Morals can be for all of society or an individual’s beliefs for instance; respect others, do not judge others, and tell the truth. Morals basically govern which actions are right and which are wrong, they normally do not have to come from a story or past experience of some sort. In Jonathan Haidt’s article, “What Makes People Vote Republican”, he emphasized that “...the second rule of moral psychology is that morality is not just about how we treat each other (as most liberals think); it is also about binding groups together, supporting essential institutions, and living in a sanctified and noble way. When Republicans say that Democrats "just don't get it," this is the "it" to which they refer” (1). Not one person morals are the same, some …show more content…
He asserted “The Democrats could close much of the gap if they simply learned to see society not just as a collection of individuals—each with a panoply of rights--but as an entity in itself, an entity that needs some tending and caring” (24). That is to say that the Millian Society leans more on the Democratic side in the same way as liberals and libertarians view it, because it’s more of individuals can do what they want, create what they want to, form relationships with whomever they want to. As a matter of fact, he stated that, “a Millian society at its best would be a peaceful, open, and creative place where diverse individuals respect each other's rights and band together voluntarily (as in Obama's calls for "unity") to help those in need or to change the laws for the common good” (17). However, the Durkheimian society leans more on the Republican side as well as the Republicans being intolerant of ambiguity, because they are clinging on the more familiar and arrive at conclusions prematurely. He emphasized that, “society not as an agreement among individuals but as something that emerged organically over time as people found ways of living together, binding themselves to each other, suppressing each other's selfishness, and punishing the deviants and free-riders who eternally threaten to undermine cooperative groups” (19). Additionally, he said “A Durkheimian society would value self-control over self-expression, duty over rights, and loyalty to one's groups over concerns for outgroups” (19). Also, this is all of which leads to resistance to change and reform, also endorsement of inequality. But this is not because the conservatives have a more expandable