Utilitarianism, Kantianism, virtues and torture Having to possibly torture four innocent civilians in order to save a few hundred from a terrorist attack, would it be okay to do so? The immediate response is usually yes, if you ask an average person, until they start thinking of the innocent people that have to be tortured, they take a step back and think harder about it. Put in the position of the torturer, I will attempt to answer the question. There are three sides we can use to look at
Words: 1041 - Pages: 5
course of action, the best and foremost reasonable theory applied to this case will be we are all humans no matter the age, gestational stage or any other situation regarding that matter. In this case the way I analyze this it will fall and be utilitarianism that means all the right things are done based on the benefit of the rest of the community. In this case, it might seem like the babies don’t have a chance based on their condition and that society should just let the consequentialism theory go
Words: 653 - Pages: 3
The theory of Utilitarianism takes its name from the Latin word ‘utilis’, meaning ‘useful’. It was first developed by Jeremy Bentham, a philosopher and legal theorist of the 18th century. Bentham sought to produce a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society of the industrial age. Utilitarianism basically says that happiness is the key to life’s conquest, and happiness that is the determination of right or wrong. So if an action’s consequence causes happiness,
Words: 756 - Pages: 4
“Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge. Different viewpoints generate disparate definitions of value. Utilitarian perspective suggests that the value is proportional to the degree to which a certain concept promotes happiness (Nathanson, 2000) whereas deontological point of view, in which completing his or her duty is considered rightful, implies that value is given to the actions that fulfil one’s
Words: 1778 - Pages: 8
majority depends on the attainability of these desires. More often than not we are forced to upgrade or downgrade these desires based on the availability of resources needed to satisfy them. This makes some desires unattainable; a preposition that utilitarianism does not appreciate. Moreover, the pleasure we derive from utilities decreases with increasing quantity of utility. A utilitarian’s action is guided by the end result; pleasure maximization for a great majority. However, if this pleasure cannot
Words: 836 - Pages: 4
In this essay I will show Charles Taylor’s strategy for arguing against the primacy-of-rights theories. In Chapter 7, “Atomism” of Taylor’s book Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Philosophical Papers Vol 2. Taylor opposes the Primacy of Rights theories which he describes as “theories which assert the primacy of rights are those which take as the fundamental, or at least a fundamental, principle of their political theory the ascription of certain rights to individuals and which deny the same status
Words: 429 - Pages: 2
every decision comes down to balance. If the greater good outweighs the bad then you’ve made a good moral decision. “An action is right if it produces the greatest overall balance of happiness over unhappiness ( Rachels, James, The Debate Over Utilitarianism, pg 111)”. By an Act Utilitarian standpoint Katherine Moser made the correct decision to get genetically tested because she was able to impact her surroundings in a positive way by; fundraising, educating people about Huntington's disease, and
Words: 531 - Pages: 3
Ce qui différencie l'homme de l'animal est infime. Le commun des gens le délaisse, l'homme de bien le préserve. Les différences n'étant pas nombreuses, dit Wang Fuzhi, au moindre écart, l'homme tombe de ce côté-là (celui de l'animal). Ce n'est pas que les animaux ne connaissent absolument pas les choses : ils ne les comprennent pas clairement. Ce n'est pas qu'ils n'aient absolument, dans leurs espèces, aucune règle de relations ils ne les discernent pas à fond Ce n'est pas qu'ils ignorent absolument
Words: 641 - Pages: 3
Morals and Well Being Consequentialism is the belief that the results of one’s behavior are the ultimate basis for any judgment between the rightness and wrongness of that behavior. A consequentialist believes that a great outcome or consequence is based on a morally right act. Consequentialism is often described in the English saying, as “the ends justify the means,” which means that is an aspiration is morally significant, any approach to succeed is acceptable. Social contract theory is based
Words: 288 - Pages: 2
In this essay, I will argue that managers are not morally responsible for the happiness of their employees. I will offer various arguments and potential counterarguments from differing schools of thought and ultimately conclude in agreement with Milton Friedman’s shareholder approach to business ethics. It is not the responsibility of the managers to worry about anyone’s interest besides the owners of the company (within the confines of the law), but in many cases, what is best for employees may
Words: 1936 - Pages: 8
