15,625 $40,625 (b) Per box of chemicals $40,625/1,000 = $40.63 (5) These two product costing systems result in such widely differing costs because of the inaccuracy of the traditional single volume based overhead rate. The use of machine hours in the pre-determined rate does not reflect the usage of other activities during production. I would recommend the activity based costing system because of the accuracy of costs for each product, and it results in much better control over
Words: 938 - Pages: 4
activity-based costing analysis was undertaken in one of the company plants. After the study, a breakeven analysis was completed along with target profit projections. It will be in Company’s best interest to change from a traditional costing system to an activity-based costing system. In this summary report you will find evidence as to why this transformation it’s relevant and important since it will emphasize the differences between traditional costing and activity based costing systems. A1. Costing Method
Words: 1404 - Pages: 6
Costing Methods ACC 561 July 15, 2014 Costing Methods Absorption and variable costing are two methods an organization such as Polk Company can employ when accounting for costs and generating income statements. The differences between the two methods are focused on the types of costs absorbed or assigned to the product, specifically fixed and variable overhead expenses as well as when fixed overhead manufacturing costs are allocated. In absorption costing all costs are charged to the product
Words: 488 - Pages: 2
issues with the company’s current cost system, executives at Sippican Corp. have some decisions to make regarding the future of the company’s costing system. Appendix A offers a time-driven activity-based costing system approach to Sippican’s financial woes. Quantitative Summary Calculations (Appendix A) reveal that utilization of an time-based activity costing system provides a more detailed analysis of the amount of time (in minutes) each unit, or employee/machine actually uses versus the amount
Words: 843 - Pages: 4
Lim, the cost accountant for Hi-Power Mower Company, recently installed activity-based costing at Hi-Power’s St. Louis lawn tractor (riding mower) plant where three models—the 8-horsepower Blade Runner, the 12-horsepower Quick Cut, and the 18-horsepower Super Cut—are manufactured. Marcus’s new product costs for these three models show that the company’s traditional costing system had been significantly under costing the 18-horsepower Super Cut. This was due primarily to the lower sales volume of the
Words: 319 - Pages: 2
References Argyris, C. and Kaplan, R. (1994). Implementing new knowledge: the case of activity-based costing. Accounting horizons, 8, pp.83--83. Baird, K., Harrison, G. and Reeve, R. (2007). Success of activity management practices: the influence of organizational and cultural factors. Accounting & Finance, [online] 47(1), pp.47--67. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.mdx.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=24165021&site=ehost-live [Accessed 4 May. 2014]. Charaf, K. and Bescos
Words: 500 - Pages: 2
commercial freight shipping, personal delivery of orders under the Desktop Delivery program, warehouse handling and space, and several product ordering and entry activities. In this paper, the cost drivers were utilized to establish activity-based costing for DOP. Profitability for two current DOP customers was also analyzed for behavior patterns that might lead to or suggest improved pricing. Specific assignment questions were detailed and answered on the topic of relative profitability of the two
Words: 2526 - Pages: 11
absorption are two different costing methods. Practically all successful companies in the world use both the methods. Variable costing and absorption costing cannot be substituted for one another because both the systems have their own benefits and limitations. These costing approaches are known by various names. For example, variable costing is also known as direct costing or marginal costing and absorption costing is also known as full costing or traditional costing (2015). From my understanding
Words: 334 - Pages: 2
3 - Week 3 Quiz Activity-Based Costing Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/acc650-module-3-week-3-quiz-activity-based-costing/ 1. Activity-based costing systems: a. use a single, volume-based cost driver. assign overhead to products based on the products' relative usage of direct labor. often reveal products that were under- or over-costed by traditional costing systems. typically use fewer cost drivers than more traditional costing systems. have a tendency to distort
Words: 1572 - Pages: 7
as they are introduced throughout the course. LEARNING OUTCOMES Students should be able to: 1. Identify the various costs that are part of a business environment and the three elements of product cost 2. Differentiate between the different costing systems 3. Illustrate business transactions using T-account analysis 4. Prepare the statement of cost of goods manufactured and an income statement 5. Calculate the break-even point in units and dollars, and target sales in units and dollars K&J
Words: 2094 - Pages: 9
