...From 1824-1854 America was under the Second American Political Party System. This system included two parties that played a vital role in shaping the way America’s party system operates now: the Democrats and the Whigs. The development of these two parties and the relationships between the candidates can be seen throughout the thirty years the Second Party System existed which is discussed in the book Andrew Jackson vs. Henry Clay: Democracy and Development in Antebellum America by Harry L. Watson. By reading Watson’s work, the reader can differentiate the comparisons and contrasts of Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay, personally and professionally, and how they believe that the American government should operate. For example, the Market Revolution opened the political...
Words: 949 - Pages: 4
...Andrew Jackson is a general in the US army. In 1818, he writes a report to the US secretary of War, John Calhoun . During this time the Seminole indians have been attacking the Americans living on the frontier in Georgia. Calhoun has directed General Jackson to campaign against the Seminole indians. Jackson has recently taken over the Spanish Fort St. Marks. (Jackson, 256) Jackson’s report to Calhoun justifies his actions during his campaign and states that it was done within the spirit of both Calhoun and the US President’s approval. There are three points that Jackson makes in his report to justify his actions. First, he believes there is an outside force instigating the Seminole indians to attack Americans. Second, Jackson believes that the Seminoles intend to take over the Spanish forts in order to sustain a war...
Words: 832 - Pages: 4
...When Andrew Jackson won the presidential election, he won it because Americans saw him as the “everyman”. However, before his win, his supporters, who were bitter over John Quincy Adams’ win in the 1824 election, attempted to sabotage Adams’ presidency. Their plan was to pass a proposal in Congress that would increase tariffs on manufactured goods like wool and textiles and would help Jackson win the next election; due to Adams being a New Englander, it was assumed that this proposal would be hugely supported and paint Adams showing favoritism towards his home state. The plan backfired since Jackson won by popular vote and the proposal was passed in 1828 which named the “Tariff of Abominations” and brought disaster upon Jackson’s presidency....
Words: 439 - Pages: 2
...Summarize the Age of Jackson and his war with the Bank and their importance including the party machine, Democrats and Whigs, public and private freedom, South Carolina and Nullification, Calhoun’s political theory, the Nullification crisis, Indian removal, the Supreme Court and the Indians, Biddle’s bank, pet banks, the economy, and the panic of 1837. Although winning the most electoral and popular votes during the presidential election of 1824, Andrew Jackson lost the race to John Quincy Adams. The election of 1824 laid the ground work for a new system of political parties. In 1828, Van Buren, established the political apparatus of the Democratic Party, complete with local and state party units overseen by a national committee and network of local newspapers devoted to the party and to the election of Andrew Jackson. During the election, Jackson’s supporters made few campaign promises, relying on their candidate’s popularity and the working of party machinery to get the vote out. Nearly 57 percent of the eligible electorate cast ballots, more than double the percentage four years earlier. Jackson won a resounding victory, carrying the entire South and West, along with Pennsylvania. His election was the first to demonstrate how the advent if universal white male voting organized by national political parties, had transformed American politics. Andrew Jackson had little formal education and was a man of many contradictions. He held a vision of democracy that excluded any...
Words: 1775 - Pages: 8
...Removal Act was technically voluntary, most understood the Native Americans were actually being forced off of their land by extreme pressure from the government. Historians Francis Paul Prucha and Edward Pessen take opposing views on Andrew Jackson’s decision, with Prucha claiming Jackson...
Words: 758 - Pages: 4
...this question was a firm no. During that time period, the United States government had been attempting to move Native American tribes west into their newly purchased Louisiana Territory. Previously, the Cherokee had sided against them in many wars, and had expressed violent attacks against them. The government wanted to move them off of their Georgia land. This caused the Indian Removal Act to be created. The president, Andrew Jackson at the time, suddenly had the power to negotiate treaties with Native Americans that would move them into Indian Territory. While many...
Words: 1448 - Pages: 6
...The Trail of Tears is a phrase known to define the forceful expulsion of the five civilized Native tribes, away from their traditional lands and forced migration to new Indian ground which was west of the Mississippi River. These tribes were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and the Seminoles. When Andrew Jackson was elected president in the year 1828, the Natives soon became a part of the next racial targeting. President Andrew Jackson encouraged the expulsion; the Congress authorized this removal policy set by the president in 1830. The Indian Removal Act was passed on May 28, 1830; they were involuntarily removed from their homes and forced to move west. The Indian Removal Act was defined as swapping the U.S. western area for the...
Words: 1731 - Pages: 7
...There was an Indian removal act signed and put into action by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. No, the Cherokee’s weren’t forced out of Georgia without anything to take with them, they were offered a different part of land in America along with $5 million. The 1830 Indian Removal Act was greatly justified because America got the land they purchased back, there were no more torturous and violent acts placed on Americans, and there was one less thing for Americans to worry about knowing the Indians were moved off their land. First of all, America was finally free of the violence placed on them by the Indians. The Americans had adults and children being tortured by the Cherokees, one way...
Words: 527 - Pages: 3
...(Indian Removal Act) As the 19th century began, Americans who had their eyes set on new unclaimed land poured into the south and began heading towards present day Alabama. Since the Indian tribes living there seemed to be the main thing prohibiting the expansion, white settlers petitioned the federal government to remove them from the land. In his 1829 State of the Union address, President Jackson called for the removal of Native Americans from their tribal lands. Andrew Jackson wanted to renew a policy of political and military action for the removal of the Indians from these lands and worked towards creating a law for Indian removal. The Indian Removal Act was put in place to give to the southern states access to the land that Indians had formerly settled on (U.S. Department of State). The Indian Removal Act brought many issues to the table. Such as whether it was constitutional, who had the authority to pass what, and could it be done peacefully. In 1823, a case, Johnson v. M’Intosh, which was fighting for Indian’s rights, was brought before the...
Words: 775 - Pages: 4
...the American Frontier As Americans, we do not usually question how we came to this land or why we are able to live here as we do. We believe that the American frontier is this grand historical past of our growth as a nation. However, the country we know today as the United States of America was originally inhabited by natives such as the Native Americans, or Indians as they are commonly known as, and Mexicans who were robbed of their homeland in order for the white man to take over control. As citizens of this country, it is important to know how the natives were treated and portrayed in literature in order to become educated about our country and the people that inhabited this land before us. Being ignorant about a particular culture leads to misguided feelings and judgments that are not normally acceptable. By looking at examples from John Smith’s The Chesapeake Indians, Mary Rowlandson’s A True History of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, and Frederick Jackson Turner’s The Significance of the Frontier in American History, we will see that natives were portrayed negatively in popular literature and why it is important to understand how they are represented is justified by the colonial expansion of the American frontier. In early literature written by English settlers, Native Americans were portrayed with very negative connotations. The writers often used words such as: brutal, dark, uncivilized, and savage to depict the native people and their actions....
Words: 1447 - Pages: 6
...“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Quoted from Abraham Lincoln. Although the quote itself was not directly associated with the Indian Removal Act of 1830, it depicts the circumstances regarding towards the persecuted Indian tribes by the authorities of the United States when they were confronted with the enactment under compulsion. The prejudice endorsed by the U.S. towards the native Indian tribes inaugurated with the tenet of manifest destiny in the beginning of the 19th-century. The ideology primarily shapes the justification for the U.S to gradually expand their territory westward. However, the united states would have to be dealt with some...
Words: 988 - Pages: 4
...the 19 century? The Manifest Destiny was a belief that the American settlers thought that justified their actions of expanding and moving across the continent to spread their traditions and institutions no matter the harm they brought to others to achieve it, while enlightening more ancient nations. The United States sought to expand the country from the frontier of the Louisiana Purchase all the way to California. The westward expansion used the issues of power, wealth, and morality to expand our country or in other words reach our “Manifest Destiny’’. Many Americans believed that God blessed the growth of American nation and even demanded of them to actively work on it. Since they were sure of their cultural and racial superiority, they felt that their destiny was to spread their rule around and enlighten the nations that were not so lucky. Their race gave them the idea that they had power over others so they started with the Indians. This is how Andrew Jackson beat the Creek Indians at horseshoe bend and forced them to give up...
Words: 627 - Pages: 3
...control over enslaved people’s bodies into authority over their own credit” (245). The C.A.P.L, or Consolidated Association of the Planters of Louisiana, was put into action by politician-entrepreneurs Edmund Forstall and Hughes Lavergne, who chartered the company in 1827, which allowed planters to mortgage their slaves and buy stock in the C.A.P.L. (245). By owning stock in the company, these planters were allowed to borrow bank notes “of up to half the value of the mortgaged property” (246). These slave holders were then able to use this money to re-invest in their own plantations, such as buying more slaves, a cotton gin, etc., which furthered the cotton industry. But how did the C.A.P.L. essentially securitize these mortgages from the planters? The C.A.P.L. sold bonds “on the financial...
Words: 1136 - Pages: 5
...The Progressive Era DeAveon Sharpe The Progressive Era was a period of widespread social activism and political reform that spread across the United States, from the 1890s to the 1920s. The main reason for the Progressive movement were to eliminate the problems like industrialization, urbanization, immigration and corruption.At this time immigrants could migrate without so many problems like, them not being able to escape from being slaves, the literacy test, and etc. Also not having to pay to vote after immigrating with no education or money. The children during the progressive era/ industrial revolution worked hard hours for little or no pay. Children as young as six years old worked up to 19 hours...
Words: 571 - Pages: 3
...civilization and fulfill what they saw as their “manifest destiny”(Edmunds). They intended to expand their colonies and settle into unknown territory and bring it to life. There was only one problem. The west already had life and that was the Indians, so they had to move. Was this fair? No but the way they justified their thinking was the Indians had a different way of life and it didn’t fit the mold of the U.S. They thought the Indians were uneducated, unclean, savages who didn’t know how to make the most of the modern civilization. The rest of the unknown territory needed railroads, manufacturing, and agricultural growth. They also thought the Indians would be better off with their own kind and in a place of their own, meaning further west. But the Indians were educated people. They could read and write, some spoke three languages and they were the original expansionists. They helped tame the west and shape it way before the settlers. They were already “farmers and entrepreneurs”(Edmunds). Also, the Indians didn’t believe anyone owned the land, it was for everyone to share. So this land that was founded on the rights of others (U.S.), decided to take their land (the Indians) and basically told them you don’t belong here. This land is ours now. But the U.S. was a democracy and this was their destiny, to bring their knowledge and “technology” (Edmunds) to the untamed west. After all, they were just doing what all the other countries were doing, growing...
Words: 1727 - Pages: 7
