...Habeas Corpus, what does it mean? The literal meaning is Latin that translates as “you have the body “. A writ of Habeas Corpus means a “body” that is being held has the right to be brought before the court and have the charges be stated that they are being held for. In layman’s terms, you cannot be held for no reason; you have to be charged with something to be detained. We don’t live in a communist state where we can be picked up off the street and be jailed for an unlimited amount of time with no due process. A Habeas Corpus petition is used for many situations, from unlawful imprisonment to family law involving custody of children. (The ‘Lectric Law Library’ 1995-2012) In this paper I will discuss the history of Habeas Corpus and it’s use and if it is still pertinent in today’s world especially in view of the War on terror. Habeas Corpus is a hold over by our forefathers from the English courts. In England a “writ of Habeas Corpus or “prerogative writs” were historically used by the courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom.” (Habeasbook.com). Since most of our forefathers were from England and the framers of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they incorporated a great many of England’s laws into our new set of laws. Habeas Corpus has been an important legal instrument in safeguarding an individual’s freedom against an arbitrary state action and these men felt it was of upmost importance...
Words: 329 - Pages: 2
...Writs in Indian Constitution - Definitions and Examples 29 Jul 2011 Posted by Admin We might have a thought of how our Fundamental Rights are protected and what are the safe guarding measures granted by our Constitution for the proper enforcement of Fundamental Rights.Here comes the importance of Writs,more precisely Prerogative writs. Indian Constitution has adopted 5 Prerogative writs. Article 13 clearly states that Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights are void.The Supreme Court (Under Article 32) and the High Courts (Under Article 226) are empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights against any authority of the State. Article 12 has defined "State" to include the Government and Parliament of India, and the Government and Legislature of the States, and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India. The expression, "other authorities" has been interpreted to cover citizens,business organizations and therefore such organisations also are amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the courts.A proceeding under Article 32 is described as a constitutional remedy and the right to bring such proceedings before the Supreme Court is itself a fundamental right. Article 139 confers the Supreme Court the powers to issue the below 5 writs. 1. What is Habeas corpus writ Habeas corpus literally means ‘you may have the body'. It is the most valuable writ for personal liberty...
Words: 1374 - Pages: 6
...writ of habeas corpus directs a person, usually a prison warden, to produce the prisoner and justify the prisoner's detention. If the prisoner argues successfully that the incarceration is in violation of a constitutional right, the court may order the prisoner's release. Habeas corpus relief also may be used to obtain custody of a child or to gain the release of a detained person who is insane, is a drug addict, or has an infectious disease. Usually, however, it is a response to imprisonment by the criminal justice system. A writ of habeas corpus is authorized by statute in federal courts and in all state courts. An inmate in state or federal prison asks for the writ by filing a petition with the court that sentenced him or her. In most states, and in federal courts, the inmate is given the opportunity to present a short oral argument in a hearing before the court. He or she also may receive an evidentiary hearing to establish evidence for the petition. The habeas corpus concept was first expressed in the Magna Charta, a constitutional document forced on King John by English landowners at Runnymede on June 15, 1215. Among the liberties declared in the Magna Charta was that "No free man shall be seized, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or injured in any way, nor will we enter on him or send against him except by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land." This principle evolved to mean that no person should be deprived of freedom without...
Words: 691 - Pages: 3
...The Great Writ of Liberty POL201: American National Government November 24, 2013 The Great Writ of Liberty Can you imagine what the United States would be like without the Writ of Habeas Corpus? Well, the “Bill of Rights” which is the first ten amendments in the United States Constitution would be stripped away and our nation would crumble. The Bill of Rights protects the American people and their civil liberties against the government who may infringe upon the rights of the people. In other words, the Bill of Rights limits the government’s power, and this is why our “Founding Fathers believed Habeas Corpus was so essential in preserving our liberty, justice, and democracy that they enshrined it in the very first article of the United States Constitution” (Center for Constitutional Rights, n.d., p. 1). In this paper, I will share the meaning and history of Habeas Corpus; provide examples from U.S. history of the suspension of Habeas Corpus and their applicability to the present; Analyze the importance of Habeas Corpus to the contemporary U.S. situation during the war on terror; discuss the U. S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the right of Habeas Corpus with respect to enemy combatants or illegal combatants, and evaluate four perspectives on this topic expressed by the President, Congress, the Supreme Court, and share my own personal philosophy. What is Habeas Corpus? Habeas Corpus literally means “you should have the body” (Halliday, 2011, p. 1). ...
Words: 1877 - Pages: 8
...Writ of Habeas Corpus Jose A. Gonzalez POL 201 Antonio Quirante September 24, 2012 Writ of Habeas Corpus Habeas Corpus demands a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges (Levin-Waldman, 2012). Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law that applies to all Americans and anybody in the United States at the time of their arrest. It is a legal procedure that requires a person to be brought in front after the have been arrested/ taken into custody. This is done so that the government to show cause to why the liberty of that person is being taken away and to let the person know what they are being charged with. Habeas Corpus is fundamental to American and all other English common law derivative systems of jurisprudence. It is the ultimate lawful and peaceable remedy for adjudicating the providence of liberty’s restraint (http://www.slate.com). History of Habeas Corpus The history of Habeas Corpus is an ancient law that has been used since the middle ages. It appears to be predominately of Anglo-Saxon common law origin but the exact origins are not really known. Even though the origin of Habeas Corpus is unknown it has been used in Europe for centuries. Its principle that has been used since the middle ages by various writs (http://www.slate.com). Habeas Corpus has evolved and changed a bit over the years, but it has basically remained the same. Habeas Corpus states that a person who has been arrested or in custody be brought before a court...
Words: 1905 - Pages: 8
...POL 201 American National Government The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus POL 201 American National Government Instructor: Professor D B Aug 12, 2013 The Right of Habeas Corpus is derived from the Latin meaning “you have the body.” The meaning according to the U.S. Constitution is the right of any person to question their incarceration before a judge. The detainees of war are entitled to habeas corpus because the authorized use of military force does not activate the Suspension Clause, holding them indefinitely is a violation of the Due Process Clause, and it is undetermined whether the detainees are prisoners of war or citizens suspected of treason. As citizens of the United States we must consider if it is legal for the U.S. government to detain a person without Due Process or Habeas Corpus in any circumstances. The term “habeas corpus” is believed to have first appeared as early as 1305 as a concept as part of the common-law tradition at a time of Magna Carta, signed by King John, the law states “No freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or disseized, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way harmed—nor will we go upon or send upon him—save by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law.” McElroy W. (2012). This later in the seventeenth century was re-written and used to assistance by the lawyer and politician Sir Edward Coke. In 1628 he helped to draft the Petition of Right, which became a foundation of the document...
Words: 2101 - Pages: 9
...• Welcome Stewart, Felicia. You are logged in. [pic]Wednesday, August 28, 2013 Your Application Has Been Submitted EMERGENCY COMMUN OPERATOR I The following is your confirmation number. Please save this number for future reference: 785970 **Important Information - Please Print This Page** Thank you for applying for the Emergency Communications Operator I position with the Cobb County Department of Public Safety. In order to continue in the hiring process, you must take an online Data Entry exam. This testing should take you approximately 10 minutes and you should allow yourself the appropriate time for testing without interruptions. The Data Entry exam uses both alphabetical and numerical characters during the test. For this reason, we have found that candidates typically do better using a desktop computer or keyboard with a 10-key pad. If you choose to use a laptop computer or other device without 10-key availability, you agree to accept the results as reported. If you do not have access to an acceptable computer for this exam, please contact CobbEmployment@cobbcounty.org to schedule your exam in person no later than Fri., August 30, 2013 at 5 pm EST to schedule a time. In-person testing is reserved for only those candidates who do not have access to an acceptable computer and will be administered at the discretion of Employment Center staff no later than Sept. 3, 2013. You have limited time to take these exams. After August 30, 2013, the test link below will expire...
Words: 641 - Pages: 3
...Writ of Habeas Corpus: A Right or Not? Shelly Shelton POL 201 American National Government Instructor: Amy Lyons August 4, 2014 The words war, terrorism, and death strike fear, anger, and pain in to the hearts of many. We want to retaliate against those who have caused us to feel this way. To somehow make them pay for the wrongs they have committed against us. In order to do this we kill, capture and or detain them. This is a fact of war, even an undeclared one. When these persons are taken prisoner do they lose their right to fair treatment, trial by constitutional standards and civilized means of interrogation? To answer these questions and others let us look at our history as well as review how our courts have viewed cases and situations that have arisen from actual war and the war on terrorism. Looking at the history of the United States it can be seen that the framers of the Constitution took civil liberties and civil rights into consideration when writing the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Article I Section 9 of the Constitution states “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” This writ is issued to determine if a person has been afforded due process of the law and to prevent unlawful imprisonment. It literally means “you should have the body.” (Unknown, 2013). The writ has been mentioned as early as the fourteenth century in England. The English people lived...
Words: 2107 - Pages: 9
...IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS EXTRAORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRIT PETITION NO. [Ω] OF 2011 In the matter inter alia of Art. 21 r/w. Art. 14 of the Constitution; And In the matter of the provisions of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 [as applied to the State of Maharashtra (except Wardha District)]; And In the matter of Part VI-A of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953; And In the matter of Respondent No. 1’s Notification (No. FLR. 1104/CR-21/EXC-2) dated 26th September, 2005, thereby notifying the Bombay Foreign Liquor (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2005 1. Imran Khan, about 28 years of ) age, an Actor by occupation, ) holding Overseas Citizen Card ) No. [Ω], residing at 24, Pali Hill, ) Bandra (West), Mumbai – 400 050 ) 2. Vedant Malik, about 22 years of ) age, a student by occupation, ) residing at 301, Aquamarine, ) 273-B, Carter Road, Bandra ) (West), Mumbai – 400 050 ) … Petitioners Versus 1. State of Maharashtra, through ) its Home, Finance, Prohibition ) and Excise and Social Justice ) Departments, Mantralaya, ) Mumbai – 400 032 ) 2. The Commissioner...
Words: 7035 - Pages: 29
...AN INSTITUTIONALIST STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN A GOVERNMENT- LINKED ORGANISATION NORHAYATI BINTI MOHD ALWI UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 2009 AN INSTITUTIONALIST STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN A GOVERNMENT-LINKED ORGANISATION by NORHAYATI BINTI MOHD ALWI Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am especially indebted to my supervisor, Dr. Siti Nabiha Abdul Khalid for her constant guidance, limitless support and patience throughout the period of my study. There is no way that I would be able to repay the kindness and caring that she has shown to me. I am thankful to Assoc. Professor Dr. Yuserrie, for giving valuable inputs to my study and also to others in the School of Management, who have helped me in some way or another. I would like to acknowledge the comments made by Professor Lee Parker and other participants of the Global Accounting and Organisational Change Conference, held in Melbourne, Australia in July 2008. A special thank you is also dedicated to Professor John Burns for the insightful comments on the research. I am also indebted to my employer International Islamic University Malaysia and the Ministry of Higher Education for providing the financial support. Thanks so much also to the respondents for their willingness to share some of their thoughts and experiences, which have made my data collection easier than I would ever...
Words: 8361 - Pages: 34
...Habeas Corpus: The Writ of the People Anela Murillo POL 102 Brent Schindler March 18, 2013 Habeas Corpus: The Writ of the People English in origin, the concept of habeas corpus literally means “that you have the body,” meaning that the court can force the police to produce a prisoner before them for review of their case. While complex in its use, a writ of habeas corpus forms the foundation for the rights of the accused since it allows one branch of the government (the courts) to check and balance the actions of another (the police) in criminal proceedings. And yet, while habeas corpus has been maintained as a fundamental right of the imprisoned, this protection has been tampered with in our history, making habeas corpus sometimes a casualty of our desire for security during times of crisis. Under the law of England, as a result of long usage, the term came to signify a prerogative writ; a remedy with which a person unlawfully detained sought to be set at liberty. It is mentioned as early as the fourteenth century in England and was formalised in the Habeas-corpus Act of 1679. The privilege of the use of this writ was regarded as a foundation of human freedom and the British citizen insisted upon this privilege wherever he went whether for business or colonisation. This is how it found a place in the Constitution of the United States when the British colonies in America won their independence and established a new State under that Constitution. In India, under the Constitution...
Words: 1816 - Pages: 8
...The Writ of Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror Charles Chamberlin POL201 Prof. Jason Weinerman 5/12/14 Introduction The basic right to question the government and hold it accountable is a basic hallmark of American Government. The right of the individual to question those in power, whom, according to the US Constitution, are there to represent and/or serve the public, is what makes the American construct unique. Our strength as a nation is manifested in the fact that we even treated our enemies within the rule of the law, even when the Great Writ was suspended. The Writ of Habeas Corpus which is the right to question and challenge the grounds in which our government holds a sovereign free American citizen against their will, is among our most basic fundamental rights. In the following pages, we will explore the history and what has caused us to stray from this ideal and, perhaps, instill the idea in the reader that all American citizens and aliens detained under suspicion, no matter the circumstance, must be treated justly. History of Habeas Corpus The right...
Words: 2737 - Pages: 11
...Marbury and the three other men brought suit against Madison, seeking writs of mandamus from the Supreme Court to require Madison to deliver their commissions. Marbury and the other plaintiffs sought action under Section...
Words: 533 - Pages: 3
...that no one would be held prisoner without a trial. According to the constitution the writ to Habeas Corpus is implemented to prevent tyranny and false imprisonments. In the length that our nation has been around there has only been three instances in which the habeas corpus writ was suspended. The first was after the civil war (during the reconstruction) and most recently during the War on Terror. The War on Terror has brought the Habeas Corpus writ into different perspective when it was approved that the writ be suspended for prisoners in Guantanamo Bay (GITMO). The Bush administration went under severe scrutiny after choosing GITMO as a detention center for “enemy combatants/illegal combatants” and suspending the Habeas Corpus writ to them. There had been no legal aid provided so that the detainees could attempt to prove innocence. In the over zealous need to prevent further terrorist attacks in a way we condoned terrorist like ideals. In 2008, the verdict in Boumediene v. Bush the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration and their position on the detainees. The Supreme Court made its ruling, yet it has not taken new cases from Guantanamo in for review. So if the Supreme Court is turning their face then where does the power fall to…the President, Congress, Senate, or the Military? Who will get to dictate when detainees have proven their innocence? Habeas Corpus is a United States writ and has been for a...
Words: 1670 - Pages: 7
...is a writ (court order) which directs the law enforcement officials who have custody of a prisoner to appear in court with the prisoner to help the judge determine whether the prisoner is lawfully in prison or jail or not ( Legal Dictionary). The order is usually obtained in the jurisdiction within which the prisoner is held.A writ of habeas corpus is a challenge to the legality of a prisoner’s detention and does not entail an inquiry into the prisoner’s guilt or innocence. After examining the reasons for confinement, the court that issued the writ may release the prisoner or remand the prisoner into custody. The habeas corpus concept was first expressed in The habeas corpus concept was first expressed in the Magna Charta, a constitutional document forced on King John by English landowners at Runnymede on June 15, 1215. Among the liberties declared in the Magna Charta was that "No free man shall be seized, or imprisoned, or outlawed, or exiled, or injured in any way, nor will we enter on him or send against him except by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land." The roots of habeas corpus are found in English common law dating to the fourteenth century and were made a part of England’s statutory law in 1679. American colonial courts issued the writ at common law, and state governments continued to recognize habeas rights following independence. The U.S. Constitution made no clear provision for the writ, providing only that “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas...
Words: 1681 - Pages: 7