...We are killing us I believe that one day human will not be able to live on earth anymore. Look all around the world, every country is trying their best to develop their industries in every area. They take natures away replace with artificial things, statistics shows that we cut down forty seven hundred trees everyday, think about it, isn’t that horrible? There are a lot more environmental problems, each one of them is a threat of our live. Industrial pollution and industrial waste is a topic that we often talk about, when ever I’m back to my home town after school year I found there are more factories, I see chimneys every where, the sky is always grey. Some people blame it to those industrialists, people who are blaming didn’t aware that they are all beneficiaries of those industry’s products. And also they take a part of the blame. Every car we are driving, every refrigerator, every air conditioner, none of them are doing anything good about the environment. Same as other damages, we condemn people who cut trees but meanwhile we are using instant chopsticks all the time, we ask for a bag in supermarket, “It’s just one bag, not a big deal, if I don’t take it someone else will take it anyway” that’s the common excuse we find for ourself. The pollution is not the worst, the worst is we all know what we are doing is damaging to earth but we are using all kinds of excuses to excuse ourselves, and never make a change. Look back the first sentence...
Words: 322 - Pages: 2
...Honor killing in our country An honor killing or honour killing (also called a customary killing) is the murder of a member of a family or social group by other members, due to the belief of the perpetrators (and potentially the wider community) that the victim has brought dishonour upon the family or community. Honour killings are directed mostly against women and girls. The perceived dishonor is normally the result of one of the following behaviors, or the suspicion of such behaviors: a. dressing in a manner unacceptable to the family or community, b. wanting to terminate or prevent an arranged marriage or desiring to marry by own choice, c. engaging in heterosexual sexual acts outside marriage, or even due to a non-sexual relationship perceived as inappropriate, and d. engaging in homosexual acts. Women and girls are killed at a much higher rate than men. Recently, there has been a spate of honor killings in the country and this has led the government to decide what laws should be put in place to stop this heinous crime. Also whether the Hindu Marriage Act should be reformed or not is being debated. So what is the definition of honour killing and what leads families to commit this heinous crime so that they can protect their family honour? Is this practice prevalent only in India or is it prevalent in other parts of the world also? What are the misconceptions regarding honour killing and what are the solutions to stop this crime from spreading? These are the questions...
Words: 1051 - Pages: 5
...INTRODUCTION What if killing is legal? Would you remain in your house, or start to hide and run for your very precious life? According to Rawls Principle of Justice, many different kinds of things are said to be just and unjust: not only laws, institutions, and social systems, but also particular actions of many kinds, including decisions, judgments, and imputations. Do you think first before you act? Are you sure that your action does not violate the rights of others? Well, as a person, there are lots of things need to be consider as an unjust action. One example that is said to be unjust in our society is killing. When we say KILLING, it is the act of depriving someone or something's life. When you kill, you’re taking away their rights, not only right to live, but even small things such as right to smile, right to be free and right to love. You are not allowing them to continue their journey and mission as a human. In short you’re ending everything on them. Killing involves decisions and judgments. Judgment if you really going to kill him/her and decisions in deciding how will you kill or what is your way of killing. In every society in our world, it has been set in our minds that killing is prohibited. Once you killed someone or anyone, law will put you to imprisonment for you to pay the sin you've done and the consequences of it. But let me point these things out, even though all of the human race know that killing is forbidden, still there are instances of killing all around the...
Words: 1730 - Pages: 7
...Cuerdo, Ruth Ann P. Media Killings under the Culture of Impunity in the Philippines Freedom of Expression and the Media “Everyone has the right to freedom of expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers” according to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ideally that was the case, but what happens when this right to freedom becomes hampered in a country that was ironically deemed as being the freest in Asia. The Philippine media has been known for its “long tradition of respect for free expression” which we could be traced back during the American period of administration where the freedom of the press was said to be recognized (Pineda-Ofreneo, as cited in ARTICLE 19 & Center for Media Freedom & Responsibility [CMFR], 2005). This commitment to free expression, right to information and freedom of the press was then continued in the first Philippine Republic (Malolos Constitution in 1899) that was about more than a hundred years ago, and was expanded through the succeeding Constitutions in the country (Teodoro & Kabatay, cited in ARTICLE 19 & CMFR, 2005). However, regardless of the having a liberal tradition along with liberal laws, still there was no guarantee for the full exercise of the freedom of expression and the freedom of the press, as it was also challenged...
Words: 3955 - Pages: 16
...Kant’s view Life, an unexplained phenomenon is something most of us take for granted and don’t understand its true value as much as we should is the condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and capacity for growth. There are two major facts about life, not everyone lives but everybody dies. Life is lived and valued differently from individuals who live life according to Ethical and Morality Theories established longtime ago from religious philosophers, philosophers and scholars who claim to understand the way we as “humans” should live, and set fourth curtain rules and guidelines for us to live by. Many would object to these morality views but some of these views have stood the test of time and are still being used today. One philosophers views in particular, Immanuel Kant. He’s known to be one of the greatest philosophers known to man. Kant had his own set of ethical and morality theories that many people still follow today. Which brings us to this case and point, is it ever morally permissible to do a morally wrong action in order for the greater good? I will be discussing Kant’s and my moral views on this particular issue. Immanuel Kant was known for his critique of judgment. Kant said that “human beings have “an intrinsic worth” or dignity” that make the valuable “above all price” Rachel’s (page136). Kant believed that “all of our duties can be derived from one ultimate principle, which he called the Categorical Imperative” Rachel’s (Page137). Categorical...
Words: 1029 - Pages: 5
...rest of their lives. There are a lot of dogs in America who are in cages and are killed for not finding a home. Stop killing dogs for not finding a home to live in. You expect dogs to feel safe and not act violent when you have them locked in a cage for days and only allowed to go out once...
Words: 1019 - Pages: 5
... The killing of Osama Bin Laden affected the U.S socially, economically, and politically. Socially people want something to be done but at the same time not to send our troops there. Economically we lost a lot of money through the years. And for politically question were ask and the democrats wanted him dead while the republicans didn't want to kill him. First off who is Osama Bin Laden and what did he form. Bin Laden was a billionaire that was born in Saudi Arabia and was killed in Pakistan. He formed the al-Qaeda. He was on the FBI’s most wanted list for more than a decade. Some things he did was the 1998 bombings in the U.S, Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and did 9/11. It took a little more than ten years for the U.S to kill him. He was just a bad dude overall but had potential when he was young. 9/11 was the reason why we had to track him down. He killed almost 3,000 U.S citizens. He destroyed the twin towers and the pentagon. 4 planes were hijacked by 19 of Osama Bin Laden people. They got on the plane to kill people, it was a suicide mission. This is what cause...
Words: 991 - Pages: 4
...ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We have taken a lot of efforts in this project, however it would have not been possible without the kind support and help from many. We are highly indebted to KISHINCHAND CHELLARAM COLLEGE and principal MISS. MANJU NICHANI, the head of the department MR.KAILASH CHANDAK and my teacher MS.ANJALI DHOLAKIYA for giving us the opportunity for doing this project and learning something new, for their guidance and constant supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding the project and also for their support in completing the Project. We would like to express our gratitude towards our parents for their kind co-operation and encouragement which helped us in completing this project. Our thanks and appreciation also goes to my friends in developing the project and people who have willingly helped us out with their abilities. TABLE OF CONTENT SERIAL NO. | PARTICULARS | PAGE NO. | 1. | INTRODUCTION | 3 | 2. | HONOUR KILLING IN INDIA | 5 | 3. | IN LEGAL CODE AND AS CULTURAL PRACTISE | 6 | 4. | CAUSES | 9 | 5. | EFFECTS | 11 | 6. | HONOUR RELATED VIOLENCE | 13 | 7. | CASE STUDY | 14 | 8. | WARNING SIGNS | 17 | 9. | SUPPORT AND PROTECTION | 18 | 10. | INHIBITING FACTORS | 20 | 11. | GUIDELINES FOR SUPPORT | 21 | 12. | PUBLIC FUNDS | 22 | 13. | RECOMMENDATIONS | 23 | 14. | CONCLUSION | 24 | 15. | BIBLOGRAPHY | 26 | INTRODUCTION An honor killing or honour killing is the killing of a member of a family or social group...
Words: 6156 - Pages: 25
...“Abortion is impermissible, because it deprives a being of a future like ours. Accordingly, it is morally similar to killing a healthy adult.” Critically discuss this argument, drawing upon at least one of the authors we have looked at in the readings. Abortion in general can be defined as terminating a pregnancy before birth and this still remains a controversial topic in the world today of whether it is immoral or moral to do so. Besides certain exceptions, the view of abortion as a seriously immoral action has minimal support or evidence in present-day philosophical literature (Marquis, 1989). However, views exist when it comes to illuminating the permissibility of abortion, particularly when future prospects of the foetus are taken into account. This is what the future like ours argument also points out that killing an adult human being is wrong because it deprives the adult of a future and the foetus has a future as well, killing foetuses is wrong in the same way that killing adult human beings is wrong (Kuflik, 2008:417). The future like ours argument is parallel to controversial religious claims and does not appeal to perplexing or difficult philosophical theories (Kuflik, 2008:418). In this essay an attempt will be made to critically discuss abortion being impermissible as it is similar to killing a healthy adult. People against abortion normally depend on the idea that the foetus is a human being or a person from the moment of conception, this notion is argued for...
Words: 1097 - Pages: 5
...“murder” is used quite frequently however usually incorrectly. Some people say animals or even trees get murdered, but under the law it is not murder unless a human takes the life of another human. Homicide is a lawful term for any killing of a human being by another human being. Homicide itself is not automatically a crime, some homicides are legal, such as the justifiable killing of a suspect by the police or a killing in self-defense. Unlawful homicides are classified as crimes like murder and manslaughter. This paper will explain the important but often overlooked distinctions between murder and manslaughter, and the different variations of both crimes. When we look at “murder” we must also look at the different degrees of murder which are a reflection of the intent or severity of a certain murder charge. The most common degrees of murder are 1st degree murder and 2nd degree murder and in some cases what we call “capital murder”. Regardless of the label on the degree of the murder committed, the general idea is to increase the punishment with the degree. The more inhumane the killing is, or the motive associated behind the killing, then the greater the punishment and degree is for the murder. We must first understand what murder is: Murder is the killing of one human by another that is intentional, unlawful, and done with “malice aforethought” or in other words, premeditated. Malice aforethought is a key element in determining the degree of the murder committed. This state of...
Words: 1650 - Pages: 7
... Your Excellencies, The undersigned human rights and civil rights organizations write to share our concerns about state practices of targeted killings and the use of armed drones. We welcome the holding of a panel on the use of armed drones during the 27th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council and urge UN member states to support and take steps to monitor and promote meaningful transparency and legal compliance by states with regard to their targeted killing policies and practices. In particular, we call on states to publicly disclose their targeted killing standards and criteria; ensure that their use or facilitation of lethal force operations abroad comply with international law; enable meaningful oversight and remedies; and ensure effective investigations, tracking and response to civilian harm. Disclose legal standards and criteria. We are concerned about the lack of transparency in targeted killing operations. While many states affirmed their commitment to transparency at the UN General Assembly in 2013, some states have made only minimal progress in practice. Commitment to the rule of law requires that states disclose the legal constraints on their lethal targeting operations. Greater disclosure of legal and policy standards, and procedural mechanisms, is a prerequisite to informed assessment and debate. We believe this disclosure is an essential first step toward ensuring accountability and redress, and are confident it is possible to improve transparency...
Words: 1165 - Pages: 5
...Target killing BY: Syeda Masooma Kazmi Last day I was going to market where I saw an innocent boy with rough dress .He was selling flowers on the road. I saw hopelessness, fear in his eyes. After some discussion, he told he has lost his family in target killing my eyes were also watered ,that time I thought here would be so many Pakistani people who lost their families WHY Pakistan is facing a lot of problems due to terrorism ?Target killing is a modern genre of terrorism. In target killing innocent persons are targeted and killed. This harmful activity is creating anarchy among the peoples of Pakistan. Before some years , it was used for kill the leaders or particular persons .The murder of Benazir,Gen. Zia -ul-hak ,poet Mohsin naqvi were also killed by target killing ,recently the murder of Bashir Ahmed Bloure is also included in target killing But these days it is used to kill the common pepeoles . WHAT can be causes of target killing? There are two causes of terrorism National or International. In Pakistan there are many secret services of foreign countries which are against in Pakistan .Many countries can not see the development of Pakistan and these are creating anarchy .In National causes there can be the involvement of dictators who want to fail the government of democracy .peoples are fighting due to ethnic base, sects base ,or due to discrimination of provincial level .The personal affairs of peoples are also included but these are on low scale...
Words: 493 - Pages: 2
...Abortion February 23 2015 “Is abortion moral or immoral?” We still have no answer. We defend about the nature and the moral status of the fetus. Don Marquis as well as Bonnie Steinbock embraces with the argument of their own, which point out the morality of abortion. Don Marquis upholds the fact of since abortion deprives the fetus of a future like ours therefore most abortion is morally wrong. He adheres in his article “abortion is, excepting possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral”, what he meant was that not all abortions are wrong. He did not discuss about the exception of “… abortion before implantation, abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy or abortion by rape” Regard of that, Marquis has claimed, “… It is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being.” He inquires the reason of killing a human being is wrong. Marquis explains the killing is not just cause of pain and perceive of loss to the victim’s family, moreover it includes the basis loss to the victims themselves as “the loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future”. With the respect of Marquis’s theory, it is the loss of a valuable future like ours that respond to the question of why killing a human being is morally wrong. Moreover, Marquis also stated in his article “…the future of a standard fetus includes...
Words: 1384 - Pages: 6
...HONOUR KILLING: MURDER IN THE NAME OF HONOUR CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Honour killing is a deep rooted brutal and burning human rights issue in India and other countries. Women particularly are the victims of the gross violation. They exist all over the world but no religion stipulates them. Outdated traditions and alleged honour violating behaviour are the motive for these crimes. The victims are almost always female. Young, unmarried women can "dishonour" their families easily. Every year hundreds of women are killed in India in the name of honour and many cases go unreported and almost all of them go unpunished. The criminal justice system is unable to combat it though it is claimed that the criminal justice system is the most legitimate institution to control this practice in the country. Honour is the most precious moral attribute of mankind. It is deeply ingrained in its nature. Defence of honour even at the cost of life has been prevalent in human beings since ages. It is a commonwealth of close blood relatives. Defilement of honour is taken as the most atrocious social crime and its redemption becomes a joint and sacred duty of close-knit people. Debased groups have a soft approach towards transgression of honour. The sentimental chord dormant in them may react at times; its degree may vary from group to group. Tradition-bound rural societies invariably react violently for the redemption of their honour. To them honour is dearer than life. Honour killings...
Words: 30961 - Pages: 124
...Ricky Sides English 102 Mrs. Murphy Thoughts on Abortion and Its’ Morality Abortion seems to have become one of the most controversial topics within schools, politics, and religion. Many people have many contradicting ideals about abortion and the immorality that the act presents or does not. Some say abortion is a mother’s right that cannot be taken away while others say that is a cruel selfish act to kill an unborn child or lack their of. Is abortion moral and should it remain legal? Aside from maybe a few homicidal maniacs it is safe to say that killing another human being is immoral and frowned upon. What makes it moral to kill an unborn child then? Is it human? One of the biggest struggles that pro-life participants have is what an unborn child is classified as. The definition of a human being according to (Google Dictionary) is as followed. A human being, esp. a person as distinguished from an animal or (in science fiction) an alien, a homosapien. A child whose mother is a homosapien is a human. There is no way around it. Some say that an unborn baby is a human but is not a person. This is quite confusing seeing as how the definition of a “person” is a human being regarded as an individual. Most pro-life individuals say that an unborn child is not human. How can a baby or even a fetus not be a human if it is being born from a human, it is clearly not an alien, I hope. And how can it not be a person if it is human. Just because it depends on the life of its’...
Words: 876 - Pages: 4