... I currently reside in the state of Tennessee, which is a right to hire and fire state. There is a common law notion stating that, without any type of formal employment contract, employees have the right to quit their jobs any time they want to, regardless of whether or not they have a reason. By the same token, employers have the right to fire employees any time, whether they have a legitimate reason to do so or not (TN website). “Employment at Will” policies cannot be utilized by employers in any discriminatory manner, according to federal law. Employers are not allowed to fire employees because of their national origin, age, sex, religion, color, or race. If any type of written or oral agreement exists, such as a union contract or verbal promise, then the Employment at Will doctrine will be restricted. With that being said, I strongly believe a business owner should be afforded the opportunity to fire or hire anyone if he or she opens a business through their own volition. This hypothetical business owner has funded and conceptualized the whole idea. Because of this, the owner should have every right to base their ability to earn money and grow their business based on any stance on gender, sex, race, traits, or culture. I say this with no annotation on the moral issues accompanied with racism or sexism, but on the private freedoms involved. If am owner decides only to hire a certain race, gender with a specific height, that should be their right in a free market economy...
Words: 834 - Pages: 4
...One big deal about Employment Law – who does it apply to? Scenario: Small business is being asked to raise minimum wage to $15 per hour. Unfortunately they aren’t able to afford that without taking a hit on their bottom line, owner needs to look at who does the law apply to and do it based on # of employees. Meaning, # of employees can affect whether or not the law applies to your organization. Employment Law Misconceptions: You can’t be fired without good cause You can’t have your pay cut You are entitled to unemployment if you’re fired Your desk, office, computer, and/or your locker are personal property There is no automatic right to employment but there are laws in place “At Will”, needs to be within the guidelines of discrimination laws. The question isn’t about what you can do… it should be about what you should do. Who and what decides what law to apply? Contracts, bargaining units (unions), employment practices at the company may define an unwritten agreement, contracts can be written, unwritten, and oral and/or inferred. Court decisions can interpret laws and regulations The law is fluid and subject to change…. Employment Law Coverage: Based on the number/amount of employees you have working for your organization. Employment Law Agencies in CA: CAL-OSHA Labor Commissioner Department of Fair Employment and Housing Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Employment Development Department Francise Tax Board Employment Law Agencies in United...
Words: 363 - Pages: 2
...Private Bag 92066 Auckland 1030. Contract of service MEANING OF EMPLOYEE TESTS Control Integration Fundamental or economic reality test Independence Intention APPLICATION OF LAW BEST PRACTICE CHART OF DIFFERENCES APPENDICES: IRD CHECKLISTS Appendix 1: Control test checklist Appendix 2: Integration test checklist AdviceLine For telephone advice and assistance, call or email the EMA AdviceLine and talk to one of our employer advisors: 09 367 0909 or 0800 800 362 AdviceLine@ema.co.nz Appendix 3: Independent test checklist Appendix 4: Intention test checklist Appendix 5: Economic reality test checklist Appendix 6: Employee Checklist 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 8 9 9 11 12 13 14 14 A-Z of Employing is available to EMA members only, via email, or online at www.emadvice.co.nz Contact AdviceLine to obtain your password. AdviceLine is open 8am – 8pm Monday to Friday (excluding public holidays) Contracts for Services OVERVIEW 1 2 3 A contract for service contrasts with a contract of service. An employee is a person under a contract of service and a contractor is a person who enters into a contract for service. The concern with the correct classification of a relationship is usually over whether a person has been prevented from accessing rights and protections available only to employees. The Employment Relations Act 2000 does not define a contract of service but defines the meaning of employee. The terms are interchangeable therefore the meaning of a contract of service is...
Words: 4676 - Pages: 19
...Pros and Cons of an Employment Contract Abstract An employment contract or contract of employment is an agreement between an employer and an employee which sets out their employment rights, responsibilities and duties. These are called the terms of the contract. The employment contract does not have to be in writing. However, the employee is entitled to a written statement of the main employment terms within two months of starting work. (Heathfield) The employment contract is made as soon as the employee accepts the job offer. When the employee starts work it will show that they accepted the job on the terms offered by the employer, even if the employee does not know what they are. Having a written contract could cut out disputes with the employer at a later date, and will help the employee understand their employment rights. Introduction A written employment contract is a document that the employer and employees sign setting forth the terms of the relationship. The employer does not have to enter into a written contract with every employee you hire. In fact, written employment contracts are generally the exception, rather than the rule. In some situations, however, it makes good sense to ask an employee to sign a contract. (Heathfield) The concept of an employment contract seems simple enough: “You work for me and I pay you for that work.” But there are some very important contractual nuances to the relationship between employers and employees which all human resources...
Words: 2272 - Pages: 10
...“last-chance agreement” under which he waived and released “any claims, suits, or causes of action” against the defendant. The employee refused to sign because he was unwilling to waive his rights to state unemployment benefits or workers' compensation. Under state statute, agreements to waive such rights are invalid. The employee is discharged. [Edelberg v. Leco Corp., 236 Mich. App. 177 (1999).] * b. A nurse is asked by her employer to sign a backdated Medicare form. She refuses and is terminated that day. As a healthcare provider, she is required to complete that particular form. [Callantine v. Staff Builders, Inc., 271 F.3d 1124 (8th Cir. 2001).] Exceptions to the Doctrine of Employment-at-Will States vary in terms of their recognition of the following exceptions to the doctrine of employment-at-will. Some states recognize one or more exceptions while others might recognize none at all. In addition, the definition of these exceptions also may vary from state to state. * • Bad faith, malicious, or retaliatory termination in violation of public policy. * • Termination in breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. * • Termination in breach of some other implied contract term, such as those that might be created by employee handbook provisions (in certain jurisdictions). * • Termination in violation of the doctrine of promissory estoppel (where the employee reasonably relied on an employer's promise, to the employee's detriment). *...
Words: 2299 - Pages: 10
...Law firms Project What is the legal aid? Payment from public funds allowed, in cases of need, to help pay for legal advice or proceedings. Legal aid can help meet the costs of legal advice, family mediation and representation in a court or tribunal. Legal aid are limited, which mean that people who earns a certain amount of money, would not be eligible to have a legal aid. Legal has been reduced by 15 pound comparing to the previous hourly pay of 44 pound. The government is cutting off pay rates of 8.75%. Law firm or law centre Law centres defend the legal rights of people who cannot afford a lawyer. They are specialists working in their local communities to uphold justice and advance equality. Procedure within a law company? The procedure are first of all they would speak to you to see if/how they can help. Then they would tell you about the costs. They would also be able to tell you if legal aid is available. Can I get help with my employment tribunal case? Thinking about making a claim to an employment tribunal can be scary. Many people find it helpful to get some advice before they take action. There are lots of organisations that might be able to offer you advice, or help with your case. You can find more information and contact details on this page. You might also want...
Words: 1074 - Pages: 5
...Considerations in Employment Selection Cardinal Stritch University Cathy Carew Instructor John Koehler MGT-445 Human Resource Management II July 25, 2013 Legal and Ethical Considerations in Employment Selection Organizations use screening tools such as assessment tests, medical tests and drug testing to effectively find applicants or current employees that are best qualified for a particular job. There are legal and ethical considerations that need to be applied when using any type of assessment test, or medical and drug testing; the selection process should follow federal employment laws, show reliability and validity, exclude bias, as well as protect the test taker’s individual rights and security of information. Assessment tools that are used by employers to make hiring decisions must follow professional and legal principals. Employment laws and regulations disallow discrimination and give equal employment opportunities for all. The U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration created an assessment guide for organizations to use as a guide in the employment selection process. In the assessment guide Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Tower Amendment to Title VII state that professionally developed workplace tests can be used to make employment decisions only if the test does not discriminate against any one particular group (U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration, 1999). The Equal Employment Opportunity...
Words: 1108 - Pages: 5
...of recruiting and hiring comprises of several phases, however, before being able to recruit and retain employees the company needs to make sure it understands all of the regulations and laws that must be followed during the process (Fernández-Aráoz, 2009). There are a multitude of regulations and laws in place to safeguard applicants throughout the recruitment process; many of the legal mandates that pertain to recruiting and hiring are on a federal level that all states must comply with but there are also a number of laws on a state level that apply to that state only (Wren, 2006). The federal laws that cover employment and recruitment are as follows: • Wages and hours- the laws regulating this fall under the FLSA (fair labor standards act) and is enforced by the WHD (wage & hour division) of the US DOL (department of labor). This act stipulates the criteria for minimum wage and overtime. Under the FLSA employees, unless they are exempt, must be compensated at least the federal minimum wage for a 40 hour work week anything beyond 40 hour must be compensated an overtime rate of one-and-one-half-times the regular rate of pay (U.S. Department of Labor, 2014). . • Age requirements -. The WHD governs the federal child labor laws. Under the FLSA mandates, 14 is the minimum age for employment and restricts the number of hours an employee under the age of 16 can work. It also prohibits anyone...
Words: 1577 - Pages: 7
...Elements of a Contract Sandee Jones Ashford University Business Law BUS670 Mr. Michael Huang December 16, 2013 Elements of a Contract Our entire economy is based on the freedom of individuals and businesses alike to form contracts, and a legal system of laws that enforces each to freely enter into. Most folk are used to seeing a contract in written form, and so most assume it must be lengthy, and in writing to be enforceable. This is not 100 percent true. However, there are five elements of a contract that must exist for the agreement to be enforceable (Seaquist, 2012). Contracts have no particular form. There are no particular words or phrases that must be used by either party. But someone needs to make an offer, which is element number one of a contract. The three characteristics of an offer are: 1. The language of the offer is definite and certain. This means that words that mean you are serious and “for sure.” 2. The transaction looks like a contract and it passes the “objective test,” and 3. The offer has been communicated to the offeree. The second element is “Acceptance.” Acceptance can happen after a valid offer, but it is the only one that leads to the “contract formation.” This means that one party has made an offer and another person has accepted the offer. For example, if an offeror says, “I will sell you a car for $5,000” and the offeree says, “I’d love another dependable car for $5,000.” The two have agreed to the terms of the offer and...
Words: 903 - Pages: 4
...Therese Thomas GM597 Business Law Fall 2010 Week 5 Assignment: You Decide Reading these cases, it is a little bite complicated and hard to decide who should prevail. Being the judge in these cases, I think Kenny’s mother, Kyle, and Kenny’s Poor-Man’s Bar can sue Authorit-I for the damage caused by Cartman. They will prevail because this would be considered as a case of negligence which by law, principals which is Authorit-I would be liable for negligent conduct of agents (Cartman) acting within the scope of their employment. Also when running a motivation test, I think that Authorit-I would also be liable if Cartman’s motivation in committing intentional tort was to promote Authorit-I business, Authorit-I is liable for injuries caused by the tort. If Cartman motivation was personal, Authorit-I would not be liable, even if tort occurs during business hours or on premises. Running a work related test, which is only applied in some jurisdictions. Authorit-I would be liable if Cartman commits intentional tort within a work-related time or space, which it was in this case. As far as Cartman suing his employer for wrongful termination, he will definitely not prevail because after hurting couple people there is no need to interview him even if the employee’s handbook said so. I am sure the State police will before anyone else does. In the case of the Jewelry Store suing Authorit-I I believe it would hard to decide who will win this case. I could said that the Jewelry Store might...
Words: 440 - Pages: 2
..."Employment-at-Will and Whistleblowers" Please respond to the following Analyze the duty of loyalty in whistleblower cases to determine to whom loyalty is owed and who shows the greater duty of loyalty. Support your analysis with specific examples. Then, suggest at least one change to an existing law. From the e-Activity, compare and contrast the key difference between Europe’s view of employment as a property right and America’s employment-at-will approach. Next, determine whether and how the United States might adopt laws that reflect work as a fundamental right. Support your response. its not much I would change about the existing law but maybe put the whistleblower in a higher position far as job title, and I say this because jobs can have layoffs for many reason and lay the whistleblower of and that’s legal but if you give the whistleblower higher power then they will be part of the decision of who get laid off and this will secure their job. The Europeans treat there employees as if their part of the company and gives them more right whereas the U.S you have a job until they decides to get ride of you and don’t have to provide you with a reason. I think if the U.S takes on this law people would fell better after getting fired because the employer reason to fire you and they will have to provide you with a reason. I never believe that it was ok to just fire someone because of the at-will policy, I don’t think its fair to the employees that lose their jobs and don’t...
Words: 276 - Pages: 2
...at-will employment doctrine and analyze the implications for both employers and employees. One of the most widely known federal employment laws is the Employment-At-Will policy, which states that both the employee and the employer can terminate an employment relationship at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all. However, this employment practice is only legally permissible if an employment relationship is not bound by a formal, written contract and the understood duration of employment is indefinite. Although this common employment law is still widely practiced throughout the United States, many federal provisions have been introduced to protect employees against unlawful termination disguised by the “no reason” clause of the Employment-At-Will policy (U.S. Department of Labor). For example, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from making any employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Therefore, if an employee is terminated without reason but can prove the decision was truly based on a factor protected by Title VII, the employer will be held legally responsible because the Title VII provision supersedes the Employment-At-Will doctrine. Examples of other provisional laws include the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (Sklover). Job applicants and new employees are often baffled to read--in a job application, employment contract...
Words: 1282 - Pages: 6
...To: Employment Law Students From: Dan Ginsberg Subject: Reading Cases Date: April 14, 2015 Background: The authors of the textbook (Bennett-Alexander and Hartman) include legal cases to provide some real life situations to help in understanding the legal principles explained in the text. Here are some things to keep in mind when you read and study these cases: 1. Laws are created by the legislature (also known as statutory laws). The cases you will be reading are summaries of judicial opinions made by appeals courts either by a state judge or by a Federal judge. Once a decision is rendered by a judge, it becomes a part of the “common law”, and can be followed, modified, or rejected by another judge, who thus creates an update to the common law. 2. The cases you read are snapshots in time, based on the facts of each case. While general principles can and should be understood, it is not always clear what the value of the case is to the understanding of the law. Sometimes, the conclusions reached by the judge, don’t make a lot of sense…. But, don’t get hung up over that, since you need many case studies to understand what the real law is. And, even if you understand the law, a new and more important decision can be rendered, which throws out the old common law, and replaces it with new common law. Or, in some cases, the legislature will pass a new law that renders the latest court decision meaningless, and the checks and balances of government are demonstrated...
Words: 822 - Pages: 4
...a sole proprietorship is the simplicity behind the formation. There is very little paperwork that needs to be filed at the inception and it takes very little work to keep the business compliant with state and federal laws. Another advantage to a sole proprietorship is taxes. Any money made by a sole proprietor is considered income to the owner. The profit is claimed as income on the owner’s annual tax filings. * Liability: Because there is no legal separation between an owner and the business in a sole proprietorship, the business owner is unlimitedly liable for any debt or fault of the business. Even if the sole proprietorship dissolves, the owner will be liable for the debt. If the debt is not taken care of in a timely manner it will could affect the owner’s credit rating and lead to future earnings being garnished. * Income Taxes: Taxation of a sole proprietorship happens once, at the income level of the owner. Any profit made by the company is considered an income to the owner. A sole proprietor is considered by the internal revenue service as self-employed, meaning the sole proprietor will not be held liable for FICA taxes. However, as the owner you will pay 100% of the self-employment tax (SECA). The annual contribution to the Self-Employment Contribution Act tax is deductible up to 50%. * Continuity: Because a sole proprietor is the...
Words: 4431 - Pages: 18
...1. Please select one or more of the questions included in the "Notebook," and post specific reasons why the questions should be avoided while interviewing applicants for a job; Have you ever been arrested? You can ask whether the applicant has ever been convicted of a felony.) The Wisconsin law prohibits inquires about past arrest records but permits consideration of current arrest. If an applicant is currently under arrest for an offense that is substantially related to the job, an employer may either suspend judgment until on the case is resolved, advise the applicant to reapply when the charge is resolved, or refuse to employ the applicant. Some exceptions an employer may not refuse to employ a person or discharge a person with a conviction...
Words: 687 - Pages: 3