Abstract
The 2012 Presidential campaign will most likely be one of the tightest races of all time. The outcome will affect all Americans in many ways such as whether Obamacare will remain or go, the jobless rate in the country and the economy. Each candidate believes he is the best choice for America, but the best candidate for bringing jobs back to the United States (U.S.) is undoubtedly Mitt Romney. This paper will compare and contrast why Mitt Romney, with his business expertise, economic stance and political experience, is better than Obama to accomplish the difficult task of creating and bringing jobs back to America.
Introduction
Barrack Obama assumed the role of President of the U.S. in January 2009. The unemployment rate at that time was 7.8 percent. By the end of his first year in the White House, unemployment reached an astounding 9.9 percent. Average unemployment during his first year was 9.3 percent. As the table in Figure 1 shows, employment in the U.S. has not recovered by much as we approach his fourth year as our President.

(Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2012)

President Obama may have a lot of experience in community service, but absolutely no experience as a businessman. His experience is that of an extremely successful politician, and politicians are the ones who have created the economic mess we are in today. It is time we all realized that the U.S. Government is a for profit “business”, and needs to be managed as such or the country will go bankrupt taking all Americans into bankruptcy with it. (Atkinson Jr., 2012).
Business Experience
Mitt Romney has an extremely successful career managing and consulting for large corporations. Even the Obama administration recognized this and tried to attack Romney because of his success. Obama’s attacks were an attempt to pit the poor (Americans) against the rich (Romney). Romney