made a final decision. The vote will determine the outcome of the Patriot Act. The patriot act is the government's program for monitoring our digital habits, and hopefully finding and stopping terrorists. The United States Public has a very torn opinion of the Patriot act. And if we were to vote for what we believe is best for the public, I think we should vote in favor of the Patriot Act, and I'll explain why. Firstly, I'll start with the side of the argument that disagrees with the Patriot Act. I can understand what points are being made by this side, but I see no inherent issue with...
Words: 435 - Pages: 2
...Would you prefer to be a Patriot or a Loyalist? Personally, I would prefer to be Patriot.Here are three specific reasons on WHY I prefer being a Patriot over a Loyalist. My first reason on why I prefer being a Patriot instead of a Loyalist is that they do not get abused. They do not get wiped nor have hot tar poured on top of them and feathers stuck to their body while parading down the streets. When you are a Loyalist, one of your punishments is getting whipped or hot tar poured on your head. Patriots do not abuse each other/did not abused their groups. This group is very kind to each other and have lots of respect for each other. The Patriots are on the Rebellion side and are their own little group which is why they do NOT abuse each other...
Words: 385 - Pages: 2
...The USA Patriot policy paper University of Phoenix The USA Patriot policy paper The Patriot policy developed, after the horrible events of 9/11 attacks. It was in power to ensure that Americans would never have to deal with a tragedy as such again happening, to our beloved society and citizens. That we will protect and secure from the United States enemies and will be better equip, to prevent threats and attacks that are foreign and domestic. A paper we will discuss our point, of view of the Patriot Act and the related legislation that deal with the following areas. Like the Societal implications of the USA PATRIOT law and similar legislation limiting daily behaviors. Next are the worries associated to race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, and beliefs as they identify with police agencies and security services. After that are the effect with technology and globalization and the balance of individual rights against public safety. Another is the influence of domestic and international terrorism about federal agencies also private security companies, and lastly is the conclusion. Societal implications of the USA PATRIOT Act and related legislation limiting daily behaviors For some of the citizens of the United States, the Patriot Act has no tangible impact on them. Although groups feel that, it could be harsh effects on constitutional rights. The theory of the patriot act can give the government more freedom to spy on citizens and use the argument within their case...
Words: 2235 - Pages: 9
...the World Trade Center in New York City, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the intention of finding and indicting international terrorists performing on American soil; however, the adverse ramifications of the Act have been dire. Many of the Patriot Act’s virtues are in violation of the U.S. Constitution, a document outlined in order to protect American rights and freedoms. The Patriot Act infringes on the First Amendment rights, which is protects the of freedom of speech,...
Words: 770 - Pages: 4
...U.S.A. Patriot ACT (Traylyn Redman) September the 11th 200l is a day that we all know well and remember for the rest of our lives. It is a day that will down in U.S. history as one of the most historic and tragic events in our history. One response enlighten of these events that was put in place was the USA PATRIOT ACT. The reason why the USA PARTIOT ACT was signed is mainly because of poor intelligence that the U.S. has had prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In addition to have a plan and reanalyze our intelligence we can make sure this attack would never happen again on American soil. The patriot act is a critical and historical event in itself. The act was put into place very quickly after 9/11. The government and President Bush had seen the U.S. as a whole was a strong country but still had weaknesses and were vulnerable to attacks without taking swift action. The act was signed on October 26, 2001, just one month after the 9/11 attacks. The patriot act was put in place for many reasons and has been a benefit and various ways. There has still been criticism and skepticism of the act in just the short term of the act being signed. The act of information sharing is one factor that the critics argue. The critics argument that this information would get into the wrong hands or be used by other agencies for unrelated or wrong reasons. The act would permit wiretaps on terrorist or even any potential terror threat over more than one jurisdiction. This would make sense...
Words: 955 - Pages: 4
...THE USA PATRIOT ACT--GOOD OR EVIL? Abstract Terrorism has been around in one form or another since long before September 11th 2001. It is our extreme reaction to the real threat of a terrorist attack began 9/11/2001. Although the odds of dying from a terrorist attack in America are extremely remote, after the attacks of 9/11/2001 and the overwhelming show of concern by American citizens, Congress hastily put together a bill outlining the workings of the U.S. Patriot Act. The United States Patriot Act of 2001 was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2001. President Barack Obama signed the Patriot Sunsets Extension Act of 2011, which created a 4 year extension of 3 key parts of the Patriot Act. Warrantless searches of business records, roving wiretaps, & conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities not linked to any specific organized terrorist groups. The Patriot Act dramatically reduced restrictions on law enforcement agencies' ability to search all records, documents, histories, etc., without the restraints of the normal operations of judicial law which most citizens assume will always protect them. The National and State Governments and their agencies work together to implement the Patriot Act with as minimal an “obvious” intrusion as possible into ours, the American citizens lives. It is obvious the security must be there, but with a minimal amount of perceived disruption to constitutionally given freedoms and rights. US...
Words: 2455 - Pages: 10
...The USA Patriot Act also known as the (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001) was a law signed by President at the time George W. Bush. The basis of this act was rushed into Congress after the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York City. In 2011 President Obama renewed the Patriot Act while granting a four year extension on four main parts of the USA Patriot Act. The basis of the Patriot Act is to conduct wiretaps, searches of business records, and conducting lone wolf surveillance on individuals suspected to be committing terroristic activities on United States soil. As recent as this year the Patriot Act came back into the news after...
Words: 432 - Pages: 2
...to protect the people without infringing on our privacy and fourth amendment rights. A discussion will be made to consider the advantages, and disadvantages of making the USA Patriot Act mandatory statue. As of now some of the patriot act has is under revision while other parts have been voted on and extended. To fully grasp why or why not the patriot act should become a permanent statue in American law. In order to fully understand the patriot act we must know the reason for its existence and the definition of what it is must be understood, to know that it is wrong and goes against our fourth amendment rights. Americans should be aware so that we can call out to congress to repeal the Patriot act. On October 26, 2001 an act of congress was signed into law by President George W. Bush known as the Patriot Act. It gives permission to law enforcement officers to search a home or business without the owner's compliance or knowledge. The extended usage of national security letters that allow the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to search and monitor telephone and e-mail communication and financial records without a court order; and the expanded access of law enforcement agencies to business records, including library and financial records (History.com). According to the Department of justice, the Patriot Act is set in place to use surveillance already used in everyday life to track terrorists and criminals such as drug traffickers and the mafia. The Act got rid of legal barriers...
Words: 1239 - Pages: 5
...The Patriot Act After the September 11 terrorist attacks, the country was in a state a mass hysteria. As a result, the United States Congress passed the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or known simply as The Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the objective of locating and arresting terrorists working on American soil in order to prevent another major attack from happening. The only way to do this was for the Patriot Act to allow for the unconstitutional surveillance of Americans citizens. As a result, the Patriot Act is an infringement on basic American ideals and freedoms. The first infringement of citizens’ rights is Section 213. Section 213, also known as the “sneak and peek” section, violates the Fourth Amendment by allowing law enforcement to enter a person’s house or apartment, search through their things, and even seize their property while they were gone without having to tell them first. The Fourth Amendment was intended to protect people from any unreasonable searches and seizures, and also requires the...
Words: 920 - Pages: 4
...Introduction The Patriot act in my opinion has served the United States a great justice in many unique ways. There are so many aspects to this act. These aspects stretch as far as, why it came about, and what is the biggest protest towards it? The combination of all these aspects gave me the interest to write on it. There were a few things that made this Act stand out but the determining factor was simply that it dealt with controlling terrorist acts. After September 11, 2001 I always had a little fear inside, and always thought what our country is going to do to make sure this does not happen again. I have always had a great interest on how the United States protects itself from these terrorist acts of violence and felt understanding the Patriot Act should give me a clearer picture on how our system truly works. Throughout the next couple of pages I will use various researched information to provide the reader a clear insightful view of the Patriot Act through my perspective. I will focus mainly on Act titles that I feel are the most important, along with a brief overview of these titles, I will also provide some background information, controversial issues, alternatives, and some of my own recommendations on how to improve the Patriot Act. Lastly, like many other Acts or laws there have been many changes and amendments to the Patriot Act over the last several years, this being said I will also supply the reader with an update on the Act’s current status...
Words: 2934 - Pages: 12
...from the Magna Carta in 1215 to the more current event of Operation Neptune Spear. Although many documents and plans have been beneficial to the well being of Americans, The Patriot Act and NSC-68 have been the most influential in American culture. They fundamentally have shaped the way we think, act and carry out government ideas. Even though the Patriot Act and NSC-68 involve two separate incidents, they still talk about some of the same issues. In the NSC-68 document, it highlights key differences between the military in the United States and that of the Soviet Union. It states that the military of the United States has a goal in doing things...
Words: 809 - Pages: 4
...important for us to worry about terrorism and to defend our country but it is not necessary for our government to take away our civil liberties in the process. So where does this leave us? Do we let terrorism scare us into losing our civil liberties or do we ignore terrorism and keep our rights? I do not think we have to compromise our safety from terrorism to keep our civil liberties, there has got to be a common ground where everyone can keep their civil liberties and still be safe from terrorism. I believe that restrictions in civil liberties violate the underlying principles of American democracy greatly. It is not necessary to throw out everything this country stands for to prevent us from being hurt by terrorism. There are many other ways to fight terrorism without violating our rights as American citizens. I do not understand the governments need to tap into our conversations...
Words: 969 - Pages: 4
...Ferguson began preparing to face his enemies. The Patriots reached Gilbert Town at last, and quickly realized that Ferguson and the militia were not there. The Patriots were notified from a spy that the Loyalists were approximately 30 miles ahead near King’s Mountain. The spy, Joseph Kerr assured the commanders that Ferguson was there and he also quoted him saying that he “was on King’s Mountain, that he was the King of that mountain and that God Almighty and all the rebels of hell could not drive him from it.” The Patriots grew in number after being joined by South Carolina soldiers. The Patriots marched through the night and the next day. On October 7, mid-day they reached King’s Mountain. King’s Mountain was a portion of the Blue Ridge Mountains and elevates about 60 feet. The top of the mountain was like a plateau and had heavily rocky descents. The base of the mountain was heavily treed and there were scattered trees along the steep sides of the...
Words: 1185 - Pages: 5
...Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, or USA Patriot Act was established on 26 October 2001 “just forty-five days after it was introduced” (Alex, Carrington, & Ward, 2008). The aggressive security measures combined with “the vague nature of the wording and the broad exception clauses” has steadily kept the light on the Patriot Act (Theissen, 2012). The Patriot Act was supposed to protect and builder a stronger defense against terrorism, to prevent future attracts on U.S soil. Instead it allowed law enforcement to violate the people’s civil right to privacy. It is an “example of a good idea gone too far [and] how the Patriot Act has been used in an effort to expand government powers in areas having nothing to do with terrorism” (Dempsey, 2012). Debatably, the amendment is written for open interpretation for law enforcement to use as they see fit. This is seen when “from 2006-2009, [Section] 213 was abused 1,740 times granting sneak and peak search warrants involving drugs [and] or fraud, … only 0.8% sneak and peak warrants were used in the suspicion of terrorism” (Timm, 2011). This is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment which states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause…” (Legal dictionary, 2012). Sixteen sections in the Patriot Act have what is called a Sunset Provision, meaning “a statutory...
Words: 1286 - Pages: 6
