Free Essay

Zipcar

In:

Submitted By tatka
Words 8022
Pages 33
ZIPCAR
ZIPCAR
2011
Sebastian Cruz
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND POLICY
2011
Sebastian Cruz
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND POLICY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXCECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………….3
COMPANY INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………..4-10
PORTER FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………………….11- 17
INTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION (IFE)……………………………………………………………18-24
EXTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION (EFE)………………………………………………………….25-30
TOWS MATRIX……………………………………………………………………………………………….31-35
REFERENCE……………………………………………………………………………………………………..36-59

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

After analyzing Zip car situation in the industry with a Porter 5 forces analysis, internal factor evaluation, external factor evaluation, and the TOWS analysis, I came out with some strategic ideas that based on the implication of business concepts along with the business idea of Zip car can lead for a better succeed of the company. For the SO strategy, I developed three important opportunities for Zip car. Government got Zip, this consists in working together with the government to reach environmental goal and for Zip car avoid some cost in the long term. Zipster to Wal-Mart, develop a market penetration to focus on a certain group working together with the top wholesaler company in the world would lead for new members to use Zip car. Introduce Zip car to India, this one I think is the most important and very achievable, it is a market that is growing fast with an over populated urban areas. Using a market development will lead Zip car to a new market segment. For the WO strategies, my strategy is aiming for subsidiary agreement to reduce cost. Zip car is a firm that prioritizes environmental concern and government should help industries that try to improve the environment. For the ST strategy, focus Alliance with public sectors, insurance companies to avoid claims and insurances fees. Lastly, WT strategy, selling a part of the company to a big car rental firm to avoid debt, at the worst scenario, there is no need for liquidation; this is a new business model that nobody knows what could be the top for this industry but as for today, is a business model that wants to create a new lifestyle in society.

Company Name: Zipcar Inc
Industry: 5012: Automobile and other motor vehicles
Market: (NASDAQ) National Market
Symbol: ZIP (NASDAQ)
Revenue (Latest Year): $186, 1 million
CAR SHARING INDUSTRY Car sharing is an industry where society and environmental purposes are more important than business and financial objectives. This type of industry is known as a service for urban communities by helping environmental and communities’ transit goals. Car sharing business is the car rental service of the new era. Generally, customers obtain a one time or annual membership then pay a small rate fee each time they need a vehicle. To differentiate from car rentals services, car sharing has minute, hourly, day services which target another market than any other car rental service. It focuses towards students, business, and residents of urban areas where other ways of transportations are available and where parking fees are extremely high and do not need cars for daily activities. This is a market that is increasing every day, “it is now growing in the US with over 200 cars share programs operating in over 600 cities” (http://www.cleanfleetreport.com/fleets/car-sharing-competition-hertz-and-enterprise-chase-zipcar/).
ZIP CAR
Zip car has been the car sharing leader in the past years with over 560, 000 members in 50 markets all over the US, Canada, and Europe. They had focused their membership on residential, college, and business markets. CEO of the company had set two main goals for the future: attracting new customers that are not included at the demographic and geographic market that already exist and to find opportunities to increase the customer growth which include future partnership with others companies.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES: * Leaders in the market with more the 560,000 members. “Zip car, with $186.1 million in revenues, owns over 45% of the market”.(http://blog.stonestreetadvisors.com/2011/04/19/zipcar-time-to-step-on-the-brakes/) * Technology to increase customer satisfaction.”Zip car program is as fast as to take out money from the ATM. In minutes or up to a year in advance, members can reserve Zip cars online, over the phone or by using their mobile device, 24 hours a day, seven days a week (http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23)”. * Innovative partnership. Being leaders in the market give them the chance to develop partnership with colleges in order to enter the students market. To increase their potential members, they reduce the minimum age to 18 for the college program. * “Zip car members have automated access to zip cars using a keyless entry card to simply unlock the door and automated access to zip cars (http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23)”.
CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION
It focused to target 18-40 years old men and women middle working to upper class individuals of any ethnicity, colleges students, businesses and residents in urban areas or college campuses who are concerned about environmental problems and are looking for other ways of transportations available to avoid the high expenses of insurance, cars costs, and where parking fees are extremely high and do not need cars for daily activities.
RATES AND PLANS | | Extra Value Plans | | | Occacional driving | EVP $50 | EVP $75 | EVP $125 | EVP $250 | Drinving discount | - | 10% | 10$ | 10% | 15% | Pay as you go | / | - | - | - | - | Monthly commitment | - | $50 | $75 | $125 | $250 | Rollover | | | 1mo. | 2mo. | 2mo. | Annual Fee | $60 | - | - | - | - | membership fees | | | | | | Application fees | $25 | $25 | $25 | $25 | $25 | Deposit | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | Mon/Thurs driving rates | | | | | | Hourly from | $8.75 | $7.88 | $7.88 | $7.88 | $7.88 | Daily(any 24h) from | $82 | $73.80 | $73.80 | $73.80 | $73.80 | Fri/Sun driving rates | | | | | | Hourly from | $13.75 | $12.38 | $12.38 | $12.38 | $12.38 | Daily(any 24h) from | $124.00 | $111.60 | $111.60 | $111.60 | $111.60 | what is included | | | | | | Gas | / | / | / | / | / | Insurance | / | / | / | / | / | 180 free miles | / | / | / | / | / |

MAIN COMPETITORS HERTZ ON DEMAND
Advantages:
* Partnership with a car service rental. Hertz has introduced Hertz on Demand; this is a new market Hertz is entering. As they are owned by a strong brand in car rental service, it is an advantage with other competitors because they have the consumer satisfaction and recognition in the car rental service. * They have introduced the one way trip service. “You can travel freely with Connect by Hertz by dropping off your Connect car at over 100 locations in greater New York City, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., the Hamptons and Hoboken, NJ. At Connect by Hertz, we understand plans change and we'll change with them. (http://www.connectbyhertz.com/newyork/About/Oneway)”. * Members pay a low hourly or daily rate that includes: gas, insurance, GPS navigation, 24/7 roadside assistance, 24 hour member care center communication, and 180 free miles per 24 hours period.
Disadvantages:
* New in the market, Hertz on Demand even though is a subsidiary of Hertz is a new market they are entering and they have a lack of experience against competition that have been on the market for many years * Lack of variety of cars. In comparison with Zip car that have around 30 models to choose from, Connect by Hertz offers 6 models that are only sizes for maximum 5 passengers.
WE CAR BY ENTERPRISE
Advantages:
* Partnership with a car rental. “We car When choosing corporate partners, probably look for those that are both proven and financially sound. Well, none are more so than the parent company of WeCar, Enterprise Rent-A-Car. For decades, Enterprise has proven to be a valuable business partner with an unmatched record of customer service (http://www.wecar.com/benefits.html)”. * Strategic niche markets. “For the moment, its push nationally will come only through business-to-business ventures, not by opening locations that rent cars to anyone (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122282146961692671.html)”. The idea is to implement a less risk business negotiating with specific groups in universities or government bureaus to use We Car for their employees or students. * Helping environment. “We Car members are concerned about our environment. That’s why most cars in the We Car fleet are hybrids, and most are primarily fuel-efficient. Because car sharing helps reduce the total number of cars on the road, We Car members help contribute to a cleaner, greener environment (http://www.wecar.com/pdf/weCarHandbook_2.pdf)”.
Disadvantages:
* We Car even though is part of Enterprise, the US’ largest rental car company by revenue, is a new market they are entering and they have a lack of experience against competition that have been on the market for many years and have more market share than them. * Application process takes too long time. “We Car's application process takes three to five business days and requires applicants to fax in a form. Zip car members can do theirs entirely online and receive their Zip card, the device that unlocks the car doors, by mail in one to three business days, or in person at a Zip car office the same day (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120235251027849679.html)”.
REFERENCE
* Addison, John. “Car Sharing Competition: Hertz and Enterprise Chase Zipcar”. Clean fleet report. http://www.cleanfleetreport.com/fleets/car-sharing-competition-hertz-and-enterprise-chase-zipcar/ * “Zipcar time to step on breaks?”. Stone street advisor. http://blog.stonestreetadvisors.com/2011/04/19/zipcar-time-to-step-on-the-brakes/ * Zipcar. http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23 * “About connect by Hertz. Connect by Hertz. http://www.connectbyhertz.com/about/default.aspx * Everson, Darren. “ Car rental companies learn to share”. The wall street journal. Feb, 7,2008. < http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120235251027849679.html> * Nassauer, Sarah. “ Enterprise plans to expand car sharing business in US”. The wall street journal. Oct, 1, 2008. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122282146961692671.html * http://www.wecar.com/pdf/weCarHandbook_2.pdf * http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23 * http://www.connectbyhertz.com/newyork/About/Oneway

RIVALRY Mod
BARRIERS TO ENTRY

Mod

BUYER POWER Low

SUPPLIER POWER Low

THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES High

RIVALRY Mod
BARRIERS TO ENTRY

Mod

BUYER POWER Low

SUPPLIER POWER Low

THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES High

MARKET ANALYSIS
Environmental concerns have become a strategic advertisement campaign for many firms in order to increase their dedication in environmental issues. Car sharing focuses on the idea of reducing the ownership of cars in main urban cities to decrease traffic and the pollution that affect Mother Nature. Introducing 100% electric vehicles for public, is the alternative to avoid using gasoline and one of the highlights points of this industry. This is a market place where is still unclear how big it could turn in. “Enterprise Holding Chief Strategy Officer and EVP Greg Stubblefield told in an interview that car sharing is in the early, early stages, and it’s still unclear if it will become more than a niche market (1)”. As today, most of the firms in the industry only offer members renting their cars by hour or daily base and cars have parking lots around urban areas for customer delivering cars. Car sharing industry is a market that is new in consumers’ minds but as economy has not been great, is a great alternative to avoid car ownership. In order to analyze Zip car situation in the market, by using Porter’s five forces will help us will help us having a better understanding of the industry Zip car operates.
PORTER’S FIVE FORCES
RIVARLY
INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION
Zip car is the world’s largest car sharing company. As being the innovators of the car sharing industry in the US, they operate in more than 50 cities and 250 college campuses with a total of 605,000 members. “The current market for the US and Europe alone is estimated to be just over $400 million. That means the market (US/Europe) is expected to grow at a CAGR of 32.7% over the next 9 years. Further, it means that Zipcar, with $186.1 million in revenues, owns over 45% of the market (2)”. Due to the high percentage of market share in the market, this makes decrease the intensity in certain point because car sharing industry is increasing in new firms entering the market.
IINCREASING COMPETITION
However, even though they have a significant percentage of the market share in the industry after they merged with Flexcar, Inc and purchased Streetcar limited in 2010, competition has increased in the car sharing industry. Some of the big car rental services firms have started entering this niche marketing. Hertz on Demand by Hertz Global Holding Inc and We Car by Enterprise have the advantage of the recognition on the car rental service will be a strong fight to take does share from Zip car. “We car When choosing corporate partners, probably look for those that are both proven and financially sound. Well, none are more so than the parent company of WeCar, Enterprise Rent-A-Car. For decades, Enterprise has proven to be a valuable business partner with an unmatched record of customer service (3)”. Due to the introducing to the market of new firms in a niche market, this will increase intensity among competitors.

LOW LEVEL OF DIFFERENTIATION
Car sharing industry is a system adopted by firms that do not have a lot of variation other than by technology. Zip car introduced a system as fast at taking out money of the ATM. “In minutes or up to a year in advance, members can reserve Zip cars online, over the phone or by using their mobile device, 24 hours a day, seven days a week (4)”. Hertz on demand introduced a system that does not need keys for opening cars. “Swipe your Hertz On Demand vehicle entry device over the card reader (located on the driver's side of the windshield) to enter the vehicle (5)”. We Car by Enterprise are focusing their campaigns by using hybrids cars. “We Car members are concerned about our environment. That’s why most cars in the We Car fleet are hybrids, and most are primarily fuel-efficient. Because car sharing helps reduce the total number of cars on the road, We Car members help contribute to a cleaner, greener environment (6)”. This shows that variation in the service has a minimum differentiation. Most of the firms offer the similar features and this gives a high level of rivalry.

LOW SWITCHING COST As the entire car sharing companies has a low level of differentiation, there is high increase intensity between competitors because customers can switch from one service to another. By sharing similar characteristics, car sharing companies have to struggle to capture customers.
THREAT OF SUBSTITUES
It is early to compare this niche market with car rental service due to the significant difference they have in the market. Due to the threats of substitutes is high; car sharing companies have to compete also with car rentals firms, taxis companies, bikes, busses, and friends & families. All of these are alternatives individuals have for transportation (basic need). Car sharing goal is to compete against car ownership rather than any other competitor. This is a lifestyle they are trying to introduce to the market which is cost efficient in compare with car ownership.
BARRIERS TO ENTRY
Even though Zip car introduced the car sharing service in US, is not a market where are high barriers to entry. Zip car as the leader of the market they have a medium power which is more based in technology and brand equity than other reasons. Car sharing is a business model were is more effective working among other organization to avoid high cost like parking, permits, license, advertising. It is estimated that it can cost $1 million to open a new market in the US. As any other business, there are infrastructure costs to cover. “The operator needs to purchase vehicles, obtain insurance, set up a reservation system, hire staff, market to prospective members and find parking near them. It then takes time to build the business and break even. All of these steps require risk-taking (7)”. Big car rental Hertz and Enterprise entering the industry demonstrate that barriers are medium power and depend on the financial condition of companies that wants to enter.
SUPPLIER POWER
As car sharing is a service where they offer car rentals for an hourly/day base, there is no a supplier power in the industry. The suppliers are the car manufactures and the car sharing industry does not have control over them. Either way, there are strategic alliances that may occur with suppliers. “Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F) and Zipcar, Inc. (Nasdaq: ZIP) -- the world’s leading car-sharing network -- today announced a new strategic alliance establishing Ford as Zipcar’s largest university vehicle partner, reaching students at more than 250 U.S. campuses (8)”. The two years alliance established Ford as the largest automobile sources for Zip car’s university programs.

BUYER POWER
Same as supplier power, there is a low buyer power because as Customers are the buyers, buyers are fragmented; there is not buyer that has influence for changing price or product.
CONCLUSION
To conclude, car sharing business can be introduced as another transportation option for consumers mind. They target market individuals that live in urban areas and want to avoid the cost of owning a car due to the high expenses of owning a car. It is a alternative society should use in order to help community to avoid the excessive use of cars. In addition, Government is also encouraging the use of electric cars. “A $15M grant funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act through the Transportation Electrification Initiative administered by the Department of Energy Charge Point America will provide 4,600 public and home Charge Point Networked Charging Stations by October 2011, adding to the existing Charge Point Network. Coulomb will work together with its distribution and industry partners to evaluate the demand from the respective geographic regions and allocate charging stations based on this and other factors. (9)”. With the support of the government, it is a great advantage for the future.

REFERENCE * (1) Fehrenbacher, Katie. “The economics of car sharing still unclear to rental car giant”. Gigaom. May, 1, 2011. http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-economics-of-car-sharing-still-unclear-to-rental-car-giant. * (2)“Zipcar time to step on breaks?”. Stone street advisor. http://blog.stonestreetadvisors.com/2011/04/19/zipcar-time-to-step-on-the-brakes/ * (3)About WeCar. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2011, from WeCar: http://www.wecar.com/content/car-sharing/en_US/about_wecar/benefits_business.html * (4)Zipcar media kit. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2011, from Zipcar Inc: http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23 * (5)Hertz on Demand How it works. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19,2011, from Hertz on Demand: http://www.hertzondemand.com/NewYork/About/Index * (6)WeCar Members responsabilites. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2011, from WeCar: http://www.wecar.com/pdf/weCarHandbook_2.pdf * (7) http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_108.pdf * (8) Dearborn, Mich. and Cambridge, Mass. “Ford, Zipcar Bring Future of Transportation to Newest Generation of Drivers at U.S. Universities”. Prnewswire. Aug 31, 2011. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ford-zipcar-bring-future-of-transportation-to-newest-generation-of-drivers-at-us-universities-128723403.html * (9) http://www.chargepointamerica.com/)

| External Factor Evaluation Matrix (EFE) CAR SHARING INDUSTRY | | KEY EXTERNAL FACTORS | WEIGHT | RATING | WEIGHTED SCORE | Opportunities | | 1. Consumers trends in green brands | .20 | 3 | .60 | 2. Government support for the adoption of electric cars | .20 | 2 | .40 | 3. Building Partnership | .16 | 3 | .48 | | Threats | | 1. Battery electric vehicles | .16 | 1 | .16 | 2. Insurance and claims | .10 | 2 | .20 | 3. Press considering car sharing not profitable. | .11 | 1 | .11 | 4. Lack of data | .07 | 2 | .14 | TOTAL | 1.00 | | 2.09 | |

OPPORTUNITIES
CONSUMERS TRENDS IN GREEN BRANDS
On the results of the 2011 green brands survey (one of the largest consumers’ surveys of green brands and environmental responsibilities), which survey over 9,000 people in 8 countries, stated that “this year's study reveals that consumer interest in green products has expanded across categories. Consumers worldwide intend to purchase more environmental products in the auto, energy and technology sectors compared to last year (http://www.cohnwolfe.com/en/ideas-insights/white-papers/green-brands-survey-2011)”. India was the only country that said air pollution is the most important green issue. In order to help the environment, 28% of consumers said that they will buy green auto products in the next year. This is a great international candidate to introduce the car sharing model due to their economic growth in the past years. In the US market for green products, technology and automotive will tend to grow in the future. This trend in society is a great opportunity for Zip car and the car sharing market to increase their customers and brand awareness. With the support of society in concern of environmental issues, people will start to use car sharing service in order to help decrease all the pollution created by cars and avoid the massive use of gasoline for cars. Also, as consumers tend to buy more products in energy, is a great chance to encourage the use of electric cars were it have been already introduced in the car sharing industry.
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR THE ADOPTION OF ELECTRIC CARS “Richard Lowenthal, Coulomb Technologies' CEO: “The Obama Administration has set significant and considerable goals for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles in the coming years. This grant will bring thousands of networked charging stations to nine US regions that are slated to receive the first electric vehicles from our automobile partners. These charging stations will build upon our already growing and established network of infrastructure and will accelerate the deployment of public and private charging infrastructure which will in turn encourage consumers to buy electric vehicles.”(http://chargepointamerica.com/press-quotes.php). Car sharing mission is to support environmental issues and by the introduction of electric cars, it will reduce the pollution created by the massive use of cars. With the support of the government to adopt the use of electric cars, this will increase individuals to use this type of vehicle that most of the car sharing companies’ offers. Using electric cars will reduce the use of oil and the world would not be to dependant of petroleum. Car sharing is promoting electric cars to encourage individuals to become environmentally concern with the alternative of using their service and become a car-free. This is a great opportunity for Zip car to build relationship with the government to promote the use of Zip car to help the community and the environment.
BUILDING PARTNERSHIP Building a partnership is an important factor to consider for any car sharing firm. Many car sharing companies work close to public sectors to help environmental groups, transit ridership, neighborhood communities that will help promoting car sharing service. Car sharing is a business that works better with a participation of partners. Is an opportunity for Zip car and other car sharing firms because working together with other organization can reduce cost significantly for promoting car sharing service and to avoid other cost. Also another potential partner is working together with business members. “While many of these partner organizations will be small, others can provide a major boost to a car-sharing organization’s membership. The cities of Philadelphia and Berkeley, for example, are providing employees with access to car-sharing as a cost-effective alternative to expensive city fleets (http://www.citycarshare.org/download/CCS_BCCtYC_Long.pdf)”. Key partners to consider for car sharing are: * Cities, counties or countries: they can provide with funding, support with other partnership and other organization, publicity, encourage community the importance of environmental care. Help securing parking. * Parking: the can provide parking to car sharing companies’ member ideally free or at least discounted. * Transit Agencies: the use of car sharing involves for some members the use of trains, subways, and busses to get to their homes after check out of the vehicles. Working as partners will help each other. They can provide advertising space in their stations, websites, busses or trains. Parking at transit stations ideally free or discounted. * Social services providers: they can provide subsidizing or free car sharing to their clients. * Universities or Colleges: Free parking space or discounted, promote at school to students and faculty members, advertising inside school. * Community groups: They can provide political support.
THREATS
BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES
One of the threats in the car sharing industry relating with electric cars is the duration of the battery. “Most electric vehicles need up to four hours to be fully recharged between users – time that the vehicles will be out of service and unable to generate revenue. Coupled with the fact that they are often less desirable to members, this has a major impact on their utilization rate and thus potential to generate revenue. Advanced technology projects that integrate battery state of charge information with the vehicle reservation system can help to minimize downtime for charging, but do not avoid it entirely. (http://www.citycarshare.org/download/CCS_BCCtYC_Long.pdf)”. One of the missions of this industry is to support the environment and as the use of electric vehicles are not technically build for long trips, it is still a short distance use and that could affect the numbers of members and the demand of electric cars.
INSURANCE AND CLAIMS Car sharing industry provides in their service gas and insurance fee included in their rates. Members are not charge for extras fees do to insurance security for the cars. Creating a system that need members to be more careful on the use of the vehicles is a factor that companies could not control and insurance claims will occur and the Car sharing firms are the ones that have to deal with that entire problem. “Being willing to closely track even small accidents, and setting up serious consequences (including expelling members) for violations, will help keep anonymous accidents to a minimum. After a certain number of claims, insurance companies may simply stop covering an organization. This is one of the most serious threats to car-sharing’s success. (http://www.citycarshare.org/download/CCS_BCCtYC_Long.pdf)”. In this service, members have cannot leave their stuff in the vehicles and they have to deliver the car clean just as any other rental car but as different that it is use for an hourly term and making members use to another habit of living is hard. Members have to work together with the company to avoid any concern.
PRESS CONSIDERING CAR SHARING NOT PROFITABLE Car sharing is an industry where is still unclear how successful it can be. “Enterprise Holding Chief Strategy Officer and EVP Greg Stubblefield told in an interview that car sharing is in the early, early stages, and it’s still unclear if it will become more than a niche market. (http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-economics-of-car-sharing-still-unclear-to-rental-car-giant/)”. It is too early to compare it with the car rental service; In fact, it is an alternative for individuals who want to avoid owning a car. Zip car, leader of the market has been attacked by the press. “Zipcar generated revenue of $186.10 million, with a net loss of $14.12 million. As of December 31, 2010, they had an accumulated deficit of $65.4 million, and in the company’s risk factors in its S1, it says, “We expect to incur a net loss in 2011. We do not know if our business operations will become profitable or if we will continue to incur net losses in 2012 and beyond (http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-economics-of-car-sharing-still-unclear-to-rental-car-giant/)”. In the car sharing industry is an advantage to works as partners with other organization to avoid some cost and with a bad review of your company; this can reduce chance of partnership. The idea of car sharing is not making profit, it is helping the environment.
LACK OF DATA As car sharing is relatively new business model, potential partners doubt about the potential of this service due to the lack of information available about car sharing. Gaining credibility by showing the car sharing business model and the impact it can have in the market is not enough for agencies. Agencies need prove of how profitable this service can be either for investing at the company financially or through giving resources such as advertising and parking. In order to have a better understanding of the potential of this service is important to develop a performance and a cost data by the agencies. Current partners said “It’s one of those ‘good to have’ things that does make a difference, but is difficult to quantify” This show the lack of involvement of the partners to develop a better measurement of the effect of car sharing. Many agencies that want to change to car sharing do not have good data to compare their fleet vehicles to car sharing cost. “The City of Berkeley started its fleet program by identifying underused department vehicles. Because data was manually collected by departments and assumptions had to be made about costs and utilization, it took a year to determine the first 15 vehicles that would be replaced by car-sharing (http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_108.pdf)”. This is a threat for Zip car and the car sharing industry because the lack of information could delay future partnerships, investors, and members who want to change to this service but do not have the exact measurement to compare it with their actual service.
REFFERENCE
* Fehrenbacher, Katie. “The economics of car sharing still unclear to rental car giant”. Gigaom. May, 1, 2011. http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-economics-of-car-sharing-still-unclear-to-rental-car-giant. * Mission driven. (n.d.). Retrieved November 2, 2011, from Citycarshare: http://www.citycarshare.org/download/CCS_BCCtYC_Long.pdf * Press-Quotes. (n.d.) Retrieved November 2, 2011, from Charge Point America: http://chargepointamerica.com/press-quotes.php * The 2011 Green Brands survey. (n.d.) Retrieved December 14,2011, from Cohn& wolf: http://www.cohnwolfe.com/en/ideas-insights/white-papers/green-brands-survey-2011 * http://galenet.galegroup.com.ezproxy.library.berkeley.org/servlet/BCRC?vrsn=unknown&locID=nysl_me_berk&srchtp=glbc&cc=3&c=11&mode=c&ste=72&tbst=tsCM&tab=2&ccmp=Zipcar+Inc.&mst=ZIP&n=25&docNum=A269973540&bConts=13119.)

| Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix (IFE) ZIPCAR | | KEY INTERNAL FACTORS | WEIGHT | RATING | WEIGHTED SCORE | Strengths | | 1. Position in the market | .15 | 3 | .45 | 2. Innovative Technology | .15 | 4 | .60 | 3.International recognition | .10 | 2 | .20 | 4. Innovative Partnership | .10 | 3 | .30 | | Weaknesses | | 1.Managing international issues | .10 | 2 | .20 | 2. Dependency on third parties | .15 | 2 | .30 | 3. High debts amounts in ratios | .20 | 1 | .20 | 4. Lack of person interaction | .05 | 2 | .10 | TOTAL | 1.00 | | 2.35 | |

STRENGHTS
POSITION IN THE MARKET Zip car has the competitive advantage against their competitors for being the innovators of this service. They are the leaders of the market with 186.1 million in revenues and with more than 45% of the share. Their brand recognition has created Zip car the first word that pops out to consumers about car sharing companies. With more than 605,000 members, “The Company operates a fleet of over 9,000 vehicles in 15 major metropolitan areas and on more than 230 college campuses in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom (http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23)”. For this factor the weight is 0.15 because they are the leaders of the market and the rate of 3 due to the brand recognition in consumers’ mind that they have created.
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY In 2005, Zip car was in the top two companies for customer service in internet innovation by the BusinessWeek. Their service model is the attraction for their consumers due to the rapidly way to book for a car. Cars can be reserved in a minute or with a year of advance online, by phone, and by mobile apps for Androids or iPhones. “Zip car members have automated access to Zip cars using a keyless entry card (called a “Zip card”) to simply unlock the door and drive away. Zip sters choose the make, model, type and even the color of the Zip car they want depending on their specific needs and desires for each trip and the available Zip cars in their neighborhood (http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23)”. Zip car is always trying to get easier ways for members to use their service and they have gone beyond other car sharing company. They have introduced their service on Facebook, where members can reserve vehicles too. Social network is a 24/7 service use for most of our society today and a great way to interact with consumers for any firm. For this factor the weight is 0.15 because of the importance of technology on their business and a rate of 4 due to their superior service on the web.
INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION Zip car operates the world leading car sharing service. In order to growth, companies have to enter new market and that has not been the exception for Zip car. They operate in 15 major cities and more than 230 colleges in USA, Canada, and Europe. “In December 2009, Zipcar acquired a minority interest in Catalunya Carsharing S.A., a Spanish limited liability company, known as Avancar, based in Barcelona, with the option to extend its ownership stake to a majority interest through the end of 2011. In April 2010, the company acquired Streetcar Limited, the largest car sharing service in the United Kingdom (http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23)”. We can see that Zip car is reaching new markets focusing on urban cities around the world and that has made Zip car a strong brand globally. For this factor the weight is 0.10 because they have work hard to enter new international market and the rate is 2 because as it is a niche market, it is recognized only in urban cities worldwide.
INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIP Car sharing is a business that works better with other organization in order to avoid expenses. This business model has been the succeed strategy for making the firm gain revenues. Zip car work together with Business and Universities where both of them gets something to win. In some states they have reduce the minimum age for using their service to 18 years old for college programs. Working with universities and businesses will lead to word mouth marketing that can benefit the recognition of the brand. “Zipcar now provides a self-service, on-demand car sharing program at Stanford University. To use it, simply register as a member, reserve a car online or by phone, use your Zipcard to enter the car, and drive away (http://transportation.stanford.edu/alt_transportation/zipcar.shtml)”. At this program they provide students and faculty members an affordable price for their use. For this factor the weight is 0.10 because they are trying to work together with other organization and the rate is 3 due to the company succeed in doing it.
WEAKNESSES
MANAGING INTERNATIONAL ISSUES The effort of expanding to other international market can cause a lot of risks that could affect the financial condition of Zip car. The need to invest significantly amounts on a market where car sharing would be something new is a big risk. Zip car financial condition is not the best at the moment to make a huge risk to invest in other markets. Some difficulties that can occur are the length of time in acquiring massive members; convenient parking lots; the adaptation of the service to their native language, currency, and financial regulations; transits and insurance regulations; staffing new operations; and most important adapting to the culture where in some cases firms have to change their entire business model to succeed in foreign markets. For this factor the weight is 0.10 because is important to consider this risk before entering a new market. Rate is 2 because their work is average because they haven’t yet accomplished their goals in the foreign markets.
DEPENDENCY ON THIRD PARTIES Zip car succeed has been due to the team work among other organization and has lead it to have revenues. This model creates a high dependency on third parties where zip car has not the entire control of the entire service. For example, third parties are the ones that provide gas credit cars on the vehicles to the members. A third party controls most of the member support calls and general maintenance of the vehicles. If the other organization does not provide the service Zip car expect, it could damage the reputation of the company. Also, they rely on technology the entire service. Customer service, reservations of vehicles and maintenance are made by the web, apps, or by phone. If there is a technical difficulty, computer viruses, low speed internet access, or a use of fraudulent credit cards can affect the business operation. For this factor the weight is 0.15 because they rely to other organizations their service and could harm the organization. Range is 2 because it seems they are controlling this factor as they should.
HIGH DEBT AMOUNT IN RATIOS Car sharing is a market where is not proved profitable yet. Zip car has been the leader of the market but since the creation of the firm, it has experienced net losses. “As of December 31, 2010, we had an accumulated deficit of $65.4 million. We expect to incur a net loss in 2011. We do not know if our business operations will become profitable or if we will continue to incur net losses in 2012 and beyond. We expect to incur significant future expenses as we develop and expand our business, which will make it harder for us to achieve and maintain future profitability (http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ABEA-48TM4M/1511660047x0xS1193125-11-97522/1131457/filing.pdf)”. Zip car market is still considering a niche where you can’t compare it with other rental car service. Most of their profit margins ratios are less in compared with the industry. Their growth profit margin is 44.10 (Industry 46.6), net profit margin is -0.06 (Industry 0.07), return on investment -4.00 (Industry 9.5), and a Net income -23,236.00 (Industry 8,044.00). The main reason of the debt in the ratios is because the acquisitions of other competitors like Flexcar, Inc, Streetcar Limited, and Catalunya Cars sharing S.A. For this factor the weight is 0.20 because I consider is the biggest issue they are dealing now. The rate is 1 because they haven’t come with a solution to solve their financial problems.

LACK OF PERSON INTERACTION As they rely on technology their service, there is a lack of person interaction that for new members could become an issue. It is important sometimes to have a person interaction in order to understand the whole concept of the service. Zip car concept is on self-service, where members have to practically do everything by their own. I believe for early adopters, they should encourage a person interaction for better understanding of their business model. The rate is 0.05 because I consider is the factor with the least of importance. The rate is 2 because, they have control it and is not yet a big issue, where it can be a greater issue on future foreign markets where car sharing is not common.
REFERENCE
* “Zipcar time to step on breaks?” . Stone street advisor. http://blog.stonestreetadvisors.com/2011/04/19/zipcar-time-to-step-on-the-brakes/ * Zipcar media kit. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2011, from Zipcar Inc: http://zipcar.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=23 * Alternative transportation. (n.d.). Retrieved November 16, 2011, from Stanford University Parking and Transportation services: http://transportation.stanford.edu/alt_transportation/zipcar.shtml) * http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ABEA-48TM4M/1511660047x0xS1193125-11-97522/1131457/filing.pdf) * Zipcar Inc. Ratios. (n.d.). Retieved November 16, 2011, from The Motley fool: http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/ZIP/Ratios.aspx?source=icasittab0000007

TOWS MATRIX

| Strengths – S | Weaknesses - W | | 1. Position in the market 2. Innovative Technology 3. International recognition 4. Innovative Partnership | 1. Managing international issues 2. Dependency on third parties 3. High debts amounts in ratios 4. Lack of person interaction | Opportunities – O | SO Strategies | WO Strategies | 1. Consumer trends in green brands 2. Government support for the adoption of electric cars 3. Building Partnership | 1. Government got Zip (O2, O1,S1, S4) 2. Zipsters to Wal-Mart (O3,S4,S1) 3. Introduce Zip Car to India market (O1, S1, S3) | 1. Aim for subsidiary agreement to reduce cost(O1, O2,W3) | Threats – T | ST – Strategies | WT – Strategies | 1. Battery electric vehicles 2. Insurance and claims 3. Press considering car sharing not profitable 4. Lack of data | 1. Alliance with public sectors, insurance companies to avoid claims and insurances fees. (T2, S4,S1) | 1. Selling a part of the company to a big car rental firm to avoid debt(T3, W3, W1) |

SO STRATEGIES 1. GOVERNMENT GOT ZIP (O2,O1, S1, S4) Zip car needs to use its strengths to take advantage of the opportunity. The good reputation of the firm, its service network, and the effective on its industry gives them the competitive advantage against any other car sharing company. As innovators of the service in the US, and the ability to develop strategic alliances that has become successful agreements, Government should be the next target of their new partnership. Obama’s administration declared that they will support the adoption of electric vehicles in the next years with the grant of thousands of networked charging stations in different regions around US. Also, based on the survey 2011 green brands survey, it stated that for the next years, consumers will focus their purchases on green automobiles, and energy products. With the support of the government and the application of a market penetration to create an intensive marketing campaign, it will create a competitive advantage against other main competitors like Enterprise and Hertz. In the long term working together with the government to promote the important of helping the environment, it could lead to agreements to get parking for Zip car for free or discounted prices around main cities and to subsidize some cost for the car sharing business in order to create a new lifestyle in America to stop the massive use of oil. 2. ZIPSTERS TO WALLMART (O3,S4,S1)

Wal-Mart is the biggest wholesaler in the world and the top company of the 500 fortune companies. The opportunity of building partnership among with the strengths of the position of Zip car in the market and the innovator partnership, another big target alliance is Wal-Mart. As the target market of Zip car are in urban cities like New York, Wal-Mart location are far from Manhattan due to regulation against the introduction of Wal-Mart in the city of New York. There is no urban transportation that can take you there. This is a great opportunity to advertise a weekend for shopping at Wal-Mart. Create an agreement that both parties can gain something from it. The idea is to get parking lots and advertising on the Wal-Mart parking space for Zip car member and develop a one way trip to reduce cost for members. Zip car can provide discounts for Wal-Mart employees to become members and also to promote the eco-friendly campaign to reduce the use of car ownership. For this strategy I will recommend the use of product development which is modifying the existing service to increase sales. This is a great opportunity for Zip car to market a grocery day and give better rates to encourage members to shop at Wal-Mart. 3. INTRODUCE ZIP CAR TO INDIAN MARKET (O1, S1, S3)

Zip car have strong brand recognition globally. They operate in US, Canada, and Europe but in my opinion, there are markets where is a great opportunity to enter. They have the competitive advantage against other car sharing companies because they the most market share in the industry. On 2011 green brands survey, they stated that India was the only country that said air pollution is the most important green issue. For the next year, 28% of consumers said that they will buy green auto products. India is expected to be one of the potential countries is the next years due to their economic development. The founder of Car sharing Portland said “The transportation system in India was already at capacity- trains were long and very crowded; buses were packed for 12 hours a day; roads were narrow, bumpy and travel was slow. And we could see that even relative prosperity was resulting in rapid expansion in the number private cars (http://carsharingus.blogspot.com/2009/06/carsharing-in-india.html)”. This is a great market sector Zip car can target in the future. Only Mumbai, one of the main cities of India, has a population of 20, 748, 395 million habitants, were habitants are concerned on environmental issue. For this strategy, I recommend the use of a market development that is the common strategy firms use to introduce their existing products to new geographic areas.

WO STRATEGIES

1. AIM FOR SUBSIDIARY AGREEMENT TO REDUCE COSTS(O1, O2,W3)
Car sharing business model has not yet proved how profitable it can be, Zip car as the leader of the industry had losses since the introduction to the market. It is a business models were they prioritize environmental issues other than profit. They have dedicated their service to help the community and to encourage individuals to avoid the car ownership to reduce cost and help the Mother Nature. Based on the response of the 2011 green brand surveys, consumers have understand the importance in using green products and services. Also, Government has declared to support the use of electric cars to decrease the use of oil. Zip car, as leader of the market, should discuss a subsidiary agreement with the government to encourage the use of car sharing. This is a niche business model that has a high dependency on third parties and costs are very high, having a net profit in a short term is impossible. The strategy that I recommend is market penetration in order to develop a massive advertising campaign for government understand the importance of the use of car sharing business model to decrease pollution.

ST STRATEGIES 1. ALIIANCE WITH PUBLIC SECTORS, INSURANCE COMPANIES TO AVOID CLAIMS AND INSURANCE FEES( T2,S1,S4)
Zip car should alliance with insurance companies to reduce the risk of fees that involve in this service. Zip car has to pay insurance more in the universities programs because they lower the age for driving to 18 years old to attract college students. Working among with a Insurance company where they can agreed in both parties to get something in favor each one, this will lead to avoid insurance cost. Zip car can give their insurance employees transportation and encourage them to join their service which could include discounts. For this strategy I recommend the use of market penetration in order to advertise future alliances.
WT STRATEGIES 1. SELLING A PART OF THE COMPANY TO A BIG CAR RENTAL FIRM TO AVOID DEBTS(T3, T4,W3, W1)
In order to avoid the managing international issues, costs, investments, loans, lack of data about car sharing, and the high debt Zip car had accumulated that even the top executives of Zip car does not know if they will continue next year, a solution to stop all the press considering car sharing not profitable, is with the use of divestiture to sell a part of the company to focus on the firm’s strengths or core strength. A big rental firm like Budget will want to enter to a market where other car rental companies already did.
REFERENCE
http://carsharingus.blogspot.com/2009/06/carsharing-in-india.html

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Zipcar

...MAY 9, 2005 MYRA HART MICHAEL J. ROBERTS JULIA D. STEVENS Zipcar: Refining the Business Model It was October 14, 2000, and Robin Chase was leaving yet another meeting with potential providers of capital for her fledgling venture, Zipcar. Chase was CEO and cofounder of the company, which she and Antje Danielson had started some 10 months before. The idea behind Zipcar—a sophisticated form of car sharing—was simple, yet potentially revolutionary. Chase and Danielson had conducted some initial research during late 1999, and by the end of that year, the two had developed a business plan. They had incorporated in January 2000 and raised their first $50,000 from one angel investor. By June of 2000, the two entrepreneurs had leased 12 cars and were ready to open for business in Boston. By October, the fledgling company had 19 vehicles, nearly 250 members, and the founders had raised—and spent—an additional $325,000 to fund the early stages of operations. Yet, even with this demonstration of viability, Chase and Danielson had not succeeded in raising the equity capital they needed to really grow Zipcar. Beginning in early 2000, Chase had made a series of presentations to potential investors in which she sought $1 million in capital to prove the business model in Boston and, eventually, to set the stage for expanding the business to other U.S. cities. Potential investors seemed intrigued and enthusiastic about the Zipcar idea. While Chase hoped to close on this first round of financing...

Words: 9325 - Pages: 38

Free Essay

Zipcar

...Zipcar is an innovative rental car service company –their innovation must exploit hourly car-renter-needs with unique some IT activities such as RFID, GPS, Apps, and Wireless technology. Zipcar’s strategy with its unique IT activities, including Zipstars or Ziptrips that are social networking technologies, must create more customer values and its creation should be sustainable Zipcar's growth. Also, details are following answers of Discussion Questions; 1. Threat of new entrants –are hard to replicate those unique IT activities because they already have been obtained repositories about personal experiences. Bargaining power of buyers –are reduced because of including the cost of gas, insurance, and reserved parking spots. Bargaining power of suppliers –are mainly structured leased cars, fuel, insurance, maintenance, and parking that are reduced their volume customer or wealth of customer’s information. Threat of substitute products –could not easily follow their activities because of, continuously, improving their services level with customer needs such Zipsters. Industrial competitors –Zipcar has clearly difference between their original hourly rental car service and traditional daily rental car service. 2. Their business strategy, hourly rental car service, has been sustained sophisticating IT, for instance, RFID key system probably decrease a waste of time when standing in line or filling out papers to rent a car –hourly renters must emphasize those time naturally...

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Zipcar

...1 Hi guys, I’m gonna take it from here and I’ll talk to you about the market size & dynamics, the revenue model, and the reasons why we choose zip car. So first off, I will talk about the market size. Zip car is very huge, they are in 175 counties all over the world, they are in the united states, Europe, latin America, Canada, and I believe they are looking for expanding in Australia The picture that you see on the right is a picture of a zip car wondering the streets of London 2 Zipcars target market is mainly us Young adults College students Who don’t own a car They offer a wide rage of cars, from bmws to Volvos so you can pick whatever you want whether it was the low end commercial use or the high end leisure use They are also targeting environmentally conscious people as they have added a line of electric cars called plug-ins where they run on electricity, one single charge can take you for 30 – 40 miles 3 This slide shows results for a survey that was conducted by market trends LLC and it shows some of the challenges that zip car face, The first one is that 80% of the people that have heard about zip car never tried or used it Moreover, 64% of the people feel that the price is an important factor and that they currently cannot afford zip car prices Lastly, 77% reported that they would use more of zip car if they added more car drop off locations 4 This is their revenue model and how they make profit They make profit by renting the cars...

Words: 592 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Zipcar

...zi9-605-054 REV: JUNE 30, 2005 FRANCES X. FREI Zipcar: Influencing Customer Behavior Anita Karr frantically gathered everything she needed for her road trip: water, her favorite “mix” CD from Javier (the ex-boyfriend), ear plugs. After years as a struggling musician her sister was making her debut as the new drummer for No Bags to Check, a performance art/hard rock band that was gaining momentum on the East Coast college circuit. The venue for this breakthrough in her sister’s career was Lupo’s in Providence, Rhode Island and Karr had to be there. Living in Cambridge a car hadn’t been necessary; most of the places she needed to visit on a daily basis were within walking distance of Karr’s Valentine Street apartment. To visit her sister across the river, grocery shop, and run errands Karr relied on Zipcar, which she had signed up for a year ago rather than continue to pay for parking, car insurance, and gas. For tonight’s trip she had reserved weeks ago, using Zipcar’s convenient online reservation system, a VW Jetta Jericho. It was 3:30 pm. Karr was scheduled to pick up the Jetta at 4:00 pm, her sister by 4:30 pm, and arrive at Lupo’s by 6:00 pm. Both she and her sister had figured that this was more than enough time to get to Boston from Cambridge, load the drums, and make Providence by the appointed hour. Karr made one final sweep of her belongings—she couldn’t find Javier’s Best of Bob Dylan CD, which she had conveniently forgotten to return—then gathered her bags and...

Words: 2041 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Zipcar

...Zipcar: Influencing customer behavior Zipcar provides its members, who it has dubbed “ Zipsters”, the freedom of on demand access to a fleet of cars at any hour of the day or night. The fleet of vehicles is parked conveniently in the Zipsters’ neighborhoods or any Zipcar locations without the costs or hassles of car ownership. There is an estimated 10 million driving age residents, commuters and university community members near these locations so Zipcar provides convenient access to all of them. The freedom associated with owning a car is available to Zipsters as well as they are able to choose where, when and for how long they want to drive. Thanks to car sharing vehicle miles traveled are reduced as well as CO2 emissions. Zipcar is able to provide a low cost by cutting costs on infrastructure and employees. Since the cars are parked in parking lots or otherwise on the street and Zipsters unlock it with their card, no employees are needed to man the lots. The cost saving that comes from comparing the ownership of a car or renting from a traditional rental company is also achieved from the fact that Zipcar takes care of maintenance, insurance, parking and gas for its members. The service is mainly offered online, mobile phones and the Zipcar app (today). Zipcar offers high flexibility and convenience and less people interaction. There is no need to deal with any unhappy employees when filling out paperwork and picking up the car. As a result of this customers ar involved in...

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Zipcar

...Assignment ZipCar Evaluate this potential venture and the progress that Chase has made. For the purpose of evaluating the Zipcar business venture I made use of the format of the Salhman article named “How to write a great business plan.” Hereby, a business framework should systematically assess four independent factors critically to every venture namely; The People, The Opportunity, The Context and an overview of possible risk and the reward for coping with these risks effectively. After shortly explaining the factors I will apply this framework to the Zipcar Case and analyze the quality of its business model. This makes it possible to evaluate the potential of the venture; and its progress from scratch to start, from an investor’s perspective. The people The success of a product or service is dependent on the people developing them. “The people” refers to both the entrepreneurs developing the business as all other actors who have been actively involved in providing key resources or important services. The analysis The easiest way to analyze the people behind the business is by usage of the ‘Fourteen personal questions every business plan should answer’. Hereby, I looked at the completeness in providing the right information and the quality of the information that is provided in the Zipcar case. At first, both developers of the concept; Danielson & Chase were highly experienced and qualified within their field of interest. Danielson; having an educational background...

Words: 3429 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Zipcar

...Zipcar Upon receiving first round financing of $1.3 million, Zipcar is, as CEO Robin Chase describes, “poised for action”. The measures that the company intends to take moving forward will likely determine its future viability as the dominant player in the relatively untapped market of car sharing in North America. Currently, Chase is testing the concept in the single market of Boston, and has ambitious goals to break into other markets along the East and Mid-coast by the end of next year. Having received preliminary positive customer responses, Zipcar has potential to establish a secure market foothold and revenue traction; however, the start-up company is not without problems, namely the short lead time on their competitive edge, the lack of a strong, committed and experienced management team, and the absence of a focus on building-up assets. These are significant issues to be addressed before any attempts should be made to raise second round funding for expansion capital. THE MARKET FOR CAR SHARING Before discussing Zipcar’s problematic issues, a brief examination of the market in which the company is operating in is important to put the situation in perspective. The concept of organized car sharing originated in Switzerland in 1987, and has since gained popularity in neighboring regions. Consequently, there is an established and functioning market in Europe, but no such market exists in North America. Whether this is an untapped market potential waiting to be exploited...

Words: 1307 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Zipcar

...Zipcar, is an innovative car sharing company, founded by Antje Danielson and Robin Chase. In Cambridge Massachusetts, 2000. The business model consist in an immediate, electronic, car rental reservation, using mobile phones. Users can reserve a car at any time, in over 400 college campuses and over 50 airports. Zipcars are located in different areas of USA, Canada, UK, Spain, Austria, France and Turkey. Users have to join using their credit card and wait for an approval, then reserve the desired vehicle, hybrids, SUVs, pickup trucks, luxury vehicles, minivans, and cargo vans, BMW, or Hybrid; then go to the Zipcar parking spaces, unlock the car with a card (Zipcard), and then drive. The driver has to return the vehicle to the same parking space were the car was initially located ready for the next user. Zipcar has its competitors, RelayRides and GetAround offer a similar service, traditional car rentals are another option for the customer, and Uber is also considered a competitor. The main problem that Zipcar is having, and that is mentioned in the case “Zipcar – Influencing Customer Behavior” is that sometimes drivers are not calculating the time they have to use the car and when cars are reserved for another service after, it causes a lateness problem that affects the Zipcar´s service model. As mentioned above, Zipcar, is located in different cities around the world, with more than 10,000 vehicles, it also offers an innovative mobility service that gives their affiliates...

Words: 1577 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Zipcar

...Case Analysis: Zipcar Business Model: Application in the US of a car sharing service that provides customers (that can not own a car or do not want to own a car) access to an automobile at defined parking spots by daily or hourly billing. SWOT Analysis: Strengths | Weakness | * Business in a niche market (blue ocean) with a viable concept (sharing that allows save money to customers) * Starting at a very suitable location for the strategy (Boston) * Easy of use and environmentally friendly concept (reduce car usage and pollution) * Well developed technology (protected by patent) | * Higher costs and attrition rates than expected for setting up the strategy * Lack of expertise in this industry and in venture capital of the founders (very anxious) * Very improvised launching (technology platform was not ready) * Poor financial attractive delivered to investors (economic model) | Opportunities | Threats | * Potential growth of the market (low penetration in the US) * Attractive alternative than owning a car (potential customers) * Alliance with car makers or car rental * Potential for revenue diversification (enhancements to the car) | * Vulnerable to increases in costs (parking, fuel, insurance, leasing) * Car rentals offer lower and competitive prices. * Problems to locate good parking spaces in some urban areas. * Potential investors require higher than expect returns (expensive financing) | Recommendation: Zipcar founders need...

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Zipcar

...MAY 9, 2005 MYRA HART MICHAEL J. ROBERTS JULIA D. STEVENS Zipcar: Refining the Business Model It was October 14, 2000, and Robin Chase was leaving yet another meeting with potential providers of capital for her fledgling venture, Zipcar. Chase was CEO and cofounder of the company, which she and Antje Danielson had started some 10 months before. The idea behind Zipcar—a sophisticated form of car sharing—was simple, yet potentially revolutionary. Chase and Danielson had conducted some initial research during late 1999, and by the end of that year, the two had developed a business plan. They had incorporated in January 2000 and raised their first $50,000 from one angel investor. By June of 2000, the two entrepreneurs had leased 12 cars and were ready to open for business in Boston. By October, the fledgling company had 19 vehicles, nearly 250 members, and the founders had raised—and spent—an additional $325,000 to fund the early stages of operations. Yet, even with this demonstration of viability, Chase and Danielson had not succeeded in raising the equity capital they needed to really grow Zipcar. Beginning in early 2000, Chase had made a series of presentations to potential investors in which she sought $1 million in capital to prove the business model in Boston and, eventually, to set the stage for expanding the business to other U.S. cities. Potential investors seemed intrigued and enthusiastic about the Zipcar idea. While Chase hoped to close on this first round of financing...

Words: 9105 - Pages: 37

Free Essay

Zipcar

...Zipcar 1. Company: Zipcar has great potential to meet needs of urban consumers. An analysis of the company’s strategy, its potential customer market, and its financing needs shows us that while Chase has been great at researching and identifying a potential multi-million dollar business, her ability to raise funds, manage operations, and grow the business at speeds required to keep the competition at bay is in question. Competition: There are no large competitors for Zipcar with only two other car sharing services in US in the west and one in Canada, though large car manufacturers such as Volkswagen could start to compete directly. With a low subscription price and better execution Zipcar should be able to keep ahead of its competition. 2. Zipcar relied on multiple revenue streams. Users paid for annual subscription, processing fees, tiered pricing for usage and interest income on security deposit which created a hybrid revenue model. Between December 1999 and May 2000, Chase realized that her assumption were too optimistic and began to remodel revenues accordingly. Revenues were now skewed towards usage rather than subscription which would call for better ongoing marketing strategy and put them into direct competition with established car rental companies. On the cost front, Chase had to incorporate new charges under parking and increased leasing cost per car, thereby increasing variable cost per car. In addition there were some surprises on fixed costs. The...

Words: 702 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Zipcar

...Zipcar: Influencing Customer Behavior Zipcar was a car-sharing service. Started in Boston in 1999, up to 2004, the company had expanded to 21 cities and owned more than 400 cars. Members would have to pay annual fees and monthly fees in order to use this service. The car could be rented hourly or daily and is expected to be returned to the appointed location within the schedule time. The company has recently faced a problem that would influence the reservation schedule. The company needs to figure out a way to influence its customer behavior to return the car on time. In a recent incident, Fishman had picked up the Jetta at 1:00pm for his interview and expected to retune it by 3:30pm, but the interview went beyond the designated time and he could not return the car on time. However, the same Jetta was reserved by Karr weeks ago and she supposed to pick up the car at 3:30pm at that day and drive it to Providence by 6:00pm for an important event. By the time she got to the parking lot where the car should be already waiting, she founded that the car was not there, so she called the company hoping that they could track the car and have it delivered as soon as possible. Meanwhile Fishman excused himself from his interview to call Zipcar to extend his reservation. But he hung up before Zipcar could pick up the phone after someone called him back to the interview. If Fishman did not withdraw himself from the interview and return the car any sooner, Karr would have trouble...

Words: 388 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Zipcar

...• 1. Zipcar : Refining the Business ModelByGroup 4 • 2. ConceptCar sharing business initiated in Switzerland in 1987.Organized car sharing was the coordinated use of vehicles by various subscribers in succession and Independently of one another.Member can reserve any car in the network • 3. Concept Best SuitedUrban LocationsLarge number of potential userExpensive ParkingNeed to drive limited distanceCollege-educated individual were the most receptive to the proposition • 4. BenefitsConvenientEasy to useFreedom to travelHassle free ownershipCost savingEnvironmentally friendly – one car eliminates the need of 7.5 individual owned cars • 5. Course of ActionCompany Web SiteTelephone SupportTechnology development - challenge- admit only confirmed driver, capture usage dataPrice Structure – security fees, initiation fees, annual fees, monthly fees, per mile fees, per mile fee and hourly rates • 6. 1st Business Plan$25 - nonrefundable application fee$300 - fully refundable security deposit$300 - annual subscription feeAdditional member - $1.5 per hour, $.40 per mile$20 fine for late returnAssumed annual renewal rate for members – 95%40% utilization of vehicles. Where as European Companies – 50% utilization of vehicles Assumed – avg. member would take 4 trips per month at an avg. of 4 hours and 22 miles per trip • 7. Users were expected toHandle simple maintenance themselvesRefuel and submit receipt for reimbursementKeep the car cleanTake responsibility of any traffic or parking...

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Zipcar Case

...The proposed venture in this case study has great potential in highly populated areas with a need for transportation. Since Zipcar provides the cars in areas close to the customer, this service would be easy to use. The drawback would be finding a way to make the benefit of utilizing Zipcar more compelling over other forms of transportation such as owning a car, using other car rental services, taxis, subways, or buses. The nice component of Zipcar is that it offers hourly services which can attract people who need a car only for a doctor’s appointment or grocery run. Zipcar has been able to progress its venture which is notable since funding and parking have been an issue. Most of the funding was used to start building the wireless technology to serve as the operating system. Unfortunately, the shortcoming in Zipcar’s progression could be because the “ Z-card” reader is not finished. With no asset and few angel investors, Zipcar can seem as a risky investment. Instead of rushing to start operating the business perhaps Chase could have gained investors by guaranteeing that she had a system that functioned. Despite the technological setback, Zipcar was able to obtain 3 cars and rely on members to keep a driving log to track usage. The advantage of Chase and Danielson starting Zipcar early is that since both lacked a degree of expertise, Zipcar would be able to grow by observing customer’s usage patterns and understanding the operational and financial parameters of running...

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Zipcar Case

...Zipcar Case & IT Doesn’t Matter Zipcar Case 1. Analyze the business model of Zipcar using Porter’s five forces model. a. Threat of new entrants: The threat of new entrants is something to be concerned about. The barriers to entry are no different now than when Zipcar first launched with the exception that technology has evolved. The major advantage Zipcar has is it is the first entrant and established in its current markets, but this is not the case in other markets/cities where Zipcar does not currently have a presence. The other advantage Zipcar has is the patent on its wireless technology, but a new competitor might be able to develop technology that could function just as well. In order to keep the threat of new entrants minimal, Zipcar would have expand into other cities and take advantage of its existing infrastructure. b. Supplier power: The biggest equipment costs I can guess for Zipcar would be car purchasing and maintenance and infrastructure cost/maintenance. For cars, there are a few big suppliers that also provide service. The models offered by the various companies that could fill the needs of Zipcar are largely similar. There are a few differences but all of the major car suppliers offer models that have similar fuel effiency, power plant (combustion engine, full electric, or hybrid), etc. While Zipcar might be able to dictate price, the company could shop around for the best price with small cost for switching. c. Threat of substitution:...

Words: 880 - Pages: 4