DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY Graduate School of Business Master of Business Administration Business Law Case 3 GSIS vs. Court of Appeals Submitted by: Liao, Weiqin Facts of the case • National Food Authority (NFA, formerly National Grains Authority) was the owner of a Chevrolet truck which was insured against liabilities for death of and injuries to third persons with the GSIS. • On May 9, 1979, at about 7:00 in the evening at Tabon-Tabon, Butuan City, the said truck driven by Guillermo
Words: 811 - Pages: 4
Winfred Hatton Visual analysis of “Welcome to College” There are many negative mythsthat have erupted in today’s society about college. The picture, “Welcome to College,” {draw:frame} demonstrates the photographer’s use of many different techniques to oppose these mythsby portraying two female college students in an outdoor setting relaxed and happy. The photographer portrays two ideal college students in order to attract the viewer by showing the relationship between happiness and going to
Words: 779 - Pages: 4
State of Confusion BUS/415 Tamika Nimely Erikka Hise Monday, July 18, 2011 State of Confusion This paper will examine a civil suit which Tonya Trucker is the Plaintiff and the State of confusion is the defendant. The state of confusion has commanded a B-Type truck hitch in favor of all 18 wheelers that drive on the highways in the state of confusion. By this, this will require all truckers and towing trailers to attach the new hitch if they want to drive through the confusion. By this regulation
Words: 1311 - Pages: 6
State of Confusion Federal courts will have jurisdiction in Tanya’s case since the state itself adopted the statute to require all trucks and towing trailers to use the B-type hitches. This clearly unlawfuly interfere and restraint the flow of interstate commerce regulated by the UCC and is unconstitutional because it breaks Federal Antitrust Laws permiting and promoting one company to manufacture the hitch and this way creating a monopoly, act that can be sanctioned by The Federal Trade Commission
Words: 1031 - Pages: 5
be one of the symbols of Lupus. One of the most noticeable bodily changes due to Lupus is a butterfly shaped rash across the bridge of a person’s nose. The author colorfully shows this again by pictures, and notes. I felt the strong emotional appeal that the creator wanted to make with this video. I definitely felt that the “logos” “ethos” and “pathos” were all met, therefore making this Presentation not only easy to watch, but emotionally appealing. That is definitely an attribute that
Words: 822 - Pages: 4
is as follows: the highest court is the Supreme Court, then the Court of Appeals, Superior Court and District Court. The Supreme Court hears mandatory jurisdiction in civil, capital criminal, criminal, administrative agency, juvenile and disciplinary cases, as well as discretionary jurisdiction in civil, criminal, administrative agency, juvenile, advisory opinions for the executive and legislature. The court of Appeals hears mandatory jurisdiction in civil, noncapital criminal, administrative
Words: 344 - Pages: 2
influence. These are rational persuasion, consultation, inspirational appeals, collaboration, apprising, ingratiation, exchange, personal appeals, legitimizing, pressure, and coalition tactics. Rational persuasion includes logical explanations and factual and detailed evidence (Scharlatt 17). Consultation includes being open to ideas from the requested and thoughtful responses from me regarding those ideas (Scharlatt 18). Inspirational appeal includes showing how the request meets that person’s goals and
Words: 727 - Pages: 3
Appeals Process Paper When any defendant is found guilty, of any charge, is entitled to an appeal to at least one level of appellate court (Meyer, J & Grant, D. 2003). An appeal is when a defendant has already been found guilty in court, and they decide to take it to a higher court in order to change the ruling (Meyer, J & Grant, D. 2003). Basically it is a process that takes place, because the defendant and their attorney do not feel that the verdict given was accurate; and that could be due
Words: 830 - Pages: 4
door was shut and the front patio of a home is a part of the home. Therefore making this entire surveillance setup illegal under the 4th Amendment. The court trial judge actually sided with Mr. Jardine and threw out the evidence but an intermediate appeals court said the evidence was admissible and the decision was reversed. The Supreme Court 5-4 Decision The high court decision was that the activity was not constitutional because you cannot obtain evidence
Words: 534 - Pages: 3
(1982) Appellant： Gordon Charles Hancock Appellee： State of Oregon Jurisdiction： Court of Appeals of Oregon Procedural History： Hancock was convicted of possession of a weapon by a person committed to a penal institution and being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm in the Linn County Circuit Court. Hancock appeals the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal to the Court of Appeals of Oregon. The court denied the motion, merged the two convictions, and the conviction on the charge
Words: 345 - Pages: 2
