A Moral Argument for Abortion Rebuttal Casey Garza December 6, 2012 A Moral Argument for Abortion Rebuttal Casey Garza December 6, 2012 Davidson Loehr’s article “ A Moral Argument for Abortion” is based on a wide range of arguments based on bates over abortion. One of the arguments I found that I did not agree with was when he stated, “ It’s a quantity
Words: 573 - Pages: 3
ECON220- GP Below, I will give two arguments in reference to the AT&T and T-Mobile merger. The first argument will be in favor of the merger and the second being opposed to the merger. Argument in favor: The merger will benefit workers and consumers for a few different reasons. T-Mobile, who is financially incapable of truly accessing the potential of their high speed network. The 39 billion dollar acquisition will ensure that the high speed network expands to ninety seven percent of
Words: 286 - Pages: 2
determines the type of fallacy the argument or idea is. These come up in the philosophy world very often. This is why philosophers have different categories for them. Depending on how the error comes about determines the type of fallacy it is. Mere Assertion is an argument that lacks factual support. It’s merely an opinion that is formed more so by belief then logical evidence. For example, Robert is a vampire; I can feel his cold blood when I touch him. This argument has no real logic behind it, only
Words: 1168 - Pages: 5
MGT 565 | Just Cause Assignment | Stephanie Bourdo | 1/29/2013 | Section 1 – Due Process A. Arguments to support Maria was provided due process: * Maria was part of a group that was given a formal verbal warning and reminder of the policy regarding no company property other than protective gear or clothing could be in employee’s lockers. * The verbal warning/reminder ended with a statement indicating that anyone caught violating the rule would be subject to discipline
Words: 1191 - Pages: 5
Winners believe in Win/Win. Losers believe, for them to win someone has to lose. Winners are like a thermostal. Losers are like thermometers. Winner chooses what they say. Losers say what they choose. Winners use hard arguments but soft words. Losers use soft arguments but hard words. Winners stand firm on values but compromise on petty things; Losers stand firm on petty things but compromise on values. Winners follow the philosophy of empathy. “Don’t do others what you would not want
Words: 274 - Pages: 2
One of the most vivid memories of conflict I often remember would be an argument that seemed to go on for an eternity in my then youthful mind and body. The whole argument revolved around my idea of independence and freedom for me at the age of 16. For me the argument was all based on freedom of wanting to be able to go out more often, and not have to argue my to the 2 supreme judges of the house, mom and dad. Just to go out with friends and catch a movie or just hang around the mall would become
Words: 454 - Pages: 2
Joy Lawlor 02/09/2012 HUMN 210 Miriam Abbott Assignment 6-1 Assignment 6-1: Validity of an Argument Part 1: Cartoon stock. (n.d). Retrieved February 9, 2012 from http://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/a/articles.asp This article has too many errors in it, right? If you are smart, you are Greek. And if you are Greek, you will write grammatically correct articles. But you cannot write grammatically correct articles. If you write grammatically correct articles, you are not Greek
Words: 552 - Pages: 3
It is important to be able to distinguish between a valid argument and a sound argument. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises, such that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. A sound argument is one that is valid and the premisses are true (hence the conclusion is also true). Here is an example of a valid deductive argument with true premises and a true conclusion (notice it is in the form of a syllogism): Premiss 1: If the
Words: 273 - Pages: 2
Handout #1 It is important to be able to distinguish between a valid argument and a sound argument. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises, such that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. A sound argument is one that is valid and the premisses are true (hence the conclusion is also true). Here is an example of a valid deductive argument with true premises and a true conclusion (notice it is in the form of a syllogism):
Words: 278 - Pages: 2
users limited information than to give nothing. What’s more, Google managers argue that Google is the only searching engine in China telling users that their searching has been censored because of the government regulations. It seems the Google’s argument sounds very convincing and reasonable, but from my perspective, Google is absolutely a utilitarian who only cares about their benefits more than cost. In addition, Google managers adopted the straw man approaches, including the Friedman doctrine
Words: 280 - Pages: 2
