Fitch v. Valentine Supreme Court of Mississippi Facts * Valentine, the plaintiff, and Sandra were married in 1993. The couple had a son together in 1997. During the spring of 1997, Sandra began working for Fitch Realty division of Fitch Oil Company. * According to Fitch, when Sandra worked for Fitch Oil Company, Sandra earned around $400 per week in cash. * Sandra testified that an adulterous affair with Fitch, the defendant, began late 1997 or early 1998. Fitch was aware that Sandra
Words: 717 - Pages: 3
Alesia ClevelandMAR3310-12Week7a.docx 02/26/2015 Professor Tenebaum The litigious climate in which PR professionals work means that any case, civil or criminal, can draw media attention. Normal involvement with law for PR professional falls into three general areas: normal legal exposure rthat may business has, work- oriented exposure (or something peculiar to the client's or organization's business) and extraneous legal exposure(such as testifying as an expertiutries ). What would the legal
Words: 414 - Pages: 2
side before making a decision. If the judge decides all or part of the case against you, you can then appeal the case to a higher court. When you have appealed as far as possible, you can consider appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court. - The beginning process is to file a notice of appeal, rarely does a losing party have an automatic right of appeal. Usually there must be a legal basis for the appeal, an alleged material error in a trial, not just the fact that the losing party did not like the verdict
Words: 683 - Pages: 3
retail value of $300. The plaintiffs had paid $619.88 at the time of trial but still owed $819.81. The trial court found that the agreement was unconscionable and that the payment previously made would replace the contract in full. The seller began the appeal process. Seller argued that the contract on June 15th, 1966 was a financing contract and not a sales contract. The finance agreement stated” Refinance of Freezer”. This agreement requested for refinancing and signed by the seller and purchaser.
Words: 2703 - Pages: 11
students have with private schools, college and universities (education providers) in Australia. If you are not satisfied with a decision or action taken by your private registered education provider, you should ask about their internal complaints and appeals process. If you complain to your provider, but you are not satisfied with the result, you can complain to the Ombudsman. Who can complain to the Overseas Students Ombudsman? Intending, current and former overseas students can contact the Ombudsman
Words: 2404 - Pages: 10
the type of neighborhood in which it is located. (Note: the time of day would be another relevant factor in this case, among others). Procedural History* What court authored the opinion: The United States Supreme Court? The California Court of Appeal? The Ninth Circuit Court
Words: 910 - Pages: 4
Citation(year) | 415 U.S. 189 (1974) | Court/J. | U.S. Supreme Court | Procedural History | District Court held that a jury trial was neither authorized by Title VIII nor required by the Seventh Amendment and denied the jury request. The Court of Appeals reversed on the jury trial issue. The Court concluded essentially that the Seventh Amendment gave respondents the right to a jury trial in this action, and therefore interpreted the statute to authorize jury trial so as to eliminate any question of
Words: 778 - Pages: 4
Unilateral contracts Analysis: The memo gave specific mathematical equations to figure out the bonus pool, so the court gave the decision that the memo was sufficient enough to constitute an offer and agreed with the jury’s decision. Conclusion: The appeal court affirmed the jury's decision and awarded Meadors 2,406,522.60 in the Dillard’s
Words: 277 - Pages: 2
• Brady Goodell appealed the suspension and went to federal court to have the case reviewed • Judge Richard Berman overturned the suspension on Brady because of “significant legal deficiencies” • The NFL has filed appeal in the second circuit court of appeals OPINIONS: What are the viewpoints? View point 1. Mr. Brady should not be penalized because his suspension was built on significant legal deficiencies View point 2. The NFL disagrees with the suspension overturn and wants
Words: 370 - Pages: 2
American Natural Soda Ash Corporation/ Botswana Ash (Pty) Ltd. Case no: 12/CAC/Dec01. This was decided in the Competition Appeal Court of South Africa (‘CAC’) in 2003. The panel members were Jali JA, and Malan AJA, who all concurred with the written judgement of Davis JP. Facts The parties are: American Natural Soda Ash Corporation and CHC Global (Pty) Ltd (‘Ansac’) as the first and second appellant respectively, and, the Competition Commission of South Africa, Botswana Ash (PTY) Limited (‘Botash’)
Words: 1569 - Pages: 7
