Free Essay

Upload Document

In:

Submitted By sedap87
Words 12834
Pages 52
Japan Navigator No.565
RATES

Global Markets Research
This is a direct translation of the original Japanese report issued on 11 April and reflects data as of that date. 14 April 2014

Research analysts

1: Near-term market environment and investment strategy
JGB curve is unlikely to flatten materially further on US factors alone Next week the focus will be on the 5yr and 20yr JGB auctions. As there will be few other domestic factors, the market will remain susceptible to external factors. However, we do not think US factors alone can bring the risk-off driven flattening further. The key will be whether investors revise down their outlook for economies other than the US based on their view for unexpectedly weak US growth and hawkish Fed, in which case they should reduce risk positions in these markets. This week, risk-off momentum strengthened more than expected. 10yr UST rates have declined to levels signalling that a rate hike, as communicated by the Fed, would be premature, and are also approaching to levels that even reject QE3 tapering. (We note that 10yr rates traded around 2.50% when former Fed Chair Bernanke began talking about a QE exit.) These levels were tested in October 2013, but data do not look as poor as to suggest momentum has slowed to levels equivalent to that period. Even US shares, despite the current adjustment, are trading about 10% higher than in October 2013. We surmise that the issues that the US is currently facing are not cyclical, but rather structural (see below). For this reason, we believe any surprises in terms of a rates market rally could come from emerging economies, which are dependent on US growth, or in Japan and Europe, whose monetary policy rest on a strong USD. Indeed, China‟s export data released this week surprised on the downside, and EUR approached highs for the year. In Japan, while JPY has not strengthened materially due to real-demand selling, stemming from large trade deficits and foreign direct investments, the stock market is approaching the year‟s low. Considering the strength of risk-off momentum this week, we believe JGBs could have rallied more than they did. However, the market remained subdued likely because of concerns over supply and demand in the super-long zone. Although these concerns apparently have played out this week, we believe investors are unlikely to go long shortterm positions yet. This is because JPY is slow to strengthen and the BOJ continues to communicate the market in such a way as to disappoint near-term easing expectations, in our view. We expect these conditions to remain in place next week. In this environment, only the stock market could weaken further. To this, we believe the government is more likely to feel the need to take any action than the BOJ, and thus could begin discussing a policy response. The ECB, which appears more willing to take easing action than the BOJ, could communicate to the market in such a way as to keep EUR from strengthening. In this case, a weaker EUR should pressure the BOJ more into taking action, in our view. Based on the current supply and demand conditions and fundamentals, we believe the 20yr auction will come in at lower levels than in the previous auction (average of 1.527%). Although 20s are unlikely to rally on short-term flows, the lack of potential bearish factors means that some investors may value in the new issue for carry and roll, which is as high as those for the 7yr range.

Japan Rates Strategy
Naka Matsuzawa - NSC naka.matsuzawa@nomura.com +81 3 6703 3864

See Appendix A-1 for analyst certification, important disclosures and the status of non-US analysts.

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 1: JGB market indicators
(bp) 2 10 Apr yield curve (RHS) 1 0 Yrs -1 -2 -3 0.4 -4 -5 0.2 0.0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 1.2 1.0 0.65 0.8 0.60 0.6 0.55 0.50 1.6 1.4 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 (%) 1.8 (%) 0.90

Changes in JGB yields: 10 Apr - 4 Apr (LHS)

10yr JGB yield

20140228

20140310

20140314

20140331

20140404

20140304

20140306

20140312

20140318

20140320

20140325

20140327

20140402

20140408

(bp) JGB curve spread 2-5yr 9.6 10 Apr - 4 Apr Asset sw ap spread 2yr -10.5 10 Apr - 4 Apr
Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

5-10yr 43.9 (-1.5) 5yr -13.9 (0.9)

7-10yr 27.8 (1.1) 10yr -17.0 (0.8)

10-20yr 88.9 (2.5) 20yr -5.7 (2.8)

20-30yr 20.0 (1.4) 30yr -9.0 (3.8)

(-1.1)

(0.2)

20140410

2

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Decline in potential growth in global markets We believe the issues that the US is currently facing are structural rather than cyclical. Investors are increasingly asking whether the US economy‟s nominal potential growth rate, and thus the neutral policy rate, have declined (see Japan Navigator No. 563, 31 March). Originally, these concerns started in the US following the 2007 sub-prime shock. Before the crisis broke out, a prevailing view was that the US‟s real potential growth rate was near 3.0%. (The Fed‟s long-term forecast at that point was 2.5-2.6%.) Subsequently, these concerns took hold in Europe in 2010-2011 because of the euro area fiscal crisis, and then in China in 2011-12, causing a downward revision in growth and inflation forecasts for the global economy as a whole and destabilizing financial markets. Now this trend seems to have returned to the US. Currently, there are concerns that the real potential growth rate may be lower than the 2.2-2.3% expected by the Fed, or that it may not return to 2% under current Fed policy. Almost five years after its turnaround, US growth and inflation have not picked up. This has led to widespread concerns that the economy lacks underlying momentum, which is unlikely to be dispelled unless substantially strong data prints continue. For that matter, we believe a recovery in corporate capital spending would be necessary. In our view, overseas investors likely have lowered their expectations on Fed policy now, which apparently has led to their risk aversion. Based on this, we believe it would be crucial for the Fed to recover confidence by investors, which was apparently lost due to the failure of its forward guidance policy, while at the same time demonstrating that Ms. Yellen is in control of its policy. Japanese shares' price earnings are declining Japan has also been affected by potential growth concerns taking hold globally, with its financial markets having destabilized several times. However, its own potential growth rate has been affected little by this trend (Figure 2). This is because it led others in experiencing a decline in potential growth. However, to the extent that Japan‟s potential growth rate remains low, Japanese shares have been affected by the decline in global potential growth, with the price earnings ratio (PER) edging down gradually through 2012. The PER recovered to levels seen just before the 2008 Lehman bankruptcy due to the Abenomics boost, but is beginning to fall again now that expectations for Abenomics have played out and there is a risk of another downward correction in the global potential growth rate (Figure 3).

Fig. 2: Japan’s estimated potential growth rate
(%)

1.6
1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4

0.2
0.0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13

Note: No estimate available in 2011 due to the impact of the natural disaster in March. Source: Cabinet Office

3

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 3: Japanese shares' price earnings
(PE) 35

30

25

20

15

10

5 2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Note: Based on FTSE data and forecast earnings after 12 months. Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

4

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Next week’s events
5yr JGB auction (15 April Overview: Look for carry and roll until BOJ easing is played out The BOJ is signalling little intention of easing policy further in the near term, easing expectations. Hence, we believe short-term buying is unlikely to pick up. Even if additional easing does become more realistic, yields are likely be resisted in the mid0.1% range unless rate cut expectations heighten, meaning that yields below 0.20% would not look attractive for short-term buyers, in our view. Judging by current fundamentals, we believe policy duration of near 4yrs lacks logical support. Despite this, we believe the front to intermediate part of the curve is likely to be supported by the BOJ‟s new lending facility, which allows banks to borrow at 0.1% for four-year terms, providing opportunities for carry trades in the JGB market. In terms of supply and demand, we do not expect many investors to shed intermediates materially until BOJ easing expectations play out. However, we expect selling to pick up once the Bank takes its next easing action, as investors are likely to become wary of a QQE exit and look to take profits. Auction backdrop: Decline in easing expectations has little effect The previous 14 March supply was well received. The average came in at 0.204%. Undisclosed takedowns, which reflect direct investor bidding, amounted to JPY515.9bn, or a low 19% (Figure 4). The takedown in the No. 2 non-competitive auction was 99%. 5s subsequently traded in a 0.185-0.20% range, closing at 0.19% on 10 April. The 2s5s curve traded in a 9-12bp range, closing at 10bp on 10 April. The 5s10s curve traded in a 43-45bp range and closed at 44bp on 10 April. The recent BOJ language has made near term easing action even more unlikely, but 5s apparently have barely been impacted, with yields trading in an extremely narrow range at slightly higher levels than in the previous auction.

Fig. 4: Ratio of undisclosed takedown in 5yr auctions

60% Average since 2012 50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0% 12/01

12/04

12/07

12/10

13/01

13/04

13/07

13/10

14/01

Source: Quick, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

The main events since the previous auction were as follows: (5yr yields rose to 0.20% on 18 March.) 19 Mar Fed chair Yellen suggests that Fed could raise rates about six months after QE3 has been wrapped up. 8 April BOJ Governor Kuroda‟s spoke with unexpectedly hawkish language, disappointing easing expectations. (5yr yields fell to 0.185% on 9 April.) 9 April FOMC minutes were more dovish than expected, lowering rate hike concerns.

5

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Investor analysis: Recovery in investor demand in February Banks are the main investors in the 5yr. Since the QQE adoption, however, as 5yr rates have moved significantly lower, and with little likelihood of further BOJ easing, they appear to have continued to shed intermediates and adjust risk exposure using long and super-long JGBs and swaps. JSDA data suggest that, in reaction to the 4 April easing, city banks have been shedding intermediate JGBs (Figure 5). As net selling increased in July-September and December, we believe they may have sold yen bonds to compensate for losses on foreign bond investments. Conversely, their net selling was limited in January and February, when UST and JGBs both rallied. JSDA data do not reflect investor selling into BOJ operations and direct takedown in auctions, making it difficult to determine actual investor trends. Based on BOJ data, city banks shed JGB investments by JPY22.0trn in April-June (Figure 6). This suggests that they brought a substantial amount into BOJ operations, in addition to selling in the market. Subsequently, while they basically continued to shed JGB investments, their behaviour differed considerably depending on the month. They were large net sellers in January but became net buyers in February, albeit slightly. Judging from the amount of undisclosed takedowns, major banks‟ direct bidding was apparently subdued, but was relatively aggressive in February (Figure 4). Regional financial institutions are apparently slow in reducing investments (Figure 6). We think this is because they do not look to reduce JGB holdings via BOJ operations and they are not positioned well in taking on large investments in foreign bond markets (in terms of staff and repo lines). Some may look to shed JGB duration by shifting out from long-term JGBs into intermediates – as major banks did after the 2003 VaR shock – while others may be adding back duration while monitoring the market. Either of these flows could become more pronounced depending on market trends. Reflecting their contrarian stance, they were net sellers of long-term bonds for a total of JPY3.4trn and shifted into intermediates when the market rallied in June-September 2013 (Figure 5), but became net buyers of long-term JGBs in the selloff in OctoberDecember. They became net sellers again in January-February when the market rallied, but during this period their net buying of intermediates declined and they may have turned to securities other than JGBs.

6

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 5: Bond purchases by investor data: Banks
(JPYbn) City banks (including long-term credit banks) Super longterm FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 2013 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 Jan Feb -1,292 -111 -1,500 -385 -1,625 -156 -151 -183 -95 -109 -156 110 240 -71 -76 185 -237 Long-term -1,826 -3,448 147 -2,153 -555 2,792 -1,501 233 53 661 976 1,245 -2,008 -132 -188 516 1,478 Intermediateterm 5,749 15,613 11,298 2,350 -1,178 -1,853 -1,052 -860 -909 -1,440 -2,592 -1,938 -1,208 -750 -1,683 -670 -366 Non-JGBs -688 730 390 -686 -749 8 -94 -208 -64 -36 -146 32 -48 -22 -43 -139 13 Total 1,942 12,784 10,334 -874 -4,107 792 -2,797 -1,018 -1,014 -924 -1,918 -551 -3,024 -975 -1,991 -107 888 Super longterm 1,373 1,149 116 -1,359 -521 -434 228 -140 -151 -125 -269 -269 -253 -177 -102 -180 -249 Regional financial institutions Long-term 2,529 7,883 6,015 4,025 4,007 331 1,159 314 -185 -317 -702 -1,184 39 459 863 -402 -215 Intermediateterm 4,132 4,405 5,345 6,840 1,769 61 827 692 429 360 647 571 572 440 264 220 189 Non-JGBs 4,928 3,538 5,642 5,983 5,849 221 822 494 389 348 266 227 659 622 480 217 613 Total 12,962 16,976 17,118 15,489 11,104 178 3,037 1,360 482 266 -57 -655 1,017 1,345 1,505 -145 338

Source: JSDA

Fig. 6: City and regional banks JGB holdings
(JPYtrn) 120 110

City banks

Regional banks

100 90
80 70 60 50 12/01
Note: Data include Treasury bills Source: Add source here

12/07

13/01

13/07

14/01

Yield levels: Policy duration is range-bound at 4yr, i.e., 5yr rates near 0.20% The 5yr par yield closed at 0.18% on 10 April, down 1bp since the previous auction. This is below the median in the post-QQE range (Figure 7). 5yr rates traded mostly in the low 0.1% range (trading as low as 0.095% at one point) in March 2013, when there were expectations that the BOJ would lower the rate it pays on excess bank reserves. Yields traded as high as 0.245% at one point during the risk-on selloff into end-2013, and were near 0.25% just before the September 2013 FOMC. The BOJ increased its liquidity supply via a bolstered bank lending facility at the 17-18 February meeting. 5yr rates have remained below 0.20% since then, on the view that JGBs with remaining maturities of around 4yrs would benefit most from carry flows funded by the new lending program. Calculated from JGB forward rates, BOJ policy duration (expected length of time until the next BOJ rate hike) as factored in by the forward market was 3.8yrs on 10 April (Figure
7

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

10). The BOJ set a two-year timeframe for achieving its inflation target, making the outlook of its policy after the two-year period uncertain. This led to the shortening of policy duration to the 2yr range at one point. Policy duration now has recovered to levels near 4.0yrs, moving in a narrow range around this level. It should be kept in mind that, when the BOJ took easing action in the past, policy duration has tended to become subsequently volatile. We note that the three-year policy duration is equivalent to 0.30% 5yr yields (right, Figure 10). If policy duration lengthens to four years, 5s could rally to 0.20%, but shortening to two years could bring yields as high as 0.55%.

Fig. 7: 5yr yield levels and relative value comparison
(%, bp) 5yr JGBs 10 April 2014 14 Mar (prev. 5yr auction) 1st QE period (19 Mar 2001 ~ 8 Mar 2006) Low High Median 2nd QE period (1 Dec 2009 ~) After Italian debt shock (12 Jul 2011 ~) QQE period (4 Apr 2013 ~) Low High Median Low High Median Low High Median Yield 0.18 0.19 0.16 1.11 0.53 0.10 0.65 0.33 0.10 0.44 0.22 0.13 0.44 0.22 2-5yr 10 11 13 73 45 6 42 20 6 29 12 6 29 11 5-7yr 16 16 9 50 35 10 35 24 10 32 22 10 32 20 5-10yr 44 45 28 101 81 32 84 63 32 72 58 32 58 45 5-20yr 133 134 61 164 144 101 165 146 101 165 142 101 147 134 ASW -14 -14 -20 9 -6 -28 -5 -15 -22 -8 -15 -22 -12 -16

Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Fig. 8: 5yr JGB breakeven yields
10 Apr 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.184 End Jun 14 End Sep 14 End Dec 14 End Mar 15 0.6 1.4 2.2 2.9 0.8 1.8 2.9 3.9 1.4 3.2 5.1 6.8 0.198 0.215 0.234 0.252 End Jun15 3.5 5.0 8.6 0.269 End Sep15 4.3 6.1 10.4 0.288

Cushion (bp) Roll (bp) Cushion + roll (bp) Break-even 5yr JGB par yield (%)

Notes: The cushion in the table refers to the cushion against a rise in yields provided by carry income. Breakeven is calculated in comparison with Treasury bill rates for durations corresponding to each period, and thus reflects rate hike expectations. Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

8

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 9: 5yr JGB yields and OIS rates
(%) 0.7 [a] less [b] (RHS)
5yr JGB yields [a]

(%) 0.5

0.6

5yr JPY OIS [b]

0.4

0.5 0.3
0.4

0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0

0.1

0

-0.1

Source: Bloomberg

Fig. 10: BOJ policy duration and 5yr rates
6 1.2

5yr JGB yields less 6M Treasury bill rates (%)

BOJ QQE
5

1

BOJ comprehensive easing
BOJ policy duration (yrs)
4 VaR shock 3

0.8

0.6

2

0.4

1

0.2

0
2001/10 2002/03 2002/08 2003/01 2003/07 2003/12 2004/05 2004/10 2005/03 2005/08 2006/02 2006/07 2006/12 2007/05 2007/10 2008/03 2008/09 2009/02 2009/07 2009/12 2010/06 2010/11 2011/04 2011/09 2012/02 2012/07 2012/12 2013/06 2013/11

0 0 1 2 3 4 BOJ policy duration (yrs) 5 6

Notes: The time until the BOJ raises rates to 0.25% is estimated using forward rates on JGBs. The period during which there was no policy duration in effect (9 March 2006 – 30 November 2009) has been excluded from the data. In order to account for differences in policy rates, the spread between 6-month and 5yr rates are used in the vertical axis of the graph to the right. In the graph on the right, the red circle indicates the break-even yield on 6 March 2014. Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Relative value: 5s became less undervalued to 10s The 2s5s spread was 10bp on 10 April, 1bp narrower since the previous auction. This makes 5s look expensive in the range since the 4 April BOJ easing. The 5s10s spread narrowed by 1bp to 44bp, making 5s look slightly cheap in the post-QQE range. Looking at OIS rates to exclude the impact of BOJ purchases, the 5-10yr spread was 37bp. Compared with the 44bp average since 2012, the 5yr looks cheap at current levels (Figure 11). The 5yr asset swap spread was -14bp, unchanged since the previous auction. This makes cash JGBs look cheap in the range since the QQE adoption. Carry and roll on 5yr asset swap positions is -1.4 over a six-month horizon.

9

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 11: 2-5yr and 5-10yr OIS spreads
(%) 0.6 2-5yr OIS spread 5-10yr OIS spread Average since Jan 2012 Average since Jan 2012

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

-0.1

Source: Bloomberg

Fig. 12: 5yr JGB-OIS spread and 5yr asset swap spread
(%)
0.3 (%)

5yr JGB rates - 5yr OIS (LHS)

5yr JGB rates - 5yr swaps (RHS)

0

0.25 -0.05 0.2 -0.1 0.15 0.1 0.05 -0.2 0
-0.25

-0.15

-0.05 -0.1 -0.3

Source: Bloomberg

20yr JGB auction (17 April) Overview: Yields should look attractive for short-term buying from 1.55% Considering that 20s attracted lifer buying below 1.60%, even during the risk-on driven JGB selloff into end-2013 (during which 20yr rates averaged 1.56%), it is unrealistic to expect yields of 1.6% or higher in the near term. Assuming that volatility remains subdued before the July BOJ meeting (or before the BOJ actually eases policy) and the low risk of 20s selling off to 1.6%, 20 yr yields should look attractive for short-term buying from 1.55%, taking carry and roll into account. The auction environment has improved compared with last month. The uncertainty over supply and demand in the super-long space (reduction in BOJ purchases, relaunch of super-long futures, and absorption of 30yr supply with increased issuance) has now been cleared. Globally, markets are apparently becoming risk-off again. Investors can take bull flattening positions on this, but short-term buying is unlikely to pick up unless the BOJ shows at least some inclination to take further easing action.

10

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Auction backdrop: Relationship with risk-on/off flow declines The 18 March auction was disappointing for a second consecutive month. The average came in at 1.527%. Undisclosed takedowns, which reflect direct investor bidding, amounted to JPY317.0bn, or a somewhat low 26% (Figure 13). The takedown in the No. 2 non-competitive auction was 12%. Yields subsequently traded in a 1.465-1.52% range, closing at 1.49% on 10 April. The 10s20s spread traded in an 87-90bp range, closing at 88bp on 10 April. 20s posted a low on the day after the auction, after which they have moved sideways despite strengthened risk-on flows that followed and the recent risk-aversion. It appears as if their relationship with other markets has fallen markedly, moving on their own supply and demand dynamism. 20yr swaps move more in line with risk-on/off flows. The main events since the previous auction were as follows: (20yr yields rose to 1.52% on 19 March.) 19 Mar Fed chair Yellen suggests that Fed could raise rates about six months after QE3 has been wrapped up. (20yr yields fall to 1.465% on 1 April.) 8 April BOJ Governor Kuroda‟s spoke with unexpectedly hawkish language, disappointing easing expectations. 9 April FOMC minutes were more dovish than expected, lowering rate hike concerns.

10 April 30yr supply was easily absorbed, with an average of 1.696%.

Fig. 13: Ratio of undisclosed takedown in 20yr auctions
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 12/01 Average since 2012

12/04

12/07

12/10

13/01

13/04

13/07

13/10

14/01

Source: Quick, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Investor analysis: Lifers continue with regular purchases, slow to shift into foreign bonds Life insurers and pension funds as well as public financial institutions are the main investors in the 20yr. Although lifers have continued with regular purchases after the QQE adoption, the monthly average purchase in April 2013-February 2014 was JPY509.9bn, which is about 70% of FY12 (JPY744.4bn) (Figure 14). We attribute this to a decline in insurance premium revenues following the reduction of the standard guaranteed rate in April and because they focused more on foreign bonds during this period. After sharply increasing net purchases in December, life and non-life insurers‟ buying returned to levels in line with the FY13 average in January and February. With all of the super-long auctions since February having largely been disappointing, lifers do not seem to have bought more than their usual levels after rates fell in January, with 20yr yields trading at around 1.50%. Major lifers‟ H2 investment plans suggest that, on average, they expect 20yr JGB yields to trade in a 1.43%-1.83% range. Compared with this, they expect 10yr UST rates to
11

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

trade in a 2.38-3.25% range, so we would not be surprised if they shift to foreign bonds. In reality, their foreign bond purchases have not picked up. Instead, they shed a net JPY107.2bn in Jan-Mar as UST rates fell (Figure 15). As the Fed is exiting QE3, the lifers may be looking at the risk of rate hikes. We note that lifers generally continue with regular purchases when the market is rallying, but tend to abstain when super-longs are selling off, as they are apparently aware that few others would absorb selling in this zone. Some pension funds may have revised investment plans in such a way as to increase riskier asset investments on Abenomics expectations. This, coupled with the GPIF‟s plans to sell a net JPY2.6trn in assets in FY13 and a net JPY2.4trn in FY14, may make pension funds cautious on JGB investments, as suggested by their increasing focus on intermediates when allocating new funds. Trust banks were relatively substantial net buyers of long-term and super-long JGBs in December-January and appear to have partly added back duration, but they shed risk again in February (Figure 14). At 7.6yrs, the median of the pension fund portfolio duration was substantially underweight relative to the bond index (7.66yrs) at end-March (Figure 16). Trust banks that shortened duration into the fiscal year-end may be looking to add back risk after the new fiscal year began. City banks are not consistent investors in the super-long zone, but rather trade for shortterm gains. To this extent, they could have a significant impact on auction results should they look to buy aggressively. City banks are required to buy new super-long issues as primary dealers (taking down 1%; not reflected on JSDA data), and tend to sell these bonds in the market after the auctions. As risk aversion took hold unexpectedly around the 20yr auction in late January, they began to add back super-longs and became net buyers of these bonds in January (Figure 5; not including direct takedowns). However, they became net sellers in February, and are unlikely to be actively involved in short-term activity, as suggested by disappointing super-long JGB auctions since February.

Fig. 14: Bond purchases by investor data: Life/non-life insurers and trust banks (pension funds)
(JPYbn) Life / non-life insurers Super longterm FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 2013 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 Jan Feb 5,705 5,783 10,248 10,591 8,933 927 57 655 481 654 507 628 227 494 882 560 464 Long-term -1,738 -136 -1,011 1,251 223 96 -263 43 4 -252 -61 -11 86 -110 93 13 -42 Intermediateterm 171 219 -74 742 94 -91 257 41 209 101 160 114 250 58 180 69 -11 Non-JGBs 1,124 1,539 870 945 648 91 190 64 119 125 99 162 114 138 91 81 117 Total 5,262 7,406 10,033 13,529 9,898 1,022 241 803 812 628 704 893 676 579 1,245 724 528 Trust banks (representing pension funds' purchases) Super longterm 4,479 6,262 3,629 3,021 5,153 1,118 419 266 390 124 281 420 309 184 138 75 304 Long-term 5,418 1,920 1,143 2,558 2,673 768 -263 -455 195 319 -264 472 315 -51 38 632 -221 Intermediateterm 3,266 4,378 250 3,546 4,011 1,166 1,205 1,447 1,026 419 641 561 291 457 328 136 825 Non-JGBs 1,437 4,227 2,475 138 1,183 158 265 -26 91 200 86 46 146 95 100 -6 2 Total 14,601 16,787 7,496 9,263 13,020 3,211 1,626 1,231 1,702 1,061 744 1,499 1,061 685 605 837 910

Source: JSDA

12

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 15: Life insurers’ foreign bond investments
(JPYbn) 1,500

Insurers shifted portfolios as the difference between yen and foreign interest rates widened.

1,000

500

0

-500

-1,000

2002

2005

2007

2010

2012

2013

2003

2004

2006

2008

2009

2011

Source: MOF

Fig. 16: Average pension fund duration vs. Nomura BPI duration
(Yrs) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3

Median duration of pensions less NOMURA BPI

Mar-01

Mar-03

Mar-05

Mar-07

Mar-08

Mar-09

Mar-10

Mar-12

Note: Interview of about 35 pension funds at the end of every month. Source: Quick, Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Yield levels: Yields were supported at 1.59% in risk-on selloff into end-2013 The par yield was 1.51% on 10 April, down 2bp since the March auction. This is slightly below the median of the range since the BOJ‟s adoption of QQE. Yields traded as high as 1.59% in the risk-on selloff into end-2013, and traded in the high 1.6% range just before the 18 September FOMC announcement. Looking at OIS rates to eliminate the impact of BOJ purchases on supply and demand, we note that 20yr OIS rates were 1.26% on 10 April. 20yr OIS traded below 1.20% at the height of the European financial crisis in July 2012, and also for a few days after 4 April (Figure 19). They sold off to 1.60% on 22 May as the BOJ conceded a rise in long-term yields, heightening concerns over a QE3 exit. 20yr OIS rates have not remained consistently above 1.60% after the outbreak of the euro area crisis in 2011. Based on this, we expect 20yr OIS rates to trade in a 1.20-1.60% range in the near term. Major lifers expect 10yr JGB yields to trade in a 0.54-0.94% range in H2 FY13 (average of eight insurers). Adding in the median 10s20s spread since QQE (89bp), this would be equivalent to a 1.43-1.83% range for 20yr cash bond yields. 20s are most likely to react sensitively to global risk-on/off flows since they are less likely to be absorbed in BOJ operations (about one-third of new issuance) under the current

Mar-14

Mar-02

Mar-04

Mar-06

Mar-11

Mar-13

2014

13

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

monetary policy and since super-long swaps are used in hedges on currency-structured notes.

Fig. 17: 20yr yield levels and relative value comparison
(%, bp) 20yr JGBs 10 April 2014 18 Mar (prev. 20yr auction) 1st QE period (19 Mar 2001 ~ 8 Mar 2006) After Lehman bankruptcy (16 Sep 2008 ~) 2nd QE period (1 Dec 2009~) After Italian debt woes (12 Jul 2011 ~) Low High Median High Low Median Low High Median Low High Median Low High Median
Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Yield 1.51 1.53 0.78 2.47 1.98 1.20 2.23 1.80 1.20 2.18 1.76 1.20 1.90 1.69 1.20 1.78 1.55

5-20yr 133 135 61 164 144 95 165 144 101 165 146 101 165 142 101 147 134

10-20yr 89 90 28 73 60 52 103 80 64 103 82 64 103 86 64 96 89

20-30yr 20 18 10 50 33 6 27 15 6 27 15 9 27 18 9 20 13

JGB-swap -6 -4 -31 9 -10 -15 47 6 -15 19 4 -15 19 7 -15 2 -4

QQE period (4 Apr 2013)

Fig. 18: 20yr JGB breakeven yields
10 Apr 14 End Jun 14 End Sep 14 End Dec 14 End Mar 15 0 1.8 3.9 6.0 8.1 0 1.4 3.1 4.9 6.8 0 3.2 7.0 10.9 14.9 1.506 1.538 1.575 1.615 1.655 End Jun15 10.3 8.8 19.1 1.697 End Sep15 12.6 10.9 23.5 1.741

Cushion (bp) Roll (bp) Cushion + roll (bp) Break-even 20yr JGB par yield (%)

Notes: The cushion in the table refers to the cushion against a rise in yields provided by carry income. Breakeven is calculated in comparison with Treasury bill rates for durations corresponding to each period, and thus reflects rate hike expectations. Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

14

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 19: 20yr JGB yields and OIS rates
(%)
2.4

(%) [a] less [b] (RHS) 20yr JGB yields [a] 20yr JPY OIS [b]
0.7

2.2

0.6

2 0.5 1.8 0.4 1.6 0.3 1.4
0.2 1.2

1

0.1

0.8

0

Source: Bloomberg

Relative value: 20s look less cheap to 10s The 10s20s JGB spread closed at 88bp on 10 April, 1bp narrower since the previous auction. This puts 20s in the middle of the post-QQE range. The 20s30s spread was 18bp, 2bp wider from the previous auction. This puts the 20yr at its most overvalued level in the range since QQE. Looking at the 10-20 OIS spread (73bp) to disregard the impact of QQE, we note that the 20yr looks slightly cheap to the average since 2012 (70bp). The 20-30yr OIS spread is 23bp, making 20s look somewhat cheap relative to the average since 2012 (17bp; Figure 20). The 20yr asset swap spread was -6bp, 2bp richer since the previous auction (Figure 21). Cash JGBs look rich in the range since 4 April. Carry and roll on 20yr asset swap positions is quite positive, at 2.0bp for a six-month period.

Fig. 20: 10-20yr and 20-30yr OIS spreads
(%) 1
Average since Jan 2012 Average since Jan 2012

10-20yr OIS spread

20-30yr OIS spread

0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0

Source: Bloomberg

15

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Fig. 21: 20yr JGB-OIS spread and 20yr asset swap spread
(%) 0.7 20yr JGB rates - 20yr OIS (LHS) 20yr JGB rates - 20yr Swap (RHS) (%) 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.5 0.05 0.4 0
-0.05 -0.1

0.6

0.3

0.2 -0.15 0.1 -0.2 -0.25

0

Source: Bloomberg

2. Medium-term outlook and strategy (Changes/additions since last week highlighted)
Fig. 22: Rates forecast
(%) Latest 10-Apr Japan Basic loan rate Unsecured O/N call 3M Tibor 2yr JGB 5yr JGB 10yr JGB 20yr JGB 30yr JGB 0.30 0.07 0.21 0.08 0.19 0.60 1.49 1.69 0.30 0.08 0.20 0.07 0.19 0.60 1.45 1.65 2014 April 0.30 0.08 0.20 0.07 0.19 0.60 1.45 1.65 June September 0.30 0.08 0.20 0.14 0.35 0.90 1.80 2.00 0.30 0.08 0.20 0.14 0.35 0.90 1.80 2.00 Decmber 0.30 0.08 0.20 0.13 0.33 0.85 1.75 1.95 March 0.30 0.08 0.20 0.12 0.30 0.80 1.70 1.90 2015 June

0.00 0.18 0.06 0.17 0.55 1.40 1.55

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.10 0.22 0.11 0.30 0.80 1.75 1.90

0.00 0.18 0.06 0.17 0.55 1.40 1.55

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.10 0.22 0.11 0.30 0.80 1.75 1.90

0.00 0.18 0.07 0.18 0.60 1.50 1.65

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.10 0.22 0.16 0.50 1.10 2.00 2.20

0.00 0.18 0.10 0.25 0.70 1.60 1.75

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.10 0.22 0.16 0.50 1.10 2.00 2.20

0.00 0.18 0.10 0.25 0.70 1.60 1.75

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.10 0.22 0.16 0.50 1.10 2.00 2.20

0.00 0.18 0.10 0.25 0.70 1.60 1.75

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.10 0.22 0.16 0.50 1.10 2.00 2.20

Source: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.

Scenario Our scenario is as follows: Investors should be more risk averse now that the Fed has become hawkish unexpectedly early, with USD carry flows remaining subdued. As the BOJ decides not to ease policy at its April meeting, markets begin to call for action in their movements. We doubt the BOJ will increase its purchases in the super-long area until it comes under considerable stress. Expectations for further BOJ easing should decline as the BOJ begins to show confidence in economic growth following the consumption tax hike. In this event, we would expect the stock market rally and JPY depreciation to slow and JGBs to stabilize around 10yr yields of 0.70%. In response to a slow improvement in CPI inflation and disappointing outcomes of the spring labor negotiations (i.e., smaller wage increases), we believe the BOJ could begin revising its policy framework in such a way as to raise inflation expectations in April-June, thus shifting its focus to quality from quantity (to riskier assets from JGBs). In July, the BOJ may decide to increase JGB and ETF purchases. At the same time, we believe the BOJ will officially announce that it will continue QQE into 2015. Once easing expectations play out, banks may begin to shed yen bond portfolios. In autumn 2014, the market may begin to factor in a Fed rate hike and a halt to BOJ easing in earnest as the Fed approaches its exit from QE, and concerns over asset inflation makes the Fed more hawkish. This should push yields higher. After testing 10yr yields of 1.0% again in Sep-Nov, the market should stabilize or edge up on BOJ
16

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

purchase operations into end-2014 and speculations over a decision on the second consumption tax hike. Investment strategy Over a long time horizon, the JGB rally, fuelled by BOJ easing, likely ended in April 2013. Given this, we recommend investors look to dip buy and sell on strength through mid2014 on the premise that: 1) neither the Fed nor the BOJ will shift to a tightening bias; and, 2) that the JGB trading range will shift in line with the global risk-on/off trends. Investors should maintain short duration positions on JGBs by following a risk-on trend in early 2014. We expect a brief pickup in risk-on flows, with 10yr rates likely to sell off to 0.7%, in which event investors may as well add long short-term positions. Conversely, JGBs could rally in June-July as the market prices in expectations for BOJ easing, in which case investors should look to shed duration. USTs have not adequately priced in the risk of a rate hike. For this reason, we recommend shifting into euro area bonds, which have a similar monetary policy and inflation environment as Japan. Investors could also consider taking on currency and stock market exposure. As expectations for BOJ easing weaken and risk-on momentum slows in January-March, investors can buy 10yr yields in the 0.7% range for short-term gains. Conversely, in April-June, if easing expectations rekindle and the JGB market rallies again, investors should look to shed duration, targeting yields near 0.60%. As US markets in H2 2014 begin to price in a Fed rate hike, expectations of an end to BOJ easing should emerge. We recommend adding back duration at 10yr UST yields of 3.253.5% and 10yr JGB yields in a 0.9-1.0% range. Risks (Bear flattening) Central banks take a hawkish stance as signs of asset inflation appear. The BOJ would refute any intention of easing policy further and exiting QQE. (Bear steepening) Crude oil prices rally sharply as emerging economies bottom. The BOJ significantly increases purchases of risk assets. (Bull flattening) The BOJ lengthens tenor of signal operations. The Fed embarks on QE4. China tightens monetary conditions early and faces a hard landing. (Bull steepening) The BOJ cuts rates. The ECB adopts QE measures.

17

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

Appendix A-1
Analyst Certification
I, Naka Matsuzawa, hereby certify (1) that the views expressed in this Research report accurately reflect my personal views about any or all of the subject securities or issuers referred to in this Research report, (2) no part of my compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this Research report and (3) no part of my compensation is tied to any specific investment banking transactions performed by Nomura Securities International, Inc., Nomura International plc or any other Nomura Group company.

Issuer Specific Regulatory Disclosures
The term "Nomura Group" used herein refers to Nomura Holdings, Inc. or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries, and may refer to one or more Nomura Group companies.

Issuer THE STATE OF JAPAN

Disclosures A13

A13 The Nomura Group has a significant financial interest (non-equity) in the issuer.

Important Disclosures
Online availability of research and conflict-of-interest disclosures
Nomura research is available on www.nomuranow.com/research, Bloomberg, Capital IQ, Factset, MarkitHub, Reuters and ThomsonOne. Important disclosures may be read at http://go.nomuranow.com/research/globalresearchportal/pages/disclosures/disclosures.aspx or requested from Nomura Securities International, Inc., on 1-877-865-5752. If you have any difficulties with the website, please email grpsupport@nomura.com for help. The analysts responsible for preparing this report have received compensation based upon various factors including the firm's total revenues, a portion of which is generated by Investment Banking activities. Unless otherwise noted, the non-US analysts listed at the front of this report are not registered/qualified as research analysts under FINRA/NYSE rules, may not be associated persons of NSI, and may not be subject to FINRA Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with covered companies, public appearances, and trading securities held by a research analyst account. Nomura Global Financial Products Inc. (“NGFP”) Nomura Derivative Products Inc. (“NDPI”) and Nomura International plc. (“NIplc”) are registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the National Futures Association (NFA) as swap dealers. NGFP, NDPI, and NIplc are generally engaged in the trading of swaps and other derivative products, any of which may be the subject of this report. ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED IN THE U.S. Principal Trading: Nomura Securities International, Inc and its affiliates will usually trade as principal in the fixed income securities (or in related derivatives) that are the subject of this research report. Analyst Interactions with other Nomura Securities International, Inc. Personnel: The fixed income research analysts of Nomura Securities International, Inc and its affiliates regularly interact with sales and trading desk personnel in connection with obtaining liquidity and pricing information for their respective coverage universe. Valuation methodology - Fixed Income Nomura‟s Fixed Income Strategists express views on the price of securities and financial markets by providing trade recommendations. These can be relative value recommendations, directional trade recommendations, asset allocation recommendations, or a mixture of all three. The analysis which is embedded in a trade recommendation would include, but not be limited to: • Fundamental analysis regarding whether a security‟s price deviates from its underlying macro- or micro-economic fundamentals. • Quantitative analysis of price variations. • Technical factors such as regulatory changes, changes to risk appetite in the market, unexpected rating actions, primary market activity and supply/ demand considerations. The timeframe for a trade recommendation is variable. Tactical ideas have a short timeframe, typically less than three months. Strategic trade ideas have a longer timeframe of typically more than three months.

Disclaimers
This document contains material that has been prepared by the Nomura entity identified at the top or bottom of page 1 herein, if any, and/or, with the sole or joint contributions of one or more Nomura entities whose employees and their respective affiliations are specified on page 1 herein or identified elsewhere in the document. The term "Nomura Group" used herein refers to Nomura Holdings, Inc. or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries and may refer to one or more Nomura Group companies including: Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. ('NSC') Tokyo, Japan; Nomura International plc ('NIplc'), UK; Nomura Securities International, Inc. ('NSI'), New York, US; Nomura International (Hong Kong) Ltd. („NIHK‟), Hong Kong; Nomura Financial Investment (Korea) Co., Ltd. („NFIK‟), Korea (Information on Nomura analysts registered with the Korea Financial Investment Association ('KOFIA') can be found on the KOFIA Intranet at http://dis.kofia.or.kr); Nomura Singapore Ltd. („NSL‟), Singapore (Registration number 197201440E, regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore); Nomura Australia Ltd. („NAL‟), Australia (ABN 48 003 032 513), regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission ('ASIC') and holder of an Australian financial services licence number 246412; P.T. Nomura Indonesia („PTNI‟), Indonesia; Nomura Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. („NSM‟), Malaysia; NIHK, Taipei Branch („NITB‟), Taiwan; Nomura Financial Advisory and Securities (India) Private Limited („NFASL‟), Mumbai, India (Registered Address: Ceejay

18

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

House, Level 11, Plot F, Shivsagar Estate, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai- 400 018, India; Tel: +91 22 4037 4037, Fax: +91 22 4037 4111; CIN No : U74140MH2007PTC169116, SEBI Registration No: BSE INB011299030, NSE INB231299034, INF231299034, INE 231299034, MCX: INE261299034) and NIplc, Madrid Branch („NIplc, Madrid‟). „CNS Thailand‟ next to an analyst‟s name on the front page of a research report indicates that the analyst is employed by Capital Nomura Securities Public Company Limited („CNS‟) to provide research assistance services to NSL under a Research Assistance Agreement. CNS is not a Nomura entity. THIS MATERIAL IS: (I) FOR YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION, AND WE ARE NOT SOLICITING ANY ACTION BASED UPON IT; (II) NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITY IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION WOULD BE ILLEGAL; AND (III) BASED UPON INFORMATION FROM SOURCES THAT WE CONSIDER RELIABLE, BUT HAS NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY NOMURA GROUP. Nomura Group does not warrant or represent that the document is accurate, complete, reliable, fit for any particular purpose or merchantable and does not accept liability for any act (or decision not to act) resulting from use of this document and related data. To the maximum extent permissible all warranties and other assurances by Nomura group are hereby excluded and Nomura Group shall have no liability for the use, misuse, or distribution of this information. Opinions or estimates expressed are current opinions as of the original publication date appearing on this material and the information, including the opinions and estimates contained herein, are subject to change without notice. Nomura Group is under no duty to update this document. Any comments or statements made herein are those of the author(s) and may differ from views held by other parties within Nomura Group. Clients should consider whether any advice or recommendation in this report is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice, including tax advice. Nomura Group does not provide tax advice. Nomura Group, and/or its officers, directors and employees, may, to the extent permitted by applicable law and/or regulation, deal as principal, agent, or otherwise, or have long or short positions in, or buy or sell, the securities, commodities or instruments, or options or other derivative instruments based thereon, of issuers or securities mentioned herein. Nomura Group companies may also act as market maker or liquidity provider (within the meaning of applicable regulations in the UK) in the financial instruments of the issuer. Where the activity of market maker is carried out in accordance with the definition given to it by specific laws and regulations of the US or other jurisdictions, this will be separately disclosed within the specific issuer disclosures. This document may contain information obtained from third parties, including ratings from credit ratings agencies such as Standard & Poor‟s. Reproduction and distribution of third party content in any form is prohibited except with the prior written permission of the related third party. Third party content providers do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of any information, including ratings, and are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such content. Third party content providers give no express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use. Third party content providers shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including lost income or profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of their content, including ratings. Credit ratings are statements of opinions and are not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase hold or sell securities. They do not address the suitability of securities or the suitability of securities for investment purposes, and should not be relied on as investment advice. Any MSCI sourced information in this document is the exclusive property of MSCI Inc. („MSCI‟). Without prior written permission of MSCI, this information and any other MSCI intellectual property may not be reproduced, re-disseminated or used to create any financial products, including any indices. This information is provided on an "as is" basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, its affiliates and any third party involved in, or related to, computing or compiling the information hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in, or related to, computing or compiling the information have any liability for any damages of any kind. MSCI and the MSCI indexes are services marks of MSCI and its affiliates. Russell/Nomura Japan Equity Indexes are protected by certain intellectual property rights of Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. and Russell Investments. Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. and Russell Investments do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or usefulness thereof and do not account for business activities and services that any index user and its affiliates undertake with the use of the Indexes. Investors should consider this document as only a single factor in making their investment decision and, as such, the report should not be viewed as identifying or suggesting all risks, direct or indirect, that may be associated with any investment decision. Nomura Group produces a number of different types of research product including, among others, fundamental analysis, quantitative analysis and short term trading ideas; recommendations contained in one type of research product may differ from recommendations contained in other types of research product, whether as a result of differing time horizons, methodologies or otherwise. Nomura Group publishes research product in a number of different ways including the posting of product on Nomura Group portals and/or distribution directly to clients. Different groups of clients may receive different products and services from the research department depending on their individual requirements. Clients outside of the US may access the Nomura Research Trading Ideas platform (Retina) at http://go.nomuranow.com/equities/tradingideas/retina/ Figures presented herein may refer to past performance or simulations based on past performance which are not reliable indicators of future performance. Where the information contains an indication of future performance, such forecasts may not be a reliable indicator of future performance. Moreover, simulations are based on models and simplifying assumptions which may oversimplify and not reflect the future distribution of returns. Certain securities are subject to fluctuations in exchange rates that could have an adverse effect on the value or price of, or income derived from, the investment. The securities described herein may not have been registered under the US Securities Act of 1933 (the „1933 Act‟), and, in such case, may not be offered or sold in the US or to US persons unless they have been registered under the 1933 Act, or except in compliance with an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. Unless governing law permits otherwise, any transaction should be executed via a Nomura entity in your home jurisdiction. This document has been approved for distribution in the UK and European Economic Area as investment research by NIplc. NIplc is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. NIplc is a member of the London Stock Exchange. This document does not constitute a personal recommendation within the meaning of applicable regulations in the UK, or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual investors. This document is intended only for investors who are 'eligible counterparties' or 'professional clients' for the purposes of applicable regulations in the UK, and may not, therefore, be redistributed to persons who are 'retail clients' for such purposes. This document has been approved by NIHK, which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, for distribution in Hong Kong by NIHK. This document has been approved for distribution in Australia by NAL, which is authorized and regulated in Australia by the ASIC. This document has also been approved for distribution in Malaysia by NSM. In Singapore, this document has been distributed by NSL. NSL accepts legal responsibility for the content of this document, where it concerns securities, futures and foreign exchange, issued by their foreign affiliates in respect of recipients who are not accredited, expert or institutional investors as defined by the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289). Recipients of this document in Singapore should contact NSL in respect of matters arising from, or in connection with, this document. Unless prohibited by the provisions of Regulation S of the 1933 Act, this material is distributed in the US, by NSI, a US-registered broker-dealer, which accepts responsibility for its contents in accordance with the provisions of Rule 15a-6, under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The entity that prepared this document permits its separately operated affiliates within the Nomura Group to make copies of such documents available to their clients.

19

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

This document has not been approved for distribution to persons other than „Authorised Persons‟, „Exempt Persons‟ or „Institutions‟ (as defined by the Capital Markets Authority) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia („Saudi Arabia‟) or 'professional clients' (as defined by the Dubai Financial Services Authority) in the United Arab Emirates („UAE‟) or a „Market Counterparty‟ or „Business Customers‟ (as defined by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority) in the State of Qatar („Qatar‟) by Nomura Saudi Arabia, NIplc or any other member of Nomura Group, as the case may be. Neither this document nor any copy thereof may be taken or transmitted or distributed, directly or indirectly, by any person other than those authorised to do so into Saudi Arabia or in the UAE or in Qatar or to any person other than „Authorised Persons‟, „Exempt Persons‟ or „Institutions‟ located in Saudi Arabia or 'professional clients' in the UAE or a „Market Counterparty‟ or „Business Customers‟ in Qatar . By accepting to receive this document, you represent that you are not located in Saudi Arabia or that you are an „Authorised Person‟, an „Exempt Person‟ or an „Institution‟ in Saudi Arabia or that you are a 'professional client' in the UAE or a „Market Counterparty‟ or „Business Customers‟ in Qatar and agree to comply with these restrictions. Any failure to comply with these restrictions may constitute a violation of the laws of the UAE or Saudi Arabia or Qatar. NO PART OF THIS MATERIAL MAY BE (I) COPIED, PHOTOCOPIED, OR DUPLICATED IN ANY FORM, BY ANY MEANS; OR (II) REDISTRIBUTED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF A MEMBER OF NOMURA GROUP. If this document has been distributed by electronic transmission, such as e-mail, then such transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this document, which may arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version.

Disclaimers required in Japan
Explanation on Ratings by Unregistered Rating Agencies From the perspective of obtaining fairness and transparency in the market, registration system for credit rating agencies has been introduced based on amended Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. In accordance with this, those financial instruments business operators utilizing ratings assigned by unregistered rating agencies (“Unregistered Ratings”) upon soliciting clients are obligated to notify their clients that these ratings are Unregistered Ratings and to provide them with such other information necessary as the significance of registration. ○Significance of Registration Those credit rating agencies which have been registered under the system will be supervised by the Financial Services Agency (FSA) and will be subject to certain restrictions. Such restrictions include the following; duty of candor and good faith; obligation to maintain compliance system to prevent conflict of interest and to maintain fairness in the credit rating process; prohibited from assigning ratings on those securities which they are holders of; and obligation to prepare and disclose rating policies and other necessary documents and to make publicly available the explanation materials and other necessary documents. They will also be obligated to report to FSA upon its request, to accept on-site investigations, to receive business improvement order and will be under other forms of supervision by FSA. Unregistered rating agencies will not be subject to these restrictions and supervision by FSA. ○Rating Agencies Standard & Poor‟s -Name of the rating agency group and registration number Name of the rating agency group: Standard & Poor‟s Ratings Services (S&P) Name of the registered credit rating agency within the group and its registration number: Standard & Poor‟s Ratings Japan K.K. (Financial Services Agency Commissioner 5) -The way of obtaining summary information on the policies and methods used for assigning credit ratings Please refer to its website at (http://www.standardandpoors.co.jp). Access「無登録格付け情報」 (http://www.standardandpoors.co.jp/unregistered) under 「ライブラリ・規制関連」. -Assumptions, Significance and Limitation of Credit Ratings Credit ratings assigned by Standard & Poor's are statements of opinion on the future credit quality of specific issuers or issues as of the date they are expressed and do not guarantee timely payments of interest or principal. Credit ratings are not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold any securities, or a statement of market liquidity or prices in the secondary market of any issues. Credit ratings may change depending on various factors, including issuers' performance, changes in external environment, performance of underlying assets, creditworthiness of counterparties and others. Standard & Poor's conducts rating analysis based on information it believes to be reliable in terms of quality and quantity. However, Standard & Poor's does not perform an audit, due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives, or guarantees its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. This information is based on information Nomura has received from sources it believes to be reliable as of August1, 2011, but it does not guarantee accuracy or completeness of the information. For details, please refer to its website above. Moody‟s -Name of the rating agency group and registration number Name of the rating agency group: Moody‟s Investors Service Inc. (Moody‟s) Name of the registered credit rating agency within the group and registration number: Moody‟s Japan K.K. (Financial Services Agency Commissioner 2) -The way of obtaining summary information on the policies and method used for assigning credit ratings Please refer to Moody‟s Japan K.K.‟s Japanese website at (http://www.moodys.co.jp). Click 「信用格付事業」and access to 「無登録格付説明 関連」in「無登録業者の格付の利用」. -Assumptions, Significance and Limitation of Credit Ratings Credit ratings are Moody‟s Investors Service, Inc.'s ("MIS") current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. MIS defines credit risk as the risk that an entity may not meet its contractual, financial obligations as they come due and any estimated financial loss in the event of default. Credit ratings do not address any other risk, including but not limited to: liquidity risk, market value risk, or price volatility. Credit ratings do not constitute investment or financial advice, and credit ratings are not recommendations to purchase, sell, or hold particular securities. No warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any such rating or other opinion or information is given or made by MIS in any form or manner whatsoever. Based on the information received from issuers or from public sources, the credit risks of the issuers or obligations are assessed. MIS adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MIS considers to be reliable. However, MIS is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

20

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

This information is based on information Nomura has received from sources it believes to be reliable as of September 24, 2010, but it does not guarantee accuracy or completeness of the information. For details, please refer to its website above. Fitch -Name of the rating agency group and registration number Name of the rating agency group: Fitch Ratings (Fitch) Name of the registered credit rating agency within the group and registration number: Fitch Ratings Japan Limited. (Financial Services Agency Commissioner 7) -The way of obtaining summary information on the policies and method used for assigning credit ratings Please refer to Fitch Ratings‟ Japanese website at (http://www.fitchratings.co.jp) and access 「格付方針等の概要」in the section「規制関連」. -Assumptions, Significance and Limitation of Credit Ratings Ratings assigned by Fitch are opinions based on established criteria and methodologies. Ratings are not facts, and therefore cannot be described as being "accurate" or "inaccurate". Credit ratings do not directly address any risk other than credit risk. Credit ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price or market liquidity for rated instruments. Ratings are relative measures of risk; as a result, the assignment of ratings in the same category to entities and obligations may not fully reflect small differences in the degrees of risk. Credit ratings, as opinions on relative ranking of vulnerability to default, do not imply or convey a specific statistical probability of default. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The assignment of a rating to any issuer or any security should not be viewed as a guarantee of the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information relied on in connection with the rating or the results obtained from the use of such information. If any such information should turn out to contain misrepresentations or to be otherwise misleading, the rating associated with that information may not be appropriate. Despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed. This information is based on information Nomura has received from sources it believes to be reliable as of September 24, 2010, but it does not guarantee accuracy or completeness of the information. For details, please refer to its website above.

Disclaimers required in Japan
Investors in the financial products offered by Nomura Securities may incur fees and commissions specific to those products (for example, transactions involving Japanese equities are subject to a sales commission of up to 1.404% on a tax-inclusive basis of the transaction amount or a commission of ¥2,808 for transactions of ¥200,000 or less, while transactions involving investment trusts are subject to various fees, such as commissions at the time of purchase and asset management fees (trust fees), specific to each investment trust). In addition, all products carry the risk of losses owing to price fluctuations or other factors. Fees and risks vary by product. Please thoroughly read the written materials provided, such as documents delivered before making a contract, listed securities documents, or prospectuses. Transactions involving Japanese equities (including Japanese REITs, Japanese ETFs, and Japanese ETNs) are subject to a sales commission of up to 1.404% of the transaction amount (or a commission of ¥2,808 for transactions of ¥200,000 or less). When Japanese equities are purchased via OTC transactions (including offerings), only the purchase price shall be paid, with no sales commission charged. However, Nomura Securities may charge a separate fee for OTC transactions, as agreed with the customer. Japanese equities carry the risk of losses owing to price fluctuations. Japanese REITs carry the risk of losses owing to fluctuations in price and/or earnings of underlying real estate. Japanese ETFs carry the risk of losses owing to fluctuations in the underlying indexes or other benchmarks. Transactions involving foreign equities are subject to a domestic sales commission of up to 1.026% of the transaction amount (which equals the local transaction amount plus local fees and taxes in the case of a purchase or the local transaction amount minus local fees and taxes in the case of a sale) (for transaction amounts of ¥750,000 and below, maximum domestic sales commission is ¥7,668). Local fees and taxes in foreign financial instruments markets vary by country/territory. When foreign equities are purchased via OTC transactions (including offerings), only the purchase price shall be paid, with no sales commission charged. However, Nomura Securities may charge a separate fee for OTC transactions, as agreed with the customer. Foreign equities carry the risk of losses owing to factors such as price fluctuations and foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Margin transactions are subject to a sales commission of up to 1.404% of the transaction amount (or a commission of ¥2,808 for transactions of ¥200,000 or less), as well as management fees and rights handling fees. In addition, long margin transactions are subject to interest on the purchase amount, while short margin transactions are subject to fees for the lending of the shares borrowed. A margin equal to at least 30% of the transaction amount and at least ¥300,000 is required. With margin transactions, an amount up to roughly 3.3x the margin may be traded. Margin transactions therefore carry the risk of losses in excess of the margin owing to share price fluctuations. For details, please thoroughly read the written materials provided, such as listed securities documents or documents delivered before making a contract. Transactions involving convertible bonds are subject to a sales commission of up to 1.08% of the transaction amount (or a commission of ¥4,320 if this would be less than ¥4,320). When convertible bonds are purchased via OTC transactions (including offerings), only the purchase price shall be paid, with no sales commission charged. However, Nomura Securities may charge a separate fee for OTC transactions, as agreed with the customer. Convertible bonds carry the risk of losses owing to factors such as interest rate fluctuations and price fluctuations in the underlying stock. In addition, convertible bonds denominated in foreign currencies also carry the risk of losses owing to factors such as foreign exchange rate fluctuations. When bonds are purchased via public offerings, secondary distributions, or other OTC transactions with Nomura Securities, only the purchase price shall be paid, with no sales commission charged. Bonds carry the risk of losses, as prices fluctuate in line with changes in market interest rates. Bond prices may also fall below the invested principal as a result of such factors as changes in the management and financial circumstances of the issuer, or changes in third-party valuations of the bond in question. In addition, foreign currency-denominated bonds also carry the risk of losses owing to factors such as foreign exchange rate fluctuations. When Japanese government bonds (JGBs) for individual investors are purchased via public offerings, only the purchase price shall be paid, with no sales commission charged. As a rule, JGBs for individual investors may not be sold in the first 12 months after issuance. When JGBs for individual investors are sold before maturity, an amount calculated via the following formula will be subtracted from the par value of the bond plus accrued interest: (1) for 10-year variable rate bonds, an amount equal to the two preceding coupon payments (before tax) x 0.79685 will be used, (2) for 5-year and 3-year fixed rate bonds, an amount equal to the two preceding coupon payments (before tax) x 0.79685 will be used. When inflation-indexed JGBs are purchased via public offerings, secondary distributions (uridashi deals), or other OTC transactions with Nomura Securities, only the purchase price shall be paid, with no sales commission charged. Inflation-indexed JGBs carry the risk of losses, as prices fluctuate in line with changes in market interest rates and fluctuations in the nationwide consumer price index. Purchases of investment trusts (and sales of some investment trusts) are subject to a purchase or sales fee of up to 5.4% of the transaction amount. Also, a direct cost that may be incurred when selling investment trusts is a fee of up to 2.0% of the unit price at the time of redemption. Indirect costs that may be incurred during the course of holding investment trusts include, for domestic investment trusts, an asset management

21

Nomura | Japan Navigator No.565

14 April 2014

fee (trust fee) of up to 5.4% (annualized basis) of the net assets in trust, as well as fees based on investment performance. Other indirect costs may also be incurred. For foreign investment trusts, indirect fees may be incurred during the course of holding such as investment company compensation. Investment trusts invest mainly in securities such as Japanese and foreign equities and bonds, whose prices fluctuate. Investment trust unit prices fluctuate owing to price fluctuations in the underlying assets and to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. As such, investment trusts carry the risk of losses. Fees and risks vary by investment trust. Maximum applicable fees are subject to change; please thoroughly read the written materials provided, such as prospectuses or documents delivered before making a contract. In interest rate swap transactions and USD/JPY basis swap transactions (“interest rate swap transactions, etc.”), only the agreed transaction payments shall be made on the settlement dates. Some interest rate swap transactions, etc. may require pledging of margin collateral. In some of these cases, transaction payments may exceed the amount of collateral. There shall be no advance notification of required collateral value or collateral ratios as they vary depending on the transaction. Interest rate swap transactions, etc. carry the risk of losses owing to fluctuations in market prices in the interest rate, currency and other markets, as well as reference indices. Losses incurred as such may exceed the value of margin collateral, in which case margin calls may be triggered. In the event that both parties agree to enter a replacement (or termination) transaction, the interest rates received (paid) under the new arrangement may differ from those in the original arrangement, even if terms other than the interest rates are identical to those in the original transaction. Risks vary by transaction. Please thoroughly read the written materials provided, such as documents delivered before making a contract and disclosure statements. In OTC transactions of credit default swaps (CDS), no sales commission will be charged. When entering into CDS transactions, the protection buyer will be required to pledge or entrust an agreed amount of margin collateral. In some of these cases, the transaction payments may exceed the amount of margin collateral. There shall be no advance notification of required collateral value or collateral ratios as they vary depending on the financial position of the protection buyer. CDS transactions carry the risk of losses owing to changes in the credit position of some or all of the referenced entities, and/or fluctuations of the interest rate market. The amount the protection buyer receives in the event that the CDS is triggered by a credit event may undercut the total amount of premiums that he/she has paid in the course of the transaction. Similarly, the amount the protection seller pays in the event of a credit event may exceed the total amount of premiums that he/she has received in the transaction. All other conditions being equal, the amount of premiums that the protection buyer pays and that received by the protection seller shall differ. In principle, CDS transactions will be limited to financial instruments business operators and qualified institutional investors. No account fee will be charged for marketable securities or monies deposited. Transfers of equities to another securities company via the Japan Securities Depository Center are subject to a transfer fee of up to ¥10,800 per issue transferred depending on volume.

Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.
Financial instruments firm registered with the Kanto Local Finance Bureau (registration No. 142) Member associations: Japan Securities Dealers Association; Japan Investment Advisers Association; The Financial Futures Association of Japan; and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association. Nomura Group manages conflicts with respect to the production of research through its compliance policies and procedures (including, but not limited to, Conflicts of Interest, Chinese Wall and Confidentiality policies) as well as through the maintenance of Chinese walls and employee training. Additional information is available upon request and disclosure information is available at the Nomura Disclosure web page: http://go.nomuranow.com/research/globalresearchportal/pages/disclosures/disclosures.aspx Copyright © 2014 Nomura Securities Co., Ltd.. All rights reserved.

22

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Scribd Upload a Document Search Documents

...Scribd Upload a Document Search Documents Explore Documents Books - Fiction Books - Non-fiction Health & Medicine Brochures/Catalogs Government Docs How-To Guides/Manuals Magazines/Newspapers Recipes/Menus School Work + all categories Featured Recent People Authors Students Researchers Publishers Government & Nonprofits Businesses Musicians Artists & Designers Teachers + all categories Most Followed Popular Sign Up | Log In Your Browser is Outdated Because you are not using a modern browser you will not have access to all of Scribd's features. Please consider upgrating to a modern browser: Close This Message Five Paragraph EssayI have never read a story like The Unicorn in the Garden and it definitely it was one of the beststories I have ever read. At the end of the story you don't know if the man really saw an unicorn or made it up so his wife would call the police. It really doesn't matter if he saw the unicorn or made it upthe point is that he gained what he wanted he got rid of his wife.The story also teaches a lesson, every little bad thing you do to someone can backfire twice ashard. The woman had called the police and the psychiatrist in the most meanest intention because shewanted to get rid of him, she did not love him after all. So what the man did was that he gave her of her own medicine, when the police asked if he saw an unicorn he replied using the same words that she hadused previously when he told her that there...

Words: 1015 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Apoem

...Top of Form Bottom of Form Browse Don't want to upload? Get unlimited downloads as a subscriber SIGN UP NOW Once you upload an approved document, you will be able to download the document Google Glass yajnasanjay Upload a document for free download access. Select files from your computer or choose other ways to upload below. SELECT FILES TO UPLOAD For multiple files hold down the shift key when selecting. Drag files here from your computer. Supported File Types: pdf, txt, ps, rtf, epub, key, odt, odp, ods, odg, odf, sxw, sxc, sxi, sxd, doc, ppt, pps, xls, docx, pptx, ppsx, xlsx By uploading, you agree to the Scribd Uploader Agreement. Add files from Google Drive, Gmail, Dropbox and more with FilePicker.io. Add files from multiple cloud and file storage services. Pick Files More reasons to publish on Scribd Scribd's platform is designed to help you easily publish your content on the web and mobile devices, distribute it to a wide and global audience, and potentially make money from selling that content. Here's more on the benefits of publishing on Scribd. 1. Reach Scribd's audience of 90 million monthly readers. By publishing on Scribd, your content can be seen by up to 90 million people from all around the world who use Scribd. 2. Turn your content into a beautiful HTML5 webpage, that you can even embed on another website. Scribd's patent-pending conversion technology instantly turns documents into beautifully formatted webpages. 3. Get your...

Words: 616 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Koofers Notes: A Case Study

...The audio summary is a new product for the market. These is no direct competitor because we are the only audio summary in the market currently. However, the competitions are still existed since there are substitutes for our product. The substitutes include document summary and video review for textbooks. It is obvious that there are many different documental summary for textbooks in the market right now. For example, Koofers Notes is a website that allowed students to upload these course materials for others students, but the materials are delayed and unorganized. It has hundreds relative files for one course, and many of them are insignificant. It will take a great amount of time for students to find the information they want. In addition,...

Words: 329 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Yayy3Y

...will provide you with details about the vacancy. How to apply Institutions will either use the HireWire online form or their own application form in a downloadable word format. HireWire online application form 1. Select the ‘apply for this job online’ button to complete the application form. 2. Ensure you save each page as you complete it. Sessions will timeout after 90 minutes. 3. Further and Higher education academic vacancies require you to upload a CV or supporting document. This is optional for support staff vacancies. Please include any supporting information and upload as one document only. 4. School vacancies do not require you to upload a CV or supporting document. 5. Once the form is complete, select the submit button. 6. Once submitted, the HireWire application form cannot be amended. Institutions application form 1. Select the download button to open and save the application form. 2. Complete the application form and include any supporting documents you wish to submit. Please note only one document can be uploaded so ensure that any additional information is added to the application form. 3. To apply, please visit www.hirewire.co.uk and log in as a candidate. 4. Select the vacancy on your homepage. 5. Click the browse button to locate and attach your application form. 6. Once submitted, the application form cannot be amended. My Homepage You can access your homepage by visiting www.hirewire.co.uk . ‘My Homepage’ allows you to: 1. Review incomplete...

Words: 371 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Safasafsf

...lecturer one. so, i will confirm with u the finalize version. Qianqi Liew pls update this one also.. if u know how to do annual cycle inventory, tell me about it.. Q2.docx Document DownloadPreviewUpload Revision 23 hours ago Comment Seen by everyone View 3 more comments Erica Lee then how should we do Q2? because they call us give recommendation.. recommendation based on Q1 lor.. so, i just take a bit from Q1 and explain 7 hours ago · Like Qianqi Liew Im not sure... Charles Kang what do u think ? 6 hours ago · Like Charles Kang Write a comment... Charles Kang 1st Question - YES, You need to to explore & explain new plans and please do cost comparisons (calculations) for both EG151 & DB032 2nd Question - After analysis pls do specify your recommendation on which is better system for EG151 & DB032 and explain why? From Dr. Affendy on Thursday Comment Seen by everyone Jing Wei ? Whats your question again? 8 November at 09:25 via mobile · Like Qianqi Liew Which mean Q2 is more on explaining the recommendations? COnfuse.. 7 hours ago · Like · 1 Charles Kang Write a comment... Qianqi Liew uploaded a new version of Case4.Q1.Completed.docx. Here's the completed version for Q1 from me and erica. Case4.Q1.Completed.docx Document DownloadPreviewUpload RevisionHistory (2) 7 hours ago Comment Seen by 3 Erica Lee...

Words: 1380 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Tender Cover Letter

...Tender (ITT). Please read and examine the following documents as contained in this Invitation to Tender carefully: No. of Pages Part 1: Conditions of Contract 11 Part 2: Requirement Specifications 76 Part 3: Evaluation Criteria & Submission Requirements 2 Document A: Preventive Maintenance Schedule 23 Document B: Equipment List 19 Document C: Notes to Schedule of Rates 24 Document D: Schedules of Rates Drawing 56 2. Submission Forms Appendix 1: Form of Tender Appendix 2: Tenderer’s Information Appendix 3: Statement of Non Compliance Appendix 4: Performance Guarantee Appendix 5A: Summary of Tender Appendix 5B: Breakdown of Tender Price Appendix 6: Non Disclosure Agreement 3 5 1 2 1 4 1 3. The submission of your tender shall also be in accordance with the Standard Instructions to Vendors posted on our website (http://www.sutd.edu.sg/procurement.aspx). Any noncompliance to this document shall also be indicated in Appendix 3. Submission of Tender - Pricings 4. All submission forms and required documents listed in this Tender along with the proposals must be completed and submitted by 4.00 pm (Singapore Time) sharp on 24 Aug 2012 via SUTD Procurement System (SUPS). Please note that you have to enter prices in the system in order to qualify for bidding. If we receive manual price submissions without your electronic price, we will disqualify your offer. Late submissions will not be accepted. As SUPS will disallow you to continue upload your proposal at 4pm sharp, please ensure you login...

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Giberish

...UC International University of Cincinnati PO Box 210640 Cincinnati, OH 45221-0640 Room 3134, Edwards One Phone (513) 556-4278 Fax (513) 556-2990 Financial Certification Form Personal Information: Please put your name in full as it appears in your passport. Family/Surname:___________________________________________________________________________ First/Given: ______________________________________ Middle: __________________________________ Country of Birth Date of Birth _____________________________ ______/______/______ month day Country of Citizenship ____________________________________ year Are you currently in the United States? ___YES ___NO If yes, list immigration status:_____(F1, H1B, etc.) If Yes, and the immigration status is not F-1, the Form I-20 or DS-2019 will not be issued until you have made an appointment with us for assistance with a change of status application. If you are not eligible for a change of status, the form will only be issued for travel to your home country. E-mail: __________________________________________ Telephone: _______________________________ ========================================================== Mailing Address for I-20 or DS-2019: Street Address:_____________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ City:_______________________________________ Province ______________________________________ State/Country______________________________________...

Words: 660 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Status of Books in Modern Society

...Books are symbolic of learning, and the educated. For years now, having a home library was the luxury few could afford. The lucky few who had one were immeasurably proud of it, and rightly so. Today, not only are books beginning to lose the value that they once had in the eyes of Man, their place in society has been increasingly challenged by the newborns of the digital age. New trends such as the increasing pace of life, the accelerating rate at which new information is being pedalled forth, and the ubiquity of the effects of capitalism have driven people to become more efficient. The by-product of such phenomena is that Man is taken as its slave, and only the interests of the market are considered, instead of the individual. Unfortunately, this has dealt a severe blow to the significance of the book in modern society. All indicators seem to point out that the book is unworthy of its more efficient counterparts like the personal computer or tablet. Yet, the book holds a special place in our hearts: its final trump card. We should not be too quick to oust the book out of our lives even with the proliferation of suitable alternatives, for there is still indeed worth of the hard copy even in the frenzy of modern society. Evolution seems to have taken mankind back to square one, where the modern man (like his ancestors thousands of years ago) worries about his next meal, appointment or payment. "Next" seems like the buzzword of modern society, with people constantly looking for...

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Qm0682 Ed a

...1. Which document should the clerk compare with the DCR to find the omitted item? The change document The shortage annex The hand receipt The MTOE 2. After identifying which item has been omitted, you should ensure that the clerk does which of the following BEFORE ordering a new item and posting the document number to the shortage annex: WRONG Destroy the existing documents Add the item to the Document register Make no changes to the documents Place the item number on the shortage annex 3. You have been furnished three documents (maintenance section hand receipt DA Form 2062, MTOE and PCN: ALV-151) (figures below). Using the documents, determine the authorized quantity for LIN# W33004 for the Maintenance section. 29 28 20 25 4. You are preparing to conduct an inventory on the unit?s organization property. What do you refer to in order to get the latest updates on technical manuals, supply catalogs (SC) and supply bulletins? WRONG AR 25-400-2 FEDLOG AMDF DA PAM 25-30 Figure 5-1. 5. SSG Brown just issued the Generator set, LIN: G74711, NSN: 6115-01-275-5061, Sn: G472221 to Paul J. Sfransky on the Temporary Hand Receipt in the figure above. Where does Paul J. Sfransky sign the DA Form 3161? Signature not required 1 3 2 6. How would you verify that equipment is being issued to the intended user, and determine if the individual is still assigned to the unit? Use the unit personnel roster and...

Words: 1156 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Records Format

...Summarize in 250-300 words the differences among source-oriented records, problem-oriented records, and integrated records. Include how you think the advantages and disadvantages of each record format affect every day work- remember to think about retrieving records as well as filing them. Source-oriented records (SOR) maintain reports according to source of documentation. This means that whomever the document is generated by, whether it being a nurse, radiology, or a physician each has their own section in the patient records. Problem-oriented records (POR) or problem-oriented medical records (POMR) is a way of record keeping that focuses on a specific problem that a patient may be having, which uses four components database, problem list, initial plan, and progress notes to identify problems. In a POR patients are assigned one or more problems and notes are documented for each problem using the SOAP structure. SOAP is defined as subjective, objective, assessment, and plan. Subjective is a patient’s statement about how she/he feels. Objective is the observation of the patient. Assessment is the judgment, opinion, or evaluation made by the health care provider. Plan is the diagnostic, therapeutic, and educational plan to resolve the patient’s problem. Integrated records format is the arranging of reports in a chronological date order. This allows observation on how the patient is progressing according to test results and how well the patient is responding to treatment based...

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Records Organization

...Week 6 –Records Organization Tamara Tate HRC/210 Patient Record: Keeping it Real (Axia) March 12, 2014 Lisa Owens Records Organization Records Organization There is variances and parallels amongst small, medium, and large facilities regarding how patient's records are organized. There are also differences in how loose paper records are maintained. Likewise, I have noticed the majority of facilities prefer that their loose records are anchored in their charts. This makes sense to me because it prevents the loose reports from coming up missing or lost. However, the size of facility seems to regulate how the facility systematizes its patient's files. The most prevalent methods of organization I have seen include chronologically, form numbers, report types, and categories. While reviewing the interview threads, I observed many similarities and many differences in how patient files are controlled. For example, the medium and large facilities are most likely to use electronic documenting than paper ones, thus eliminating the threat of misplaced records. The most common variance I perceived was in whether or not the facilities use paper files versus electronic files. Almost all of the medium and large facilities are using electronic files with all records immediately filed with the patient's main file. In contrast, the smaller facilities seem more likely to use paper files. Records are filed with the patient's main record right away or by the end of the day. This makes it easier...

Words: 268 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Term Paper from Web

...Term Paper Format Format for Term Papers ________________________________________ Below are some links and a general outline on how to write your term papers. Depending on your topic you may want to rely on the scientific report style or literature review styles, or a combination of the two. The choice is yours. Links to these styles can be accessed by the buttons below. Below the three buttons I outline the scientific report style. More details can be found by clicking the scientific format button below. Click here for how to write a reseach paper Click here to gain a more detailed view of the scientific report format described below or, Click here to gain a description of how to write a literature review ________________________________________ Format for a Scientific Report Abstract Short (three-quarters of a page) description of the paper. Describe what the issue or problem is, why it is important or interesting, and your findings Introduction • What is the issue or problem? • Literature review: what is current thinking, findings, and approaches on the problem? • What is the significance of the problem? • How do you plan to deal with the problem? What is your solution? Methods • How did you search for information or data on the topic? • What is your impression of the ulility, relevance, or quality of the data you collected? • What special steps did you take to select or utilize the data? Results • What are your findings? • Are their problems...

Words: 278 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Jjjjjj

...International Trade Documents & Logistics Assignment- 1 Submitted to- Submitted by - Ms. Supriya Lamba Karan Patwari Enroll no.-A1802014028 Ques.-Describe ADS(Aligned Documentation System) & what are its objectives? Ans.-Under Aligned Documentation System, different forms used in the International trade transaction are printed on the paper of the same size and in such way that the common items of information are given the same relative slots in each of the documents. With the effect from 1.10.1991, the new standardized documents came into effect. This is referred to as The Aligned Documentation System based on the U.N. layout key. The documents are aligned in such a manner that the common items of information are given in the same relative slots. This system also helps to prepare one" Master Documents" embodying information common to all documents, and xerox all the aligned documents by suitable and reproduction techniques. Accordingly the standardized documents for Indian exports are · Invoice · Exchange Control Declaration (GR) Form · Shipping Bill (Dock challan\ Duty Draw back and Port Trust Copy) · Bill of Lading Aligned DocumentationSystem is based on the U.N. layout key. Deriving national...

Words: 261 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Erb for Business Management

...Republic of the Philippines CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY Don Severino de las Alas Campus Indang, Cavite ( (046) 862-0939 / 862-0940 www.cvsu.edu.ph CvSU ERB FORM 01. PROTOCOL PACKAGE RECEIPT STUDY CODE: TITLE: PROPONENT: To the principal investigator/research proponent: Kindly arrange the required (with bullets) and other documents in your protocol package according to the following order. Write NA if the document is not applicable. | | | | |Original plus 7 copies of the ff: |NA |DATE Received at ERB with Proponent/Investigator/Representative| | | |and ERB secretariat initials | |Endorsement Letter from the research grant if applicable | | | |Accomplished ERB Form 02 -Request for Review of Protocol | | | |Accomplished ERB Form 03- Permit to Conduct the Study and | | | |Informed Consent (English and Filipino) | | | |Accomplished ERB Form 04 – Ethics Review Board Ethical...

Words: 298 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Laboratory Information Management System (Lims)

...2010) The main feature of a laboratory information management system is the management of registering and tracking if samples and test that take place in the laboratory. After the sample container arrival and registration, the LIMS tracks it and records its location. This may involve printing barcodes to identify the sample containers. However, it is also used to increase the amount of integration with instruments and applications what is done by creating files which will lead the operations on the sample; and to record and exchange electronic information what can be done through Oracle, SQL and Microsoft Access database. (Nicola 2012) Alongside the main functions mentioned above, a LIMS also manages the communication with clients, documents related to the samples and the personnel and workload. List of the main types of information that would need to be stored on a laboratory information management system: 1. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) records. 2. Scientific data. 3. Scientific apparatus. 4. Waste disposal. 5. Health and safety checks. 6. Training records. 7. Quality assurance. 8. Report records. 9. Specification levels. 10. Sample throughput. 11. Management. How information could be entered onto a laboratory information system: Information can be entered onto a laboratory management system using...

Words: 448 - Pages: 2