My favorite character in the movie of Angry Men would be Juror 8. He is my favorite for always having a reasonable argument with screaming or insulting. For example, when they could putting down facts of the court down he would say his opinion and take the insults from them especially juror 3. Juror 8 would also show examples and really use his imagination to show and go deeper into the facts. There are many examples of him doing this, one would be when he reenacts the old man getting to the the
Words: 272 - Pages: 2
Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA 321 Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors represented in the film, 12 Angry Men. All but one were convinced the boy on trial was guilty of first degree murder based on eye witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. Uncomfortably hot and sweaty, one intent on getting to a ball game, eleven of the twelve jurors had no intention to stop and think about the life contingent on their verdict. The entire
Words: 782 - Pages: 4
Film Analysis Due: 2/8/15 The act of “people watching” can be very beneficial in learning how humans act and interact within an environment. You can determine mood, anticipate and manipulate future behavior, and read the subtle signs of feedback a person sub-consciously projects when communicating. The power of non-verbal communication drives a conversation further than the more obvious verbal communication we consciously use every day. I will analyze a specific scene in the movie, 12 Angry Men
Words: 677 - Pages: 3
12 Angry Men PROC 5840, Negotiations, Midterm Case Analysis Table of Contents Table of Contents……………………………………………………….……………………………….…2 Character Listing…………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Major Case Issues…………………………………………………………………………………………..5 Analysis of Juror Number Eight……………………………………………………………………………7 Analysis of Juror Number Four…………………………………………………………………………...13 Analysis of Juror Number Nine…………………………………………………………………………...17 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………………….19
Words: 3945 - Pages: 16
In Reginald Rose’s play Twelve Angry Men, juror four only allows factual evidence influence his views on the case. The play depicts a case where a jury of twelve men has to decide if a boy is guilty or not guilty of killing his father. They are presented with evidence and testimonies and are set aside in a room to interpret the information. If they vote guilty, he will be executed and if they vote not guilty he will be set free. Although all three modes play part in changing the the fourth juror’s
Words: 658 - Pages: 3
Similarly, both On The Waterfront and 12 Angry Men create the opposing majority to agree with the differentiating opinion put upon them. The first response in 12 Angry Men from the jurors is initially ‘guilty’ although this prejudice tone shifts greatly when all jurors are seen to be voting ‘not guilty.’ Similarly Juror 7 is seen to be changing his vote in agreement to Juror 8 by proclaiming that “it takes a great deal of courage to stand alone even if you believe in something very strongly” the
Words: 327 - Pages: 2
Small Group Analysis of ’12 Angry Men’ Interpersonal and Group Dynamics – SOSC 301 Instructor: Mr. Crisp Bryant & Stratton College October 31, 2012 A Small Group Analysis of ’12 Angry Men’ Set in a large U.S. city, in the 1950’s, Twelve men of a jury are sequestered in a room and are unable to leave until a weighty decision is made, one that will either condemn a young man to death or set him free. The twelve strangers are trapped within the confines of the jury room until the goal
Words: 1787 - Pages: 8
While reading Reginald Roses Twelve Angry Men the readers and audience are required to do some thinking and responding. Rose choses to include numerous dramatic climaxs in his drama, which usually foreshawdow events that will soon occur. Therefor, the readers are alwazs engaged and wondering about what will happen next. Throughout the drama many important events occur, however Rose choses not to explain all of them in detail. He also leaves many answers of the readers questions unanswered. At
Words: 294 - Pages: 2
12 Angry Men Separate Paragraphs Juror #3, is a strongly opinionated man who is extremely intolerant of other people's views and opinions, he obstructs the jury system. He is “accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others” through the use of strong words and force (1). While talking to juror #12, juror #3 decides to play tic-tac-toe during the trial and says “Your turn. We might as well pass the time” (13). The utter fact that juror #3 had the audacity to play a game during a life or death
Words: 867 - Pages: 4
6/9/2014 12 Angry Men Case Study 12 Angry Men Case Study Jaime Galván Webster University Author Note This paper was prepared for PROC 5840 (Spring 2, 2012), taught by Professor Alvin Dunn. Jaime Galvan, Webster University E-mail: cirlos@aggienetwork.com TABLE OF CONTENTS * Character Listing * Major Case Issues * Jury Member #8 * Jury Member #4 * Jury Member #3 Character Listing * Martin Balsam (Juror #1): He serves as the foreman of the jury and is fair. He listens to others and tries to guide
Words: 4472 - Pages: 18
