...THE UNIVERSITY OF BURDWAN DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION TERM PAPER ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTISE BY DIFFERENT COMPANIES OF INDIA AND OTHER COUNTRIES. COURSE: MASTERS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PAPER: BUSINESS LAWS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. PAPER CODE: MBD 107. SEMESTAR: 1ST SUBMITTED BY SOUMYA KANTI BOSE ENROLLMENT NO: DDE/MBA/JUL2013/14. REGISTRATION NO: APPLIED FOR. SESSION: JULY 2013 - JUNE 2015. INDEX PARTICULARS | PAGE NO | Introduction | 03 | Objectives of Study | 03 | World Scenario in Corporate Governance | 03 | Indian Scenario in Corporate Governance | 03-04 | Corporate Governance Practices By State Bank of India, India | 04-05 | Corporate Governance Practices By Axis Bank Ltd, India | 05-13 | Corporate Governance Practices by National Australia Bank, NAB | 13-18 | Corporate Governance By HSBC, London | 19-23 | Conclusion | 23 | Reference | 23 | Introduction: The issue of corporate governance has come up mainly in the wake up economic reforms characterized by liberalization and deregulation. Corporate governance has at its backbone a set of transparent relationships between an institution’s management its board, shareholders and other stakeholders. Corporate governance has come up mainly in the wake up of economic reforms characterized by liberalization and deregulation. According to OECD, the corporate governance structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation...
Words: 8238 - Pages: 33
...Year in Industry Module: International Corporate Governance Assignment Title: Critically discus the extent to which you consider the initiatives aimed at corporate governance reform in the UK represent an improvement to the system of corporate governance Date and Time of Submission: 13/11/2014 11:00AM Please ensure that you complete and attach this Submission Form to the front of all work that is submitted online. Before submission, please ensure that your name does not appear anywhere on your work, only your Student ID number. By submitting your work online you are confirming that your work is your own and that you understand and have read the University’s rules regarding plagiarism and the consequences that will arise should you submit plagiarised work. Corporate governance pertains to the implementation of a set of established policies in which influence the way an organisation is managed and the style in which it operates. For policies to be efficiently and effectively implemented the execution of corporate governance is not only vital, but also essential in satisfying an organisations customers, employees, management and the interrelations amongst stakeholders involved (Bhattacharya, 2000). The late 1980s and early 1990s witnessed major upheaval in regards to continuous instances of corporate failure of several prominent UK organisations including Polly Peck, BCCI and Maxwell Communications. These corporate collapses and financial scandals were the...
Words: 1644 - Pages: 7
...A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities: the role of institutional shareholders Robert A. G. Monks Robert A. G. Monks, in his article ‘A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities: the role of institutional shareholders’, states that the problem with the British and American corporate governance system is that the majority of the shareholders, both institutional and individual, do not act as owners. The aim of this article is to determine why there is a lack of commitment among the majority of the shareholders and to suggest some measures in order to encourage them to have a more active role in the companies they own. In the first section of the article Monks observes that 30 per cent of the U.S. and U.K. shareholders invest in index mode and 20 per cent, based on mathematical-based algorithms. In both these cases the rulings are made by ‘mechanistic formulae’ with no human decision-making being present. Another 30 per cent rely on their ‘friendly broker’, meaning that only 20 per cent of the shareholders are actively involved in their portfolio companies and are prepared, if necessary, to take steps to ensure that flaws in the governance, strategy or execution by managers are properly addressed. Moreover, the author notes that the number of these ‘intrinsic investors’ (such described by McKinsey, the premier consulting firm for corporate management) may be weakened because of the ‘dirty...
Words: 685 - Pages: 3
...Subject: Corporate Governance Istanbul Aydin Univeristy Modern Approaches in Management And Organization ISM503 Shahla Gafarova MBA Class Y1112.130010 Plan of Corporate Governance 1. Introduction………………………………………………..………………………………...........3 2. The UK Approach to Corporate Governance… …..………………………………………....4-7 3. Example topic of Corporate Governance: Starbucks….………………………………….. 8-11 4. Summary………………………………………………… ……….…………………………….12 5. References………………………………………………………………………………………..13 Introduction “Corporate Governance denotes direction and control of the affairs of a company and it is the relationship between the owners ,directors and managers.” Scope of CG - IT provides the structure for setting objectives and providing means to attain them. Main features of Corporate Governance - It is a set of system and processes which embraces organization structure. Ensures best interest of the stakeholders Denotes direction leadership explains relationship between directors , owners and managers. Attempts to put a check on working of an organization. Activity time - “Corporate Governance is explain the importance of Corporate Governance. Corporate governance specifies the distribution of rights And responsibililities among different participants in corporations. Corporate governance means a system by which corporate entities are under control and are directed Corporate governance attempts to put a check on the working of the organization. Corporate governance...
Words: 4216 - Pages: 17
...Finance 4311 Corporate Governance and Ethics First Paper Corporate governance has been define many different ways throughout time, but there is one definition that I feel properly demonstrates what corporate governance means. Corporate governance refers to the system by which corporations are directed and controlled. The governance structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation (such as the board of directors, managers, shareholders, creditors, auditors, regulators, and other stakeholders) and specifies the rules and procedures for making decisions in corporate affairs. In business this concept plays a key role in a lot of business decisions dealing legal ramifications of different cultures and other places that differentiate geographically. These rules and regulations can help keep neighboring countries on a similar system so that rules do not get misinterpreted causing financial fraud or other violations. The US corporate governance is determined mainly by legislation of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002(SOX) and detailed regulations which SOX required the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and NASDAQ to draw up. I recently found through research that at this point in time the United Kingdom corporate governance does not exist. I also think that this could cause problems when trying to avoid trade regulations and other violations. The US and the UK can be compared...
Words: 563 - Pages: 3
...Autumn 2010 Different ApproA in corporAte Gov Relevant to PaPeR P1 Learning Centre PAGE 15 ches ernAnce Study tiPS: Despite some new additions to the Paper P1 Study Guide in June 2011, a substantial part of the Paper P1 syllabus continues to concern matters of corporate governance. Section A6 of the Paper P1 Study Guide requires to have knowledge of the different approaches to corporate governance, inter alia, the development of corporate governance codes in principles-based jurisdictions (A6(d)), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) as an example of a rules-based approach (A6(e)) and the objectives, content and limitations of corporate governance codes intended to apply to multiple national jurisdictions, namely the OECD principles of corporate governance (A6(f)). specification in something such as a code of best practice ... One thing is clear, though. Whatever the model, the public must know about it and about how it is operating in practice. Disclosure should be a central feature of any corporate governance regime. Shareholders, potential shareholders and the wider public are entitled to real, meaningful detail about the way the directors say they are carrying out their stewardship role. The annual report and, in these times, the company’s website are important forums for disclosure. Directors who take the fundamental notions of openness, integrity and accountability seriously …… will be well on the way to good corporate governance.” to US and non-US companies with a...
Words: 1956 - Pages: 8
...Introduction Corporate governance could be defined as the system of regulating and overseeing corporate conduct and of balancing the interests of all internal stakeholders and other parties which are external stakeholders, governments and local communities who can be affected by the corporation's conduct, in order to ensure responsible behavior by corporation and to achieve the maximum level of efficiency and profitability for a corporation. (Jean, Anil and Mirko 2011, pp.10). Therefore, the corporate governance framework consists of explicit and implicit contracts between the company and the stakeholders for distribution of responsibilities, rights, and rewards; the procedures for reconciling the sometimes conflicting interests of stakeholders in accordance with their duties, privileges, and roles; and procedures for proper supervision, control, and information-flows to serve as a system of checks-and-balances. (businessdictionary.com 2012) Starbucks Company and British Petroleum Plc are chosen to explain and discuss on good corporate governance; meanwhile Enron is chosen to explain and discuss on bad corporate governance. Since Starbucks and Enron are incorporated in the United States of America (USA), therefore these two companies will be used to compare how they governance their company under principle of corporate governance of America. Corporate Governance in United States (US) In United States, after have various corporate scandals, corporate governance has rising...
Words: 2172 - Pages: 9
...New Zealand Principles of Corporate Governance and Responsibility. A Global Perspective. Prepared by: Mark Gray Large businesses around the world are controlled in a variegated fashion. Whilst the Anglo American system of corporate control is heavily based on a strict structure of a Board of Directors, in itself controlled by a chairman and constituting a various number of executive and non-executive directors. Whilst the primary function of the Board has fundamentally been seen as one of accountability, monitoring and goal setting, there is large chasm of difference in Board performance, and this highlighted graphically by the numerous large scale Corporate collapses in the United States. Indeed the U.S economy has been severely affected by ‘avoidable’ corporate bankruptcies. As the United States comprises a large proportion of the largest corporations in the world, it is not surprising that it has suffered a large number of corporate failures of corporate governance (Blackmore, 2006). The speedy corporate meltdown of very large U.S corporations, the like of Lehman Brothers and Enron threw the entire U.S business community into turmoil, prompting the U.S and other governments to speedily regulate as a deterrent to all business owners. This approach is ‘rules based’ and relies heavily on legislation for business compliance and good corporate governance. Although there have been corporate failures in New Zealand, most recently...
Words: 1616 - Pages: 7
...Aspects of Corporate Governance. The report was published in December 1992, following the recommendations of the Cadbury Committee. • Address concerns about the working of the corporate governance system. • The Committee made it its purpose to address the financial aspects of corporate governance and out of this produced a Code of Best Practice. The Committee • The Cadbury Committee was established in May 1991 by the Financial Reporting Council, the London Stock Exchange, and the accountancy profession. • Reasons: Increasing lack of investor confidence in the honesty and accountability of listed companies. Financial collapses of listed corporations. Auditors who signed off a set accounts which turned out be a misrepresentation of the facts, and about losing its self-regulatory role. Lack of board accountability for such matters as directors’ pay. Corporate Governance Contemporary corporate governance started in 1992 with the Cadbury report in the UK Cadbury was the result of several high profile company collapses is concerned primarily with protecting weak and widely dispersed shareholders against self-interested Directors and managers Cadbury Report 1992 The committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance’ The Code of Best Practice’ (1992) Voluntary code ▪ But for listed companies a compliance statement was required ▪ ‘Comply or explain’ – Principles rather than rules The ‘principles v rules’ argument (UK v USA) The...
Words: 871 - Pages: 4
...Corporate Governance Issues- Pre and Post financial Crisis By Unnikrishnan. P -ID No. 4317257 Session: Spring Year: 2013 Word Count: 1768 “Corporate governance is concerned with holding the balance between economic and social goals and between individual and communal goals. The governance framework is there to encourage the efficient use of resources and equally to require accountability for the stewardship of those resources. The aim is to align as nearly as possible the interests of individuals, corporations and society.” (Sir Adrian Cadbury, UK, Commission Report: Corporate Governance 1992). The concept of Corporate Governance (CG) in this corporate world has gained extra importance after the recent global financial crisis. Trading in the world has history of centuries and so do the existence of companies & business. The structure of company, its practices, the roles of key personnel, organizational behaviour, performance & goals got a new outlook in recent past when the collapse of Big firms such as Worldcom, Enron, Lehman Brothers etc. were witnessed despite their long history in business or their top ranking...
Words: 2110 - Pages: 9
...4.1. Introduction The aim of this chapter is to present the corporate social responsibility and how the organisation is governed in Meggitt PLC along with its competitors. This chapter presents a theoretical outline on the roles of the governance in the organisation and the corporate social responsibility. Following this, the research recognises various inferences and pertinence to Meggitt PLC and its competitors (Airbus and BAE Systems PLC). 4.2. Governance 4.2.1. Implications of Corporate Governance The methods used for directing and controlling companies are referred to as corporate governance. OECD (1999) signifies the role of corporate governance as the relationship structure along with the associated responsibilities of the board members...
Words: 908 - Pages: 4
...With recent changes in the UK law in terms of shareholder empowerment, controversy has arisen questioning the benefits of having shareholders decide on executive compensation. This form of decision-making from shareholders relates directly to corporate governance and that ability of an organization to make profits following such decisions. As a result, this essay seeks to discuss the benefits and demerits of giving shareholders a say in executive compensation in the UK context. Fernando (2006) terms corporate governance as the system or structure through which a business is controlled and its activities driven in terms of decision-making, where it determines the hierarchy of authority. The above makes it a system through which responsibilities...
Words: 1473 - Pages: 6
...Corporate Governance in Financial Services UMACTF-15-M Corporate Financial Strategy – 2014 Student number- 07975484 Word Count- 2,021 Introduction Dictum Meum Pactum- My word is my bond. Simple, powerful, trustworthy. Unfortunately, the world we live in is not simple, those that hold power (and those that do not) are not always trustworthy. Moral hazard is rife in everyday decisions we make, when multimillion amounts are on the line this does not simply fade. In fact, the temptation to break moral code is as high as it will ever be. As much as we would like to trust those in control to be acting in our best interest, we definitely feel better when there are safeguards in place to ensure we are protected. These safeguards are the beginning of the notion of corporate governance, “The process of supervision and control intended to ensure that the company’s management acts in accordance with the interests of shareholders” Parkinson (1993). Over the course of this essay I will investigate and explain how corporate governance has failed and how this failure is arguably at fault for, or at least contributed to, the recent financial crisis in the UK. Critically assessing the pitfalls in corporate governance I will present a reasonable case for where responsibility lies for resolving previous problems and from this move to suggest potential areas for improvement that may limit the potential for future failure. What has happened? We have experienced financial...
Words: 2130 - Pages: 9
...MANAGING CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY IN WIDER BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT NAME ID INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY LTD Edexcel BTEC Level 7 Professional Diploma in Strategic Management & Leadership Managing Corporate Responsibility in Wider Business Environment Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 Page | 1 PART 01: .................................................................................................................................. 3 LO 1.1: Briefly explain how the globalization has an impact on a national economy ......... 3 LO 1.2: Discuss the influence of international institutions. .................................................. 4 LO 1.3: Explain the role of European Union on Unilever, UK. ........................................... 6 LO 2.1: Explain the importance of having good Corporate Governance for the organization ............................................................................................................................................... 7 LO 2.2 & 2.3: Discuss what regulatory requirements exist in the country shaping the corporate governance practices of an organization and their role in ensuring corporate stakeholder’s interest. ............................................................................................................ 8 LO 3.1: Discuss the economics of adopting a policy...
Words: 3359 - Pages: 14
...3. Introduction Corporate Governance has become a subject in its own right over the past decade but Corporate Governance issues are as not new- there have been tensions from the beginning as the case of Salomon v Salomon [1897] illustrates. Despite the longevity the phrase ` corporate governance ` is somewhat `MALLEABLE`- i.e almost every author or book on the subject offers a different view of what the phrase means. In the broadest sense, it means the question of who should own and control the company and in its narrowest; it purely means the relationship between the shareholders and Directors. The importance o Corporate Governance (CG) can best be understood in the context of how large modern companies operate. Owing to the separation of ownership and management, there is a need to establish appropriate control monitoring procedures to ensure that management can effectively utilise entrusted resources to add values to business owners. The owners ( the investors/ shareholders) will not usually be involved in the planning and control of the business of the companies and there is a risk than the managers( Directors) may pursue their own interests even at the expense of the shareholders. In other words – conflicts of interest can arise. Moreover, there are a number of different interested parties/ stakeholders- e.g between controlling large shareholders and minority shareholders, creditors and shareholders, shareholders and employees. Thus CG can be defined as “a set of...
Words: 1080 - Pages: 5