Section One: Rule: A civil action is commenced (1) by filing a complaint with the court and serving the summons and complaint within ten days of the court filing date, or (2) by service of a summons and complaint. The summons and complaint must be served by a non-party who is at least eighteen years of age. Elements: • Filing the complaint with the court • Serving the summons • Serving the complaint • Within ten days of the court filing date • Service of a summons and complaint Facts: Nancy is
Words: 433 - Pages: 2
The jurisdiction and venue of the case will have to be determined, since the two parties are located in different states, California and Washington. The cases discussed are from different circuits and may be persuasive depending on the decided jurisdiction of the case. Furthermore, once jurisdiction is decided Chapel may also rely on state dilution statutes. The disputed mark will most probably be eligible for a claim of dilution under 15 U.S.C §1125 as the mark is famous i.e. distinct and well
Words: 463 - Pages: 2
from discrimination. (Brown, 2014) The company did not want to give females promotions, pay decisions, job assignments and did not want to train the females, because the supervisor said that this was not a place or job for females. Wal-Mart now appeals to the Supreme Court, arguing that the class certification does not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a). “Wal-Mart also claims that class certification was improper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b) (2) because
Words: 575 - Pages: 3
MILLERSBURG — Reiterating his skepticism a Big Prairie man was exclusively growing marijuana for his own use and, even so, the need to find a legal avenue to pain relief, a Holmes County judge sentenced the man to local jail time. After attempts to suppress evidence in his case were unsuccessful, Charles M. Bucher Sr., 62, of 13027 Township Road 511, pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to illegal cultivation of marijuana and possession of hashish. In exchange for his April guilty plea
Words: 565 - Pages: 3
As judge, I will award the plaintiff in this case. There are several violations that took place in the case. First, the partner made unlawful comments to the plaintiff as it relates to her disclosing that she has a child. Disclosing such information, was not considered part of the employment process and not contingent to actually being hired for the position. The employer clearly terminated the plaintiff as a result of retaliation. The plaintiff was disadvantaged due to having engaged in protected
Words: 299 - Pages: 2
STS.T.D. Codes Station Abohar Adilabad Adoni Adoor Aduthurai Agra Ahmedabad Ahmedgarh Ahmednagar Ahwa Aizwal Ajmer Akola Alagappanagar Alathur Aligarh Alipurduar Allahabad Alleppey Almora Alwar Alwaye Ambajipet Ambala Ambalamugul Ambalapuzha Ambasamundram Ambernath Ambikapur Ambur Amloh (MSTD) Amreli Amritsar Ammundi Amudalavalasa Anakapalli Anand Anantapur Anantnag Anaparthi Andal Angamaly Angul Anjar Ankleshwar Arakonam Armoor Arni Aroor Arrah Aruppukottai Assolna Attingal Attur Atul Aurangabad
Words: 1656 - Pages: 7
On Tuesday 06/27/17 at 1559 hours I was dispatched to a shoplift from Tommy Hilfiger in the Outlet Collection Mall located at 1101 Outlet Collection DR SW in the City of Auburn, King Co, WA. Dispatch advised an employee from Tommy Hilfiger said they had an 18 year old male in custody for shoplifting. I met with Tommy Hilfiger employees, one of who identified herself as Esther Vallejo. The employees pointed to a male, who verbally identified himself as John Williams, and told me he had shoplifted
Words: 581 - Pages: 3
Facts On the 22nd of February, 1980, the Supreme Court of Illinois filed their opinion in the case number 50745. In this case, Robert E. Woodill et al. – the appellants – had sued Parke Davis & CO. et al. – the appellees – citing a drug that the company had produced as responsible for injuries sustained by Eric Woodill during delivery. For that matter, the plaintiffs were acting on behalf of Eric – a minor – in which case they were seeking restitution for the injuries. In reference to that, the
Words: 1086 - Pages: 5
Catherine Player CJ-515 Model Case Brief Case: Hess v. Indiana, (1973). Facts: The parties in the lawsuit are Gregory Hess v. the state of Indiana. The dispute is an arrest of disorderly conduct and speech and the right to protest. The case made it to the Supreme Court because Mr. Hess appealed his case because he was not satisfied with the verdict. A few important facts in the case are Mr. Hess was protesting
Words: 660 - Pages: 3
IN COURT OF APPEAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN BETWEEN MICHAEL HUCK (Plaintiff) AND THE CORONET THEATER (Defendant) (Issue: Was Michael Huck Discriminated because of his disability?) CLERK: Order in court, The Honourable Mister Justice R.N. Hall presiding. JUDGE: You may be seated. CLERK: The case of the Michael Huck versus The Coronet Theater. JUDGE: Thank you, are all parties present? PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: Yes, I am G.J.D. Taylor, Q.C. , acting on behalf of the Plaintiff, Michael Huck in this matter. DEFENDANT'S
Words: 1232 - Pages: 5
