...At a global scale, human beings, each with an individual identity, contribute to the existing dynamics of this world and human geography. In addition, humans share significant fundamentals that have been established and preserved for several years. According to a NewStatesman article, being human is to ideally embrace the common rights to freedom of speech and assembly as well as peace that are endowed by their Creator (“What Makes Us Human?”). Although these human rights connote the variety of advantages that people enjoy in realizing their value and aspiration, the truths are self-evident, as individuals do maximize their possibility to live based on their desires and coexist with others in harmony. Therefore, humanity appreciates autonomy...
Words: 1113 - Pages: 5
...What Makes Us Humans There are more than 7 billion humans in this world that ask themselves this questions. Not because we have a heart, money, Human Rights or a pair of eyes do these things make us humans. Nor because we are based on nationalities or religion. There are five qualities that makes us human, humor the fact that we have a mind of our own laughing and loving are signs of being humans (2) imagination our mind is full of imaginations and thoughts everybody has a figure of their own imaginations friend thats does not exist ,(3)rebelliousness us humans has a little crazy alter ego in them, (4) beauty each human is beautiful in there own way may it be a personality. (5) Spirituality humans have a different aspect on religion and...
Words: 459 - Pages: 2
...Mark Magidson, this essay examines what makes us human internally and externally. Drawing on articles consistent in humanity and compassion exploration, biological research, chimpanzee research and analysis, and a look at our distant Neanderthal ancestors, we can combine the crucial pieces of humanity to look at it as a whole. Baraka depicts not only diversity, but importance of religion, ritual, traditions, and culture in the world. At first, the film seems to be a jumbled mixture of images and non-verbal sounds, but in fact it is strategically linked and results in one final theme: Life. 3 For centuries, humans have made themselves superior over our predecessor: Earth. While science has proved that the earth,with its animals and nature, have existed long before we have, we continue to oversee its power and lose our humanity. Our humanity, in my opinion, is not what makes us human biologically, but rather internally and cognitively. According to the dictionary, humanity is described as "the quality of being humane" and followed by words such as compassion, brotherly love, understanding, sympathy, and consideration. Is humanity an instinct, something we are born with? Or is humanity learned, taught, and projected? There are many things that we can relate to being human. Biologically, the DNA that lies within the cells that make up our physical body can tell whether we are human.We can also relate being human through cognition, which is the mental...
Words: 3381 - Pages: 14
...What It Means To Be Human I have never pondered on such a question that reflects the whole human race and what it means to be a human being. What it means to be a human being is not just having a face, eyes, heart, or being able to drive a car, or to own a house. Being a human being is much more than that, deeper and more passionate. Being a human being is to have the ability to know what is right and wrong, having rational thought and to think deeply beyond the tangible things in the world, and being a human being is to find love. Yet as I think deeply into this more and more, I see that those things are not as important to be a human being, simply because you can live without those things; but to really live and thrive and build a race and society, being a human being is to have the ability to build relationships around anyone and everyone around us. What it means to be a human being is to have relationships. Many people may argue with this person’s opinion on the meaning of being a human being, but this is an opinion that should be taken into consideration. As all humans know, what makes us unique from animals is our ability to drive cars, create masterpieces of art, build cathedrals, and invent things no one would think of. However, those are only the tangible aspects of being a human being. If we all think carefully, and work out many other aspects to what makes us human, we should find that all other answers inadequate. What makes us truly unique and great is our ability...
Words: 1838 - Pages: 8
...instead of doing what is right people want to be told what to buy. So if a commercial or someone tells us a fact about a certain food to make it seem healthy people will buy it. People will hesitate from just doing what is right like eating balanced will let someone pursued them into buying something that actually isn’t that healthy for them. This is how the question has become confusing. 2. Pollan means that nationwide we are obsessed with the fact of looking healthy instead of actually being healthy. I completely agree with this because people base what they buy off of what it is supposed to make them look like instead of just plane eating right and exercising. 3. Pollan thinks this because “it never would have happened in a culture in possession of deeply rooted tradition of food and eating”. We are more vulnerable because we are so ethnically and culturally different. We as Americans have no massive religious and cultural ties to food so it makes us more vulnerable to be persuaded into eating no necessarily healthy things. 4. The American Paradox is the people here that are unhealthy and are obsessed with the idea of being or becoming healthy. The French paradox is a healthy group of people that live and eat in ways that we look at as unhealthy. 5. An omnivore eats both other animals and plants. 6. The omnivore’s dilemma is that as omnivore’s we have such a huge selection of possible items of food, but we have to base possible items off of what is healthy or what could eventually...
Words: 2621 - Pages: 11
...topics and made descriptive points on what we as Christians are supposed to do, how we are supposed to live and walk in our day to day life. This essay will break them down in several different categories; The Natural World, Human Identity, Human Relationships, and Culture. It will be one sided and the writers opinion only. THE NATURAL WORLD: God created this world in only a few short days. With a few words, He spoke everything we know into existence. We know this to be true through God’s Word. It is the inspired word of God, God breathed His Word into His chosen writers. The prophetic word that was told of in the Bible, is what helps us know that the Bible is truth. The natural world is sin for us. There are so many things that lure us to sin. Jesus is our way to forgiveness. The natural world is dangerous, and this is some of what Paul was trying to help people understand in his writings. Everyday we have a choice to take the right path or we can choose to take the wrong one. Either way we go, there are consequences to our decisions. If we choose the right path, then we have salvation and mercy. When we choose the wrong path we have eternal damnation, unless we find our way back to the Savior. This natural world was once perfect, when man could walk in the cool of the day with God. Then sin entered the garden, and well the rest is history. Now we have Jesus, and we have our second chance. HUMAN IDENTITY: Our human identity is made in God’s image. ...
Words: 1084 - Pages: 5
...Texts can transcend the time in which they are written and evolve to be applicable to a new time and a new social content by facing everlasting human concerns. Human concerns that transcend the decay of time include the influence of science, the influence of consumerism and what it means to be human. Mary Shelleys’ 1818 epistolary novel, “Frankenstein” show the early 19th century fears of the advances of both science and technology as well as what makes someone human. Ridley Scott also faces these issues as well as the influence of consumerism in a modern context in his 1991 Film “Blade Runner” These composers lived centuries apart and both critique these humans concerns. Mary Shelleys’ “Frankenstein” introduces us to the ideas of Galvanism,...
Words: 577 - Pages: 3
...separate parts or books: Right and Wrong as a clue to the Meaning of the Universe, What Christians Believe, Christian Behavior, and Beyond Personality: or First steps in the Doctrine of Trinity. The book was originally a radio talk that was converted into a novel. The overall tone of the book is very serious and majority of the book has emphasis by Lewis on the roles of Christianity and what their view would be on a particular subject. Subjects in the book ranged from the law of human nature to Christian beliefs to Christian behavior and to the new men. Lewis uses many forms of exaggeration to represent his wanting or desire for the reader to clearly understand. Lewis made strong points on particular things like charity, the great sin and faith. Lewis’ first book is prominently about the “Law of Human Nature.” The law of human nature is the sense/value of right and wrong that we all seem to share. It is basically some universal standard of behavior that we all appeal to. A sense of the law of human nature is when people dispute or argue over what seems to be “fair” or “unfair.” C.S Lewis emphasizes multiple times throughout the chapter how when people quarrel or argue they demonstrate this law or theory. Lewis also brings up the point that people defend their own wrong actions with excuses, but denying that some rules exist, while in reality this is all part of the concept of the “law of human nature.” Next, Lewis begins to explain moral relativism and how the differences between...
Words: 2602 - Pages: 11
...but no machine can replace the human spark of spirit, compassion, love, and understanding.” Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Materialist Thomas Hobbes once stated that “human beings are in effect just complicated machines”, I disagree with that because unlike machines, humans are having a lot of factors to them that make them unpredictable whereas even the most complicated ones have predictable behaviors,. While humans behave as per their consciousness, machines just perform as they are taught and the most obvious reason is human emotion. This essay will be further expanding on ideas which will be contradicting Thomas Hobbes theory of human machines. “Your intellect may be confused, but your emotions will never lie to you.” Roger Ebert The main thing that makes humans, unlike machines is our emotions, unlike machines emotions are the very core of our being even though our brain makes chemicals that allow us to feel emotions, but that does not define what emotions are. Emotions are what make us weak and also make us strong. A mother’s love for their child can make her cry when they have to live apart for a prolonged period. Again, even the weakest of the weak might rise to the occasion and give a valiant fight with the strongest mass to save his beloved from any form of harm. A machine no matter how complicated cannot use emotions the way a human does, if it to be to keep a memory or even shape their being therefore it is invalid to say humans are complicated machines. “While...
Words: 1580 - Pages: 7
...ethics as the man’s faculty which seeks the good. According to the book, it is perfected by the quest of what is good. Therefore, it is not enough to just do what we want to do. We should look first for the glorification of God in order to satisfy this will. Usually, I associate this with the freedom or the free will of human to choose on what they want to do. I believe that God gave human the knowledge to know what is wrong or what is right so we can exercise this free will. But when He gave us the free will to choose, He expects us to choose what is right. That’s why will is the eternal happiness with God. Sometimes people choose to do bad things. They think that because they have the power to choose then they can do whatever they want. But they don’t know that in doing so, a certain punishment will be given to them. And if they choose to do the right thing, they will be rewarded. At first, I thought that this doesn’t make any sense to me. Why would God give us the chance to choose on what to do but will punish us if we did not choose to do His will? That’s not free will right? When our parents lets us choose which college we would want to go to, now that’s free will. But what God gave us is the chance to choose what is right despite of all the tempting things that surround us in this world. He did not give us the right to do whatever we want but He gave us the chance to do what is right and pure in His sight. We can choose to help our neighbor mourning over their loss. We can...
Words: 450 - Pages: 2
...science assignment: What is the kind of relation between faith, and reason or science ? General: The discoveries we make through science make the people think and ask questions about his identity, sometimes they even change ones ideas about himself. We see for example that by Copernicus revolution about astronomy the people got to know that they are not living in a world that is not found at the centre of the universe, to the contrary to what was thought before but we live in a planet amongst many others. The theory of revolution of Charles Darwin taught people that we are a member of many different species of animals. These discoveries challenge us to think about the world in general, life and humans in a different way. Nowadays faith cannot forget reason and psychology has to be taken with the importance it needs. During this assignment as indicated by the title we are going to see the relationship between faith and psychology (reason). First we start by showing the type of relationship that can take place between them then we explain how and why they go hand in hand with religion. In the second chapter we see how reason challenges our faith, then conclude by giving some suggestions how reason can contribute with faith. The relation between faith and reason: You cannot actually talk about the relation between faith and reason because there are many psychological reasons like there are religions. Faith cannot be separated from the human person. Even less the...
Words: 1846 - Pages: 8
...Complexities Ever wondered why we create complexities for ourselves? Is it our nature like Goulish tried to tell us? All these questions could pop up into anyone’s head once he/ she really put their heads into it. Upon taking just a glance at our lives we could manage to understand that we make things more complex than they have to. Confucius once said, “Life is simple, but we insist on making it complicated.” This quote ostensibly covers the whole idea of this essay. We as humans have had rough time through our evolution; we have gone through much as a race that it has affected us to our core. Goulish explains it in his essay that it is our nature to complicate things. “Irreducible complexity seems to characterize the late twentieth century itself” (Goulish 557). Goulish seems to have a pretty good idea of what complexities are and how this trait of human beings has been us for as long as we can remember. Goulish does not hesitate to explain to his readers that making things complex is our nature. Goulish hits this spot right from the beginning of his essay, “Each time we experience a work of performance, we start over almost from nothing” (Goulish 557). Why does he say that? Goulish tells us that when we experience an act of performance we tend to look at it from the fresh eye instead of using our previous encounters in similar situations. He tells his readers that, come what may, we will look at things with the thought in our head that we have never encountered it before. Goulish...
Words: 1427 - Pages: 6
...declare nature as an innate trait given to all human being (e.g., reflexes and primary needs). Which makes us consider, is this all there is to human development? Is there something else at work? Are there other factors that play a key role in our development? At this turn we must consider nurture/culture. We as human beings are born into societies with all sorts of set norms, social structures and attitudes that manipulate the way in which we develop. The question we will be looking at is which one of these, nature or nurture has the most significant role in our overall development. Or is there yet still something else to add to the pot. Some say there are dimensions that intersect and work in conjunction with one another to form who we are as humans being. Viktor Frankl (1967) noted that the person lives in three interpenetrating dimensions: soma (the physical body), psyche (the emotions and intellect), and the noëtic (the soul). The noëtic dimension includes free will, responsibility, choice, spirituality, and the unique meaning capacity of Homo sapiens. Is it time to reinvent the wheel: Nature, Nurture and Noetic? Introduction The controversy over nature vs. nurture/culture has been a mainstay in psychology for decades. As we gain knowledge and continue to look into what make human beings, human beings, we find that there has to be more than just genetics and environmental manipulators that shape social and behavioral human development. It is time to take a new look at...
Words: 1537 - Pages: 7
...Explain Aristotle’s human function argument. Does it provide a good basis for understanding eudaimonia? The link between the human function argument and eudaimonia has been harshly criticised due to it being based upon three questionable claims: that human beings have a function, that the good for a human being resides on the fulfilment of that function and that being a good human being leads to eudaimonia. I will nevertheless show that once the concepts of eudaimonia, virtue and human function are correctly understood, it is possible to answer many of the objections that criticise the human function argument as a good basis for the understanding of eudaimonia. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle’s purpose is to discover the human good, that at which we ought to aim. Aristotle tells us that everyone calls this good eudaimonia (happiness, flourishing, success, wellbeing), but that people disagree about what it consists in. Aristotle insist that the point of engaging in ethics is to become good and by searching for ‘’the good’’ he means searching for the highest good; that which is desirable for itself rather than for the sake of some other good and that for whose sake all other goods are desirable. Aristotle then goes on to argue that ‘’eudaimonia’’ (well-being) is the highest end, since all other subordinate goals are sought after only because they promote this well-being or happiness. But unless we can determine which good or goods happiness consist in, it is of no use to understand...
Words: 2249 - Pages: 9
...journey into the way human beings might live contrasted with the thoughts of how weasels live. In this beautifully written essay, Dillard describes her chance encounter with an ordinary weasel and how it helped her receive understanding into the difference between the way human beings live their lives and the way wild animals go about theirs. She does this by offering up vivid descriptions and images concerning her quick, but thought provoking run in with the reclusive weasel. Dillard is attempting to show us that we can discover a lot about the true way to live by observing nature's other creations. Yet, at the same time telling us that the way we live is totally up to us, which leads me to my personal interpretation. One could argue humans that lived during the Neanderthal period were similar to that of a weasel. Throughout time the mental capacity of the human has grown to be far more complex and sophisticated than earlier times. With that being said the weasel as we know acts off of pure instinct, whereas the human mind needs to process and articulate each move we make. People often search a definite answer on how to live their lives, as if there is a road map or instructions that will lead you to resolution. Actually, the truth is we, humans, are blessed with an ability that separates us from any other creature; the capacity to intelligently choose to live as we please, instead of how we were created to. I believe that in earlier times humans lived as Neanderthals...
Words: 1392 - Pages: 6