It has been proven that animal testing is widely ineffective. According to PETA, “It’s
[animal testing] archaic. Forward­thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effective non­animal research methods, including human­based microdosing, in vitro technology, human­patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modeling, that are cheaper, faster, and more accurate than animal tests. Although human microdosing, in vitro technology, and human­patient simulations work effectively, computer modeling is the best. Human microdosing is a way to test on a human subject. “Volunteers are given an extremely small one­time drug dose, and sophisticated imaging techniques are used to monitor how the drug behaves in the body. Microdosing can replace …show more content…
Another solution that is debated is human­patient simulators. “ The most high­tech simulators mimic illnesses and injuries and give the appropriate biological response to medical interventions and injections of medications. Ninety­seven percent of medical schools across the U.S. have completely replaced the use of animal laboratories in medical training with simulators like this, as well as virtual­reality systems, computer simulators, and supervised clinical experience ” (PETA). Although they are utilized in most medical schools across the country, not many research laboratories have bought them because of the relatively low effects and dosage that you can give to them. They are not fitted for research that large corporations and organizations use. Computer modeling is sought to be the best solution.
To begin with, computer modeling is a feasible solution to animal testing. In the scientific world, this solution is called In silico. With today's computers and research equipment, scientists have developed a wide range of modeling programs and sequences to simulate the testing. …show more content…
Basically, computer modeling eliminates subject prices and caregiving, with the purchase of digital sequences and data. Legally, In silici clears a multitude of legal and abuse charges. Testing organizations are under surveillance by federal oversight because of laws regarding animal testing. Charges are introduced into courts against the corporations all the time because the federal bureaus in charge of oversight can’t watch the hundreds of companies.
Unless computers had feelings that could be abused, putting computers in effect would do away with legal charges. The computer testing method has been implemented already at major companies and even governments of other countries. There are a variety of outcomes from switching to animal testing alternatives. First, the moral grounds of inhumane testing are gone.
Secondly, more accurate results are to come. Computer modeling does not have emotional or physical variables to hinder research results or disease inhibitions. Computer modeling is the best solution because it removes animals from testing, permanently. In previous years, research companies would try to get away with using animals for half of the experimentation