SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NO. C126447 HAROLD BENNETT, Plaintiff, vs. INTERROGATORIES SOUTH WESTERN HOSPITAL Defendant.
Words: 746 - Pages: 3
Greetings, I hope this message finds you well. I am in receipt of your client’s answers to interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Unfortunately, upon receipt of your discovery responses, I was disappointed to learn that many of your client’s responses appear to be unresponsive, evasive, and contain improper objections. Accordingly, please accept this letter as a good faith attempt to resolve this discovery dispute. As you know, the scope of permissible discovery as articulated
Words: 1223 - Pages: 5
merely produces the remand papers in the courts instead of actually producing the prisoner in front of the magistrate. This practice is widely reported, notwithstanding the strict requirement of the law in Section 167[2][b] of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 [CrPC] which says that – ‘No Magistrate shall
Words: 11087 - Pages: 45
Alabama Long-Arm Statute AL ST RCP 4.2 (2003) Rule 4.2. Process: Basis for and methods of out-of-state service. (a) Basis for Out-of-State Service. (1) When proper. Appropriate basis exists for service of process outside of this state upon a person in any action in this state when: (A) the person is, at the time of the service of process, either a nonresident of this state or a resident of this state who is absent from the state, and; (B) the person has sufficient contacts with this state
Words: 1825 - Pages: 8
[Caption] Now comes Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), and moves this Court for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Civil Rule 12(C). In light of this Court's January 22, 2009 Decision and Entry Granting Defendant Wells Fargo N.A.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss, the only remaining claim asserted against Wells Fargo by Plaintiff, Apex Restoration, LLC ("Apex"), is its second claim, alleging unjust enrichment. However, construing all material allegations in the Complaint as true
Words: 1643 - Pages: 7
Facts - Susan Jeske is a resident of Costa Mesa, California, she owns a registered trademark MS. AMERICA and has a website www.msamericapageant.com. Jeske conducts beauty pageants. Raven Fenmore also conducts beauty pageants and has a website www.ms-america.org, established in 2006. Fenmore's pageant Ms. Cont'l has a number of titles related to California. Participants can apply for the pageant through the website and pay through it. Fenmore's pageant are performed in Connecticut. Jeske is not sure
Words: 286 - Pages: 2
160 Ohio App.3d 634; Ricker v. Fraza/Forklifts of Detroit; | |[pic] |[pic] |Page 634 |[pic] | RICKER, Appellant v. FRAZA/FORKLIFTS OF DETRIOT, Apellee. [Cite as Ricker v. Fraza/Forklifts of Detriot, 160 Ohio App.3d 634, 2005-Ohio-1945] 2005-Ohio-1945 Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County. No. 04AP-582 Decided April 26, 2005 LAZARUS, Judge. {¶1} Plaintiff-appellant
Words: 2359 - Pages: 10
BAR EXAMS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 2001 GEN TOPIC: RECEIVERSHIP SPECIFIC: REMEDIES Joaquin filed a complaint against Jose for the foreclosure of a mortgage of a furniture factory with a large number of machinery and equipment. During the pendency of the foreclosure suit, Joaquin learned from reliable sources that Jose was quietly and gradually disposing of some of his machinery and equipment to a businessman friend who was also engaged in furniture manufacturing such that from confirmed reports Joaquin
Words: 37116 - Pages: 149
DATE: March 27, 2016 TO: Mrs. H. Walton FROM: Belinda McLemore RE: Critical Thinking and Applications Problems CRITICAL THINKING AND APPLICATIONS PROBLEMS Chuck and Dewayne have been enemies since Dwayne's wife, Pam, left him and began living with Chuck. Dwayne is a county sheriff. One evening when Dwayne was on patrol, he notice Chuck driving down a desert road. Overcome with anger, Dwayne stopped Chuck. Chuck inquired what he had done wrong, Dwayne responded, “I'll find something.” He
Words: 308 - Pages: 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF WISCONSIN CONSTANCE WOLF, ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. 06-626 v.s. ) LEWIS E. OLSON and ALBERT DOBIASH, ) MOTION: Defendants. ) Trial by Jury Demanded ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTICE OF SERVICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the undersigned, Elise Smith, Esquire, did prepare Defendants, Lewis E. Olson and Albert Dobiash's Interrogatories to answer
Words: 740 - Pages: 3