...The Shock Doctrine Matt Linseman The Shock Doctrine describes the concept of “disaster capitalism” where the “the powers that be” exploit the current social and economic systems in place to gain an advantage over the general population and in turn achieve their ultimate goal of generating any type of profit or power possible. Naomi Klein’s book describes how free market policies have come to dictate the world with the help of disaster manipulation, torturous exercises and shock of all kinds implemented upon countries as well as individuals themselves for profit and power gain. Naomi Klein dissects this theory in her book by illustrating countless unfortunate events that have happened across the globe such as revolutions, terrorist attacks, market meltdowns, wars and natural disasters and how “disaster capitalism” is implemented behind the scenes while these events take place. “Friedman defines these orchestrated raids on the public sphere in the wake of catastrophic events, combined with the treatment of disasters as exciting ‘market opportunities’ or ‘disaster capitalism.’”(p6) It’s interesting because critics have been known to label Klein as a kind of conspiracist due to the nature and tone of her writing, though she does backup her arguments. She also follows the actions of a man named Milton Friedman throughout her book; she describes him as “a grand guru of the movement for unrestricted capitalism and for writing the rulebook for the contemporary, hypermobile global...
Words: 771 - Pages: 4
...The question on my mind after seeing The Shock Doctrine was whether ends justify means. Quite possibly, this is the question Klein wanted to be asked, because much of her case regards the distasteful means taken in order to further free market economics, tactics which the very proponents of these dogmas may feel they want to disassociate themselves with. However, my question was about Klein's/Winterbottom's own tactics. The film uses all methods that we've grown used to from modern politics: cherry-picked facts, "proofs" by emotionally-charged metaphors, hinted claims of guilt by association, sound-bite slogans that are repeated incessantly, and, of course, scare tactics. Sad to say, I've come to expect these things from political candidates that need to make their points in a 30-second TV appearance. I've even come to expect them in rating-seeking news programs. But have we stooped so low that these tactics are now par-for-the-course in documentaries, where a film-maker has 90 minutes of canvas to make a clear, compelling, and well-argued case? I happen to agree with Klein's stance that extreme capitalism is dangerous, and I think what we are seeing in both Europe and China in recent years (e.g. the collapse of Chinese nation-wide education and health policies) are just further proofs of the narrative Klein forwards. However, I don't see that there is a well-argued case here that would convince someone claiming that any change, good or bad, rarely happens in a peaceful way...
Words: 407 - Pages: 2
...Soc. 403 May, 8, 2012 Shock Doctrine Through history wars and natural disasters have been part of the adversities humanity has suffered. Mankind has managed to get ahead with theses adversities but it becomes hard to believe where blood, and pain takes place others can get benefits from death. Where some fight for a better equal society others are expecting to spend a disgrace to make money from it. In the book “The Shock Doctrine” by Naomi Klein, critiques how free market is dominating the world through the exploitation of disaster-shocked people and countries. America has become a corporatist state using the element of shock treatment among citizens. The term “disaster capitalism” first pointed out in the book by economist Milton Friedman claims that “whenever government have imposed sweeping free-market programs, the all-at-once shock treatment or shock therapy has been the method of choice” (8). Friedman observed only a crisis actual or perceived produces real change and the new fundamental change was a permanent reform. The reason is simple capitalism has always needed disasters to advance and the prefer method to achieve goals from corporations utilizing a collective trauma engage in radical social and economic engineering. The shock therapy has helped America to become a corporative state where free market makes everything, it is the ultimate goal but hand with hand privatizing is what leads to corporations to a better success without of these disasters...
Words: 1436 - Pages: 6
...With the implementation of fair trade policies and the straining policies that the WTO (World Trade Organization) initiates, globalization will become a threat to the current status of power around the world. Globalization is the process by which regional economies, societies, and cultures have become integrated through a global network of politics through communication, transportation, and trade. Globalization will create a one world economy, where big global corporations make a fortune exploiting slave labor on the other side of the world. With the treat of these global corporations taking control of the world economy because of fair trade policies, Naomi Klein’s argument about disaster capitalism that is discussed in her book The Shock Doctrine, can be directly related. Globalization helps develop third world countries in response to the outsourcing of jobs that multinational corporations carry out. As more capital is poured in to developing countries, those countries will acquire economic stability and increase their standard of living. In return the economy that those individuals belong to will also begin to grow. As stated in Forbes Magazine, “Per-person income in China has climbed from $16 a year in 1978 to $2,000 now. Wages in factory boomtowns in southern China can run $4 a day--scandalously low in the eyes of the protesters, yet up from pennies a day a generation ago and far ahead of increases in living costs” (Robyn Meredith and Suzanne Hoppough). China’s economy...
Words: 1225 - Pages: 5
...flows. The concept of globalization is said to have been spawned out of the Cold War as a result of the increase in specialization and the need for trade. As a result of globalization many economists, businesspeople, and politicians have found that they needed to change their policies and adopt what is called “the Golden Straightjacket”, which is a set of guidelines that governments and businesses must follow to be successful in a unified market. Many economists, politicians, authors, and businesspeople have differing views on the costs and benefits of putting on the Golden Straightjacket. Tom Friedman, an economist and author, argues that the Golden Straightjacket is a good thing for the world economy, while Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine, argues that free trade is a technique used to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Other ideas that have been argued are the effect globalization has on the spread of democracy. Tom Friedman argues that globalization is used to revolutionize governments to conform to democracy while Dani Rodrik, author of The Globalization Paradox, says that globalization actually hinders the spread of democracy. Klein, Rodrik, and Friedman offer differing views that reveal the various costs and benefits of globalization. Globalization usually refers to the global distribution of goods and services though reduction of barriers to trade. Globalization has existed for as long as there has been international trade. Our ancestors used trade routes...
Words: 1818 - Pages: 8
...stages of disaster capitalism is shock and awe and the inception of what she refers to as the shock doctrine. Throughout Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine, she describes how cataclysmic events whether through wars, terrorism, military coups, market meltdowns or natural disasters open the doors to Friedmanite (named after Milton Friedman) economics (2007). Not only do these disastrous events make countries susceptible to increased exploitation from free market capitalists looking to profit from disaster, their radical economic policies and the massive privatization of public schools, utilities, health care and other public services, but also, as Klein describes in the book, it has led to some of the most atrocious and violent acts carried out by governments and their army and police forces throughout the world. Klein begins with describing the events that took place immediately after Louisiana was hit by Hurricane Katrina. She introduces us to Milton Friedman, author of Capitalism and Freedom and the one responsible for using “shock therapy” to implement Chicago School economics in other countries. Friedman’s goal was to recreate societies and return them to a pure capitalist state without any interruptions, government regulations, trade barriers and entrenched interests (Klein, 2007). In addition, he believed that the reformation to pure capitalism of these societies was not possible without the presence of a disaster or state of collective shock. When disaster strikes, societies...
Words: 1235 - Pages: 5
...Mac Yerks Katie Javers English 201 2/18/14 Is Google Affecting Us? Picture yourself on the couch at home browsing the internet for information you need for your English paper. You probably would be in the library right now but due to a hazardous snow storm that kept you in side you have no book materials for your paper. You start scavenging the internet for information you need. Bouncing from one hyperlink to the other on what you might find easy, convenient information. You find yourself skimming through the readings you find and having to re-read what you read to fully understand what it is that you read. Why is that? Well, Nicholas Carr in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” is warning his readers that the internet is affecting the way that we read and think in a negative way. In his opening paragraph he tells his readers about how the internet can be convenient for everything we need in life and can be helpful; however Carr goes on by saying that we are becoming too dependent on the internet and he tells us that because of the constant bouncing around from one hyperlink to another, we are not fully understanding the whole thought of what we are reading. Bouncing from one link to the other you are not reading the whole article instead looking for that one word to pops out and only read that one sentence. Carr also points out that we are passively reading the information and not reading into depth about the information in which he is referring us to “pancake people”...
Words: 738 - Pages: 3
...Book Review: This Changes Everything, by Naomi Klein, published: Sept. 2014 Summarize the book. What is being discussed? Rob Nixon of the New York Times called Naomi Klein’s “This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate” “a book of such ambition and consequence that it is almost unreviewable.[1]” Naomi Klein researches the impact of Climate change and its relationship with free market capitalism. She discusses capitalism as failed economic system. She goes into great depth on the subject of resource extraction, pollution and the events of surrounding the affected communities in these regions across the world. However, rather than concluding that things are hopeless Naomi Klein argues that: We can build something better and reclaim our economic system. She argues that the market cannot save us. We have the tools/technology to get off of fossil fuels, but it requires leaving free market capitalism behind. We need to rebuild local economies, reign in corporate power and reclaim democracy. She argues that we aren’t all the all powerful saviours of the planet, but that as visitors on the earth we have to save ourselves from an earth that is rocking, burning and driving humanity into extinction because of our actions. Describe the three most important arguments or claims made in the book. The first argument Naomi Klein makes is that world leaders and climate scientists agree if we are going to avoid truly catastrophic consequences of climate change; we need to...
Words: 1681 - Pages: 7
...Checkpoint Culture Shock Funkadelic SOC/120 February 23, 2012 Gena Rata Checkpoint Culture Shock If I was visiting and studying the Yanomamo the way I would prepare myself for possible culture shock is to educate myself deeply beforehand about the culture. This will enhance my understanding why they do the things they do. I honestly think I would have been fascinated to observe this culture, there is always something very unique and diverse of each one. There was a very unique and moving moment in my life where culture shock was the best thing to ever happen in my life. I live in this world, and lived by this world doing what the world does, and saying what they say. My first visit to The Church was my moment of culture shock, when I first walked in the primary thing you see is woman on one side of the church and men on the opposite side. The woman wear a veil over the heads, I was so amazed and had so many different questions. Now that I recognize what culture shock is, I know this is when I experienced it, I walked into a new life. Such morals, such teaching and doctrine, so unique, and it makes me understand why I breathe today. Not just for a material life but further into a spiritual life. By understanding the major components of culture you create empathy, and recognition then you are less offended or staggered by what is being done or said. By understanding this then you are more liberal to ask questions just as I did, and when you ask questions you...
Words: 285 - Pages: 2
...policies coupled with conservative politics eliminating public services and increasing funding for military like public sector jobs in police departments. Finally through the work of economists Naomi Klein’s writing the Shock Doctrine, describes how the use of shocks, whether natural disaster shock like Katerina or economic shocks like the bail out of US banks 2008 resulted is the stripping of public sector services like SNAP benefits and affordable housing assistance. In her work the notion of depriving groups of resources can create division between people based on these economic shocks. In her narrative we can argue how such shocks have created a bigger gap between the have and the have nots through economic division of labor and opportunity for higher paying professions and the opportunities to advance themselves through higher educational opportunities. Following these shocks like educational stratification, continuing to create a racial divides between professional successes based on educational achievement, continues to highlight the impact of social shock. Concluding the social shocks and deprivation of basic needs through the lens of Naomi Klein we can see the intersectionality of Kathryn’s and Michelle’s work through a series of economic shocks impacting the quality of life to communities of working poor black and brown families. However, government supported policies of discrimination and racism, continues to be supported and embraced in our own back yards. Understanding...
Words: 797 - Pages: 4
...Europe could not do many things because of the Monroe Doctrine. The three main concepts of the doctrine were to separate spheres of influence for the Americas and Europe, non-colonization, and non-intervention—were designed to signify a clear break between the New World and the autocratic realm of Europe (History.State.Gov). The Monroe Doctrine was another big reason why the United States declared war on Spain. The Spanish American War went on for three in a half weeks and was the best war the United States has ever had. It showed how strong and united we were. The main reason why the United States won was because of the manila bay battle and the taking of Juan Hill by Roosevelt. Theodore Roosevelt resigned as assistant secretary of the navy in 1898 to organize the Rough riders (PBS). A few days after this group did all of that the spanish left Cuba. Lieutenant Colonel Roosevelt's extraordinary heroism and devotion to duty are in keeping...
Words: 526 - Pages: 3
...The Cold War and US Diplomacy II Carter and the Doctrine Dr. Igor Barsegian Pol 300 Contemporary International Problems March 7, 2015 Abstract January, 2010marked the 30th anniversary of the Carter Doctrine as recited by former President Jimmy Carter. The State of the Union, along with his Presidency moved forward without notice. The Carter Doctrine has had a transformative impact on U.S. national security policy. Both massive and lasting, its impact has also been almost entirely pernicious. Put simply, the sequence of events that has landed the United States in the middle of an open-ended war to determine the fate of the Greater Middle East begins here (Bacevich, April 2010) The Carter Doctrine was a policy proclaimed by the president of the United States Jimmy Carter in his State of the Union address on January 23, 1980, which stated that United States would use military force if necessary to defend its national interest in the Persian Gulf region. The doctrine was a response to the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan by Soviet Union, and was intended to deter the Soviet Union-the Cold war adversary of the United States-from seeking hegemony in the Gulf. After stating that Soviet troops in Afghanistan posed “a grave threat to the free movement of middle east oil,” Carter proclaimed (Bracevich, 2010). Carter’s new policy came about because he wanted to develop a containment strategy for the Persian Gulf area. When Carter came to office, unlike John F. Kennedy, his aim was...
Words: 1415 - Pages: 6
...POL 310 Week 3 Quiz To Buy This material Click below link http://www.uoptutors.com/pol-310-ash/pol-310-week-3-quiz 1. Pesticide from the landscape that contaminates the Chesapeake Bay is which type of pollution? Run-offw Treated effluent Subsidence Point source 2. The Clean Water Act and its amendments do not address which of the following problems? Regulating emissions of toxic materials into waterways Treating water so that it is safe to drink Providing funding to build new wastewater treatment facilities Regulating industrial point-source pollution 3. Water rights in Western states are granted under a scheme known as: Riparian Rights. Doctrine of Prior Appropriation. Public Trust Doctrine. Ambient-based Regulation. 4. De-oxygenation of the water caused by agricultural run-off linked to algae growth is known as: eutrophication. sedimentation. desalination. chlorination. 5. The 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act had all of the following goals, except: immediately eliminate the discharge of toxic substances into bodies of water. eventually eliminate all kinds of water pollution. eventually eliminate the need for local wastewater treatment facilities. ensure that surface waters would become safe for human swimming. 6. Drilling for oil in the Alaskan Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would possibly result in the extraction of crude oil. If crude oil was successful extracted, this would: create a refuge for the Porcupine caribou. eliminate...
Words: 406 - Pages: 2
...Credible Keynesianism?: New Labour Macroeconomic Policy and the Political Economy of Coarse Tuning Ben Clift & Jim Tomlinson The article has been accepted for publication in the British Journal of Political Science © Cambridge University Press, 2006. Forthcoming, Volume 36 (2006). Material on these pages is copyright Cambridge University Press or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way or transmitted to others (unless explicitly stated otherwise) without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. Hypertext links to other Web locations are for the convenience of users and do not constitute any endorsement or authorisation by Cambridge University Press. Ben Clift, University of Warwick b.m.clift@warwick.ac.uk http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/staff/clift Jim Tomlinson, University of Dundee j.d.Tomlinson@dundee.ac.uk Abstract This article questions prevailing interpretations of New Labour’s political economy. New Labour’s doctrinal statements are analysed to establish to what extent these doctrinal positions involve a repudiation of Keynesianism. Although New Labour has explicitly renounced the ‘fine tuning’ often (somewhat problematically) associated with post-war Keynesian political economy, we argue that they have carved out policy space in which to engage in macroeconomic ‘coarse tuning’ inspired by Keynesian thinking. This capacity...
Words: 14356 - Pages: 58
...General Patton was an admirer of the M1 Garand (the greatest implement ever devised, he call it). The M35 2½ was what was needed to move those vast supplies when and where necessary. On the other hand, the M4 Sherman (in most of its variants, except for the British Firefly and quite possibly the Easy-Eights) was vastly inferior in combat capabilities when compared to most other medium tanks, and definitely all heavies. The M10 3-inch GMC, and the far better 76mm armed M18 Hellcat were fine vehicles but suffered heavily from the US Army Tank/Tank Destroyer doctrine, where only Tank Destroyers could engage tanks while tanks should avoid tank to tank combat, usually leading to disastrous consequences since the Germans failed to follow said doctrine. All this nonsense was finally scrapped and the M26 came to be. So, let's head to the T34. Revolutionary is an understatement when applied to this magnificent piece of Soviet engineering (hold your shots, Christie fans!). Just to mention some of its characteristics we could say that it was fast, well armed, well protected, reliable, simple, sturdy, easy to build, easier to maintain, sporting an amazing ground pressure ratio, easy to man by crudely trained Siberian draftees, economical, and to top it all handsome as hell. The first tank to have an all-aluminium diesel engine, which made it far less prone to burning at the first strike that the M4 Medium, Ronson, and provide a fantastic power to weight ratio (some 16 HP per tone in the...
Words: 587 - Pages: 3
