Free Essay

Why Did Harold Godwinson Become King in 1066?

In:

Submitted By amelia96
Words 595
Pages 3
When Edward the confessor died childless on the 5th of January 1066. a succession crisis was inevitable. During this period there was multiple ways in which monarchical succession could be achieved, these include: Hereditary factors, choice of the incumbent monarch, and selection by the witan and the right of conquest.. Harold had several different claims that explain the reasons he became king in 1066. These include, political, economical and social reasons, which can be categorised into long term and short term factors.
Despite Harold not being blood related to his predecessor Edward, Godwin was Edwards's brother in law. Edwards marriage to Harold's sister, Edith, in around 1045 was most likely a political marriage. Edward may have seen the marriage to be necessary to maintain Godwin's support as he was the most powerful of the English earls and also because of his Danish links (Godwin's wife was kinship of Sweyn of Denmark),

Another long term reason Harold became king in 1066 is due to the fact Harold was a member of the most wealthiest, powerful and richest family in England- The Godwinson family. Godwin's sons, Swein and Harold had been given earldoms in Herefordshire and East Anglia, Godwin's nephew (Sweyn of Denmark's brother), Beorn, also became earl in the East Midlands. Eventually, the Godwin family subordinately controlled Southern England???? The power and influence of the Godwinsons was evident in 1046 when Godwin's eldest son, Sweyn, abducted the abbess of Leominster: Eadgifu and later killed his own cousin, Beorn. Edward pardoned him for both sins, the power and influence of the Godwin family but also the weakness of Edwards's authority.

. Harold's status and reputation continued to increase after his victory in Wales against Gruffudd ap llywelyn of Wales in 1063. Harold later married his widow, Ealdgyth- sister of Earls Morcar and Leofric. The fact Harold married the sister of two powerful earls perhaps suggests that Harold had the intention of succeeding Edward, despite the throne being promised to William (1051)
Harold also claimed to the throne with the claim he had been chosen by Edward at his deathbed nomination. Edwards verba novissima could be argued to override the previous promises and arrangements that had been made i.e. promising William the throne. Harold could perhaps use this to justify his perjury. The deathbed nomination is seen to have been the 'words of God' as it is a time when a person is crossing between the two realms. Harold thereby was able to claim to the English throne through choice of the incumbent monarch.

By the time of Edwards's death, Harold was by far the richest, wealthiest and most powerful. English Earl. He had been loyal to Edward, as shown during the 1065 Northumbrian rebellion against Tostig, Harold's brother, whereby Harold supported the people's choice to choose Morcar to be the new earl of Northumbria over Tostig. Not only was Harold popular by the people, but he was also supported and elected by the Witan, the English council.

Harold had been involved in running England for many years. He had acted as subregulas for Edward and therefore was probably the most suitable candidate for the succession. He had been brought up in England and had a good knowledge and understanding of the way the English system worked. This is unlike William of Normandy who had spent all his life in France, and Edgar, who had lived in Hungary all his life, Harold Hardraada also followed a different tax system over in Norway. It is for these reasons the Witan supported Harold in his rise to the throne.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Battle of Hastings

...The year 1066 began with the death of a king, and ended with a shout and a trembling new monarch. When the English king Edward the Confessor died on 5 January 1066, no fixed procedures were in place to decide who should succeed him on the throne. The Witan (a council of wise men) had to make the decision, and they had four candidates to choose from Edgar the Atheling, a sickly14 year old boy. Harold Godwinson, powerful noble in England, a good soldier and a gifted politician. William juke of Normandy, a distant cousin of Edward the Confessor, over the sea in France. Harald Hardrada, King of Norway and a direct descendant of the kings of England. He was related to King Canute, the King of England from 1016-1032. Harald Hardrada attempted to invade England, and once Harold Godwinson heard about this he gathered as many soldiers as he could and set off 187 miles north to where Harald Hardrada was at Stamford bridge. On September 25th 1066 the battle took place, It was a bloody battle and one in which Harold's army (the Saxons) broke through the Viking invaders front line to go on and win the battle. It was such a fierce battle that only twenty four of the three hundred ships, that came to England carry the 8,000 soldiers, returned to Norway. King Harold's celebrations of victory were cut short as news came of the impending Norman invasion and no-one was left along the south coast of England to stop them. The Saxon army raced back south to face the Norman invaders. William...

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

1066

...1066 Leading up to the battle Seventeen kings ruled England, either by birth, military force or election by the Witan between 871 A.D and 1087 A.D. The definition of a king was difficult to define in those days. It was more a case of the dominant kingdom, such as Wessex, supplying the king or more accurately, the Bretwalda or overlord. Whilst kingdoms were always on a semi war footing with each other, it is a matter of conjecture who finally could be called the first "KING OF ENGLAND". Many historians consider Athelstan to be the first acknowledged true king of England. Wessex became the predominant Saxon kingdom in England. The southern Kingdom's power was such that thirteen kings from Alfred the Great to Harold II originated or had some affiliation with Wessex. The only diversion were the three Viking kings, Sweyn Forkbeard, Canute and Hardicanute and of course, William I (The Conqueror ) from Normandy. | It must be remembered that in the 10th and 11th centuries, most of Europe was much different to the way it is now. In those days most countries were operating on a feudal system. European countries were not always run as the king and his loyal subjects. Almost without exception, countries were divided up into regions or compartments that had their own ruling bodies and run by Dukes, Earls or Lords. To make matters worse they were usually at one another’s throats in the pursuit of power. The King of the country had little power over these areas or rulers. Normandy...

Words: 5138 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Weapons

...MEDIEVAL WEAPONS Other Titles in ABC-CLIO’s WEAPONS AND WARFARE SERIES Aircraft Carriers, Paul E. Fontenoy Ancient Weapons, James T. Chambers Artillery, Jeff Kinard Ballistic Missiles, Kev Darling Battleships, Stanley Sandler Cruisers and Battle Cruisers, Eric W. Osborne Destroyers, Eric W. Osborne Helicopters, Stanley S. McGowen Machine Guns, James H. Willbanks Military Aircraft in the Jet Age, Justin D. Murphy Military Aircraft, 1919–1945, Justin D. Murphy Military Aircraft, Origins to 1918, Justin D. Murphy Pistols, Jeff Kinard Rifles, David Westwood Submarines, Paul E. Fontenoy Tanks, Spencer C. Tucker MEDIEVAL WEAPONS AN ILLUSTRATED HISTORY OF THEIR IMPACT Kelly DeVries Robert D. Smith Santa Barbara, California • Denver, Colorado • Oxford, England Copyright 2007 by ABC-CLIO, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data DeVries, Kelly, 1956– Medieval weapons : an illustrated history of their impact / Kelly DeVries and Robert D. Smith. p. cm. — (Weapons and warfare series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-10: 1-85109-526-8 (hard copy : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-85109-531-4...

Words: 118320 - Pages: 474

Premium Essay

History of English

...A HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COURSE GUIDE Professor Michael D.C. Drout WHEATON COLLEGE A History of the English Language Professor Michael D.C. Drout Wheaton College Recorded Books™ is a trademark of Recorded Books, LLC. All rights reserved. A History of the English Language Professor Michael D.C. Drout Executive Producer John J. Alexander Executive Editor Donna F. Carnahan RECORDING Producer - David Markowitz Director - Matthew Cavnar COURSE GUIDE Editor - James Gallagher Design - Ed White Lecture content ©2006 by Michael D.C. Drout Course guide ©2006 by Recorded Books, LLC 72006 by Recorded Books, LLC Cover image: © PhotoDisc #UT088 ISBN: 978-1-4281-1730-3 All beliefs and opinions expressed in this audio/video program and accompanying course guide are those of the author and not of Recorded Books, LLC, or its employees. Course Syllabus A History of the English Language About Your Professor...................................................................................................4 Introduction Lecture 1 ...............................................................................................................5 The Foundations of Language: Brain, Development, Acquisition ......................................................................6 Signs and Meanings: Semantics .........................................................13 Sounds of Language: Phonetics..........................................................20 Sound...

Words: 42857 - Pages: 172