...Assisted suicide is a very controversial issue with numbers of pros and cons that can affect both national and international codes of ethics. Assisted suicide is emotional and controversial which ranks up there with abortion. The main thing we need to come up with is that is it morally ethical to kill someone even if the person is in pain. And there is way we can answer that without stating all the pros and cons it comes with. Let's start by saying that it goes against religious views and also against medical ethics if it is the doctor or nurse doing the assisted suicide. If the patient is suffering at the end of his life people have the right not to suffer. It should be considered as much of a crime to make someone live who with justification does not wish to continue as it is to take life without consent. Activists often claim that the laws against assisted suicide are government mandated suffering. But this claim would be similar to saying that laws against selling contaminated food are government mandated starvation. Laws against assisted suicide are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people from dishonest doctors and others. They are not, and never have been, intended to make anyone suffer. The legal right to die some people refer to the liberty interest implicated in right to die cases as a liberty interest in committing suicide we described it as the right to die and determining the time and the manner of one's death and hastening ones death for an important...
Words: 971 - Pages: 4
...for or against today’s issues issues. One major issue in today’s world is physician assisted suicide. When people think about physician assisted suicide, they think primarily about five things; they ask what is it, what are the facts, who’s choice is it, what are the development in health care, and where can this lead? What is physician assisted suicide? Physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS, is when a physician provides the necessary means or information to a patient to kill himself/herself. However, the patient is the one who actually performs the act. People often get physician assisted suicide confused with euthanasia. Euthanasia is when the physician does both actions for the patient; the physician provides the means and performs the means. After people realize what physician assisted...
Words: 1286 - Pages: 6
...Assisted Suicide Is it moral or ethically right for a doctor to have an ability to end the life of a terminally ill patient who is undergoing severe pain and suffering? My personal position is that if we believe that there is a human right to life, then we must accept that people have their own right to dispose of that life whenever and however they may choose. I do not believe that telling people they have a right to life while denying them the method to end life has any ethical consistency. I believe everyone has the right to not suffer therefore why I believe in the pros of assisted suicide. I have weighed the pros and cons for each side to show the controversy each point can have. The main topics are an individual’s “right to die”, patient...
Words: 1245 - Pages: 5
...Some would contest the belief that assisted suicide is should be allowed by saying it is morally wrong. In the Netherlands, assisted suicide is allowed. One law pertaining to assisted suicide says that children with disabilities are allowed to be killed at the request of parents (Smith). It is estimated that around 1,000 patients are killed a year that do not ask to die (Smith). In the case that the person has lost means of communication the decision will be made for him or her. Many are afraid that allowing more restricted laws elsewhere will eventually lead to these more extreme laws such as in the United States (US). Those who are pro-assisted suicide would agree the death of children and individuals who cannot communicate should not...
Words: 925 - Pages: 4
...Assisted suicide is defined as a physician providing a patient the means to take his or her own life. It is done by the administration of a lethal substance usually a type of medication. It is easy to see why this is such a controversial topic, it is dealing with the voluntary death of an individual. Each side has very strong views and arguments on this matter. Many believe that terminal ill patients have the “right to die,” while others say that we as a society have a moral responsibility “to protect and to preserve all life” (Andre, and Velazquez, Assisted Suicide: A Right or a Wrong?). People who are for assisted suicide say that terminally ill patients who are living in severe pain have the “right to die,” and should be allowed to end...
Words: 564 - Pages: 3
...A current topic in debate is whether a person should have the right to choose when they can die? I believe a person who is terminally ill should be able to choose when they want to die. Assisted suicide is where a patient who is terminally ill can take a medication that would end their life peacefully. According to Telegram.com there were five states that allowed assisted suicide in 2014, those states were Oregon, New Mexico, Vermont, Montana, and Washington. Since 2014, there have been two additional states that have approved the right to be able to choose assisted suicide and those two states are California and Hawaii. Hawaii was the most recent signing on April 5th, 2018 by Governor David Ige and it will go into effect on January 1st 2019. California signed on October 5th, 2015 by Governor Jerry Brown and went into effect on June 9th 2016. According to Time.com 143 people have implemented assisted suicide....
Words: 890 - Pages: 4
...In my opinion, Physician-assisted suicide should not be allow because, as a Christian, I believe that if a physician participate in helping someone take his or her life, they are guilty of committed a murder. I am against the practice of helping some take his or her life, besides helping them in the process because of my beliefs in God. “Thou shall not kill” (Exodus 20:13). I disagree that under certain circumstances, physician should be able to help in committing a murder, regardless, of the degree of pain and sufferings that individual is going through. In the case of terminal illnesses (diseases that are untreatable), I believe that you as the patient with the diagnosis can pray to God for help. Either, in curing the disease, or ending...
Words: 265 - Pages: 2
...Ethical Arguments of Physician Assisted Suicide With mounting increase of decriminalization, the ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continues to be debated throughout the media, courtrooms and health care settings11. This debate is rooted in bioethics, as it examines values and moral issues in healthcare, health policy and medical research12. The arguments for and against PAS are founded in these values and morals of our healthcare system and health policy. Key arguments for supporters of PAS focus on two values: autonomy (self-determination) and individual well-being. That is, as individuals we have the right to make decisions not only on how we live, but how and when to end our life. Additionally, PAS supports the principle of beneficence,...
Words: 1001 - Pages: 5
...Proponents of physician assisted suicide might one day win the legalization of physician assisted suicide, but what matters is if you’re willing to apply it to your life or somebody else’s. Compassion, dignity, and autonomy are arguments proponents of physician assisted suicide have, but they’re not arguments that are well kept. Compassion can be shown in many different ways; we can spend time with people, donate money, donate resources, and plain and simply show how much we love and care for each other. Dignity doesn’t relate to death in anyway. When you remember somebody who died you don’t remember what they were like on their death bed. You wouldn’t want to do them the dishonor of that. You would remember them they way they were when...
Words: 300 - Pages: 2
...PAS Debate Paper by Shruti Pandey Should anyone suffering from a terminal illness have the right to a physician assisted suicide? I, Senator Pandey, believe that anyone suffering from a terminal illness should never resort to physician assisted suicide because of the many negative impacts the action would have. Legalizing PAS (or physician-assisted suicide) would be profoundly dangerous. The risks would extend not just to terminally-ill patients but to elderly citizens who feel as though they are a burden to their family and to society, as well as people with disabilities, handicaps, and those who are mentally-depressed. It is also true that heirs or abusive caregivers may push someone towards PAS. In 1990, PAS became more well-known when...
Words: 561 - Pages: 3
...human right and a legal option for anyone around the globe. One major benefit of physician-assisted suicide is that it ends suffering. According to "Doctor Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List," as death nears, a lot of physical pain can occur from terminal...
Words: 1018 - Pages: 5
...are on the verge of suicide? Well the only answer would be to commit it but what if that person can't find the guts to go through it alone. Well then they ask for assistance. This is called assisted suicide. Assisted suicide or in other words euthanasia is the killing by an act of an independent human being for their own benefit. There are many kinds of definitions that one must argue the fact of, what is euthanasia. Well you would have to keep reading farther on. Euthanasia can either be voluntary or non voluntary, when it then becomes murder. But what it is not is that it's not euthanasia unless the death is intentionally. It is not medical actions or withdrawing treatment. But in this essay I will give you the most frequent pros and cons of this issue. My view is that there should be allowed assisted suicide. As many people might know is that many people are against euthanasia than most others. Some examples of people being against it would be that it demeans the value of human life, which the human life could have many different views as people understand the concept of actually doing it. Anyway, in many cases, many religions do not allow the potential suicide and the killing of others. Also it would violate the Hippocratic doctors oath. Some people also believe that someday a miracle might actually happen. Lastly people think that doctors are given too much power, and by some miracle might be wrong or unethical. Also people think that assisted suicide could be mandated...
Words: 1003 - Pages: 5
...Final Project Proposal Jamie Erwin PHI/105 February 1, 2015 Professor Randall Knighton Final Project Proposal The topic I have chosen to write about for my final project is, the Pros and Cons of Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide. Many societies have associated the taking of an individual’s own life with the magnitude of their morality. In the United States, the courts have ruled that no one actually has the right to die, and due to this, physician assisted suicide is outlawed throughout most of the world. There are only a few countries or states that have legalized this process. A lot of people will always associate Dr. Jack Kevorkian as the example of the way that a physician assisted suicide happens, however that is not always the case. When an individual has a terminal illness and they make the choice (being in their right state of mind, and have gotten a second opinion) choose to die, then their doctor may write a fatal prescription for that individual. There are definitely pros and cons to physician assisted suicide, in this paper I plan on showing both sides of the argument. Beginning with a few of the cons…as with any death, there is going to be grief over the loss. At times due to their spiritual beliefs, people feel like a physician assisted suicide is a selfish or even sinful act. This perspective has a lifelong effect on a person and they may harbor resentment, no one can say for sure if there is an afterlife, which is more about a negative personal perspective...
Words: 583 - Pages: 3
...There is a “slippery slope” effect that has occurred where euthanasia has been first been legalized for only the terminally and later laws are changed to allow it for other people or to be done non-voluntarily. Opposition overcomes 48 point deficit to defeat assisted suicide - Ballot Question 2 in Massachusetts 1 1 0 Google BOSTON, Nov. 7, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- In a stunning upset, the voters of Massachusetts soundly defeated Ballot Question 2 on Election Day. Dealing a significant setback to the expansion of the assisted suicide movement throughout the United States by Compassion & Choices (the organization formerly known as the Hemlock Society), a diverse coalition of disability rights organizations, medical associations, nurses' groups, community leaders and faith-based organizations united in this effort. "Tonight was a huge victory for those of us in the disability rights community that have worked for so long against assisted suicide," noted John Kelly , Director of Second Thoughts – People with Disabilities Opposing Question 2. "This vote confirms that Massachusetts voters saw through the rhetoric and outright misinformation put out by those supporting assisted suicide. Opposition to assisted suicide cuts across all partisan and...
Words: 6383 - Pages: 26
...Kader Lochina EN 102 Exploratory essay “Physician assisted suicide” Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is the voluntary termination of one's life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. It is legal in a few countries like the Netherlands. In the United States it is legal in only the state of Oregon. It is a very controversial topic with 3 different opinions groups. The group of people who are for it, those who are opposed to it and there is a third neutral group which is composed of medical associations. The first group is composed of the pro PAS .They argue that there are some patients who experience terrible suffering that can't be relieved by any other of the therapeutic techniques nursing has to offer, and some of those patients desperately seek deliverance. For pro PAS, PAS is not about doctors killing patients , but it is about patients whose pain cannot be relieved. Physicians who consider it merciful to help a patient to die by writing a prescription are not criminals. Supporters of PAS feel It is cruel to leave patients who need such help to find for themselves solutions to end their own lives, solutions that can be traumatic when human assistance can be available. The physicians have obligations, but when a cure is impossible and palliation has failed to achieve its objectives, there is always a remaining obligation to relieve suffering....
Words: 935 - Pages: 4
