...much. I think if you have some time and you want to waste it then watch this movie. There are various slight references to the political situation here, from the notion of the divine rule of Kings and the arrogance that stems from maintaining such a notion to distinctions of class, but unfortunately none of it is explored. The main reason the Musketeers rebel against the King is because Athos' son Raoul dies after being sent to the front to fight at Louis' orders. Aramis concocts a plan to de-throne King Louis, by replacing him with a doppelganger. This involves rescuing the prisoner in the iron mask, Louis' Twin Philippe, who was imprisoned so he could not be a threat to Louis' power. This sets up a conflict between D'Artagnan and the three Musketeers, the Queen Mother, and Louis himself as he finds his loyalties divided. This is the most interesting aspect of the movie, but it comes too late. DiCaprio presents a mixed performances in his "double acting" roles as Louis and Philippe. While the change of character is convincing (especially when Philippe's mask is removed), I think it could've been done better. The problem with DiCaprio, more than the acting, is in the delivery of the dialogue, the same problem which plagued him in Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet. The show is stolen by the actors playing the Musketeer characters, Irons, Depardieu, Malkovich, and Byrne. The mixing of accents (American, British, French) doesn't work well, but the costume and set design are well...
Words: 370 - Pages: 2