...Subject: PP&E - Measurement Subsequent to Initial Recognition Introduction The reasons why we choose to analyze the revaluation of PP&E are: 1. They are often involved in large amount of transactions and initially recognized at cost, and depreciated subsequently, as a result, it takes a lot of work to keep record of its carrying value; 2. PP&E makes up a large percentage of the total assets, especially for manufacturing companies, and is expected to be long-term assets held for use in production; 3. Mostly they are carried on the Balance Sheet based on the cost no matter how much their actual values are. So it is possible for companies to inflate or write down the value of PP&E by managers. Therefore, the investors have to pay attention to the policy of the PP&E and in this memo we tend to analyze the account deeply and understand how to the amount is reported on financial statement. In order to find the differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP on this subject, summaries of the requirements of GAAP and IFRS separately will lay a foundation for the comparison. IFRS: IAS 16 An entity may choose 2 accounting models for its property plant and equipment: an entity shall apply the same model to the entire class of PP&E (IAS 16-29: An entity shall choose either the cost model in paragraph 30 or the revaluation model in paragraph 31 as its accounting policy and shall apply that policy to an entire class [Refer: paragraph 37] of property, plant and equipment...
Words: 1456 - Pages: 6
...Disclosures in IFRS Evidence from Infosys financial statements Abstract: INTRODUCTION: To reassure the position of a globalised economy, India is all set to implement IFRS .This paper attempts to show cause the disclosures as per the new accounting standard IFRS. Infosys, the software giant is one of the early movers in India to prepare the financial statements as per IFRS. This company has carved a niche in itself in good practices in financial reporting. Though India has missed the earlier deadline of converging to IFRS from April 2011, has shown its commitments to implement IFRs compliant accounting standards once few ambiguities are addressed to The main thrust of IFRS prepared by IASB (internal Accounting standard Board) is the “fair value accounting and detailed disclosures to make the financial statements more useful for the stakeholders. With the paradigm shift in the accounting standard there might be volatilities of the numbers reported. Right from the classification of assets, liabilities, equities until principle differences of asset valuations, revenue recognitions IFRS differ from existing GAAP. There were inquisitive analysts, accounting experts who would want to capture the transition difference of the two accounting standards. Hence, it will be of academic interest to study the difference between local GAAP and IFRS. This paper analyses the IFRS statement of Infosys from Financial year 2009 and makes comparisons with the Indian GAAP numbers. This study...
Words: 4318 - Pages: 18
...Is the Difference in Accounting Treatment of Post-Retirement Benefits under IFRS Beneficial or Detrimental to the Financial Position of a Company Currently Reporting Under US GAAP? Megan N. Cook, CPA, CFE Accountancy 521 Professor Lawrence March 9, 2009 The first pension plan offered by an American employer was that of American Express in the year 1875. Amex’s plan did not resemble the plans that we see in today’s time; the first “modern” defined benefit plan was created in 1940 by the automotive behemoth General Motors. These plans of the past still do not resemble plans that we are familiar with today. In the past, employers could exercise a “pension put” option and, in essence, close the plan down at the current level of funding and turn the assets over to the retirees. This is not an optimal situation, as many plans at the time were severely under funded and retirees would be left with pennies on the dollar of what they were counting on for retirement. (Fortune, 2005) Post-retirement benefits are volatile on a couple of different fronts; up until the reforms in 1974 which created ERISA and the PBGC, employees had to put blind faith in their employers to secure their futures after their working years were over. (Fortune, 2005) On another front, these benefits pose a significant accounting problem – how should a company account for the costs and liabilities associated with these benefits they had to give their employees at a later and relatively indeterminable...
Words: 2667 - Pages: 11
...IFRS VS.GAAP Tyana Campbell ACC/291 November 12, 2014 Habib Ousmane Diallo The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are rules and guidelines established to attempt to standardize accounting and recording practices across the United States and Internationally. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is a set of international accounting standards stating how particular types of transactions and other events should be reported in financial statements. IFRS uses fair-value accounting of assets and liabilities. GAAP also known as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles which is a common set of accounting principles, standards and procedures that companies use to compile their financial statements. Generally an accepted accounting practice is a combination of authoritative standards and the commonly accepted ways of recording and reporting accounting information. Some differences between IFRS and GAAP is that IFRS is considered more of a principle based accounting standard used in more than 110 countries where as GAAP is considered more rule based and is used generally within the United States. By being more principle based, IFRS represents and captures the economics of a transaction better than U.S. GAAP. Under GAAP, the research is more focused on the literature whereas under IFRS, the review of the facts pattern is more through. Investopedia states another difference between...
Words: 889 - Pages: 4
...S&P 500’s total value (Nearon, 2008). This study researched United States (US) companies’ and indicated 40% of market value is not reflected in their balance sheet (Nearon, 2008). This decline in market value has led to strong arguments for rethinking the measurement and treatment for intangibles assets. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) have created significant differences in the accounting treatment of intangible assets. Both IFRS and GAAP view intangible assets as a non-monetary asset that do not have physical substance but can be identified. This paper will review the similarities and differences within GAAP and IFRS regarding the following: intangible asset impairments, research and development (R&D), advertising cost, and goodwill impairment. Intangible Asset Impairment Testing IFRS and GAAP contain similar indicators for testing impairment of intangible assets. Differences arise in testing, recognition and presentation. GAAP requires a two-step impairment test for intangible assets. Step one requires companies to determine if the carrying amount of the assets exceeds undiscounted future cash flows. If it meets this requirement, step two can be used to calculate the necessary impairment loss. An impairment loss is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value. Under GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset. IFRS requires a...
Words: 1504 - Pages: 7
...Introduction Basically, the study is on the differences of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) influence in property management industry. The study focuses on two basic accounting principles in valuing assets, which are fair value and historical cost. The property refers to the land and building, as those are the main part of total fixed assets of a company. Asset is the most important element in the balance sheet, hence the method used for assets valuation is very important to avoid over or under estimation. This is the reason why the choice for measurement method is importance in determining the value of assets because it will affects the acquisition price and the comprehensive income of the firm in terms off income and shareholder equity. The author too focuses on the accounting treatment in accordance to International Financial reporting Standard (IFRS), US GAAP and Greek GAAP. With reference to the article, asset can be defined as a good able to provide a constant flow of services such as housing services and a source of cash flow. Assets are ruled by a set of basic aspects such as the cost (cost of land or construction cost), the residual value, the useful life estimation and depreciation charge. These elements are correlated with the type and use form of assets. The author also apply some accounting principles in their study such as prudence, historical costs, substance over form, going concern, true and fair view and many more. Data Methodology/approach ...
Words: 1839 - Pages: 8
...IFRS Income Tax Accounting IFRS for SMEs: A less taxing standard? On July 9, 2009, the IASB published the International Financial Reporting Standard for Small and Medium-sized Entities (“IFRS for SMEs” or “the standard”), a self-contained standard of about 230 pages designed to ease the burden of IFRS reporting for entities that do not have public accountability. Globally, more jurisdictions may be encouraged to replace existing local GAAP with IFRS for SMEs. As a result, it holds important implications for US companies with multinational subsidiaries. The United Kingdom Accounting Standards Board (UK ASB), for example, has already issued a Consultation Paper asking for comments on its proposal to replace existing UK GAAP with IFRS by 2012. 2 PricewaterhouseCoopers Overview of Income Tax Accounting Treatment The Income Tax section of IFRS for SMEs contains several key provisions from the IASB’s Exposure Draft to amend IAS 12 Income Taxes (the “Exposure Draft”). For example, IFRS for SMEs includes the guidance in the Exposure Draft for tax basis, uncertain tax positions and the use of a valuation allowance. IFRS for SMEs also includes several provisions from the existing standard, such as intraperiod allocation, tax rates to apply to distributions and balance sheet classification. A closer look at the provisions in the standard provides insight into the potential for increased complexity and diversity in some areas. Tax basis Under IFRS for SMEs, the tax...
Words: 2378 - Pages: 10
...Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP). Convergence also seeks to establish understandability amongst users and enforceable by regulators (Erchinger, Melcher, 2007). The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have been trying to implement a global acceptable standard for financial reporting since the end of 2002 onwards (Fogarty, 2011). However to this day in 2013 the convergence of both IFRS and US GAAP has yet to be completed and implemented. The likelihood of the convergence being completely finished and implemented seems possible but yet so far as both the IASB and FASB have already been trying for ten years to get it completed despite the hurdles they have endured. In November 2007 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted 4-0 in favor of eliminating the requirements that forces foreign companies with U.S listings to reconcile their results with to U.S GAAP therefore companies with a year end of 2007 are no longer required to follow these set of principles (Fogarty, 2011). 2. Evaluate and describe the single most important difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS rules, and explain your answer. The most important difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS rules is that the U.S. GAAP is rules based accounting and the IFRS is principle based accounting. Each standard is different in terms of the amount of detail given in the guidance. The US GAAP (rules-based)...
Words: 1269 - Pages: 6
...Analysis of United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) This paper examined the relationship between United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and found merging both accounting standards into a worldwide standard is ideal for investors. Corporate financial statement requirements depend on location. The two accepted accounting standard systems are GAAP and IFRS. The differences between GAAP and IFRS are GAAP is rules-based and IFRS is principle-based. How can a worldwide accounting standard benefit the world economy? The answer depends on political will, culture, countries history, and business structure. Research indicated there are only slight differences between GAAP and IFRS. These slight differences must be explored further to predict the impact on companies, economic, and financial markets. GAAP and IFRS have to be reconciled as a worldwide accounting standard to efficiently allow investors to compare foreign companies. GAAP set the accounting standard for the United States since its inception in 1929. GAAP evolved over the last 60 years (Măciucă, Ursache, Moroşan, & Apetri, 2014). IFRS was established in 1973 (Smith, 2012). IFRS used GAAP as a source document for its standards, either to imitate, modify, or omit (Chevis, 2014). The European Union established IFRS as the standard in 2005 (Smith, 2012). In 2007, the United States...
Words: 1271 - Pages: 6
...EXAMINATION OF INVENTORY COSTING CONVERGENCE UNDER GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS ABSTRACT Accounting principles in the United States are converging toward international standards. If convergence continues, and there are proponents and detractors, then the U.S. system of accounting, called Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), will eventually be replaced by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Convergence has profound implications for publicly traded companies and their many stakeholders such as investors, lenders, government agencies, and employees. A key issue facing accounting standard-setters is the treatment of inventory costing, an area in which GAAP and IFRS differ. This study addresses three research questions: What is the past and current usage of different inventory costing methods?, How important is inventory on corporate financial reports?, and What will be the impact on corporate financial reporting, specifically regarding inventory costing, if IFRS replaces GAAP? Findings show that a change from GAAP to IFRS will have a major impact on inventory costing and, as a result,...
Words: 7313 - Pages: 30
...(NiCE) Institute for Management Research Radboud University Nijmegen P.O. Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands http://www.ru.nl/nice/workingpapers 1 Abstract We construct a compound measurement tool to comprehensively assess the quality of financial reporting in terms of the underlying fundamental qualitative characteristics (i.e. relevance and faithful representation) and the enhancing qualitative characteristics (i.e. understandability, comparability, verifiability and timeliness) as defined in ‘An improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting’ of the FASB and the IASB (2008). The operationalization of these qualitative characteristics results in a 21-item index. Using 231 annual reports from companies listed at US, UK, and Dutch stock markets in 2005 and 2007, we test our compound measurement tool on internal validity, inter-rater reliability (Krippendorff’s alpha) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha). Our findings suggest that the measurement tool used in this study is a valid and reliable approach to assess the quality of financial reports. The measurement tool contributes to improving the quality assessment of financial reporting information, fulfilling a request from both the FASB and the IASB (2008) to make the qualitative characteristics operationally measurable. Direct correspondence to Geert Braam, Department of Economics, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands....
Words: 13269 - Pages: 54
...Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based Accounting Amounts Comparable? Mary E. Barth* Stanford University Wayne R. Landsman, Mark Lang University of North Carolina Christopher Williams University of Michigan August 2011 * Corresponding author: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 94305-5015, mbarth@stanford.edu. We appreciate funding from the Center for Finance and Accounting Research, Kenan-Flagler Business School and the Center for Global Business and the Economy, Stanford Graduate School of Business. We appreciate comments from Elicia Cowins, Julie Erhardt, Margot Howard, Elmar Venter, an anonymous reviewer, and workshop participants at the University of Cologne, ESSEC Business School, George Washington University, Giessen Business School, University of Graz, IESE Business School, University of Leeds, University of Missouri, Oklahoma State University, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Singapore Management University, Southern Methodist University, Stanford University, Washington University at St. Louis, and the European Accounting Association Congress. We also thank Dan Amiram and Mark Maffett for assistance with data collection. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1585404 Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based Accounting Amounts Comparable? Abstract This study documents whether application of IFRS by non-US firms results in accounting amounts comparable to those resulting from application of US GAAP by US firms. IFRS firms have...
Words: 23377 - Pages: 94
...Property, Plant and Equipment Property, Plant and Equipment I- Nature of Accounting Issues Businesses purchase and use a variety of fixed assets, such as equipment, furniture, tools, machinery, buildings, and land. These fixed assets are long-term or relatively permanent assets. Also, they are tangible assets because they exist physically. They are owned and used by the business and are not offered for sale as part of normal operations. Perhaps the most descriptive titles these assets are known under are plant assets or property, plant and equipment. Depending on the industry, the plant assets of a business can be a significant part of its total assets. That is why the accounting for these long-term assets has important implications for a company’s reported results. In this paper, we discuss the proper accounting for the acquisition, use, and disposition of property, plant, and equipment. Before going over a brief overview of the nature of accounting issues, we ought to take a deeper look at what plant assets really are. The major characteristics of property, plant, and equipment are as follows: * They are acquired for use in operations and not for resale. Only assets used in normal business operations are classified as property, plant, and equipment. For example, an idle building is more appropriately classified separately as an investment. Also, land developers or sub dividers classify land as inventory. * They are long-term in nature and usually depreciated...
Words: 4741 - Pages: 19
...Applying IFRS in Germany – Determinants and Consequences Joachim Gassen Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 10099 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49(0)30-2093 5764 E-mail: gassen@wiwi.hu-berlin.de Thorsten Sellhorn Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaft Ruhr-Universität Bochum Universitätsstraße 150 44780 Bochum, Germany Phone: +49(0)234-32 28300 E-mail: sellhorn@iur.rub.de First Version, June 2006 This Version, July 2006 Forthcoming in: Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 58 (4), 2006. We thank Karsten Detert for some of the data used in this study. Applying IFRS in Germany – Determinants and Consequences Abstract: We address three research questions motivated by the recent ascent of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Europe. First, analyzing the determinants of voluntary IFRS adoption by publicly traded German firms during the period 19982004, we find that size, international exposure, dispersion of ownership, and recent IPOs are important drivers. Second, using the results from this determinant model to construct propensity score-matched samples of IFRS and German-GAAP (HGB) firms, we document significant differences in terms of earnings quality: IFRS firms have more persistent, less predictable and more conditionally conservative earnings. Third, analyzing information asymmetry differences between IFRS and HGB firms, we show that IFRS adopters experience a decline in bid-ask spread of 70 base points and an...
Words: 11298 - Pages: 46
...more well-organized and capable of trading and buying from those they have not been able to before. In some parts of the world, some industries use an accounting system called the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which is also known as GAAP, and in the others those people use International Financial Reporting Standards, which is sometimes referred to as IFRS. Although these accounting systems have some of the same basic functions, they have the ability to conform to one main system. So, why would a country change their accounting system? In order to understand why the change is needed, the FASB and IASB fair value has intensified, it is clear that the need for consistent fair value measurements in a global market. However, the fair value measurements have set principles based on global framework, with very few exceptions. This has impact all fair value measurements in a reporting entity’s of financial statements. A component depreciation is a method in which certain parts of a property are individually depreciated at many different rates or prices. A component depreciation should be use only when company’s requires that certain parts of an item such as: Property, plant, and equipment that is significant to the total cost of the asset that must be depreciated individually. This away a company has the right to exercise their judgment to decide the proper allocations to the components. The revaluation of plant assets is the...
Words: 896 - Pages: 4