The Ron Paul experiment is a political science exercise with great irony. Its central hypothesis: Even if Paul wins the presidency, the powers-that-be will prevent him from taking office by declaring a national emergency, furthering the plan to bring the United States into a one-world, socialist government.

In order for the hypothesis to be proven, it will take all-out, all-partisan support to elect Paul. Any other outcome — victory for Barrack Obama, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich — will not spoil plans for the one-world agenda, either.

To prove the hypothesis, voters must agree that currently, the United States no longer subscribes to its own Constitution and the rule of law. If this cannot be agreed upon and enough would-be voters still believe their vote is anything more than an affirmation of the status quo, things will in fact continue to move ahead as planned toward a one-world socialist government.

The irony of the experiment is Paul’s platform of civil liberty and strict constitutionalism. Ending the federal reserve and upholding the simple rights of due process are in direct contradiction to a one-world agenda. Without your vote for Paul, we will not have proven the foregone conclusion of the hypothesis in such a dramatic fashion. When we stand there in the end, at least those of us brave enough to vote for Paul can say we called them out.

Wake up! An Obama victory is not a Republican loss, any more than a Republican victory is not an Obama loss. It’s all a loss — unless you vote for Paul. Then all you get is the satisfaction of saying “I told you so” — but at least you get that.