Free Essay

The Stolen Generation

In:

Submitted By blueberry
Words 1623
Pages 7
[pic]

A short history of the systematic Removal of Aboriginal Children from their Families in NSW.

“Indigenous children have been forcibly separated from their families and communities since the very first days of the European occupation of Australia” obtained from the Bringing Them Home Report

Who are the Stolen Generations

The term ‘stolen generations” is in reference to those Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who were forcibly removed, as children, from their families and communities by government, welfare and affiliated church organisations. These children were systematically placed into institutional care or with non-Indigenous foster families. Although it can be argued that the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children began as early as the very first days of European occupation in Australia, the forced removal policies and legislation began in the mid 1800s and continued until the 1970s.

There is current discourse in Aboriginal communities supporting the notion that the removal of Aboriginal children from their families and communities continues to exist today in the form of complexities associated with current government policies and legislation and the over representation of Aboriginal children in out of home care.

How and why do we know the forcible removal of Aboriginal children occurred in NSW?

New South Wales, along with other Australian state and territory governments have acknowledged past practices and policies of forced removal of Indigenous children on the basis of race.

The Bringing Them Home Report, commissioned by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) and presented to the Australian government in 1997 came out of the HREOC National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families. This report was central to documenting evidence relating to the forcible removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in NSW and Australia wide. This report contains extensive evidence of past practices and policies which resulted in the removal of children. It also details the conditions into which many of the children were placed and discusses the negative impact this has had on individuals, their families and the broader Indigenous community.

The Bringing Them Home Report (1997, p. 651) extensively suggested 53 detailed recommendations to the Council of Australian Governments.

For further information on the Bringing Them Home Report and the recommendations that were put forward to the Australian government, please go to http://www.hreoc.gov.au/social_Justice/bth_report/report/index.html

Link-Up NSW a Koori organisation founded in 1980 was established to assist the Stolen Generations in finding their way home as well as support families of people who were separated from their children.

This removal occurred as the result of official laws and policies aimed at assimilating the Indigenous population into the wider community.

What is a Koori?

“There are many terms in use around Australia for the word “Aborigine”. In most areas of NSW the term “Koori” is used. There are several other words which are used around Australia such as – “Goori” (northern NSW/QLD), “Murri” (northern NSW/QLD), “Nunga” (SA) and “Nyoongah” (WA). There are many areas/regions that have retained their cultural language and have different terms to describe themselves” Link Up NSW.

Timeline of government legislation

The below synopsis can be identified as proof of an extensive history of legislative frameworks provided for the removal of Aboriginal children from their families, clans and communities, through an english common law regime in NSW. Under the guise of protection, Aboriginal people were subject to near total control.

This systematic approach to the forcible removal of Aboriginal children in NSW can be identified by many government Acts including:

1810s – Governor Macquarie: Proclamation 4 May 1816, Aborigines declared subject to the protection of British law, but any crimes may render them outlawed and lead to loss of privileges

1849 – Act to provide for the Care and Education of Infants who may be convicted of Felony or Misdemeanour – whereby a child under the age of 19 is convicted, court may assign care and custody of the child to such persons as make application where the court is satisfied it is for the benefit of the child.

1881 – State Children Relief Act - State Children’s Relief Board established. ‘Boarding out’ officers may remove children from charitable institutions and arrange for them to be boarded out in licensed homes.

1908 - Establishment of Bomaderry United Aborigines Mission Home

Consequently, the Aborigines Protection Board set-up in 1909 contributed to the United Aborigines Mission home at Bomaderry on the NSW south coast where younger children and babies were placed.

1909 – Aborigines Protection Act – Established the Aborigines Protection Board (APB) for the Protection of Aborigines. The duration of this Act was for 60 years until its replacement in 1969. A key provision of this Act was to provide for the custody, maintenance and education of the children of ‘Aborigines’.

1911 – Establishement of Cootamundra Girls Home

Cootamundra was the first of the homes for Aboriginal children set up by the APB. The main aim of the Board was to 'rescue' Aboriginal children from their families and assimilate them into the white community. Girls were the main target of the Board, especially so-called 'half-caste' or 'mixed blood' girls. The girls were trained as domestic servants and sent out to work for middle class white families.

1915 – Aboriginal Protection Amending Act – Removed the requirement that an Aboriginal child had to be found to be neglected before the Board could remove him/her.

[pic]
Cootamundra Girls Home

[pic]

The discourse associated with the presumption of ‘neglect’, a requirement initially implemented by the Act was disempowering for Aboriginal mothers, fathers and families as there was no recourse for Aboriginal people who challenged the notion of ‘neglect’ that was often decided at the whim of a government inspectors own beliefs and values – these officials held the sole power in determining neglect. This practice was further exacerbated by views of assimilation of Aboriginal people into mainstream white society to ease the pillow of Aboriginal people as a dying race.

1918 – Establishment of Kinchela Boys Home

The Board established Kinchela Training Institution in northern NSW for boys. The APB opened the Kinchela Boys Home with the 'official' purpose of providing training for Aboriginal boys between the ages of five and fifteen. These boys were taken from their families by the State from all over New South Wales.

[pic]
Kinchela Boys Home

1940 - Aborigines Protection (Amendment) Act– Aborigines Protection Board replaced by the Aborigines Welfare Board (AWB). This Board took responsibility for Aboriginal ‘wards’ removed under the Child Welfare Act 1939. This Board had the power to establish ‘homes for the reception, maintenance, education and training’ of wards. This included the administration of the major institutions already established in NSW including Kinchela, Cootamundra, and the Bomaderry Children’s Home.

The Board administered ‘apprenticeships’ and young Aboriginal children were ‘indentured’ to work (farm hands/domestics). Wages of the children were to be paid to the board and kept in a trust account for use by the Board for the ward’s benefit until the ward turned 21.

1943 - Aborigines Protection (Amendment) Act –The Board is the authority in relation to children admitted to its control with power over removal and transfer of wards, apprenticing wards and approving custody of wards.

1969 - Repealed by the Aborigines Act – Aborigines Welfare Board abolished. Aboriginal children under the care of the AWB to become wards of the state. Aboriginal children's institutions deemed to be depots under the Child Welfare Act 1939 and subsequent child welfare legislation.

The apology - Why was it important to apologise to the Stolen Generations?

Recommendation 5a (2) from the Bringing Them Home Report suggests that all Australian parliaments “negotiate with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission a form of words for official apologies to Indigenous individuals, families and communities and extend those apologies with wide and culturally appropriate publicity”.

“This issue is a ‘blank spot’ in the history of Australia. The damage and trauma these policies caused are felt everyday by Aboriginal people. They internalise their grief, guilt and confusion, inflicting further pain on themselves and others around them. It is about time the Australian Government openly accepted responsibility for their actions” (Archie Roach and Ruby Hunter in Buti A, Bringng Them Home the ALSA Way).

In essence, formal government apologies provided a way for Australian governments to recognise the damning effects of removal policies of the past. The lifelong profoundly disabling consequences of those taken, meant that they lost all connection to family, traditional land, culture and language.

On 14 November 1996, the Premier of NSW, Bob Carr, became the first head of an Australian government to respond to the call from the Governor General, Sir William Deane, for all Parliaments to reaffirm their commitment to reconciliation. The Premier’s resolution was passed unanimously. The NSW Premier was also the first state leader to offer a formal apology to the Aboriginal people for the Stolen Generations.

On 13th February 2008, in a historic speech, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made a formally apology to the Stolen Generations in his first official parliamentary sitting which was the commencement of the 42nd parliament of the commonwealth. Receving a formal apology by the Prime Minsiter of Australia has allowed the start of the healing process

In a response to the National apology to the Stolen Generations, Tom Calma, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, HREOC stated “Through one direct act, Parliament has acknowledged the existence and the impacts of the past policies and practices of forcibly removing Indigenous children from their families. And by doing so, has paid respect to the Stolen Generations for their suffering and loss. For their resilience. And ultimately, for their dignity”.

[pic]
Crowds gather for the National Apology, Parliament House, Canberra, 13 February 2008.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Stolen Generation Analysis

...For many young Australians, little knowledge is known about Aboriginal issues. The Stolen Generations is a historical series of events well known to many young Australians. It was important as many Australian Government bodies, alongside with other establishments, were removing children from Aboriginal families and putting them into foster homes. It was expected to cause a disconnection of the culture and structure of Aboriginal clans. From tutorials and lectures, I think that Indigenous issues are often misunderstood. I understood lecture material as providing insight into surviving problems due to the Stolen Generations. This was seen with a disconnection from land and country, and a loss of identity for Indigenous Australian. This had led...

Words: 1543 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Stolen Generation Essay

...Century to the 1970’s many thousands of Aboriginal children were removed from their families. These children, now referred to as the Stolen Generations, faced ongoing emotional and social difficulties because of their removal from their families (Oxford Big Ideas, 2018). The youth, once taken from their homes, were brought up on reserves and missions. Subsequently, these children's lives were impacted severely from life without their families and biological parents. The forcible removal of the Stolen Generations was a gross violation of human rights and had many fundamental, social and emotional impacts on the life of the Indigenous Australians. PARAGRAPH 1: Life on the reserves, was more like a prison camp...

Words: 1485 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Stolen Generation Research Paper

...The stolen generations are numerous groups of Aboriginal children that were taken away from their families by the governments, churches and welfare bodies so that they could be brought up in institutions or fostered out into white families. Beginning in the 1830’s and ending in the early 1070’s, many children were taken from their families in an attempt to eradicate the Aboriginal race and culture. The Australian government’s policy and practice of removing the Aboriginal children from their families was put into practice during that time period. Removing children from their families from their families was considered official government policy in Australia until 1969. However, the practice had begun in the earliest days of European settlement, when children were used as guides, servants and farm...

Words: 458 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ruth Mackenzie: The Stolen Generations

...The stolen generations “They used to belt them till they was knocked out, that’s how cruel they was.” – Personal testimony, Ruth Mackenzie. Ruth Mackenzie was one of the roughly estimated 6200 aboriginal children to be taken from their home in the stolen generations period. Mackenzie was one of the children the authorities targeted as she was of mixed decent, the government believed that children of mixed decent would be easier to assimilate into the “white” society. Many of the facts of what happened during the stolen generation period (ca. 1890 – 1970.) are not clear, as not much of it was recorded and what was recorded was attempted destroyed. However, many testimonies have been made by the stolen children. So what exactly did happen to them? To begin I think it is necessary to explain what the stolen generations mean. The stolen generations refer to period between 1890 and 1970 when aboriginal children were forcefully taken away from their families. The goal of this was that the aboriginal culture and people would die out, and since the culture is passed on from generation to generation taking the aboriginal children away was also taken away the aboriginals future. The children were normally either sent to institutions or white farms and households, what occurred in these places is hard to imagine....

Words: 591 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stolen Generation Research Paper

...children were removed from their families. These children, now referred to as the Stolen Generations, faced ongoing emotional and social difficulties because of their removal from their families (Oxford Big Ideas, 2018). The youth, once taken from their homes, were brought up on reserves and missions. Subsequently, these children's lives were impacted severely by life without their families and biological parents. The forcible removal of the Stolen Generations was a gross violation of human rights and had many fundamental, social and emotional impacts on the life of the Indigenous Australians. PARAGRAPH 1: Life on the reserves, was more like a prison camp than a home. The...

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Stolen Generation Research Paper

...The government Policies of Protection and Assimilation impacted the lives of the Stolen Generation negatively, contradicting its main purposes. The term ‘Stolen Generations’ was used to describe the unwilling removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from 1901 to 1970. The children had to abandoned and reject their Aboriginality, assimilating into western values and norms. Consequently, many suffered from the trauma of losing their families, identity and culture. Also, the Aboriginal children had to cope with discrimination from the white community and the fact of having their human rights taken away. The loss of family and a motherly figure negatively impacted the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. The Policy...

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Stolen Generation

...Report of the Stolen Generations Assessor Stolen Generations of Aboriginal Children Act 2006 February 2008 Depar tm e n t of P r e m i e r a n d C a binet Table of contents 1. 2. Introduction ...................................................... 2 Context of the legislation .......................................3 2.1 historical Context ................................................................... 3 2.2 Child Welfare and adoption laws .............................. 4 2.3 education policy and procedures ................................. 5 3. The Act ......................................................................7 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 4. 5. aboriginal person................................................................................. 7 eligible Categories................................................................................ 7 exclusion ..................................................................................................... 7 the stolen generations fund..................................................... 7 timeframes............................................................................................... 8 the stolen generations assessor............................................ 8 The assessment process..........................................9 Overview of applications.......................................11 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 6. source of applications..................................

Words: 12418 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

The Stolen Generations

...The Stolen Generations – Assessment2 Essay 1 Indigenous Education and Perspectives Alana Zammit Swinburne Online University WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are warned that the following assessment may contain images and names of deceased persons The Stolen Generations – Assessment2 Essay 1 Indigenous Education and Perspectives Alana Zammit Swinburne Online University WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are warned that the following assessment may contain images and names of deceased persons Assessment2 2 As stated in the Bring them Home Report (April 1997) a national inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Children from their families. It was first established by state government in Victoria in 1869. Then the other states followed. Later similar legislation is passed in other colonies: New South Wales (1883), Queensland (1897), Western Australia (1905) and South Australia (1911). The Northern Territory Aboriginals Ordinance makes the Chief Protector the legal guardian of every Aboriginal and ‘half-caste’ person under 18. Boards are progressively empowered to remove children from their families. The stolen generations has had a massive impact on Aboriginals throughout Australia. The Aboriginal people of the stolen generations’ lives have been changed and generations of families devastated from this. Children lost their parents and siblings when taken away. They also lost...

Words: 2330 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Stolen Generation

...WRITING TASK- Exposition argument In this task you are to write an argument (800- 1,000 words) in response to the following question. • ‘The Australian government were justified in removing Aboriginal children from their families.’ To what extent do you agree with this statement The Stolen Generation has had a traumatic effect on Aboriginal people, their identities and links with their Aboriginal culture. These tremendous effects are still continuing towards the Aboriginal society through the policies and practices that were in place at the time. The Stolen Generation destroyed numerous Aboriginals lives. The damage done to them has not been redeemed, even after many years. Beginning in the 1830's and ending in the early 1970's, many children were taken from their families in an attempt to eradicate the Aboriginal race and culture, ordered by the Australian Government at the time. The Government’s policies and practices regarding the removal of children, their treatment and the continuing effects cannot be resolved, despite the occurrence of the National Inquiry. The Australian Government's policy and practice of removing aboriginal children from their families was in place throughout the country during the 1830's until the 1970's. There was a massive impact on Aboriginals with one particular policy the Australian Government introduced, the policy of ˜Assimilation'. This policy encouraged many Aboriginal people to give up their traditional lifestyle, move in white Australian...

Words: 488 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Aborigines Protection Amending Act of 1915

...The Aborigines Protection Amending Act of 1915 B) Argue against the Protection Act I have chosen to argue question B, because I am against The Protection Act. The protection act was passed in 1897, where the chief protector, who was in charges and their guarding, he was allowed to remove children from their families. In 1971 the Aboriginal Protection Act stopped. The act gave the power to remove any child without any court order nor parental consent. The act provided full control, and therefore the Aborigines would lose their freedom. The government removed Aboriginal children from their families and where starting the process that created the Stolen Generation, also known as the Stolen Children. The article The Stolen Generation states that; “1 in 10 of all Aboriginal children were removed from their families in an effort to civilize them by assimilation into white society”, this entire quote is mindboggling because the word “civilize” is used derogatory as if Aborigines need taming like a wild animal. The mere fact that the government believes that the Aborigines so desperate need help makes them conceited. They were taken children from their families, and making them white because they though that it would improve their lives. Through a misguided attempt at helping the Aborigines, the government may have caused more damage than good. The whites thought that the Aborigines needed help to survive and that is just unreasonable because the Aborigines have been in Australia...

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Stolen Generation in Australia

...The Stolen Generation in Australia The Aboriginal people lived long on their land without any contact from the Europeans. They are believed to first arrive in Australia between 42,000 and 48,000 years ago (Beck). They managed to live in often inhospitable conditions unbearable for the inhabitants of the “old continent”. The Aborigines did not differ only in their living conditions, but also in their way of living in general, their culture. The aboriginal culture was based on several principles which did not come to understanding when the Europeans first arrived. Perhaps the most essential aspect of the Aboriginal culture is the “kinship obligation”, when everyone in the tribe is expected to perform certain tasks without being asked to (Encyclopædia Britannica 4). The white society, in contrast with the Australian indigenous people, was based (and still is) on the concept of private membership, something absolutely unknown in Australia prior to the European settlements. The irreconcilable differences led, in consequence, to clashes and misunderstandings between the two cultures. The Europeans, however, regarded themselves superior. Lloyd describes the situation in Australia after the arrival of the European settlers as being based on “the idea of Aborigines as an inferior ‘doomed race,’ superseded by more highly developed, more enlightened Europeans” (Lloyd). No matter whether this claim was legitimate or not, it had damaging consequences. James Cook landed in Botany Bay in...

Words: 1839 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Presentation - Personal Stories

...ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Electronic or manual submission UNIT CODE: SWK2111 TITLE: Aboriginal Histories of the Present | NAME OF STUDENT FAMILY NAME: SMITH FIRST NAME: MARY | STUDENT ID NO.10355079 | NAME OF LECTURER Dr. Gus Henderson | DUE DATE11/3/2016 | Topic of assignment Presentation-personal stories | Group or tutorial (if applicable) GRoup 11 | Course Bachelor of Social Work | CAMPUSOFF | I certify that the attached assignment is my own work and that any material drawn from other sources has been acknowledged. This work has not previously been submitted for assessment in any other unit or course.Copyright in assignments remains my property. I grant permission to the University to make copies of assignments for assessment, review and/or record keeping purposes. I note that the University reserves the right to check my assignment for plagiarism. Should the reproduction of all or part of an assignment be required by the University for any purpose other than those mentioned above, appropriate authorisation will be sought from me on the relevant form. | OFFICE USE ONLY | If handing in an assignment in a paper or other physical form, sign here to indicate that you have read this form, filled it in completely and that you certify as above. Signature Date | | OR, if submitting this paper electronically...

Words: 2760 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

A Shifting Culture Analysis

...their family, yet normally today it isn’t as forceful as it was in the movie with Mr. Neville. I think that for both Indian and aboriginal communities are treated differently than others. Which may be why there is a problem with crime rates, unemployment, and alcoholism. Meaning that even though natives are integrated into society and have their own communities, they are at times still treated badly by stereotypes and hate from others. Thus, making it hard for the natives to apply for jobs and receive education, which if not obtain could lead to unemployment and the stress from that could lead to alcoholism. Also, as using the movie as an example, Neville was trying to “Help” by washing away the native genes and culture, so by the 3rd generation of offspring, the kids would be more like the Caucasian settlers. So, for example, when looking an child who was has a native background, yet closely resembles a Caucasian, their parents and grandparent could’ve been part of the brainwashing from when they were abducted from their family. ...

Words: 519 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stolen Generation In Australia

...The stolen generation was a crucial time in Australia’s history. It was a time when the government took Aboriginal and Torres strait islander children from their families without any consent. Although they were the first people of Australia they weren’t considered as humans by the government agencies, churches and welfare bodies. After they were taken from their families they were placed in institutions, reserves, dormitories or missions where they were taught Christianity to destroy aboriginal culture. Others were fostered or sent to orphanages with non-indigenous families during the years 1871-1965. The purpose for this was to destroy aboriginal culture and to raise them the way their parents could not. However, around the 1940’s they changed the purpose to assimilation but others still trained them as domestic servants and continued that purpose The Cootamundra girls home was an institute for aboriginal and Torres strait islander girls located in NSW. They discovered Cootamundra in a dis-used hospital building by the aboriginal protection board. The purpose for this was to train them as indentured servants such as clean and cook. They were offered to go school but school wasn’t the main priority for the for them in the institution. The Cootamundra girls home started in the year 1911 and ran for 58 years....

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Rabbit Proof Fence

...Ieesh M. Irving TANTH 365/ Autumn 2014 Film Response Watching Rabbit Proof Fence was not only enlightening but also appalling to have seen. I never heard of the atrocities that the aborigines experienced at the hands of the British government prior to this movie. The British government took oppression to another level. This was the story of how Molly, her sister Daisy, and cousin Gracie were stolen from their family and their dangerous expedition of returning home to their family. It features Mr. A.O. Neville, the Chief Protector of Aborigines, as the evil antagonist who believed that his mission was to protect the aborigines from themselves. This story told of some of the countless people that were part of “The Stolen Generation”, which are the children, which were labeled half-caste, that were taken from their Aborigine parent by the Australian government. This removal occurred between the early 1900’s up until the 1970’s. Not only did the Australian government The story begins in 1931 in west Australia. This is the time the Aborigines Act granted the government the authority to act as a legal guardian of every Aborigine in west Australia. This meant the government had control of who the Aborigines can meet or marry and where they work and lived. This gave Mr. Neville the power to remove half-caste children from their families. As a mother, I think that would be the cruelest thing you can do to a person; take their baby away from them. It would be easier to die rather...

Words: 713 - Pages: 3