Table of Contents A. Page 1 Cover Sheet B. Page 2 Table of Contents C. Page 3-4 The relationship between IT Governance (ITG) and IT execution. D. Page 5-6 Describe how the COBIT framework institutes mechanisms to control IT risk. E. Page 7 Works Cited

The relationship between IT Governance (ITG) and IT execution is always talked about. IT Governance is usually seen as a fundamental part of corporate influence and execution acknowledged as how the processes of ITG have been executed; however there are it can be said that IT Governance is a subordinate methodology to Enterprise Architecture, controlling the definition and satisfaction of IT abilities inside EA. To further things, the idea of Enterprise Architecture Governance (EAG) is developing, yet it doesn't have a created definition (Korhonen, 2009). * Design, arranging and underpin perspective that keeps tabs on outer viability. It permits the association to make new capacities with enduring focus and to react to updates in nature's domain. This angle is about "doing the right things".
• Development and execution angle that is concentrated on interior productivity. Organizational capacities of this sort are retrospective and internal looking and advertise unoriginality and responsibility. It is about streamlining the existing operations with fleeting center and reacting to foreseeable possibilities. This angle is about "doing the things right”.
In this paper, the main challenge was that the administration forms and control instruments of IT legislation are deficient for all encompassing influence of endeavour construction modelling. Although IT administration fundamentally concentrates on running every day IT operations, EA is basically concentrated on outlining what's to come state of construction modelling in backing of business. IT legislation structures, for example, COBIT characterize strategy improvement and great practice for IT control, yet EA still calls for similar administration measures.
Subsequently, we positioned EA administration and IT influence as portrayed in the figure underneath. The inside of gravity in EA administration is on the arranging side and at the strategic level, although the attention of IT legislation is on the operational execution. In EA administration, the view seems, by all accounts, to be association wide and thoughtfulness regarding be regulated to outer viability. Interestingly, the target of IT influence might be that of interior proficiency.

While our qualification between EAG and ITG gives off an impression of being in accordance with a few feelings, there are numerous varying perspectives on the matter. On the other hand, we considered the positioning accommodating in planning a more equalized administration structure that lightens the characteristic clash between EA, whose fundamental target is to back business change, and IT, whose principle destination is to minimize hazard and guarantee consistence.

COBIT Framework
COBIT is a structure that is an open standard which shows the prerequisites an association can follow to attain a robust level of control and security of sensitive information. COBIT, which was built in the 1990, could be seen upon as an approach to concurrently measure quality and make inner controls (Goessl, 2009). The COBIT framework consists of six components, Executive Summary, Framework, Control Objective, Control Practices, Management Guidelines and Audit Guidelines (Christian Lahti & Roderick Peterson, 2007).
These six parts basically are a benchmarking strategy to improve measures of adequacy for IT improvement, and ought to be redone to help. The way the COBIT schema organizes components to control IT hazard is it makes an organized approach to accompany. The structure of COBIT is made up of four domains and the domain is the establishment. The four areas are: Planning and association, Acquisition and execution, Delivery and help, and Monitoring, and each of these assume an uncommon part in furnishing control practices and observing to guarantee agreeability and security of information.
Regulating and supervising hazard is a critical rule of COBIT, and by executing this system, chiefs have a consecutive and expansive extension set up that helps them keep instruments set up to lessen chance however much as could reasonably be expected. No level of danger is ever 100% secured or moderated, however by organizing a schema, for example COBIT, this can essentially decrease any vulnerabilities or mistakes with information. The helps in enhancing business worth and can likewise be utilized as an aid to increase a focused focal point. COBIT structure imbues tighter controls and is a procedure that is acknowledged to lessen the level of danger in terms of IT legislation. COBIT is not intended to be a one-size fits all sort of skeleton, and associations are better embracing the areas of COBIT that apply to their own particular structures. By utilizing COBIT managers can better screen their data security control practices in a non-specialized manner that is justifiable. Laws, for example SOX don't address IT, yet IT is truly a part of SOX. That being the situation, COBIT is perfect with IT and subsequently makes for an exceptional structure for organizations to use with a specific end goal to meet both administrative agreeability necessities.

Works Cited
Goessl, L. (2009, October 19). How the COBIT Framework can help businesses control IT risk . Retrieved from http://www.helium.com: http://www.helium.com/items/1621276-how-the-cobit-framework-can-help-businesses-control-it-risk
Korhonen, J. J. (2009, November 9). EA and IT Governance: a Systemic Approach. Retrieved from http://www.ebizq.ne: http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/agile_enterprise/2009/11/ea-and-it-governance-a-systemic-approach.php