Abandonment University Of Phoenix Abandonment This case presents evidence obtained by Officer Sedwick and Officer Melbourne. In late August of 2005, Officer’s Sedwick and Melbourne were conducting an investigation on Ecstasy distribution in an area in close proximity of a local university. Both officers’ have received a description of possible Ecstasy distributors by a liable source. While patrolling the streets of north Phoenix, 2 college-aged males were spotted, who fit the description of
Words: 528 - Pages: 3
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” In summary, the 5th Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination. Next let me briefly explain the Miranda v. Arizona case. In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and rape. After several hours of being interrogated, Miranda finally confessed and agreed to sign a written statement that included a typed disclaimer stating he had full acknowledgement
Words: 606 - Pages: 3
silent, and have an attorney present. It does not change the fact the individual will still face charges of the crime the officers will either retrieve a confession or the evidence to convict. I do agree with the Supreme Court holding in Miranda v. Arizona because the tactics sometimes used by officers to make a suspect admit guilt is morally and ethically incorrect. There are some people who are actually innocent but after sitting in a room being pressured and confused about what is really going on
Words: 270 - Pages: 2
Michael Crowe Stephanie Crowe born on April 12, 1985 and murdered on January 21, 1998. Stephanie a 12 year old girl who was stabbed to death 8 times. She was found lying on her bedroom floor 10ft from her bed by her grandmother. But who was to blame? Who killed Stephanie Crowe? Escondido Police Department questioned the parents, grandmother and her two sibling. Yet, police had Michael Crow, Stephanie’s older brother who was 14 years old as the main suspect. The police separated the parents from
Words: 330 - Pages: 2
because they were spontaneous and not made during an interrogation. Also, a prison inmate is not in custody for Miranda purposes because his freedom of movement is not restricted more than it would normally be in the prison environment. In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court held that the admission of an elicited incriminating statement by a suspect not informed of these rights violates the Fifth and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. If placed “in custody” for purposes of receiving Miranda protection
Words: 1205 - Pages: 5
Mark Tanner Ethics and Laws Criminal Justice Tutorial I chose to report the incident to district attorney. It was very challenging to choose this decision after being so convinced that the suspects were guilty of the crime. However, because my partner interviewed the boys separately didn't videotape it and the parents were never contacted this is a major violation of the law. It was a terrible thing that happened to the victim and then I feel guilty for the family, but because of the inappropriate
Words: 667 - Pages: 3
after he or she has officially been taken into custody, but prior to any questioning or interrogation. The officer must inform the person of his or her right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning as given in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). It is the officer’s duty to ensure that the suspect fully understands his rights – and if not to provide the necessary means for the suspect to do so. A person is considered to be "in custody" anytime they are placed in
Words: 1096 - Pages: 5
Laws are bodies of rules enacted by public officials. Laws are made to maintain and protect society. Without laws, society would be in total chaos. There are laws or rules that are written down and are suppose to be enforced, but that’s not always the case. These laws are called Laws on books. Just because it is written down does not mean it is always enforced. How laws are enforced may depend on the characteristics of those who enforce it or those against whom it is enacted. These are laws in action
Words: 715 - Pages: 3
My Cousin Vinny The movie “My Cousin Vinny” is a comedy film of 1992, which is an amusing interpretation of the processes of the criminal justice system. The film depicts the procedures and processes of the court and criminal justice system. There are many things that have been depicted in the movie wrongly, but some are the correct depictions of the court proceedings and the criminal justice system. Many professionals have criticized the movie for its incorrect depiction of some of the procedures
Words: 1191 - Pages: 5
Admissible Statements Worksheet Conduct an Internet search by visiting the state websites for Arizona, Illinois, New York, and California. Locate the legal requirements to obtain admissible statements in these states. Include your research findings in the following table. |State |Legal requirements |Precedent |Other | |Arizona |The legal requirements for |Brown v. Illinois takes
Words: 1519 - Pages: 7
