Cora-Leigh O’Neal BUS 3350 8:00 A.M. Case Brief 1: Raymond James 1. Case Name, Citation, and Court Raymond James v. Leonard & Company 411 F. Supp. 2d 689 (2006) United States Court of Appeals 2. Summary of Key Facts A. A former employee of Raymond James & Associates, Ronald Boerjan, resigned from RJA on December 23, 2005, and began to work for RJA’s competitor, Leonard & Company. Boerjan began to solicit his former clients of RJA, to try to transfer to LC. B
Words: 253 - Pages: 2
In 1965, New York City enacted its Landmarks Preservation Law, which protected historic landmarks and neighborhoods from destruction or alterations to their characters. This Landmarks Law also established the Landmarks Preservation Commission, whose purpose was to identify and designate the city’s landmarks (and districts) as well as regulate changes made to these designated structures. Penn Central Transportation Company owned the Grand Central Terminal, which had been designated as a landmark under
Words: 718 - Pages: 3
Pleadings – are the written statements of the respective claims and the defences of the parties submitted to the court for appropriate judgement. Reply-Plaintiff Kinds of Pleadings 1. Complaint 2. Counterclaim 3. Cross-claim 4. Third, fourth etc.-party complaint 5. Complaint-in-intervention 6. Answer to the pleading 7. Counter-counter claim 8. Counter-cross claim 9. Reply Pleadings includes all papers filed, excluding evidentiary matters, from the complaint
Words: 1363 - Pages: 6
Lim vs People G.R. No. 130038 Sep.18, 2000 The case is an appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming in toto that of the Regional Trial Court, Cebu City. Both courts found petitioner Rosa Lim guilty of twice violating Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 and imposing on her two one-year imprisonment for each of the two violations and ordered her to pay two fines, each amounting to P200,000.00. The trial court also ordered petitioner to return to Maria Antonia Seguan, the jewelry received
Words: 888 - Pages: 4
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA L. Chandra Kumar be revisited by Larger Bench of Supreme Court Report No. 215 December 2008 LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA (REPORT NO. 215) L. Chandra Kumar be revisited by Larger Bench of Supreme Court Presented to Dr H. R. Bhardwaj, Union Minister for Law and Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India by Dr Justice AR. Lakshmanan, Chairman, Law Commission of India, on 17th day of December, 2008. 2 The 18th Law Commission was constituted
Words: 15977 - Pages: 64
that were involved in a miscarriage of justice. These high profile cases included Birmingham Six, The Guilford Four and Judith Ward. The government took these ideas into account and the Criminal Cases Review Commission was set up under the Criminal Appeal Act (1995) and started in January 1997. There are 12 commissioners who are all chosen by the Queen and who are all legally qualified professionals. The commission is chaired by Richard Foster who has been chair man since 2008. Including the 12 commissioners
Words: 397 - Pages: 2
gUyz MG 260 Business Law I Park University Stephen B. Wilke Name of the Case: Young v. Weaver 2020346 Citation: 883 So.2d 234 (Ala, Ct. Civ. App. 2003) Statement of Fact: Kim Young appeals a judgment of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court awarding damages to Philip Weaver (Landlord) for alleged breaches by Kim Young (tenant) of an apartment lease Contract on December 12, 2003. Procedural History: In the fall of 2001, Kim Young is
Words: 1263 - Pages: 6
Part 1 Smith v. Stolberg, 256 Mich. App. 231, 103 N.W. 2d 586 (1998). Facts: Stolberg pushed Smith into a bench during a court appearance. Stolberg claims Smith pushed him into the bench whereas his back hit the bench causing him to launch forward onto the floor. Smith claimed that Stolberg spit and raised his hand at him and he pushed him as self-defense. Smith filed a complaint against Stolberg for assault, battery, and negligence. The plaintiff then filed a first amended complaint for negligence
Words: 654 - Pages: 3
strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the nonmoving party. 2. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points) COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, HAMILTON COUNTY Supreme Court 3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points) The plaintiff’s child was burned by coffee received at a restaurant
Words: 512 - Pages: 3
last evening. P sued D for negligence. Procedural History- Appellant sought review of the U.S. District Court’s Judgment who held them partly liable for the damages caused by the sinking of the barge as well as the cargo. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision and apportioned the damages Issue- Who is held negligent and liable to pay the damages for the loss? Judgment- Appellant was held liable for the damages as the barge was left unattended during the working hours. Judge Learned
Words: 1610 - Pages: 7
