asic v adler hih insurance HIH Insurance was founded in 1968 by Ray Williams and Michael Payne, which was known as "M W Payne Underwriting Agency Pty Ltd". However, their company was acquired in 1971 by a British company called CE Heath PLC and appointed Ray Williams to be the board of CE Heath PLC in 1980. In 1989, the business operations of CE Heath PLC were transferred to CE Heath International Holdings Ltd. And the company floated on the Australian Stock Exchange in 1992. After 3 years
Words: 352 - Pages: 2
Asic vs Adler Introduction Since ASIC is a corporate entity, it can engage in legal action with other corporate companies that it suspects to be committing criminal or civil offences within the financialsystem. There are several famous court cases that ASIC has been involved with in Australian law and ASIC vs Adler is one of the cases. The sections that defendants commonly breached include ss180, 181, 182, and 183, which involve failing to act in good faith, failing to provide a duty of care
Words: 1774 - Pages: 8
rule known as the rule in Trevor v Whitworth was developed to prohibit a company from reducing its share capital because a reduction in capital would prejudice the rights of creditors. Moreover, the reduction would in effect diminish the pool of funds available to the company to pay its creditors. The rule in Trevor v Whitworth has been incorporated into Ch 2J of the Corporations Act 2001.Certain provisions of the Corporations Law 2001 seek to enforce the rule Trevor v Whitworth. There are a few Sections
Words: 10455 - Pages: 42
evolved via case law. The (Corporations) Act has been described as “Bloated” – why???, Moves have been made to simplify the Act, but every time this happens, something else comes in to make it bigger again! The Administrative and Enforcement bodies ASIC, Under ASIC Act, Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee, Takeovers Panel, Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board, Financial Reporting Council, Australian Accounting Standards Board,
Words: 11028 - Pages: 45
QUESTION: In ASIC v Healey [2011] FCA 717 at [14] Middleton J stated: A director is an essential component of corporate governance. Each director is placed at the apex of the structure of director and management of a company. The higher the office held by a person, the greater the responsibility that falls on him or her. The role of a director is significant as their actions may have a profound effect on the community, and not just shareholders, employees and creditors. Under the Corporations
Words: 2454 - Pages: 10
Pre-registration contracts • Who is a promoter? o Whaley Bridge Calico Printing v Green – court has recognised the term promoter as not a term of law but rather one of business. o Emma Silver Mining v Lewis & Son – see Twycross case – used in connection with companies involves the idea of exertion for the purpose of getting up and starting a company and also the idea of some duty towards the company. o Jubilee Cotton Mills v Lewis – professional people, such as lawyers, accountants and bankers, are
Words: 16520 - Pages: 67
Forgiving a Director’s Breach of Duty: A review of recent decisions By Steven Wong1 1 Senior Associate, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Perth. The author can be contacted at steven.wong@iinet.net.au. 4980429v3 Forgiving a Director’s Breach of Duty: A review of recent decisions Introduction Amid fears of a global recession, directors may well be concerned that their conduct will be scrutinised should they be involved in a corporate collapse. Honest directors risk becoming embroiled in litigation
Words: 10736 - Pages: 43
CORPORATE LAW ASSIGNMENT TASK1 Introduction The board meeting conducted by the board of directors of Juices Ltd in December 2010 revealed a new proposal for Juices Ltd to acquire the juice container manufacturing business owner by Fruit juice containers Pty Ltd, $48 million being the settlement price. The proposal was duly considered important as Juices Ltd operated an apple and pear juice producing business and owned ore hands around Australia and the juice container manufacturing business can
Words: 3710 - Pages: 15
Lec 6: Ch 10 (the role of company directors and other officers and the means by which they are appointed and removed); main focus is on the directors * ‘officer’ and ‘director’ definition- s9, p200 (Morley v ASIC). * ‘director’- a) appointed director regardless of the name given to their position; b) not validly appointed director but acts in position or; c) not validly appointed but the directors of the company are accustomed to act in accordance with the person’s instructions and wishes;
Words: 6745 - Pages: 27