and death by powerful medical drugs and treatments . This incredible gift of medicine would not be possible without animal testing . Despite these overwhelming benefits , however , some individuals are calling for animal testing to be banned because of alleged cruelty. Those who are against the use of animal testing argue that it is inhumane to use animals in save human’s existence. However I completely disagree with such approach. It would be much more inhumane to test new drugs
Words: 331 - Pages: 2
Animal Testing Every single year, in the United States alone, an estimated 26 million animals are killed due to animal testing (Animal Testing, 2016). To make matters worse, most of these animals are killed after they have served their purpose. The other animals that are “lucky” enough to live are usually injured and spend the rest of their lives in captivity. Animal testing should not be permitted because animal testing usually proves futile and it is harmful to the animal subjects. One reason
Words: 410 - Pages: 2
Essay Mrs. DiGangi Using Animals for Scientific Testing 26 million animals are used for scientific testing each year. In 2013 a poll showed only 39% of people found testing morally wrong, 67% of registered United States voters found animal testing wrong as well. Many people believe animal testing is acceptable and have saved many humans lives. The same poll stated 56% of people, along with elderly people don’t have an opinion on animal testing but don’t care either way. Animals shouldn’t be used for
Words: 539 - Pages: 3
Scientists putting animals through suffrage through medical research, but in any case, it is not contested, but on a scale it often is. There is an up and downstream of whether animal experimentation is a part of good science and also result in medical breakthroughs for humans. Depending on whether the progress may have achieved by any means. Millions of animals each year in the United States are experimented on for testing to help find cures and medicine for sick people/patients. Toxicity of medicine
Words: 1567 - Pages: 7
The Negative Effects of Animal Testing While animal testing for both medical and cosmetic research has long been accepted, there are many downsides to it. Animal testing can have misleading results, in which drugs that passed animal testing had entirely different effects on humans. It is also a cruel and inhumane way to conduct research. Animals can suffer just as humans do, and the Humane Society International states that, “animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced
Words: 502 - Pages: 3
Negative: Is Animal Testing Necessary For Medical Research? Conducting medical research on animals is not necessary in advancing medical technologies. It is argued that animal testing is absolutely essential for medical research, and that it provides us with many medical benefits. There have been many medical breakthroughs that have been discovered through animal testing. Some of these include, blood transfusions, insulin, anesthetics and many other lie saving discoveries (Ten). Although, it may
Words: 578 - Pages: 3
Animal Testing Spring Ma “Across the globe, new products ranging from drugs for cancer, diabetes, and heart disease to cosmetic products such as soaps, shampoos, etc., are tested on animals (The Surprising Pros of Animal Testing You Never Thought About).” Today, with the medical technology advancing at such high velocities, it is certain that animals have been a major contributor of the achievements. Over the past 30 years, science has seen 24 substantial biomedical improves. According
Words: 541 - Pages: 3
“Traditional animal testing is expensive, time-consuming, uses lots of animals and from a scientific perspective the results do not necessarily translate to humans.”- Dr. Christopher P. Austin. People believe that animal testing is helpful, but really it’s mostly harmful. 3 reasons that could convince you that tests are harmful, consider the following: animals and humans are not exactly the same, Animals are not treated like living organisms. Treatments and other things add up in $. If these reasons
Words: 554 - Pages: 3
Proponents for animal testing will also argue their necessity from a ‘rights’ stance. The argument goes, animals don’t have rights, because they don’t have the same cognitive functions as humans. Therefore, when testing on a human is unethical, because it violates their rights, then test on animals. This argument, however, draws an arbitrary link between rights and ethical permissibility. Excuse my extremity, but black people didn’t have rights for awhile in American history, does that make slavery
Words: 322 - Pages: 2
Procter & Gamble First of all, an animal is not a human being, so they will respond differently than us humans. Even if there were bad reactions from a drug taken by the animals, that doesn’t mean it is safe for humans to consume. You can look up many examples of drugs that have been recalled because of the dangerous effects it had on humans, even after animal testing. These experiment and testing situations can make animals suffer severely every year. There are many strict guidelines and standards
Words: 489 - Pages: 2
