Internet Filtering in the Workplace 1

These passages present a discussion about arguments concerning the blocking of non-work-related websites in the workplace. This is an important debate for employers because of the temptation that the internet posses to employees. The two positions argue whether or not non-work-related websites should be blocked. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration. For example, evidence indicates that having access to websites other than those used for work encourages slacking by employees. In contrast, opposing evidence suggests that it does not. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that non-work-related websites should not be blocked is the stronger supported position, the position supported by a preponderance of the evidence cited in the passages. The most convincing and forceful reasons in support …show more content…
For example, in a 2009 study, it was found that employees were happier if they took an occasional break to check the internet. Additionally, the National University of Singapore found that surfing the internet helped keep employees fresh and productive. Consequently, the internet is an important tool to keep employees working at peek efficiency. Short breaks should actually be encouraged to ward of drowsiness. The second relevant point to make in support of the claim employers should not block certain websites is that the internet is an important tool for communication. In support of this point, the internet is even more effective in communication than a telephone. Further more, employees should be permitted to use the internet in the same way as they do to make brief personal phone calls. In short, any internet blocks will only restrict communication. This will only slow productivity and make it harder for employees to do their