...Can Evolutionism and Creationism Co-exist? Is the teaching of evolution really corrupting the minds of children? Can you really talk about the two theories without cutting off the others head? These are questions that come to mind when thinking about the topic at hand. Evolutionism and creationism can be taught together in classes without any controversy because evolutionism can be tied into creationism in many ways. Almost everyone wonders if the world was really made and how it was made. Students everywhere also ask, “How did the human originate?” This is a huge controversy that has been fought for many years. Although there are many ideas, people mainly argue over two of them. The first theory is that people was created by God during his creation of the world; this is the idea of creationism. It is backed up by many religious people and religion itself. There is much turmoil on the broad topic of creationism and its place in American society. The big controversy of creationism versus evolutionism is a very large topic, something that has been made increasingly evident by the numerous books printed on the subject. Most evolutionist and creationist spend their time attempting to prove the other’s theory wrong; in one way or another, prove that theirs is the correct answer to the origins of life as we know it. I have no intent of diving into that raging battle, but would rather take a very different approach. Being raised in a religious household, I naturally have...
Words: 3178 - Pages: 13
...April 24th, 2014 Why Creationism Should be Taught in Schools Evolution is believed to have been scientifically proven, but really it’s not. It is only a theory. If Evolution is only a theory, why is it the only theory being taught in our schools today? Creationism is another theory about how the world was created. It is just as valid as an idea as evolution, so why is only one theory being taught in our classrooms? Creationism should be taught alongside Evolution because students should be able to think on their own and decide what theory to believe. Both theories cannot be proven, so why not teach different perspectives? Evolution is not a fact, just theory and hypothesis. It is a belief. Some may even say, a faith. It might seem that people claim that creationism is religious doctrine, and it is, but evolution is just as religious as creationism. Both cannot be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Both take faith to believe them to be true. So creationism is just as valid as Evolution. Creationism came from religious views, but not everyone believes in the same religions. Evolution is a worldwide concept that many people have come to believe but they may not been exposed to these religions. “Dr. Bergman then went on to add, ‘If schools are to be a place where students can debate important questions, it would seem that eliminating religious questions would shelter students from an important area of debate which is crucial for living a well-rounded life.’” (Edwords...
Words: 1937 - Pages: 8
...Creationism vs. Evolutionism The quandary continues of whether or not creationism should be taught as an alternative viewpoint to the theory of evolution within the American public school systems. If scientific creationists believe that God's message is the defining element for the content, aims, and conditions of educational practice, then the argument can be made that creationism belongs in the classroom. On the contrary are those who assert creationism is not science and further suggests that "creation science" is a misnomer and oppose religion into public educational programs. They maintain the position that public educational programs should be made separate from concerns of the church. Fundamentalist Christians differ from liberal Christians with respect to the basic theories to how life began. Liberal Christians mold their lives around the theory of evolution; forging their spiritual doctrine around their lifestyle, where as fundamentalist Christians remain faith based; life created by God and their lifestyle strictly follows biblical doctrine. Those who side with the theory of Darwin and claim that creationism is really anti-science are in direct conflict with adamant creationists; and somewhere among these groups are a third group, scientific creationists, who use scientific terminology to prove that only life can come from other life. During the 1960’s the United States began an initiative to catch up with newer science teaching standards which...
Words: 1562 - Pages: 7
...this happened. One is the belief in creationism, which is the idea that there is a god that created the whole universe out of free will. The other belief is in darwinism, which is that the universe came from evolution and purely science. Both of these beliefs cannot be 100% proven and everybody has their own opinion on what they believe to be true. Creationism is the belief of some sort of creator, that somebody made up everything in the universe. This theory is based on faith and the ideas of the theory come from the bible mostly from the book of Genesis. Here it says that God created the earth in seven days. One of the biggest differences between the two is that with creationism, everything has a purpose. Creationism says that God created everything on purpose so that one thing leads to another and everything co-exists. There is also evolutionary creationism which is understanding the process of evolution but believing that God was involved as well. This is not a scientific theory but shows that the two theories can go hand in hand. With the belief that everything has a purpose there is the...
Words: 600 - Pages: 3
...first theory for this is known as creationism. The other is evolution and most schools have encouraged this. Why is one not right and the other false? Is there no balance between these two issues? The lack of evidence makes creationism hard to believe, and many holes in the evolution link makes that hard to believe. Theories of human evolution cause disagreements. Each theory has its own evidence to prove that its right, but lack of enough evidence to prove the others errors. Most of the theories that try to explain the human existence are labeled as creation theory, naturalistic evolution theory and theistic evolution theory. Naturalistic evolution theory states that evolution is a force and not controlled by a god, goddess or some other type of deity. Theistic evolution is a combination of both creation and naturalistic theories. To understand the struggle between creationism and evolution you must first understand creationism. Creationism is the theory that all life was created by God. In the book of Genesis you will find the story when God formed man from the dust of the ground. God also created all the galaxies, planets, animals, plants and everything else. In that same book you will find the story of Noah and his ark saved all the species, which are here today, from the great flood. In this teaching the earth is not over 10,000 years old. To understand creationism you must understand evolution. Evolution is the theory of the Big Bang. The theory of evolution...
Words: 1135 - Pages: 5
... teachers, school board members, students, parents, and state officials. It has been the talk of the courts since the Darwin Theory came along. Many issues have risen over the years since evolution was introduced to the world and into the school system. The questions of whether mankind evolved from a monkey or the way of creationism, that man was created by God as stated in the book of Genesis (Bible). Other issues that came up were with the teachers themselves and having to teach evolution in their biology classes, when not fully understanding evolution itself. In this essay we will discuss the arguments of evolution versus creationism that is being taught in our public schools and whether it is acceptable to teach evolution to our school children. II. Body paragraph # 1 – Topic Sentence # 1 The disputes of evolution started back in the late 19th century, some years after Charles Darwin came to the conclusion of linking human ancestry to lower animals by his evolution theory. This evolution of reasoning caused a stir in the public schools when it was put into the biology text books and required to be taught to the students. Some teachers had issues with teaching this because they themselves did not quit understand the theory of evolution. In addition, some of the teachers did not believe in this theory, rather, they believed in creationism, which is, God created man, as the Bible states in the book of Genesis. A. Supporting Evidence 1. As Everett Mendelsohn...
Words: 1246 - Pages: 5
...I interviewed three people prior to beginning this class about their opinions of evolutions . I asked my brother Phil, my friend Navdeep and my roommate Janae. Although I was asking them questions about their belief in creationism, I too was curious about the proof of our origin. I always believed in creationism solely due to my upbringing in a Christian household. However I never had the scientific evidence and knowledge to truly be the foundation for my belief. Through this class and interviewing my friends and realizing where I stood in my understanding of creationism, I learned more and more each week to solidify my argument for creationism. Janae, my roommate who was raised in a Christian household and had a firm belief in Jesus Christ as her savior. She said that in the bible when god made the earth in 7 days, the "day " was not referring to the 24 hour period we have today. I could dispute this by saying Hebrew scholars recognize that the intent was to convey six normal days of twenty four hour length. There was an evening and morning. In Exodus 20:11, " For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it." She then answered my next question saying there was no shared ancestor between apes and humans. Janae made some clear points about how humans walk upright unlike monkeys and are capable of communicating and having self control and emotions...
Words: 1239 - Pages: 5
...Creationism “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” This passage from Genesis 1:27 of the Bible, is a perfect example of why I believe in Creationism. I believe in creationism for many different reasons and evidence to support this theory lies in the passages inside the Holy Bible. I believe in creationism for several different reasons. First off, I have always been exposed to this theory growing up and going to church, so I picked up on the information and decided to start believing in it as well because it seemed like a legitimate reason for why humans are on the earth today. I believe in this theory because the Bible tells me to. The Bible says at least 33 times that God created categories of life each “after his kind”. From my own personal experience is only one reason why I think creationism is why humans are on earth. A second reason why I believe in creationism is because there is an immense amount of proof recorded in the Bible. Isaiah 45:12 reads like this: “I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.” Another reliable bible verse is Colossians 1:16: “For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him.” Additionally, Genesis 2:4 states a great...
Words: 426 - Pages: 2
...Creationism VS. Evolution “Why evolution should be taught in public schools” by Laura H. Kahn discusses how evolution being taught in the public school system is essential to our future in science and medicine. Kahn discusses how the theory of evolution has come to be over the many years of research and experimentation by many famous scientists, she also talks about the uphill battle it has been for the theory of evolution to be taught in the public school system because “certain segments of society insist that religious doctrine, masquerading as science, be taught instead. Laura presents her audience with the facts that in the nineteenth century theory of spontaneous generation, the theory that proposed that life could emerge from nonliving material, was the main theory of evolution back then. How ever a French chemist, Louis Pasteur, would try to disprove the theory through his discovery that yeasts were responsible for making wine palatable and bacteria was responsible for turning wine bad. He also discovered through the use of silkworms that microbes caused their illness and death. She states that Pasteur saw the connection between microbes, fermentation, putrefaction, and disease. She claims that his biggest challenge however was to try to convince the scientific community to accept is idea. She backs up her statement with bringing to our attention that at the same time Pasteur was pushing his theory a scientist by the name of Felix-Archimede claimed he had successfully...
Words: 852 - Pages: 4
...answers to these questions can be very controversial. This is where creationism and evolution comes into par. Some people may say that a higher and greater power created the universe and the people in it. Others may give reasons that are scientific for our existence. An example would be the Big Bang; the only purpose for living is being able to survive. Both evolution and creationism may not be true, that is why this topic is very controversial. Evolution is the theory that all loving organisms can be traced back to a common ancestor, which came into being from non living elements, by natural laws. Darwin contributed to this theory by the mechanism by which species would evolve; in this case it would be natural selection. This method says that in certain factors an organism’s environment can create a change from one generation to another. There are reasons why plants, animals, and everything else is the way it is. For example humans, we evolved from primates so that we could survive. This was a slow process, which made little changes at a time. The big bang is the theory that a massive explosion created all matter in the universe. Certain species died because they were not as powerful and could not change. While there were others who could change, in which they adapted to the environment to survive best. To completely understand the conflict between the two one must understand creationism. This theory is believed to be that all life was created by a higher power....
Words: 749 - Pages: 3
...Outline I. Introduction Thesis: In studying the underlying constructs of psychology – the origins of humanity, human nature, and human purpose – one sees the extensive influence of evolution. When contrasted with the biblical view of creationism, it becomes clear that modern psychology shares little in common with biblical principles. II. Basic Constructs of Human Psychology A. Human 1. What is a human being? 2. How do humans differ from animals? B. Human Behavior 1. Thought, feeling, action 2. Inner and outer worlds of human perception III. Human Origins A. Evolution 1. Life from non-life material/Big Bang Theory 2. Genetic mutation 3. Natural selection a. Competition as the foundation of behavior b. Law of the Jungle B. Creationism 1. God created the universe and all creatures 2. Each species was created separate and distinct 3. God created man special in God’s own image IV. Human Nature A. Evolution 1. Survival of the fittest a. Social behavior b. Mating c. Reproduction 2. Behaviorism a. Behavior is a combination of social learning and genetic influencces b. Effect on antisocial behavior on reproduction 3. Biological determinism a. No real basis for free will B. Creationism 1. Humans were made in God’s image a. God is love, justice, kindness, and joyful 2. The Fall of Man separated humans from God a. ‘War’ between good and evil b. Man’s nature is now sinful 3. Jesus the Son of God redeemed human...
Words: 4365 - Pages: 18
...beliefs whose Gods are all so varied and different that it is difficult to fathom that they are all the same divine being. It is also plausible that we just have a desire to quench the thirst for knowledge that lies deep within ourselves. As for myself, I cannot believe in a being which created a universe and a multitude of worlds in a rather short period of time then deigns to lower itself into becoming a puppet-master and "pulling the strings" of the Earth and all of the people therein. Since this paper touches upon many scientific terms, I feel that in order for the reader to correctly grasp the content I must first define three words: Theory, Law, and Hypothesis. The definitions will allow for a greater understanding of this essay and give us an even ground upon which to begin. Theory; noun 1. a. Systematically organized knowledge applicable in a relatively wide variety of circumstances, especially a system of assumptions, accepted principles, and rules of procedure...
Words: 2400 - Pages: 10
...Jubin John Ms. Diomande Compare & Contrast Final Draft 10/22/14 Creation vs. Evolution Today many scientists would have to believe that evolution is the only reasonable explanation of the universe. Scientists, like Stephen Hawking, claim that they proved that evolution is the only correct answer to the origins of life and the universe, yet evolution is a theory proposed by scientists to explain the origin of all species. Evolution is not the only answer but in fact, the creation theory is based on the bible and that God created the universe. This is the idea of creationism which is supported by religion. Creationism offers a more credited answer to the development of the universe than the evolutionary theory because creation has the support of the bible. To make a decision on which theory is more appealing to them, people must choose either religion or science. The creation theory is solely based on the bible. The Bible, in fact, is actually one of the most proven books in history. Creationism is the theory that God created the universe and it's creatures in six days. For example, in Genesis 2:7 it states "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters". The Bible is not considered a science book, but many consider it to be scientifically correct. For instance, the Old Testament is quoted in several ancient...
Words: 848 - Pages: 4
...with a natural science and atheistic materialism,” (Junghyung, 2011). Darwin’s Theory of Evolution has been a widespread topic of disagreement for many decades. When his theory was first introduced in the mid 1800s there was controversy between religion and science. At the time Darwin’s theory was mainstreamed most Europeans were still firm in their belief of religion and that the earth was created in seven days by a divine being as described in the bible. “Darwin worked on his theory for 20 years. After learning that another naturalist, Alfred Russel Wallace, had developed similar ideas, the two made a joint announcement of their discovery in 1858. In 1859 Darwin published 'On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection',” (bbc.co.uk). “The book was extremely controversial, because the logical extension of Darwin's theory was that homo sapiens was simply another form of animal. It made it seem possible that even people might just have evolved - quite possibly from apes - and destroyed the prevailing orthodoxy on how the world was created. Darwin was vehemently attacked, particularly by the Church. However, his ideas soon gained currency and have become the new orthodoxy,” (bbc.co.uk). Darwin’s theory that everything indeed evolved from something else was unwanted in many schools for many years- people wanted to believe in religion and a divine being not in logic and science. “Darwin's Theory of Evolution is the widely held understanding that all life is related and has...
Words: 1150 - Pages: 5
...ENG121 Evolution vs. Creationism The debate between evolutionism and creationism began thousands of years ago and the battle between the two streams of thought continues to this day. While creationists believe in a god who is the absolute creator of heaven and earth less than 10,000 years ago, evolutionists believe that the universe began billions of years ago with life started as just a single cell bacteria evolving slowly into everything we see today. “What’s the difference between creationism and evolution?” Charles Darwin’s work on evolution is the most recognized throughout history and the evidence that he discovered supporting evolution changed how many people viewed the history of our universe. His main research project was on a process called natural selection, the idea that survival of the fittest has been a main determinant is shaping how the earth and all living things appear today. Charles Darwin discuses this idea of Natural Selection in his essay “Natural Selection”, detailing evidence supporting his theory. This paper will discuss Darwin’s essay but will also go into further detail of his discoveries, other evolutionary milestones and finally comparing and contrasting the evolutionary argument to the creationism point of view. The idea of evolution first came about in the 1600’s when European naturalists started to question the current theories about how our universe was created. In 1666 the first evidence of evolution was discovered when a couple of fishermen...
Words: 2229 - Pages: 9
