Whitey Bulger was a key leader in the gangster subculture of Southern Boston. In subcultures, the group develops their own set of values, which often opposes those of the dominant culture. The gangster subculture that developed in Southern Boston clearly did not view violence or drug distribution as being wrong or against the norm, as Bulgar was viewed as a sort of community leader. To an outsider, to view Bulgar as someone to be respected seems bizarre, as the general culture frowns upon violence. But as Ferracuti and Wolfgang concluded violence is a learned adaptation in order to cope with harsh circumstances. So in an area that likely fit Shaw and McKay’s model of having high rates of poverty, physical dilapidation, as well as a high cultural mix, a violent subculture could develop. …show more content…
With lack of advancement opportunities, Bulger, and likely many others in his area, felt there was little within their control. Elijah Anderson pointed this out in his research with African Americans living in inner-cities, that they felt that one of the only things in their control was their reputation. It’s likely the same would apply to Bulger and those who took part in his crimes. By becoming a key figure in the organized crime in his area Bulger gained respect from others. Which he could have not gained from more legitimate means. This furthers the development of the subculture, as there are rewards that for many would outweigh the risks of being