Level of reflection | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 1 | Reporting, responding and relating | Insightful description and explanation of what happened.Insightful response to event through observations and examples.Insightful exploration of the event from the perspective of self and others. | Highly relevant description and explanation of what happened.Highly relevant response to event through observations and examples.Highly effective exploration of the event from the perspective of self and others. | Very relevant description and explanation of what happened.Very relevant response to event through observations and examples.Mostly effective exploration of the event from the perspective of self and others. | Mostly relevant description and explanation of what happened.Mostly relevant response to event through observations and examples.Somewhat effective exploration of the event from the perspective of self or others. | Limited description and explanation of what happened.Limited response to event through observations and examples.Limited exploration of the event from the perspective of self and/or others. | Poor/no description and explanation of what happened.Poor/no response to event through observations and examples.Poor/no exploration of the event from the perspective of self and/or others. | Reasoning andreconstructing | Insightful identification and exploration of significant factors underlying event. Insightful explanation of how and why future practice or understanding has been reconstructed.Insightful hypothesis of different courses of action and outcomes explored.Insightful connections to theory. | Highly relevant identification and exploration of significant factors underlying event. Highly relevant explanation of how and why future practice or understanding has been reconstructed.Highly relevant hypothesis of different courses of action and outcomes explored.Highly relevant connections to theory. | Mostly relevant identification and exploration of significant factors underlying event. Mostly relevant explanation of how and why future practice or understanding has been reconstructed.Mostly relevant hypothesis of different courses of action and/or outcomes explored.Mostly relevant connections to theory. | Some relevant identification and some exploration of significant factors underlying event. Some relevant explanation of how and/or why future practice or understanding has been reconstructed.Some relevant hypothesis of different courses of action and/or outcomes explored.Some relevant connections to theory. | Limited identification and exploration of significant factors underlying event. Limited explanation of how and/or why future practice or understanding has been reconstructed.Limited relevant hypothesis of different courses of action and/or outcomes explored.Limited connections to theory. | Poor/no identification and exploration of significant factors underlying event. Poor/no explanation of how and/or why future practice or understanding has been reconstructed.Poor/no relevant hypothesis of different courses of action and/or outcomes explored.Poor/no connections to theory. | Academic language and conventions | Exceptionally cohesive reflection on experience.Exceptional language choices that enhance meaning.Extremely accurate grammar and spelling.Extremely accurate adherence to referencing conventions. | Highly cohesive reflection on experience.Highly appropriate language choices that enhance meaning.Highly accurate grammar and spelling.Highly accurate adherence to referencing conventions. | Very cohesive reflection on experience.Highly appropriate language choices. Mostly accurate grammar and spelling.Very accurate adherence to referencing conventions. | Mostly cohesive reflection on experience.Mostly appropriate language choices.Minor errors in grammar and spelling.Mostly accurate adherence to referencing conventions. | Limited cohesive reflection on experience.Limited language choices.Major grammar and/or spelling errors.Some adherence to referencing conventions. | Disjointed reflection on experience.Inappropriate language choices.Major grammar and/or spelling errors.Major/no referencing conventions.Not on Turnitin | Team charter | Satisfactorily completed | Unsatisfactorily completed or not submitted |
Overall Grade:
Overall Grade:
Assessment item i: Reflection on learning Paragraph 2: Group Dynamics Unit: QCD210
Student Name: __________________________________________________________________ Student Number: __________________________________________
Tutor: __________________________________________________________________________Tutorial day and time: ______________________________________

Assessment item i: Reflection on learning Paragraph 2: Group Dynamics Unit: QCD210
Student Name: __________________________________________________________________ Student Number: __________________________________________
Tutor: __________________________________________________________________________Tutorial day and time: ______________________________________