Premium Essay

Why Did Lincoln Free The Slaves In Confederate States

Submitted By
Words 560
Pages 3
In this lesson, we are continue learning about the Civil War. By 1862, people was looking at Lincoln sideways, because he couldn’t find a suitable leader for the Potomac. So, Lincoln decided to free the slaves (on paper) it was called the “Emancipation Proclamation”. The Emancipation Proclamation states, slaves who lived in the eleven states then in rebellion against the United States (page 97). However it didn’t free the slave in the 4 Border States, because he wanted to stay loyal to them. The reason why Lincoln free the slaves in confederates states was: to convince England and France to stay out of the war, to encourage slaves living in the Confederate states to rebel against their masters and thus cause confusion and chaos in the south, and to scare the wits out of the southern slave holders (page 98). Meanwhile, Lincoln hired Joe Hooker as the new commander. Hooker plane was to capturing Richmond in the town Chancellorsville, Virginia. Once again, Lee’s army outnumber the union, and won the Battle of Chancellorsville Lincoln replace Hooker with George Meade …show more content…
Grant was trying to achieve part two of the Anaconda Plan, because they can take control of Vicksburg (page 99). In the eastern theater, July 1863, Lee score his second offensive on the union, the battle of Gettysburg. The battle wasn’t plane. On July 4, 1863, Lincoln got words that Grant won his battle against Vicksburg and Meade won his battle Gettysburg. Lincoln was on cloud nine. This was the turning point in the Civil War, because the Union start win most of the battle, it convinced England and France not to join the Confederacy side and it was devastating to the Confederates

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Emancipation Of African Americans Research Paper

...was a crucial part of the history and wealth of the United States of America. The debate to emancipate the African American slaves have been around since the founding of the country and some states even threatened to not sign the constitution if slavery was abolished. Since then there have been many push backs against slavery such as slave revolts and formation of abolitionist organization eventually leading up to full out civil war between the northern United States of America and the southern Confederate States of America. Emancipation of African American slaves was a process throughout the course of the civil war and after emancipation the meaning of having freedom meant a lot to the formally enslaved....

Words: 1220 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Civil War Notes

...Antietam Single bloodiest day of the entire war Casualties: 12,000 Union, 13,000 Confederates McClellan had been ordered by Lincoln to destroy the rebel army did not pursue the Confederate troops Marked a major change in Northern war aims Emancipation Proclamation Shift in public opinion Blow against slavery would make Britain and France less likely to aid the South Weaken the confederacy Emancipate- "Free" all enslaved African Americans in the South On January 1st 1863 Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation Applied only to areas that the Confederacy controlled, it did not actually free anyone. Hoped it would encourage slaves to run away and many would Had the desired effect in Europe. Britain and France decided to withhold recognition of the Confederacy. Southern Victories In the winter of 1862- 1863 the south is winning The ride of war turns Lee decided to invade the North. In June of 1863 he begins moving north with 75000 troops. The two armies meet by accident on July 1st near the town of Gettysburg. Battle of Gettysburg Three days of fighting The Union held the high ground On the third day of battle, Lee decided to launch an attack the he hoped would destroy the Union army. Battle with largest number of casualties of the war. About 50,000 Often described as a turning point. It ended Lee's invasion of the North Pickett's Charge Around 14,000 Confederates advanced across and open field about a half-mile long. Barely half of the Rebels returned...

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The South V. South

...anti-Confederate Southerners determined the course/outcome of the civil war. Specific information was given by Freehlng to show how the anti-confederates southerners determined the course and outcome of the civil war. The information is discussed in the following paragraph. According to Freehling, the events beyond the battlefields partially determined military verdicts. Furthermore, home front and battlefront unveiled defining aspects of civil war. The division within the south also helped pave the path toward the war and also, the division among the southern and home front dissensions determined battlefield verdicts. The outcome of the war was the collapse of the confederacy that was caused by the defeat in the military sphere, rather than dissolution behind the lines. Anti-confederate southerners piled on psychological, economical and geographical burdens that ultimately helped flatten white confederate’s resiliency. President Abraham Lincoln’s statecraft, the union’s anaconda military strategy, northern democrats and English men’s attitudes seemingly tangential matters bore vitally on southern anti-confederates capacity to influence the battlefields and to illuminate important characteristics of civil war. The tale of the southern house divided, highlights under appreciated gems of civil war lore, including revealing code words, colorful luminaries, key battles and vital military orders, this tells why the war came. In conclusion, the anti-confederate southerners...

Words: 1730 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Tragic Death At Ford's Theater: Just Or Unjust?

...and chaos breaks out. Abraham Lincolin was assassinated mainly because of his actions and beliefs. Lincoln was well known as a fighter against slavery. He became the 16th president of the United States in 1860. He was also a military leader during the civil war and issued the Emancipation Proclamation which freed all slaves in the Confederate States (History.com). Abraham Lincoln's’ assassination was unjustified because he was an honest, role model to many,equal manbelieved in equality, and a was a revolutionary leader; however others many believed that thought he was a rebel too rebellious....

Words: 643 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Civil War

...Civil War - Pink |What was the economy of the Southern states based on? |1. Agriculture and it relied on slave labor | |What was the economy of the Northern states based on? |2. Industry | |What is agriculture? |3. Growing of crops and livestock | |What is industry? |4. The commercial production and sale of goods and services | |What is a free state? |5. One where slavery is not allowed | |What is a slave state? |6. One where slavery is allowed | |What did the Northern states want new states to become? |7. Free states | |What did the Southern states want the new states to become? |8. Slave states | |Where were the new states coming from? |9. They were being created out of the western territories | |What conflicts developed between the northern and southern states|10. | |in the years following the American Revolution and led to the |North was industrialized and the South was agricultural and | ...

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

A Summary Of John Wilkes Booth's Assassination

...April 15, 1965, Booth shot and killed President Abraham Lincoln while he was attending the play Our American Cousin, at Ford’s Theater, in Washington DC. Shortly after, he jumped on stage yelling, “Sic semper tyrannis!”, meaning “the South is avenged” (History.com Staff 1). He managed to assassinate the president with the help of planning with his co-conspirators. Booth and his co-conspirators were found at a barn, yet Booth refused to surrender. John Wilkes Booth died three hours after being shot in the barn by an investigator.There are a few possible motives as to why he assassinated...

Words: 750 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Civil Wa

... What most people don’t know is the war was not originally fought for  the abolition of slavery. The South, or the Confederate, wanted to exercise their rights as  states and split from the north. Well Abraham Lincoln thought that would be the downfall  of the United States. The Civil War was fought to between the Union and the  Confederacy on the issue of splitting up the United States. The country was divided  between two philosophies, either they thought the country could only survive and prosper  as a whole, or they believed the south had the right to split from the union.  The country was divided between two different philosophies. The North  believed if the South seceded from the North the country would crumble. While the South  believed they had the right as states to separate themselves from the Union. (Malvasi)  Abraham Lincoln was the head of the Unions thinking. He had a great sense of political  knowledge. He realized if the south did secede the Union wouldn’t stand a chance against  attack because half of the country essentially would have been gone. Lincoln originally  had no plans of abolishing slavery all his focus was on keeping the country together in  one strong unit. (Malvasi) The South on the other hand felt they had been mistreated by  the Union and were being taken advantage of. Soon the idea of secession came around  and South Carolina was the first to make the threat. They were quickly followed by states  like Georgia and Mississippi. They were in fact threatening to leave because they  ...

Words: 4176 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Fort Sumter Research Paper

...Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard “made the demand upon Anderson” of unconditional surrender (Ramsdell 283). While Major Anderson as expected rejected the demand by the Confederates, his Government was also sent a second message. The message informed them that the Confederacy “did not desire to needless bomb Fort Sumter” (Ramsdell 287). As stated earlier, both sides wanted to avoid being the first to start a war. However, that does not mean that the Confederates would not attack Fort Sumter and the Union troops if needed. Major Anderson On April 12, 1861 the Confederate forces under command of Brig. Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard opened fire on Fort Sumter. Union leader Major Anderson’s forces stood little chance against the powerful and more numerous Confederate forces. And finally “at 4:30 AM on the same day ended in the surrender of Major Anderson and his garrison” (Ramsdell 284). Had the Union forces under Major Anderson not surrendered after the numerous volleys of cannon fire, they would have been “starved out in a few days” anyways since they were running low on rations (Ramsdell 283). While many know of the historic battle at Fort Sumter, few know the actual death totals of the battle. That’s because...

Words: 1752 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

To What Extent Did Lincoln Violate The Constitution Dbq

...As President, Abraham Lincoln often stated his wishes on ending slavery, but frequently claimed he could not violate the constitution. In a letter to Senator A.G. Hodges, Lincoln said that “It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the constitution”(Doc. H). Lincoln insisted that it was his job to support the constitution but in the end he violated it. In 1862, during the Civil War, Lincoln released the Emancipation Proclamation, a document that declared “all persons held as slaves with said designated states… are and henceforward shall be free.”(Doc. G) Lincoln violated the constitution by ordering confederate states to free their slaves. The confederate states did not have to free their slaves because the Emancipation Proclamation violated the constitution. Lincoln’s order didn’t do anything for the African-Americans held as slaves and just further angered the south. This shows Lincoln was just another politician and not...

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

How Did The Civil War Change The Future

...In 1861 the deadliest and bloodiest war of all time began. The war was a battle between the North (union soldiers) and the South (confederate soldiers). Many people thought this war would be a short war, but it lasted 4 years. This war was the Civil War and it is an important event in history. Many people say the civil war was over states rights, but a majority of people say it was over slavery. Slavery was said to be the #1 conflict between the North and the South in the 1860’s (Guelzo 1). People from the North were being used as slaves in the south. The south liked/ wanted slaves, but the North did not agree, which is why the country was divided (Luce 1). Fifteen out of 34 of the states were slave states...

Words: 1142 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Why Did Political Parties Rise In The Early Republic?

...A. One reason why political parties rose in the early Republic was because Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had opposing views on government. Hamilton wanted a strong central federal government. Hamilton and other leaders created the Federalist party in 1787 and it was backed by the wealthy. The Federalist party believed in a republic where the federal government had most of the power and should protect the interests of the country. Jefferson was at the head of the anti-federalists also known as the Democratic-Republican Party. The Democratic-Republican Party was backed by people such as small farmers, artisans, and planters. They wanted the federal government to have little involvement in their lives and to leave most of the power to the local and state governments (Flanders, 2007). B1. The Whig and Democratic Parties had many different platforms they used. The Whig Party did not want to expand westward and wanted to grow commercially within the current territory of the nation. The Whig party...

Words: 1140 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Formation of the Confederacy: an Inevitable Occurrence

...Occurrence When looking at the history of the United States it is necessary to look at our past in two separate halves: the first half being everything before the Civil War and the second half being everything after the Civil War. With this being said, it can be reasonably argued that the Civil War is one of the most critical events to every happen in our country’s rich history. The devastating war took over half a million American lives in just a little over four years. This tragic event in history, up until Vietnam, claimed more American lives than any other war (Rubin 11). In hindsight it is clear that this war should have been avoided at all cost but during the late 1800’s the tension was so high and hostile that the war was inevitable. Sectionalism had increased so much during that period that even citizens thought of their country divided into two halves, being the North and the South. Each section considered themselves as right and proper while the other as ridiculous and wrong. These tensions kept building until the thought of secession became not a question of if but rather a question of when. According to Cole C. Kingseed, author of The American Civil War, the seeds of the Civil War can be planted as early as the Constitutional Convention of 1787. By the time of the convention five states had already abolished slavery, which made the southern states tentative to join the union for the fear of not having their slaves counted for representation in congress. A compromise...

Words: 2217 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Us Civil War

...1. Why do you think that the black soldiers were paid less than the white soldiers? Black soldiers faced additional problems stemming from racial prejudice. Racial discrimination was prevalent even in the North, and discriminatory practices permeated the U.S. military. Segregated units were formed with black enlisted men and typically commanded by white officers and black noncommissioned officers. The 54th Massachusetts was commanded by Robert Shaw and the 1st South Carolina by Thomas Wentworth Higginson—both white. Black soldiers were initially paid $10 per month from which $3 was automatically deducted for clothing, resulting in a net pay of $7. In contrast, white soldiers received $13 per month from which no clothing allowance was drawn. In June 1864 Congress granted equal pay to the U.S. Colored Troops and made the action retroactive. Black soldiers received the same rations and supplies. In addition, they received comparable medical care. The black troops, however, faced greater peril than white troops when captured by the Confederate Army. In 1863 the Confederate Congress threatened to punish severely officers of black troops and to enslave black soldiers. As a result, President Lincoln issued General Order 233, threatening reprisal on Confederate prisoners of war (POWs) for any mistreatment of black troops. Although the threat generally restrained the Confederates, black captives were typically treated more harshly than white captives. In perhaps the most heinous known...

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Lincoln Assassination Research Paper

...political or religious reasons or sometimes for payment. Throughout the history of the United States, eight Presidents have died while in office. Four of them died of natural causes, but four others died from assassination. The first assassination of a U.S. President was in 1865, and the last assassination that has occurred was in 1963. Stricter policies have been enforced to ensure the safety for people in office. The very last President to get assassinated was John F. Kennedy, but the very first President to get assassinated was Abraham Lincoln. Overall, the assassination of Abraham Lincoln impacted the world in a negative way and made the United States look weak. Abraham Lincoln...

Words: 1335 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Essay Why Texans Fought In The Civil War

...When The United States won its independance in 1787 they hoped this Union would last forever, but they knew it would not be that easy. In 1820, the United States had the same number of slave and free states. But in 1854 Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska act stating Kansas and Nebraska settlers could decide whether they wanted to be a slave or free state. Then in 1860, an abolitionist named Abraham Lincoln was elected president making eleven states secede from the Union. So, why did Texans chose to risk their lives, and sometimes lose their lives by fighting in the Civil War? Texans fought because of their love for Texas, their want for State’s Rights, and their wish to preserve slavery. Texans fought in the Civil War because of their love for Texas. In Document D, John Wesley Rabb says “I wanto be home so bad. I here that the Yanks are in Texas...I think most of the Rangers wanto be in Texas.” This shows how much he loved Texas. It also shows how bad Rabb wanted to be home. Rabb fought for the love of Texas because he wanted to preserve the way Texas was and didn’t want it to change because of the war....

Words: 525 - Pages: 3