In “The Hanover Insurance Company v. Urban Outfitters, Inc”, the Navajo Nation had sued Urban Outfitters for infringement of its trademark, with the complaint alleging that the infringement had taken place since 2009. It is noted that Hanover, on the other hand, had offered Urban Outfitters commercial general liability insurance cover from 7th July 2010, a coverage that encompassed advertising and personal injury. This policy, however, excluded liability emanating from written or oral publication
Words: 646 - Pages: 3
A. Case: In the case of Ventura v. Titan Sports Inc. (22 III 65 F3d 725 8th Cir. 1995 ), a pro combatant and commentator agreed to an oral contract that was silent on royalties. Later they also made a second contract were he was mislead fraudulently on the royalties subject. B. Factual Summary: Plaintiff Jesse Ventura (wrestler) entered into an oral contract to wrestle for Titian Sports (Defendant).After Ventura suffered medical problems, a second oral contract was made with Titan Sports to commentate
Words: 316 - Pages: 2
Case Brief Norman Utley, Plaintiffs v. MCI, INC., MCI WorldCom Communications, INC., & MCI Network Services, INC. F/K.A MCI WorldCom Network Services, INC., Defendants. Civil action no. 3:05-CV-0046-K Facts: This is an age discrimination case arising out of MCI's decision to terminate twenty (collectively “Plaintiffs”) former MCI’s Employees. This resulted from a reduction in force ("RIF"), where the companies declining financial condition, compelled a reduction in costs of its operations between
Words: 593 - Pages: 3
Dillon v Legg is an emotional distress claim. The claim is on or about September 27th, 1964: the defendant David Luther Legg was driving his automobile in a southern direction on Bluegrass Road, close to an intersection called Clover lane in the county of Sacramento. On this same date the plaintiff Margery M. Dillon’s’ daughter Erin Lee Dillon, who is of young age was lawfully crossing Bluegrass Road. The Defendant then hit the plaintiff’s daughter Erin resulting in injuries so severe it resulted
Words: 959 - Pages: 4
Appellant asserts that the facts in Cheuvront, supra, are distinguishable from this case on appeal because 1) Cheuvront was not a garnishment action which allows a statutory “second bite of the apple” to modify the default 2) the communication by the plaintiffs’ counsel was directly with the party defendant not a registered agent 3) there was no second notification remedying any prior misleading communication. The Court in Cheuvront clearly distinguishes its own ruling from cases in which the judgments
Words: 412 - Pages: 2
Business law Glossary Chapter 1 stare decisis “let the decision stand”; the principle that the decision of a court should serve as a guide or precedent and control the decision of a similar case in the future. administrative regulations rules made by state and federal administrative agencies. case law law that includes principles that are expressed for the first time in court decisions. common law the body of unwritten principles originally based upon the usages and customs of
Words: 2003 - Pages: 9
Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Dennis Burnham, a New Jersey resident, was served with process for divorce by his wife in California, while he was visiting California on business. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Jurisdiction based on physical presence alone constitutes due process because it is one of the continuing traditions of our legal system that define the due process standard. Facts. Plaintiff a New Jersey resident, visited Southern California on business, after which he went to visit his children
Words: 402 - Pages: 2
CPLR 5015(a) is a frequently invoked provision in New York practice. It lists the principal grounds on which a judgment or order may be vacated. It provides (verbatim) that “[t]he court which rendered a judgment or order may relieve a party from it upon such terms as may be just, on motion of any interested person with such notice as the court may direct, upon the ground of: * 1. excusable default, if such motion is made within one year after service of a copy of the judgment or order with written
Words: 3409 - Pages: 14
1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points) Free Speech 2. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points) Supreme Court 3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points) A radio show decided to have an Ugliest Bride contest and used the bridal photographs that were published in the newspaper. The winner of the contest was an employee of a competing radio
Words: 959 - Pages: 4
Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure ENC 1102 34 Week 11 Individual Work Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure Civil procedure relates to the process where two parties bring a case to the court for a decision on a particular problem. These problems can include but are not limited to divorces, estate distribution, work men’s comp., injury cases, or even matters such as discrimination in the workplace. Criminal procedure applies to the process where the state or federal government is charging
Words: 940 - Pages: 4
